<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/best_web_company_in_2007.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2009:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4000-</id>
  <updated>2009-10-30T14:52:33Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Best Web Company in 2007</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.23-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4000</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/best_web_company_in_2007.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=4000" title="Best Web Company in 2007" />
    <published>2007-07-09T10:32:51Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:11:48Z</updated>
    <title>Best Web Company in 2007</title>
    <summary>This week&apos;s poll is an extension of our 2007 Half-Year Web Technology Report, which reviewed the first six months of this year in web technology. In that report, I noted that Google and Facebook have been the two companies to impress me so far this year. But what do you think? We&apos;ve asked a similar...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Richard MacManus</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Polls" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p>This week's poll is an extension of our <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/2007_half-year_web_technology_report.php">2007 Half-Year Web Technology Report</a>, which reviewed the first six months of this year in web technology. In that report, I noted that Google and Facebook have been the two companies to impress me so far this year. But what do you think?</p>
<p>We've <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/poll_best_internet_bigco_2006.php">asked a similar question before</a>, in December before we did our <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_best_web_bigco_2006.php">Best BigCo of 2006</a> post. At that time, Google got a whopping 54% of the votes, with Amazon the next best at 14%. Also, in Dec '06, Facebook weren't even in the running. But as I noted in the 2007 Half-Year Report, Facebook has virtually built itself into a BigCo over the past six months.</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>So let us know which BigCo has impressed you most this year:</p>
<p><script language="javascript" src="http://www.polldaddy.com/p/67238.js"> </script> <noscript> <a href ="http://www.polldaddy.com" >Free Poll</a> - <a href ="http://www.polldaddy.com/poll.asp?p=67238" >Take Our Poll</a> </noscript></p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4000-comment:34760</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4000" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/best_web_company_in_2007.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/best_web_company_in_2007.php#c34760" />
    <title>Comment from Ryan Stewart on 2007-07-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ryan Stewart</name>
        <uri>http://blog.digitalbackcountry.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.digitalbackcountry.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I'm obviously biased, but Adobe seems like a glaring omission on that list. :)</p>

<p>=Ryan<br />
rstewart@adobe.com</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-09T11:26:08Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4000-comment:34761</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4000" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/best_web_company_in_2007.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/best_web_company_in_2007.php#c34761" />
    <title>Comment from NatC on 2007-07-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>NatC</name>
        <uri>http://www.findapath.org</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.findapath.org">
        <![CDATA[<p>Even though Mozilla is a BigFo, not a BigCow, I would have liked to see them featured as well.<br />
Their announcement for openID support had a good part of this list to move forward all of a sudden, and that in itself is a tremendous job.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-09T12:15:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4000-comment:34762</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4000" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/best_web_company_in_2007.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/best_web_company_in_2007.php#c34762" />
    <title>Comment from Richard MacManus on 2007-07-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Richard MacManus</name>
        <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Added both Adobe and Mozilla! Sorry, the others got a 100-vote head start :-)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-09T12:55:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4000-comment:34763</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4000" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/best_web_company_in_2007.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/best_web_company_in_2007.php#c34763" />
    <title>Comment from sctronlinux on 2007-07-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>sctronlinux</name>
        <uri>http://sctronlinux.spaces.live.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://sctronlinux.spaces.live.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Google is only my choice. and I like Mozilla, too.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-09T13:29:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4000-comment:34764</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4000" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/best_web_company_in_2007.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/best_web_company_in_2007.php#c34764" />
    <title>Comment from Dan Grossman on 2007-07-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Dan Grossman</name>
        <uri>http://www.dangrossman.info</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.dangrossman.info">
        <![CDATA[<p>Google hasn't done anything impressive in years. Facebook's open API and what that's done for widgets was impressive.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-09T17:39:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4000-comment:34765</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4000" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/best_web_company_in_2007.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/best_web_company_in_2007.php#c34765" />
    <title>Comment from Rogier Visser on 2007-07-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Rogier Visser</name>
        <uri>http://www.thewebforward.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thewebforward.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>How about swoot.com. This is the new hype when it comes to Rich Media applications. look at www.swoot.com</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-09T19:12:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4000-comment:34766</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4000" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/best_web_company_in_2007.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/best_web_company_in_2007.php#c34766" />
    <title>Comment from Blogger on 2007-07-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Blogger</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Facebook ... who doesn't like Facebook?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-09T20:24:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4000-comment:34767</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4000" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/best_web_company_in_2007.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/best_web_company_in_2007.php#c34767" />
    <title>Comment from Benjamin Young on 2007-07-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Benjamin Young</name>
        <uri>http://www.bigbluehat.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.bigbluehat.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Facebook's move to calling itself a "social utility" along with building the tools to function in that role throw it far ahead of any similar product.</p>

<p>If Mozilla were to embrass a similar concept (tool/platform more than product/browser), I think they could take the cake for 2007. The OpenID is a good step, but it would be nice to see more time put into XUL et al and into promoting a Mozilla platform. Adobe, Google, and Microsoft have little to be concerned about from the Mozilla corner at the moment. It would be good to see that change. That would put the Mozilla open source community back into the camp of groups that are pushing further innovation on (and off) the web.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-09T20:55:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4000-comment:34768</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4000" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/best_web_company_in_2007.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/best_web_company_in_2007.php#c34768" />
    <title>Comment from Fiona Joseph on 2007-07-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>Fiona Joseph</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>For simple, functional applications my vote has to go to 37signals.com.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-10T14:06:02Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4000-comment:34769</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4000" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/best_web_company_in_2007.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/best_web_company_in_2007.php#c34769" />
    <title>Comment from Md.Yamin Noor on 2007-07-15</title>
    <author>
        <name>Md.Yamin Noor</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Google is the best. There's no doubt. Cause in web development google is a pioneer in every sense truely............!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-15T11:26:11Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>