<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/climate_counts.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2009:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3994-</id>
  <updated></updated>
  <title>Comments for Web Companies Lag in Climate Consciousness: New Report</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.23-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3994</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/climate_counts.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=3994" title="Web Companies Lag in Climate Consciousness: New Report" />
    <published>2007-07-07T09:51:15Z</published>
    <updated>2008-04-15T04:52:34Z</updated>
    <title>Web Companies Lag in Climate Consciousness: New Report</title>
    <summary>Jack Johnson tipped me off to this website. Well, okay, he tipped off a couple of billion other people at the same time. I&apos;m writing this while I watch the web stream of Johnson&apos;s set at the Live Earth concert in Sydney, Australia, and right before an energetic rendition of &quot;Staple It Together,&quot; he urged...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Josh Catone</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Startups" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img border="0" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/climatecounts-logo.jpg" align="left" hspace="5" vspace="5" width="186" height="32" />Jack Johnson tipped me off to this website.  Well, okay, he tipped off a couple of billion other people at the same time.  I'm writing this while I watch the web stream of Johnson's set at the <a href="http://liveearth.msn.com/">Live Earth</a> concert in Sydney, Australia, and right before an energetic rendition of "Staple It Together," he urged the crowd to visit <a href="http://climatecounts.org/">Climate Counts</a>.</p>

<p>Climate Counts, which launched on June 19th, is a non-profit website that rates corporations based on their environmental impact.  They use a 22-item scorecard that asks questions like "Is there top-level support for climate change action?" and "Does the company require suppliers to take climate change action or give preference to those that do?" You can read the full list <a href="http://climatecounts.org/pdf/Climate_Counts_Scorecard.pdf">here</a> (PDF). So who's on top? And how do web companies rank?</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>Climate Counts has currently ranked 56 corporations, and <a href="http://climatecounts.org/scorecompany.php?co=12">Canon</a> comes out on top with a score of 77 out of a possible 100.  The most climate conscious company on the list that is prominently involved in web 2.0 is MySpace parent, <a href="http://climatecounts.org/scorecompany.php?co=42">News Corporation</a>  This likely has a lot to do with CEO Rupert Murdoch's <a href="http://www.grist.org/news/maindish/2007/05/09/murdoch/">well publicized</a> pledge to address climate change at the company. News Corp. checked in at number 11 on the Climate Counts list with a score of 57.</p>

<p>Here's how the rest of the web 2.0-related companies on the list faired:</p>

<p>
<ul>
<li>26. <a href="http://climatecounts.org/scorecompany.php?co=63">Yahoo!</a> - score: 36</li>
<li>29. <a href="http://climatecounts.org/scorecompany.php?co=38">Microsoft</a> - score: 31</li>
<li>37. <a href="http://climatecounts.org/scorecompany.php?co=24">Google</a> - score: 17</li>
<li>43. <a href="http://climatecounts.org/scorecompany.php?co=67">Viacom</a> - score: 3</li>
<li>44. <a href="http://climatecounts.org/scorecompany.php?co=7">Apple</a> - score: 2</li>
<li>45. <a href="http://climatecounts.org/scorecompany.php?co=20">eBay</a> - score: 2</li>
<li>51. <a href="http://climatecounts.org/scorecompany.php?co=10">Amazon.com</a> - score: 0</li>
<li>53. <a href="http://climatecounts.org/scorecompany.php?co=13">CBS</a> - score: 0</li>
</ul>
</p>

<p>Some other interesting observations: McDonald's handily beat Burger King and Wendy's (who each scored 0), and CocaCola comes out way ahead of PepsiCo.  Also, Starbucks scored a favorable rating, so you don't have to feel bad about those overpriced morning lattes.</p>

<h3>Conclusion</h3>

<p>It would seem that web companies (at least large corporations involved in the web) mostly have a long way to go toward helping clean up the environment.  Only News Corp., Yahoo! and Microsoft on this list scored favorable ratings.  Google scored a rating of "Starting," meaning that they are heading in the right direction but have a long way to go.  I was most disappointed by Apple, which has come <a href="http://www.greenpeace.org/apple/">under fire</a> for their environmental track record before, especially given that former US Vice President Al Gore, one of the world's most prominent environmental activists, <a href="http://www.apple.com/pr/bios/bod.html">sits on their Board of Directors</a>.</p>

<p>I hope the Climate Counts expands their list to include more corporations, and I appreciate that they have opted for total transparency by including each company's full report in PDF form on their web site. If you enjoy Climate Counts, also check out <a href="http://knowmore.org/default.php">Knowmore.org</a>, which is a wiki that tracks and rates corporations based on their commitment to socially responsible business practices.</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

</feed>