<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_blogging_dead.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2008:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4009-</id>
  <updated>2008-07-02T20:22:07Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Is Blogging Dead?</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.1</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4009</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_blogging_dead.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=4009" title="Is Blogging Dead?" />
    <published>2007-07-10T22:56:45Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:11:49Z</updated>
    <title>Is Blogging Dead?</title>
    <summary>That&apos;s a dramatic and possibly even sarcastic headline, but it was derived from a real question asked in our current post comparing indie blog platforms Six Apart and Automattic. Commenter jm wrote: &quot;the other vision is that blogging is dead vs myspace/facebook stuff. Where is the need for a individual expression tool when the whole...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Richard MacManus</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Analysis" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/23/24905548_2937ad7dfe_m.jpg" vspace="5" hspace="5" align="right" />That's a dramatic and possibly even sarcastic headline, but it was derived from a real question asked in our current post <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/blog_platforms_head_to_head_six_apart_automattic.php">comparing indie blog platforms Six Apart and Automattic</a>. Commenter jm wrote:</p>

<blockquote><p>"the other vision is that blogging is dead vs myspace/facebook stuff. Where is the need for a individual expression tool when the whole business is moving to social? they were just pre-2.0..."</p></blockquote>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>Another commenter, Jason, quickly retorted:</p>

<blockquote><p>"I'm not so sure blogging is dead, jm. New blogs pop up on every few seconds and the emerging markets in Asia and Africa are just starting to be tapped. Blogging has certainly evolved over the past five years, but its final shape has yet to form."</p></blockquote>

<p>Obviously blogging is nowhere near dead, but jm does raise some interesting issues. With the rise of MySpace in the last couple of years and now Facebook in 2007, many people aren't writing personal blogs anymore. Having said that, both Six Apart (with Typepad and Vox) and Automattic (with wordpress.com) are clearly targeting personal - and social - bloggers with their products. So it stands to reason that both of those companies are threatened somewhat by social networks. Although the counter to that is that the overall market pie is growing.</p>

<h2>Why People Blog</h2>

<p>There are many other reasons, apart from being social, that people may want to blog. One is to focus on a niche and essentially treat it as a media website, which is what we do here on Read/WriteWeb.</p>
<p>Another reason is to join a distributed conversation about shared interests - usually a half social, half work activity. Newbie blogger Marc Andreessen's blog is probably of that type, as he wrote about today in his <a href="http://blog.pmarca.com/2007/07/eleven-lessons-.html">Eleven lessons learned about blogging, so far</a> post. Marc goes as far to say that "...in industries where lots of people are online, blogging is the single best way to communicate and interact."</p>

<h2>The Best Blogs Are Social</h2>

<p>Marc's post focuses on how blogging has in some ways usurped traditional forms of publishing (books etc). But I think R/WW commenter jm actually hit on a more interesting tension - between blogging as a social communications tool and social networks like MySpace/Facebook. Matthew Ingram has (as always) a great perspective on this, in a post entitled <a href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2007/07/10/do-blog-comments-still-matter/">Do blog comments still matter?</a>. Like Matthew, I think comments are vitally important to a blog. In fact, I'll let you in on a little secret - right now increasing the comments and discussions on R/WW is my number 1 priority. The reason why is because blogs are at heart a social medium. Blogs are a publishing platform, sure, but they are a <b>social</b> publishing platform.</p>
<p>Now, we've seen some very cynical and exploitative uses of blogs over the past year, along with a lot of stats manipulation. It makes me despair at times, but then I think about how the best blogs have resisted the sleeze and have become platforms where discussions bloom. These are blogs where the writers actually write <b>for their readers</b>, and not just to get page views. A good example is my friend Joshua Porter, whose blog <a href="http://bokardo.com">Bokardo</a> is a great resource about social web design - and there are always excellent discussions happening on his blog.</p>
<p>Admittedly it's hard to get discussions going on a blog, but the blogs that at least attempt it and actually write for their readers -- these blogs are the most compelling in my view.</p>

<p>So back to the original question - is blogging dead? Not on your life! Blogs, social networks, newspapers, any other form of publication - all have social aspects to them. It is a spectrum really, with social networks at one extreme and a 19th century novel at the other. But there's room for all types of social publishing platforms.</p>

<p>Cat photo <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/junku/24905548/">by junku</a></p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4009-comment:34861</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4009" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_blogging_dead.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_blogging_dead.php#c34861" />
    <title>Comment from Nick Pulido on 2007-07-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>Nick Pulido</name>
        <uri>http://www.macnewsonline.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.macnewsonline.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Yes, I agree - blogs are almost the standard of consumer generated pages now, think about it. If one were to set out to "make their own website" it is almost safely implied that it will be a blog.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-10T23:30:11Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4009-comment:34862</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4009" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_blogging_dead.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_blogging_dead.php#c34862" />
    <title>Comment from Will on 2007-07-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>Will</name>
        <uri>http://www.i9f.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.i9f.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Of course blogging is alive & well.  The outliers are those who DON'T blog.  It's been interesting to see so many large companies, though, launch a "blog" thinking it'll solve all their problems - forgetting that if it isn't a two-way conversation, it's just a frequently updated web page.  Good luck in increasing your comments here - that's a great goal to have.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-11T00:01:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4009-comment:34863</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4009" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_blogging_dead.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_blogging_dead.php#c34863" />
    <title>Comment from Jared Schwager on 2007-07-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jared Schwager</name>
        <uri>http://grupenet.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://grupenet.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Blogging is anything but dead. I have made many websites in the past and it was always a pain to manage them easily. Blogging makes managing a website so much easier. For this reason alone, I think blogging will stay alive for many years to come.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-11T01:22:47Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4009-comment:34864</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4009" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_blogging_dead.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_blogging_dead.php#c34864" />
    <title>Comment from Jason Ryan on 2007-07-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jason Ryan</name>
        <uri>http://psnetwork.org.nz/blog/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://psnetwork.org.nz/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>It might be helpful to differentiate between the <em>types</em> of conversations/discussions that you have on blogs vs social sites.</p>

<p>Specialized fields of knowledge, technical discussions or even annotations to the corporate record are all more suitable to a blog than a social network page.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-11T01:41:12Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4009-comment:34865</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4009" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_blogging_dead.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_blogging_dead.php#c34865" />
    <title>Comment from Writer, Rejected on 2007-07-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>Writer, Rejected</name>
        <uri>http://www.literaryrejectionsondisplay.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.literaryrejectionsondisplay.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Dead? I just got here. It can't be dead.  But seriously I do think specialized fields of interest (maybe not exactly knowledge) arethe cornerstone.  I have a professional web page, and I pay someone to update it for me, but blogging is easy, all me. I do wish that some of the blogging discussion would rise to a more sustaining level. Instead of the peeps who just want to tell you why your blog isn't viable. Maybe when something good gets going, there are always those who will want to kill it, or tell you to kill it.  But, geez, I hope it stays kicking for a little while longer, anyway.  I'm having fun trying to stir up a conversation on literary rejections. www.literaryrejectionsonondisplay.blogspot.com</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-11T01:47:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4009-comment:34866</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4009" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_blogging_dead.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_blogging_dead.php#c34866" />
    <title>Comment from Mathew Ingram on 2007-07-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>Mathew Ingram</name>
        <uri>http://www.mathewingram.com/work</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.mathewingram.com/work">
        <![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link and the kind words, Richard. I completely agree with your views on comments.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-11T02:27:39Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4009-comment:34867</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4009" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_blogging_dead.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_blogging_dead.php#c34867" />
    <title>Comment from Bruce on 2007-07-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>Bruce</name>
        <uri>http://onethousandamonth.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://onethousandamonth.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Like most of you readers I agree that blogs are Alive and Well. Facebook itself may evolve a strong blog presence but most will want to maintain control and ownership of their content. So yah...blogs will bloom - behemoths and bittys both.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-11T02:45:14Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4009-comment:34868</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4009" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_blogging_dead.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_blogging_dead.php#c34868" />
    <title>Comment from Donv69 on 2007-07-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>Donv69</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>When I had a blog I was more aware of the other blogs around.  But now that I no longer blog, I find that I don't browse other blogs any more.  There is the obvious popular tech ones such as this, but I even wonder if R/WW or TechCruch are still considered blogs.</p>

<p>Is "blog" a result of the technical design or the social aspect of the medium.</p>

<p>I think blogs are popular to bloggers, much like social networks are popular to those who participate in them.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-11T03:10:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4009-comment:34869</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4009" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_blogging_dead.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_blogging_dead.php#c34869" />
    <title>Comment from Network Geek on 2007-07-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>Network Geek</name>
        <uri>http://www.ryumaou.com/hoffman/netgeek/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.ryumaou.com/hoffman/netgeek/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I think blogging is dead the same way the web is old media.</p>

<p>(For clarification, just in case someone doesn't get what I mean, it's not.)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-11T03:18:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4009-comment:34870</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4009" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_blogging_dead.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_blogging_dead.php#c34870" />
    <title>Comment from sull on 2007-07-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>sull</name>
        <uri>http://pipeout.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://pipeout.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>ha!  i just saw the headline in my gmail and i was pissed.  That's it dammit!!  No more!  Out of control.  3 seconds later I was calmed by reading the first line of the article.... but still i stop and cannot read on.  but was impulsed to leave a comment.</p>

<p>I miss the days of solo-authored RR/W , truthfully.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-11T03:35:46Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4009-comment:34871</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4009" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_blogging_dead.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_blogging_dead.php#c34871" />
    <title>Comment from jm on 2007-07-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>jm</name>
        <uri>http://twitter.com/jmooi</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://twitter.com/jmooi">
        <![CDATA[<p>hi, well i agree that blogging is not dead but i also see blogging as "demod√©" (out of fashion): i agree it is much more easy that a personal page, but who is really making a personal page these days? just wait few years and 6apart will be a brand just like geocities! and the product the same!<br />
i my vision it is because blogging is so selfish: I have something to say vs I have something to share with friends!<br />
Blogging is not social.<br />
Do not worry: I will still read R/WW!<br />
All the best.<br />
JM</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-11T05:20:07Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4009-comment:34872</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4009" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_blogging_dead.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_blogging_dead.php#c34872" />
    <title>Comment from Mauro on 2007-07-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>Mauro</name>
        <uri>http://www.techtear.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.techtear.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Dead? What about content? Social networks give cero content to the web. Try googling something, the results are -generally- all about blog posts.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-11T05:51:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4009-comment:34873</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4009" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_blogging_dead.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_blogging_dead.php#c34873" />
    <title>Comment from Richard MacManus on 2007-07-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>Richard MacManus</name>
        <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Interesting comments! I was especially struck by this question by Donv69 (comment 8): "Is "blog" a result of the technical design or the social aspect of the medium."</p>

<p>It's both, but partly what I was bemoaning in the second half of the post was that too many 'blogs' are anti-social these days - i.e. they don't post for the readers, but for Google's algorithms or just to get page views. I realise this has been a pet peeve lately, and probably not relevant to many of you. But still, it's a worrying trend I reckon...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-11T05:52:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4009-comment:34874</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4009" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_blogging_dead.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_blogging_dead.php#c34874" />
    <title>Comment from Mithun on 2007-07-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>Mithun</name>
        <uri>http://ray-deo.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://ray-deo.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Blogging isn't dead but it has sure narrowed down to those who update their blogs regularly. The reason it won't die is becfause of the sense of ownership people have but the novelty has worn off.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-11T05:56:39Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4009-comment:34875</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4009" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_blogging_dead.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_blogging_dead.php#c34875" />
    <title>Comment from Marc on 2007-07-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>Marc</name>
        <uri>http://www.techne-eikon.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.techne-eikon.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>As they say, rock and roll will never die. Blogging is more than just a neato new web platform, and while it certainly benefits from social bookmarking, it is not necessary, nor reliant on it IMHO. Having said that, I recall a report from the Gartner Group recently that declared blogging to peak in 2007, followed by a decline. The assertion is that the novelty aspect is wearing off, and those who will blog, are blogging, and those who were just trying out the newest toy are moving on to the next toy. Blogging will not die, because people want to talk, and get published, and be heard. Blogging will not die because it makes it easy for people to <b>get</b> heard. Blogging cannot die, because it is firmly ingrained into the very fabric of the net, and beyond that, our culture and society. Just like rock and roll.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-11T06:07:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4009-comment:34876</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4009" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_blogging_dead.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_blogging_dead.php#c34876" />
    <title>Comment from bernard lunn on 2007-07-11</title>
    <author>
        <name>bernard lunn</name>
        <uri>http://bernardlunn.wordpress.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://bernardlunn.wordpress.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I just finished my Blog post on taxonomy of Bloggers and what will move to Twitter and what will merge into new media platforms and what will stay as classic long tail Blogging. As usual, it is "horses for courses".<br />
<a href="http://bernardlunn.wordpress.com/2007/07/11/blogger-types-and-what-this-means-for-b2b-media/" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://bernardlunn.wordpress.com/2007/07/11/blogger-types-and-what-this-means-for-b2b-media/" rel="nofollow">http://bernardlunn.wordpress.com/2007/07/11/blogger-types-and-what-this-means-for-b2b-media/</a></a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-11T13:37:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4009-comment:34877</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4009" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_blogging_dead.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_blogging_dead.php#c34877" />
    <title>Comment from heri on 2007-07-11</title>
    <author>
        <name>heri</name>
        <uri>http://montrealtechwatch.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://montrealtechwatch.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>ok - i will comment too</p>

<p>so what is the cat's picture has to do with blogs' death?</p>

<p>:-)</p>

<p>more seriously, I would say we need to differentiate now blogs. There are personal blogs (people talking about their cats), corporate blogs, media blogs, blogs that are in fact magazines, profesional blogs. there is even now pico-blogging (twitter), micro-blogging (tumblr), blogging for friends only (livejournal), blogs that are now media institutions (techcrunch, r/www), blogs with only photo shoots in it (the sartorialist)</p>

<p>the landscape is so rich and complex now you can't just put every blogger in the same basket.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-11T15:30:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4009-comment:34878</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4009" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_blogging_dead.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_blogging_dead.php#c34878" />
    <title>Comment from Pelle on 2007-07-12</title>
    <author>
        <name>Pelle</name>
        <uri>http://pelle.vox.nu/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://pelle.vox.nu/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The blog is not dead at all - quite the opposite. Whereas something like Facebook and maybe MySpace is representative of web 2.0, in the aspect of users creating the content, they are also completely centralized. If I write something at Facebook it will stay at Facebook.</p>

<p>The future - what may be called web 3.0 - is the decentralized web where you don't go to someones site to contribute, you just contribute. You are an individual node in a great web of internet users where no one owns someone else's content.</p>

<p>What Digg, MySpace, Facebook and the others fails to do is to stay open. There are a tremendous amount of Digg-clones but many of them haven't got any content. Why? Because Digg owns the content - they own my Digg. If I want to share my digg with all the Digg-clones I have to visit them and click on every one of them. Why? I have digged something and everybody interested in that should be able to share that fact.</p>

<p>The blog is my identity - my tool in cyberspace. To my blog and it's domain I can connect an OpenID which can guarantee that I am who I am on other sites. With feeds and microformat I can mark up content on my site enabling it to be part of the great web and be processable by others.</p>

<p>My internet identity can be scattered among many domains also - Last.fm for example already marks up it's content with microformats making it theoretically possible to export friends to another website - a service one site already ffer actually.</p>

<p>MySpace, Facebook, Digg and the others are inferior to the blog until they have opened up so much that a message sent from Facebook can be answered on MySpace for example... Then the competition would be about the best service and not being the one who can trick most users into registering.</p>

<p>An example of a in theory superior competitor to Digg is Technorati. The latter uses links from my blog to determine what is hot and what is not. I own my link - Technorati only processes it and other services like the swedish sites Knuff.se and Bloggportalen.se can process the same data without me having to duplicate my link. With microformats Technorati and similar could be even further improved over Digg.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-12T22:00:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4009-comment:34879</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.4009" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_blogging_dead.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_blogging_dead.php#c34879" />
    <title>Comment from Austin Hallock on 2007-08-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Austin Hallock</name>
        <uri>http://www.austinsight.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.austinsight.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>"Admittedly it's hard to get discussions going on a blog, but the blogs that at least attempt it and actually write for their readers -- these blogs are the most compelling in my view."</p>

<p>Obviously comments are the main source for discussions within a blog...It will be interesting to see how comments evolve in time--Whether they become similar to a forum or something completely new.</p>

<p>I'd like to hear others' take on this and what they think the *perfect* commenting system would be.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-08-04T07:02:37Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>