<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_webs_top_takeover_targets.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2008:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2635-</id>
  <updated>2008-07-02T20:21:37Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for The Web&apos;s Top Takeover Targets</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.1</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2635</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_webs_top_takeover_targets.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=2635" title="The Web's Top Takeover Targets" />
    <published>2007-07-24T16:20:23Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:07:43Z</updated>
    <title>The Web&apos;s Top Takeover Targets</title>
    <summary><![CDATA[ digg_url = 'http://www.digg.com/tech_news/Web_s_Top_Takeover_Targets'; digg_bgcolor = '#ffffff'; digg_skin = 'compact'; This past year has been a very eventful one in the M&amp;A arena, with many of web 2.0's biggest names being snapped up. A few stand-outs include the likes of YouTube, Photobucket, Feedburner, Last.fm, and StumbleUpon. Yet, there still remains a number of juicy, mouth-watering...]]></summary>
    <author>
      <name>Aidan Henry</name>
      
    </author>
    
    <category term="Analysis" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><font style="float: right"><script type="text/javascript">
digg_url = 'http://www.digg.com/tech_news/Web_s_Top_Takeover_Targets';
digg_bgcolor = '#ffffff';
digg_skin = 'compact';
</script>
<script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript"></script></font><img alt="Top Takeover Targets" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/top-takeover-targets.jpg" align="left" hspace="5" vspace="5" /></a>This past year has been a very eventful one in the M&amp;A arena, with many of web 2.0's biggest names being snapped up. A few stand-outs include the likes of <a title="YouTube" href="http://www.youtube.com">YouTube</a>, <a title="Photobucket" href="http://www.photobucket.com">Photobucket</a>, <a title="Feedburner" href="http://www.feedburner.com">Feedburner</a>, <a title="Last.fm" href="http://www.last.fm">Last.fm</a>, and <a title="StumbleUpon" href="http://www.stumbleupon.com">StumbleUpon</a>.</p>
<p>Yet, there still remains a number of juicy, mouth-watering targets available on the market. This may be a great opportunity for traditional media, as well as some of the Internet behemoths, to make a leap into the new web world. Let's explore some of the most sought-after names still available on the market.</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p><a title="Digg" href="http://www.digg.com"><img alt="Digg logo" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/takeovers/digg-logo.png" align="right" hspace="5" vspace="5" /></a><strong>Digg:</strong> Traditional media is losing ground fast. Social news sites and blogs are starting to attract a lot more traffic and attention, as people turn to these alternatives for news. <a title="Digg" href="http://www.digg.com">Digg</a> is a pioneer in this space and leading the charge. Close rival <a title="Reddit" href="http://www.reddit.com">Reddit</a> was purchased late last year, indicating interest in the space. Although Digg will be looking for a substantially higher price tag, my intuition tells me that the company will not refuse any offer over $150 million. Potential buyers include <a title="Yahoo" href="http://www.yahoo.com">Yahoo</a>, <a title="NYTimes" href="http://www.nyt.com">NYTimes</a>, <a title="MSN" href="http://www.msn.com">MSN</a>, or any major company looking to add a social spin (i.e. community-powered voting) to their news section. Other companies of interest in the space include <a title="Newsvine" href="http://www.newsvine.com">Newsvine</a>, <a title="NowPublic" href="http://www.nowpublic.com">NowPublic</a>, and <a title="ShoutWire" href="http://www.shoutwire.com">ShoutWire</a>.</p>

<p><em>Note:</em> Now may be a good time for any company looking to acquire Digg. My guess is that the recent <a title="HD-DVD Meltdown at Digg" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/what_happened_a_1.php">HD-DVD meltdown</a> may have eroded a significant portion of Digg's current market valuation (at least in the short term). This unfortunate situation pitted Digg vs. the community. In the end, the company was forced to let a submission containing an HD-DVD key reside on the site and deal with a cease-and-desist order. The community backlash coupled with a potential lawsuit most certainly shrunk the valuation to some degree.</p>


<p><a title="Technorati" href="http://www.technorati.com"><img alt="Technorati logo" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/technorati-logo.jpg" align="left" hspace="5" vspace="5" /></a><strong>Technorati:</strong> Blogs are undoubtedly helping to shape the new media landscape. Having said that, users need to be able to search these blogs. <a title="Technorati" href="http://www.technorati.com">Technorati</a> is the status quo blog search engine. This popular search vertical is here to stay. Competition is lacking (with the exception of <a title="Google Blog Search" href="http://blogsearch.google.com">Google Blog Search</a>). This is inexcusable for any major search engine. <a title="Yahoo" href="http://www.yahoo.com">Yahoo</a> and/or <a title="MSN" href="http://www.msn.com">MSN</a> may want to consider the addition of Technorati to strengthen their core search offering.</p>


<p><a title="Netvibes" href="http://www.netvibes.com"><img alt="Netvibes logo" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/takeovers/netvibes-logo.gif" align="right" hspace="5" vspace="5" /></a><strong>Netvibes:</strong> Personalized homepages are not a fad - their long-term future is certainly optimistic. <a title="Netvibes" href="http://www.netvibes.com">Netvibes</a> is an AJAX-ified start page that offers information aggregation and page customization. Such an offering would provide a great doorway for any portal or media site. Though monetization of the homepage itself may be difficult, an extended service offering could generate revenues via this customer acquisition tool. Potential buyers include major portals lacking such an offering, such as <a title="About.com" href="http://www.about.com">About.com</a> or <a title="Lycos" href="http://www.lycos.com">Lycos</a>. Though <a title="Google" href="http://www.google.com">Google</a>, <a title="Yahoo" href="http://www.yahoo.com">Yahoo</a>, and <a title="MSN" href="http://www.msn.com">MSN</a> all offer such a service (<a title="Google IG" href="http://www.google.com/ig">Google IG</a>, <a title="My Yahoo" href="http://my.yahoo.com">My Yahoo</a>, <a title="Live" href="http://www.live.com">Live</a>), Netvibes also brings to the table a large user base and, perhaps, a better service. Other companies of interest in the space include <a title="Pageflakes" href="http://www.pageflakes.com">Pageflakes</a> and <a title="Protopage" href="http://www.protopage.com">Protopage</a>.</p>


<p><a title="SimplyHired" href="http://www.simplyhired.com"><img alt="SimplyHired logo" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/takeovers/simplyhired-logo.gif" align="left" hspace="5" vspace="5" /></a><strong>SimplyHired:</strong> Job aggregators facilitate the job-seeking process by pulling postings from numerous sources. This saves valuable time and hassle for the searcher. Traditional job sites lack breadth, depth, and diversity. For this reason, aggregators are able to attract huge traffic and a diverse audience. Any current portal or high-traffic property looking to add a job listing component may want to contemplate <a title="SimplyHired" href="http://www.simplyhired.com">SimplyHired</a>. Potential buyers include <a title="Google" href="http://www.google.com">Google</a> and traditional publishers. Other companies of interest in the space include <a title="Indeed" href="http://www.indeed.com">Indeed</a> and <a title="Jobster" href="http://www.jobster.com">Jobster</a>.</p>


<p><a title="Spock" href="http://www.spock.com"><img alt="Spock logo" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/takeovers/spock-logo.png" align="right" hspace="5" vspace="5" /></a></a><strong>Spock:</strong> The growth and success of Google goes without saying. This means that start-ups looking to enter the 'search' space are forced to choose a niche, if they want to stand a chance at competing. For this very reason, vertical search has exploded onto the scene this year. One search vertical, people-search, has garnered a huge amount of press recently as several new players have entered the market. One in particular, <a title="Spock" href="http://www.spock.com">Spock</a>, has attracted the most <a title="Spock buzz" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/spock_vertical_search_done_right.php">attention and scrutiny</a>. This stealth start-up had been operating under a high level of secrecy until recently. Potential buyers include any major search engine looking to enter into people search vertical. Other companies of interest in the space include <a title="ZoomInfo" href="http://www.zoominfo.com">ZoomInfo</a>, <a title="Wink" href="http://www.wink.com">Wink</a>, and <a title="ex.plode.us" href="http://ex.plode.us">ex.plode.us</a>.</p>


<p><a title="Facebook" href="http://www.facebook.com"><img alt="Facebook logo" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/takeovers/facebook-logo.jpg" align="left" hspace="5" vspace="5" /></a><strong><em>BONUS</em> - Facebook:</strong> This social network continues to dominate the headlines and expand at a blistering rate. Along with this growth has come an unprecedented amount of acquisition rumors and speculation. However, Mark Zuckerberg has repeatedly stifled such rumors, indicating that a sale is not in-store. Even if an acquisition was contemplated, a steep price tag would likely ward off many potential acquisitors. <a title="Facebook" href="http://www.facebook.com">Facebook</a> would be ideal for any large Internet player with deep pockets, looking to tap into a juicy database of demographic information. <a title="Yahoo" href="http://www.yahoo.com">Yahoo</a> is a front runner, but <a title="Google" href="http://www.google.com">Google</a> or <a title="MSN" href="http://www.msn.com">MSN</a> could also provide a good fit. </p>

<h2 align="left">Others</h2>

<p>Other companies that were considered for the list include:</p>

<ul>
	<li><a title="37signals" href="http://www.37signals.com">37signals</a> - Any major ASP may be interested in this web-based app producer (<a title="Basecamp" href="http://www.basecamphq.com">Basecamp</a>, <a title="Backpack" href="http://www.backpackit.com">Backpack</a>, <a title="Writeboard" href="http://www.writeboard.com">Writeboard</a>, etc..), although the company has repeatedly expressed its reluctance to sell.</li>
	<li><a title="Cafepress" href="http://www.cafepress.com">Cafepress</a> - This on-demand, customized product creation company would be a great additional for any large e-commerce site (<a title="Amazon" href="http://www.amazon.com">Amazon</a>?).</li>
	<li><a title="Compete" href="http://www.compete.com">Compete</a> - Criticism surrounding <a title="Alexa" href="http://www.alexa.com">Alexa</a> rankings has paved the way for this new entrant; any company looking to venture into the statistic/analytic space may be interested.</li>
	<li><a title="Kayak" href="http://www.kayak.com">Kayak</a> - A simple, travel search engine that could be a great addition to any portal or outdated travel offering.</li>
	<li><a title="LinkedIn" href="http://www.linkedin.com">LinkedIn</a> - This social network vertical is prized for its highly sought-after business professionals and high net-worth individuals.</li>
	<li><a title="Ning" href="http://www.ning.com">Ning</a> - The Ning platform allows anyone the ability to create and customize their own social network; the introduction to a larger audience would likely trigger widespread adoption. </li>
	<li><a title="Pandora" href="http://www.pandora.com">Pandora</a> - Social music recommendation site; the <a title="Last.fm acquisition" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/cbs_buys_lastfm.php">acquisition</a> of <a title="Last.fm" href="http://www.last.fm">Last.fm</a> by NBC shows interest in the space.</li>
	<li><a title="SixApart" href="http://www.sixapart.com">SixApart</a> - This parent company could introduce personal blogging (via <a title="Vox" href="http://www.vox.com">Vox</a> or <a title="LiveJournal" href="http://www.livejournal.com">LiveJournal</a>) and business blogging (via <a title="Movable Type" href="http://www.movabletype.com">Movable Type</a> or <a title="TypePad" href="http://www.typepad.com">TypePad</a>) to an old media player (<a title="Yahoo" href="http://www.yahoo.com">Yahoo</a>?).</li>
	<li><a title="Yelp" href="http://www.yelp.com">Yelp</a> - Business reviews by real people; it would be a great addition for any information portal.</li>
</ul>

<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>With a limited number of high-quality names still available, it will be interesting to keep an eye on M&amp;A activity in the near future. Though many of the top names have already been scooped up, there still remain a few gems. Fit and congruence are two important factors that cannot be overlooked when considering an acquisition. If the purchase does not tie into corporate goals and strategy, then it should be dismissed. If a deal is forced, it may be a waste of time and valuable resources (both financial and human). Nevertheless, a smart acquisition can provide added depth to any company offering. We've witnessed this with <a title="MySpace" href="http://www.myspace.com">MySpace</a>'s strategic purchase of <a title="Photobucket" href="http://www.photobucket.com">Photobucket</a>. It made sense - the fit was there. In the end, it was an easy decision. </p>

<p>Any companies missing from this list? Any companies that should be removed?</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2635-comment:21262</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2635" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_webs_top_takeover_targets.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_webs_top_takeover_targets.php#c21262" />
    <title>Comment from Mike on 2007-07-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>Mike</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Uh, Spock hasn't even launched yet.....</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-24T16:30:09Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2635-comment:21263</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2635" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_webs_top_takeover_targets.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_webs_top_takeover_targets.php#c21263" />
    <title>Comment from Josh Catone on 2007-07-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>Josh Catone</name>
        <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>@Mike: That hasn't stopped takeovers in the past. Remember NewRoo.com, for example, which was bought even before their first public demo, I think (and is now MySpace News ... or presumably).</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-24T16:42:49Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2635-comment:21264</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2635" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_webs_top_takeover_targets.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_webs_top_takeover_targets.php#c21264" />
    <title>Comment from valleyblogzine on 2007-07-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>valleyblogzine</name>
        <uri>http://valleyblogzine.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://valleyblogzine.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Great Article. How come you have left out some of the alternative search engines (Powerset, Wikia and Haiku) and alternative social networks (Bebo and Hi5)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-24T17:09:57Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2635-comment:21265</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2635" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_webs_top_takeover_targets.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_webs_top_takeover_targets.php#c21265" />
    <title>Comment from Andrew on 2007-07-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>Andrew</name>
        <uri>http://changingway.org</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://changingway.org">
        <![CDATA[<p>If the list includes attractive but not for sale firms, how about Automattic (WordPress)?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-24T17:49:47Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2635-comment:21266</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2635" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_webs_top_takeover_targets.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_webs_top_takeover_targets.php#c21266" />
    <title>Comment from Greg J. Smith on 2007-07-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>Greg J. Smith</name>
        <uri>http://www.serialconsign.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.serialconsign.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Only $150 million for Digg? Digg must be worth more to a major media organization than Last.fm was to CBS ($280 million).</p>

<p>I can't wait until Rupert Murdoch gets into social news selection/bookmarking!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-24T17:59:50Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2635-comment:21267</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2635" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_webs_top_takeover_targets.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_webs_top_takeover_targets.php#c21267" />
    <title>Comment from Brad Jashinsky on 2007-07-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>Brad Jashinsky</name>
        <uri>http://www.ReimagineMemories.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.ReimagineMemories.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>A very interesting and insightful article that really sums up the landscape of the web for this year. Personally, I don't think Facebook will sell, because they seem to have an executive that is just focused on building the next great IPO. Who knows if they will be the next Friendster or the next Google.</p>

<p>One question Mike, was Last.FM acquired by CBS or NBC? I've heard both companies used in different news reports.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-24T18:01:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2635-comment:21268</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2635" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_webs_top_takeover_targets.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_webs_top_takeover_targets.php#c21268" />
    <title>Comment from Adrian Keys on 2007-07-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>Adrian Keys</name>
        <uri>http://www.jollyjo.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.jollyjo.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I agree with you most on Technorati especially for the sheer size of the blogosphere and the fact that there is clear indication that given their current level of resources, management and otherwise, they are not able to cope.</p>

<p>On the other hand though, the question as to how you monetize effectively remains front and center.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-24T18:15:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2635-comment:21269</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2635" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_webs_top_takeover_targets.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_webs_top_takeover_targets.php#c21269" />
    <title>Comment from ReadingWritingWeb on 2007-07-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>ReadingWritingWeb</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Interesting that your top choice is Digg.com, because the rumors are no longer that.</p>

<p>Microsoft will announce they are purchasing Digg.com later this week, not sure on the amount or the intention, or how it will change digg...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-24T19:17:48Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2635-comment:21270</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2635" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_webs_top_takeover_targets.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_webs_top_takeover_targets.php#c21270" />
    <title>Comment from Aidan Henry on 2007-07-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>Aidan Henry</name>
        <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@valleyblogzine - The search engines mentioned are relatively new to the web; I'd wager that a bit more exposure will likely put them on the acquisition map. As for the social networks, I just think that Facebook has much more upside potential than the others, making it a more likely takeover candidate.</p>

<p>@Andrew - Automattic seems like a very strong stand-alone property.</p>

<p>@Brad - Last.fm was bought by CBS; see the link in the post.</p>

<p><br />
Cheers,<br />
Aidan</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-24T19:19:41Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2635-comment:21271</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2635" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_webs_top_takeover_targets.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_webs_top_takeover_targets.php#c21271" />
    <title>Comment from Ryan Stewart on 2007-07-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ryan Stewart</name>
        <uri>http://blog.digitalbackcountry.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.digitalbackcountry.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I'm surprised Yelp wasn't higher on this list. I'm not sure what their books look like, but that site is amazing. The user community is VERY passionate and it seems like the kind of site that once you've discovered it, you don't use anything else. Citysearch is dead for me.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-24T20:36:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2635-comment:21272</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2635" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_webs_top_takeover_targets.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_webs_top_takeover_targets.php#c21272" />
    <title>Comment from john griffin on 2007-07-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>john griffin</name>
        <uri>http://www.cutcaster.blogspot.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cutcaster.blogspot.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Great post and interesting fodder to put out there.  ha. </p>

<p>Along the lines of online video, I think Gemstar or On2 are the next takeouts in my humble opinion. Who knows though.  </p>

<p>I can't see FB being bought out for less than 9 or 10 billion but after reading P Thiels comments about what price they would entertain offers it makes me think they are ramping up for talks with MSFT and GOOG.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-24T20:55:48Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2635-comment:21273</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2635" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_webs_top_takeover_targets.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_webs_top_takeover_targets.php#c21273" />
    <title>Comment from gettit on 2007-07-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>gettit</name>
        <uri>http://gettit.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://gettit.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@ReadingWritingWeb</p>

<p>Now that is news. I guess we'll have to wait and see, but it would be interesting.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-24T21:22:19Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2635-comment:21274</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2635" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_webs_top_takeover_targets.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_webs_top_takeover_targets.php#c21274" />
    <title>Comment from Dave Mattin on 2007-07-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>Dave Mattin</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>The real bargins in there will be the few that didn't take venture funding.</p>

<p>For example, I know Protopage didn't take venture capital, so would be a very tasty acquisition.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-24T21:23:56Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2635-comment:21275</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2635" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_webs_top_takeover_targets.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_webs_top_takeover_targets.php#c21275" />
    <title>Comment from john griffin on 2007-07-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>john griffin</name>
        <uri>http://www.cutcaster.blogspot.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cutcaster.blogspot.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>protopage looks pretty simple and easy to understand.  had never heard of it. probably bc it hasn't taken money.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-25T00:20:56Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2635-comment:21276</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2635" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_webs_top_takeover_targets.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_webs_top_takeover_targets.php#c21276" />
    <title>Comment from Scott K on 2007-07-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>Scott K</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I think Yahoo! would have the most to gain in regards to making acquisitions, but how much cash do they have on hand?</p>

<p>If I were to rank the candidates in terms of which would be most important to Yahoo!, it would be:</p>

<p>1). Yelp -  Someone is going to snatch Yelp up, and whoever does will have a distinct advantage in the local listings/search space.  If combined with Yahoo's previous acquisition Upcoming, Yahoo would have local information.</p>

<p>2). SixApart - Yahoo 360 is failing pretty miserably, so Yahoo! needs to act.  Rumor has it they have a new social networking site in development, but SixApart would give them some strong established communities (Vox, LiveJournal).  Having TypePad and Moveable Type as part of their portfolio would just be icing on the cake (although they might want to consider spinning off Moveable Type).</p>

<p>3). Digg - If they could get it for the $150 million you mention (or thereabouts), it would be a steal.  Yahoo! could integrate Digg into Yahoo! News and their other properties.  I could also see a mash-up of Del.icio.us and Digg being very desirable to both communities.</p>

<p>4). Technorati - I agree that Yahoo! needs a blog search tool, but they must make sure they don't overpay for Technorati.  Managed smartly though, Yahoo! could integrate Technorati results into Yahoo! News.</p>

<p>5). Spock - This may or may not be desirable to Yahoo! depending on what sort of challenges it receives from privacy advocates.  If Spock works those out, then Yahoo! should grab it.  A lot of searches done on the web are for people's information.</p>

<p>I'm leaving Facebook off this list because I think it's hugely overpriced right now.  Yahoo! could grab one or more (perhaps all) of the above companies for what they would have to pay for Facebook.  At this time, Facebook's open platform is still unproven.  It has a good buzz now, but give it a couple of months and I bet people will forget about it.  I for one don't know why I would use apps on Facebook versus just going to those websites directly.</p>

<p>Netvibe/Pageflakes aren't exactly needed, but Yahoo! had better ramp up development on its own My Yahoo! beta (third party widgets would be nice).</p>

<p>That's just my 2¬¢.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-25T00:51:30Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2635-comment:21277</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2635" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_webs_top_takeover_targets.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_webs_top_takeover_targets.php#c21277" />
    <title>Comment from Scott K on 2007-07-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>Scott K</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>P.S.  I think Plaxo could make an attractive acquisition target.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-25T00:52:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2635-comment:21278</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2635" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_webs_top_takeover_targets.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_webs_top_takeover_targets.php#c21278" />
    <title>Comment from Ryan Stewart on 2007-07-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ryan Stewart</name>
        <uri>http://blog.digitalbackcountry.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.digitalbackcountry.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Scott K wins the thread :)</p>

<p>Yelp is the r0x0rs</p>

<p>=Ryan<br />
rstewart@adobe.com</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-25T03:46:40Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2635-comment:21279</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2635" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_webs_top_takeover_targets.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_webs_top_takeover_targets.php#c21279" />
    <title>Comment from Scott K on 2007-07-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>Scott K</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Thanks Ryan.  Unfortunately my proof-reading skills suck as evident in my paragraph about Yelp.  I meant to say that if Yahoo combined Yelp and Upcoming, then Yahoo would have a wealth of local information that would be hard to top.</p>

<p>As for mergers and acquisitions (if they have to happen), I always thought Apple and Adobe should tie the knot.  That's particularly true now that the iPhone could benefit from Adobe AIR.  Seeing that you work for Adobe in that area, I'm curious what your thoughts are on that.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-25T05:04:51Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2635-comment:21280</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2635" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_webs_top_takeover_targets.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_webs_top_takeover_targets.php#c21280" />
    <title>Comment from Nir on 2007-07-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>Nir</name>
        <uri>http://www.sportsevents365.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.sportsevents365.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Hi<br />
very interesting list, I'll keep it for a closer watch.<br />
will be interesting to see how many of these web sites will go on sale.<br />
Hope to see our sportsevents365 in the next 100's</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-25T07:24:58Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2635-comment:21281</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2635" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_webs_top_takeover_targets.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_webs_top_takeover_targets.php#c21281" />
    <title>Comment from Biswaroop Todi on 2007-07-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>Biswaroop Todi</name>
        <uri>http://www.manuallysubmit.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.manuallysubmit.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Article Submission is another good method to get traffic and better one-way links to your site, and has become standard in website search engine optimization strategies. We will submit your quality article to around 200 best article directories which would give you relevant incoming links to your website with the anchor text of your choice. If needed, our team can write original quality article with the same topics of your website and submit to best article directories.</p>

<p>We will submit your article manually. Some article directory will require author registration before submit article. our team will do that. We are not using any software for doing this.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-25T07:46:04Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2635-comment:21282</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2635" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_webs_top_takeover_targets.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_webs_top_takeover_targets.php#c21282" />
    <title>Comment from web 2.0 innovations on 2007-07-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>web 2.0 innovations</name>
        <uri>http://web2innovations.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://web2innovations.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I thought SimplyHired was bought by Google...or may be it was just talks...</p>

<p><a href="http://web2innovations.com/news/2007/May/SimplyHired.php" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://web2innovations.com/news/2007/May/SimplyHired.php" rel="nofollow">http://web2innovations.com/news/2007/May/SimplyHired.php</a></a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-25T12:14:16Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2635-comment:21283</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2635" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_webs_top_takeover_targets.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_webs_top_takeover_targets.php#c21283" />
    <title>Comment from Helmut on 2007-07-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>Helmut</name>
        <uri>http://www.guigo.eu/blog/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.guigo.eu/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>i agree about the digg selling for only 150m is 'el cheapo' - it will be sold somewhere under 1 billion or close to 500 m, huh?...</p>

<p>and hey, Aidan, what about Snap - they're everywhere today!! team behind that product has done some sales before - picasa, overture..</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-25T13:20:04Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2635-comment:21284</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2635" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_webs_top_takeover_targets.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_webs_top_takeover_targets.php#c21284" />
    <title>Comment from omadsense on 2007-07-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>omadsense</name>
        <uri>http://www.omadsense.com/id98.html</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.omadsense.com/id98.html">
        <![CDATA[<p>The question is - if sites like second life or weblo will take off and be on the M&A list???<br />
weblo info: <a href="http://www.omadsense.com/id98.html" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.omadsense.com/id98.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.omadsense.com/id98.html</a></a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-25T19:33:44Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>