<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/fixing_yahoo_building_a_yahoo_platform.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2008:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2662-</id>
  <updated>2008-07-07T14:26:27Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for How to Fix Yahoo!: Building a Yahoo! Platform</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.1</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2662</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/fixing_yahoo_building_a_yahoo_platform.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=2662" title="How to Fix Yahoo!: Building a Yahoo! Platform" />
    <published>2007-07-30T21:32:22Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:07:45Z</updated>
    <title>How to Fix Yahoo!: Building a Yahoo! Platform</title>
    <summary>As part of our focus on Yahoo!&apos;s next 100 days this week, I am going to dive into how I would go about fixing the company. Or at least starting along that path. According to comScore, Yahoo! is the 3rd most visited collection of web properties worldwide (trailing only Google and Microsoft), reaching about 61%...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Josh Catone</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Analysis" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img border="0" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/fix-yahoo-logo.jpg" align="left" hspace="5" vspace="5" width="200" height="60" />As part of our focus on <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/100_days_for_yahoo_intro.php">Yahoo!'s next 100 days</a> this week, I am going to dive into how I would go about fixing the company.  Or at least starting along that path.  According <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/100_days_for_yahoo_intro.php">to comScore</a>, Yahoo! is the 3rd most visited collection of web properties worldwide (trailing only Google and Microsoft), reaching about 61% of the global web audience.  In the US, the company's websites are <a href="http://www.comscore.com/press/release.asp?press=1528">still #1</a>, and actually have a broader ad reach then Google domestically.  Yet Yahoo!'s total revenues for the first six months of 2007 were less than Google's revenue for just the last quarter.</p>

<p>Though that serves as a table setter for the problems at Yahoo!, I won't get into financials in this article, as that is not my forte.  Instead I will focus on what can be done to create a more useful and meaningful Yahoo! for users, one that can keep people on the site and drive them to use their search engine.  Remember that Google controls ~50% of the search market share and pay-per-click text ads on search results drive a significant portion of their revenue -- search share is very important to Yahoo!</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<h2>The Platform is the Killer App</h2>

<p>The killer app on the web is the platform.  We've talked about this before on this blog in terms of social networks and AJAX start pages, and software like Google Gears, the Adobe Integrated Runtime, and the Dojo Offline Toolkit that let developers take the web out of their web apps and have added credence to the idea that the platform of the future is the Internet.</p>

<p><img border="0" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/rwwfiles_yahoo.png" align="right" hspace="5" vspace="5" width="240" height="196" />Social networking darling <a href="http://www.facebook.com/">Facebook</a> has realized the power of the platform, which is part of the reason for <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_facebook_worth_the_hype.php">all the hype</a>, so have start pages like <a href="http://www.pageflakes.com/">Pageflakes</a> and <a href="http://www.netvibes.com/">Netvibes</a>, who are building sophisticated (and <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/pageflakes_netvibes_take_on_social_networks.php">increasingly more social</a>) web platforms for developers.  These platforms are beneficial for users because, like a desktop operating system, they allow people to aggregate the applications they use in one, central, organized location for quick access.  For developers, platforms are a central location to launch new applications to the greatest number of people.  For these reasons, the platform itself becomes the web's killer app.</p>

<p>One need look no further than this year's hottest gadget, the <a href="http://www.apple.com/iphone/">iPhone</a> to see how beneficial a strong platform can be for a service or product.  While Apple didn't provide a platform for developers in the true sense of the word, the number of iPhone-specific web apps that have been developed for the phone <a href="http://iphoneapplicationlist.com/">grows daily</a>.  These applications extend the functionality of the device and add value to users at no cost to Apple.  Often, it is third party applications on a platform that attract new users or retain existing ones.</p>

<h2>Building a Yahoo! Platform</h2>

<p>Yahoo! needs to realize that the web platform is getting more and more important.  Google already has, and is building a platform around their start page, <a href="http://www.google.com/ig/">iGoogle</a>, by encouraging developers to build "<a href="http://www.google.com/intl/en/apis/gadgets/index.html">gadgets</a>" specifically for it. For Yahoo!, a platform can unify their services -- which right now are scattered -- and add utility to their page that will keep users there long enough to conduct searches.  Yahoo! controls some of the hottest and most useful properties on the web, but has not figured out how to tie them together.  They've started to bring some of their acquisitions under the single Yahoo! sign-on umbrella, but that still doesn't bring my del.icio.us links, my Flickr photos and my fantasy sports team management to one central location.</p>

<p>The good news for Yahoo! is that they already have a property just waiting to be turned into a full fledged platform: <a href="http://my.yahoo.com/">My Yahoo!</a></p>

<p>My Yahoo! is one of the oldest and most popular start pages on the Internet (I've used it since 1999), visited by about 50 million people monthly.  The path toward a Yahoo! platform begins with My Yahoo!, which has been undergoing a major update via their new <a href="http://cm.my.yahoo.com/upgrade">beta site</a>.  Many of the changes the My Yahoo! beta showcases are good: drag and drop page organization, more customization tools, multiple pages, and the ability to create a module out of any RSS feed are all great features.  Yahoo! has also wisely begun to utilize their start page as a way to tie their various services together -- for example, I can add a static module for my del.icio.us bookmarks or my Flickr images.  But there is still a lot more they need to do.  Below I will outline three things I think they need to do to compete with the other fledgling platforms on the web.</p>

<p><img border="0" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/yahoo-myyahoo.jpg" width="530" height="260" /></p>

<p><b>1. An Open API</b></p>

<p>When it comes to developer APIs, Yahoo! is at the forefront. According <a href="http://programmableweb.com/scorecard">to ProgrammableWeb</a>, Yahoo! ties with Google for having the most APIs (25), which is why it boggles my mind that they don't have one for My Yahoo! the way Google does for iGoogle, or Facebook, or Pageflakes, or Netvibes do.  Even more amazing, Yahoo! actually already has a <a href="http://widgets.yahoo.com/workshop/">widgets API</a>, it's just focused in the wrong direction: on the desktop instead of toward their own web platform.</p>

<blockquote><p>"The bottom line is, if we expect you to make My Yahoo! your home on the Web, then we need to deliver the content that‚Äôs important to your life. Hence we‚Äôre working around the clock to add more and more relevant modules to choose from." -- <a href="http://myyblog.com/blog/2007/06/13/want-meaty-new-modules-you-got-it/">My Yahoo! Team</a>, June 2007</p></blockquote>

<p>The best way to add more relevant modules is to open the platform to anyone.  Why have a team of people adding only "official" modules and working from a limited perspective when you could have thousands of developers doing the work for you for free?  Look at the explosion of applications on Facebook's platform as an example of how well this works.  Right now there are over 2300 apps on Facebook, created in just the first two full months of the platform, and that is about 500 more than there were <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_week_update.php">12 days ago</a>.</p>

<p>Sure not all of those apps will be great, and many of them will likely be downright awful.  But the chances of adding applications that are useful to your users and will potentially attract new ones greatly increases when you open up your platform.  Further, it is now your users, rather than a small team of paid employees, who are deciding which applications are useful to them.  Yahoo! could still retain editorial control by approving applications before adding them to the site, or by featuring modules vetted by the editorial staff.</p>

<p>Certainly for a content company like Yahoo!, opening up their platform might seem like giving their competitors a way to leech users away from their own content, but in reality the opposite it a true.  It actually means giving users access to competitor content while keeping them on your site, which is a net positive.</p>

<p><b>2. Richer Applications</b></p>

<p>Currently most My Yahoo! modules are one-way, meaning that they give you information but you don't really interact with them.  I can get my email via a My Yahoo! module, but I can't compose and send or even read a full email without leaving the My Yahoo! page.  Some widgets have basic input functions -- like the reference or stock quote widgets -- but query results are still returned on a separate page, rather than inside the widget.</p>

<p><img border="0" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/igoogle-youtube.jpg" width="398" height="355" /><br /><i>iGoogle's YouTube app can play videos directly in the app.</i></p>

<p>For My Yahoo! to be taken seriously as a platform and compete with Facebook and iGoogle, they'll need to support richer applications.  That means applications that can be interacted with on the page, such as a dictionary app that loads the definition I am after without sending me away from my My Yahoo! page, or a Games application that lets me load a game of Literati right inside my start page, or a Flickr app that lets me upload photos and manage my galleries without actually visiting Flickr.</p>

<p>One of the reasons people get so excited about Facebook and other burgeoning web platforms is that there exists the potential for nearly any sort of application.  With the right apps, Facebook could theoretically become a one stop shop for web surfers to consume information and perform tasks. Support for richer applications would put Yahoo! in the mix for creating <i>the</i> web platform that demands the most of your attention.</p>

<p><b>3. Make the Platform Social</b></p>
 
<p><img border="0" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/yahoo-social.jpg" align="left" hspace="5" vspace="5" width="250" height="106" />This is probably the last step Yahoo! should take when building their web platform.  Richard and I have both talked about turning start pages into social networks (<a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/who_can_compete_with_facebook.php">here</a> and <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/pageflakes_netvibes_take_on_social_networks.php">here</a>), and this is certainly where I see these companies going.  As Richard said, it seems to be almost a natural evolution -- once you have the users, why not allow them to interact?  But Yahoo! needs to focus on building out their platform for developers before turning it into a social network.</p>

<p>It's no secret that Yahoo! has long wanted a social network.  There was their famous failed attempt to buy Facebook last fall, and they have since been linked with <a href="http://www.bebo.com/">bebo</a> as well.  When Yahoo! launched the beta of their new My Yahoo! service last March, <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/08/all-new-my-yahoo/">they hinted</a> at the prospect of making their start page property more social, so it is possible they already have plans to do so.</p>

<p>I think growing a social network around their platform makes more sense than purchasing one.  My Yahoo! already has 50 million users (by December 2006 numbers) -- or a lot more than Facebook.  Since we're already using My Yahoo! to tie Yahoo!'s services together and already want it to be the hub for the Yahoo! universe and the web at large, it makes sense to build in a social network, rather than purchase one from the outside and go through the headache of figuring out how to get it integrated.</p>

<h2>Conclusion</h2>

<p>Certainly the Yahoo! platform won't fix Yahoo! by itself, but I think it should be a major part of their plans going forward.  Turning My Yahoo! into an open platform for rich internet applications does two things: 1. it can unify Yahoo!'s services under one umbrella -- something they have long struggled to do, and 2. it adds utility for users and gives them less reason to leave Yahoo!, and the longer people stay on the page, the more likely they are to start using Yahoo! for search.</p>

<p>I think Yahoo! is actually in a better position to create a winning platform than Google is right now.  Their start page is already established and has an enormous user base, they have a rich developer culture built around their other APIs and they can seed their platform with some of the best content on the web.</p>

<p>What do you think of my proposed idea to turn My Yahoo! into a platform?  Do you use My Yahoo! now?  Would you if it was the platform I envision?  Would that be a step in the right direction for Yahoo!? Leave your thoughts below.</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2662-comment:21546</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2662" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/fixing_yahoo_building_a_yahoo_platform.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/fixing_yahoo_building_a_yahoo_platform.php#c21546" />
    <title>Comment from snehal on 2007-07-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>snehal</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>i use my yahoo everyday...i am hooked onto it since they made the beta public. certainly it makes a lot of sense for my yahoo to open up as a platform and provide easy creation and integration of gadgets.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-30T22:39:41Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2662-comment:21547</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2662" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/fixing_yahoo_building_a_yahoo_platform.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/fixing_yahoo_building_a_yahoo_platform.php#c21547" />
    <title>Comment from Harrison on 2007-07-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Harrison</name>
        <uri>http://blog.spokeo.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.spokeo.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I respectfully disagree with your third point on making My Yahoo! social.  Not every website needs to become yet another social networks.  In fact, becoming one most likely will have a disastrous effect on your core value proposition.</p>

<p>Imagine My Yahoo! with "share this" button or icon on top of every module.  Without a mockup, I think most would agree with me that the page will become more cluttered.  My Yahoo! is an aggregation service, so let's leave the social interactions to another tab on the browser.</p>

<p>I've learned that more does not equal better through my experience of building Spokeo.  More of my thoughts on this matter here:  <a href="http://blog.spokeo.com/?p=7" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://blog.spokeo.com/?p=7" rel="nofollow">http://blog.spokeo.com/?p=7</a></a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-30T22:54:59Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2662-comment:21548</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2662" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/fixing_yahoo_building_a_yahoo_platform.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/fixing_yahoo_building_a_yahoo_platform.php#c21548" />
    <title>Comment from dave mcclure on 2007-07-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>dave mcclure</name>
        <uri>http://500hats.typepad.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://500hats.typepad.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>nice piece josh.  altho i think you should be a little more specific re: #3: make the platform social.</p>

<p>in particular, that should translate into:<br />
 a) implement a friend network / social graph service throughout Yahoo (& consolidate SNS silos like Flickr, Upcoming, others)<br />
 b) implement a sharing / messaging / discovery system that utilizes the social graph, similar to Facebook News Feed, and<br />
 c) figure out how to distribute Platform functionality & Platform apps throughout Yahoo, via the social graph / feed mechanisms noted above.</p>

<p>while having a "platform" is great, and ditto for a social network, it's really the combination of these two items across the river of the social graph -- that is, the FEED -- that makes the platform live & breathe.</p>

<p>for more navel-gazing on this topic, see:<br />
  Marketing Facebook Apps, all about the Feed<br />
  <a href="http://500hats.typepad.com/500blogs/2007/07/marketing-faceb.html" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://500hats.typepad.com/500blogs/2007/07/marketing-faceb.html" rel="nofollow">http://500hats.typepad.com/500blogs/2007/07/marketing-faceb.html</a></a><br />
 <br />
and </p>

<p>  Facebook News Feed Optimization (NFO)<br />
  <a href="http://www.insidefacebook.com/2007/07/16/inside-facebook-nfo-is-the-new-seo/" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.insidefacebook.com/2007/07/16/inside-facebook-nfo-is-the-new-seo/" rel="nofollow">http://www.insidefacebook.com/2007/07/16/inside-facebook-nfo-is-the-new-seo/</a></a></p>

<p>- dave mcclure</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-31T05:25:18Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2662-comment:21549</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2662" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/fixing_yahoo_building_a_yahoo_platform.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/fixing_yahoo_building_a_yahoo_platform.php#c21549" />
    <title>Comment from danny on 2007-07-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>danny</name>
        <uri>http://www.deluzions.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.deluzions.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>"I think Yahoo! is actually in a better position to create a winning platform than Google is right now."</p>

<p>?!?!?!</p>

<p>Over half the internet (from CNN to Joe Blogger) is already tied in to Google's search and advertising API's - this platform drives billions in revenue.</p>

<p>Not to mention the whole notion of cultural DNA...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-31T06:45:30Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2662-comment:21550</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2662" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/fixing_yahoo_building_a_yahoo_platform.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/fixing_yahoo_building_a_yahoo_platform.php#c21550" />
    <title>Comment from Roy Chang on 2007-07-31</title>
    <author>
        <name>Roy Chang</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Yahoo already has a social networking platform - it's called 360.  Yahoo can improve on that and make it the centerpiece of its new strategy.  Sure, "pundits" have dismissed it as a failed experiment, but if Yahoo can connect users with professionally-produced content to differentiate itself from the likes of Facebook (which depends heavily on user-generated content), Yahoo has a chance to be a contender again.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-31T08:14:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2662-comment:21551</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2662" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/fixing_yahoo_building_a_yahoo_platform.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/fixing_yahoo_building_a_yahoo_platform.php#c21551" />
    <title>Comment from Nicolas on 2007-07-31</title>
    <author>
        <name>Nicolas</name>
        <uri>http://www.nicolasleroy.fr</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.nicolasleroy.fr">
        <![CDATA[<p>Yahoo doesn't have a platform yet, but have a quite big set of APIs available on Developer Network... Mashups vs Widgets vs Platform?</p>

<p>Agree to not really mix MyYahoo! with social aspects; but Yahoo also has a pretty old user directory at <a href="http://members.yahoo.com/" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://members.yahoo.com/" rel="nofollow">http://members.yahoo.com/</a></a> that could be easily transformed into a social network.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-31T14:06:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2662-comment:21552</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2662" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/fixing_yahoo_building_a_yahoo_platform.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/fixing_yahoo_building_a_yahoo_platform.php#c21552" />
    <title>Comment from Yihong Ding on 2007-07-31</title>
    <author>
        <name>Yihong Ding</name>
        <uri>http://yihongs-research.blogspot.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://yihongs-research.blogspot.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I agree on what you said.  But I am worried how great the action Yahoo will make.  It seems that Yahoo wants to advance with as less as possible changes on its current model. Unfortunately, however, this dream is unrealistic to a bright future.  Now it is the time to test the courage of the leaders of Yahoo.</p>

<p>-- Yihong</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-31T16:55:10Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2662-comment:21553</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2662" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/fixing_yahoo_building_a_yahoo_platform.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/fixing_yahoo_building_a_yahoo_platform.php#c21553" />
    <title>Comment from IdeaTagger on 2007-07-31</title>
    <author>
        <name>IdeaTagger</name>
        <uri>http://www.ideatagging.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.ideatagging.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Josh, I agree with most of your analysis but I would re-order and extend/revise your proposed steps as follows:</p>

<p>1.Build a closed platform to better integrate existing applications: These days everyone thinks of a platform as opening up and enabling anyone to develop apps on it. However, a platform can also be a way to integrate your own applications - enabling message/data passing between them and facilitating workflows (or hey fun-flows) that cut across them. I am thinking of a My Yahoo that lets me easily bookmark my yahoo searches (or results) using delicious; or offers me a view of related delicious bookmarks and flickr photos when I do a yahoo search etc - all in a very clean, fresh and uncluttered interface.</p>

<p>2.Make the Platform Social: Add a social engine/network to this platform, again integrating it with and leveraging the other Yahoo applications. E.g. a notification to my network when I add a new bookmark; a smooth way to convert a yahoo search query to a question on Yahoo Answers, sent optionally to just my network. I was on an impromptu business trip the other day with limited web access and time, and I wanted to know the current exchange rate. It would have been great to be able to request a yahoo search by SMS (yahoo mobile) to my yahoo network.</p>

<p>3.Open up the platform: Just like facebook has done, I think Yahoo should make their 'platform' useful and social first before opening it up. The risk in opening too early is (as you briefly mentioned) that they lose page views. If people could read and add/edit their delicious bookmarks, flickr photos, yahoo mail etc on facebook then I am not sure that they would ever visit the yahoo sites directly.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-31T21:34:39Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2662-comment:21554</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2662" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/fixing_yahoo_building_a_yahoo_platform.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/fixing_yahoo_building_a_yahoo_platform.php#c21554" />
    <title>Comment from Scott on 2007-08-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>Scott</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with the concept of the platform being the killer app.  And I agree with the comment about the biggest killer app being the combination of the platform and social aspects.  Social in the sense of making it easy to communicate with people and controlling who you are communicating with.  Not social in the sense of being able to share everything you do with everyone.</p>

<p>In my opinion:</p>

<p>- Having a platform MENTALITY is key.  It's really a different way of thinking.  It's more about building things for others to build on whereby Yahoo's benefits come when those 3rd parties are successful.  Once they are, then it's an annuity of cash rolling in and the growth is viral and exponential.  Yahoo would, of course, act as a "3rd party" to itself and reap the benefits twice, but this wouldn't stop other 3rd parties from getting in their game.</p>

<p>- Allowing third parties to develop on the platform is huge.  Look what it's done for Facebook (and Salesforce.com on the Enterprise side).  Facebook opened up to registration beyond universities and allowed 3rd party apps on there.  Once this was combined, it was made more powerful to the masses and not just a way to connect with friends.  It now has some utility too.</p>

<p>- Keep the social aspects under control.  Facebook does a good job of this with very specific profile settings.  From the perspective of an end-user, their social network can be very small and intimate with only closely held contacts.  It's not always about sharing everything with the world.  The platform should be able to control both and users should be CONFIDENT about that control.</p>

<p>- Make it easy to get information in/out.  RSS/SMS/Widgets/Website/Browser Plug-Ins/Desktop apps for being informed and communicating into the community.  The focus should NOT be on page views on the web site and advertising, but in building a community and economy so the revenues come on the back-end via the economy built by the apps on it.  Advertising might be an aspect of it, but should NOT be the focus.</p>

<p>- Encourage the business community to participate in the network.  Facebook has started doing a good job of this.  Many people have their "work life" and their "personal life" and want them to be separate with only a few exceptions where people cross the boundary.  Being able to use a common platform to manage interactions/collaboration/communication in both lives is great.  Doing this means the social controls will need to be in place so you are able to be careful about who you let into both sides of your life and see content across the business/personal life boundary.  Looking at Facebook, you are starting to hear about corporations thinking about using it as a company intranet!  Cha-ching!</p>

<p>- Build an economy with the 3rd party apps.  Allow people/companies to make money with their apps via the platform.  See Salesforce.com's AppExchange as a decent example and eBay as a great one.  The platform lowers the barriers to entry and exposes an app to (m)(b)illions of people.  Again, the community will determine who makes money because good ideas will win favor.</p>

<p>I could go on and on...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-08-01T15:44:19Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2662-comment:21555</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2662" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/fixing_yahoo_building_a_yahoo_platform.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/fixing_yahoo_building_a_yahoo_platform.php#c21555" />
    <title>Comment from AK on 2007-08-03</title>
    <author>
        <name>AK</name>
        <uri>http://www.doctype.cx</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.doctype.cx">
        <![CDATA[<p>nice post jason - almost better than the initial post itself. do you have a blog? I for one would like to hear more of your thoughts.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-08-03T21:55:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2662-comment:21556</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2662" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/fixing_yahoo_building_a_yahoo_platform.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/fixing_yahoo_building_a_yahoo_platform.php#c21556" />
    <title>Comment from Andy on 2007-08-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Andy</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>To the author,</p>

<p>Did you just learn of the "platform" buzzword yesterday?  Are you writing here from the pedestal of the Facebook bandwagon and just want Yahoo to copy Facebook?  You sure sound like it.</p>

<p>I'm not a defender of Yahoo, been using it since 1996 but recently moved everything to Google's array of services.  Yahoo's problem has NOTHING to do with platform, bandwagoner.  It has EVERYTHING to do with the fact that Yahoo is trying to do a million things, but not "THE BEST" at any one of them.</p>

<p>That is the one and only problem of Yahoo.  Facebook does one thing - social networking, better than anyone else.  Google does search, mapping, and online software better than anyone else.  What's Yahoo good at these days?</p>

<p>Nothing.</p>

<p>That's the story, not the buzzword-laden jumble you wrote.</p>

<p>Andy</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-08-04T13:25:35Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>