<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/towards_the_attention_economy_opening_silos.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2008:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2660-</id>
  <updated>2008-05-09T18:12:32Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Towards the Attention Economy: Will Attention Silos Ever Open Up?</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.1</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2660</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/towards_the_attention_economy_opening_silos.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=2660" title="Towards the Attention Economy: Will Attention Silos Ever Open Up?" />
    <published>2007-07-30T13:35:03Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:07:44Z</updated>
    <title>Towards the Attention Economy: Will Attention Silos Ever Open Up?</title>
    <summary> We have written extensively at Read/WriteWeb about Attention and the Attention Economy. As a concept attention makes sense to anyone who is online today. We know when we are paying attention and we know what we are paying attention to. The problem is that the information about our attention is not readily available to...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Alex Iskold</name>
      <uri>http://www.adaptiveblue.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Analysis" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/attention.jpg" vspace="5" hspace="5" align="left" width="150">
We have written extensively at Read/WriteWeb about <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/continuous_partial_attention.php">Attention</a> and the <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/attention_economy_overview.php">Attention Economy</a>.
As a concept attention makes sense to anyone who is online today. We know when we are paying attention and we know what we are paying attention to.
The problem is that the information about our attention is not readily available to us afterwards. The premise of the Attention Economy
is that people are in control of their attention information. This control lets them use the information to receive
utility and services.
</p>

<p>The reality is that our attention information is scattered all over the web, bits of it lying in different silos. Anytime we buy books, rent movies, click on pictures or listen to music
the information is recorded and stored. Each vendor makes an specific effort to capture what we liked, but
most do not make much effort to help us get this information out of their system. And why should they? After all,
that consumer information is a competitive advantage for each business. Breaking existing attention silos and creating
a real attention economy appears to be a complex, if not impossible task. In this post we will take at broad look
at the problem in attempt to figure out what can be done.
</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<h2>The Basics of Attention</h2>

<p>As we interact with information we reveal our attention. The attention can be explicit or implicit.
A basic example of an explicit attention is bookmarking a page or rating a movie. An example of implicit
attention is visiting the same page many times or spending time reading an article. Attention information is
very valuable because it reveals our interests. People wrongly think of attention information as beings useful
only for advertising and marketing. Instead, our attention information should be thought of as a personal filter
than can be used in many contexts.</p>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/attention-services.jpg" vspace="5" hspace="5"></p>

<p>For example, a list of books that you purchased on Amazon can be used by a service that filters
new book releases for you. Another example is a search engine that knows what movies you already rented on
Netflix, so when you search for new movies it can show you only ones you haven't seen. Or perhaps, a shopping application that recommends electronic gadgets to you based on your previous purchases.
</p>

<p>To learn more about modern recommendation engines, please <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/recommendation_engines.php">read our previous post</a> on the subject.
The take away here is that filtering
and recommendation are really two sides of the same coin. But the reason attention information is so important is
because in our fast-paced world, having personalized filters can save us a lot of time.</p>

<h2>Attention Silos</h2>

<p>At a quick glance there maybe nothing wrong with the way things are today. For example, you can login to Amazon
and see your order history, you can see what you rented on Netflix or what you bought on eBay. The problem is
that the information is not readily portable and not readily available via a common interface. Because of this,
managing your attention information is practically impossible.</p>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/netflix-account.jpg" vspace="5" hspace="5"></p>

<p>Consider a different industry - banking. Each bank makes your recent financial transactions exportable
in a few formats - pdf, comma separated, Excel, etc. An export in Excel is actually an interesting example, because
it illustrates how your information can be leveraged. By exporting information from your bank and credit card into
Excel you are able to take it to your financial adviser who can in turn analyze it. The point is that your financial information
is portable.</p>

<p>On the other hand your Netflix rental history is not. You can argue that it is possible to copy and paste
it out of Netflix, but the cost of doing this is prohibitive for individuals. In fact your Netflix rental history is a
classic example of how all of today's attention silos deal with information. The information is available, it is
just not easy to export it or direct to another service because of its format. Netflix and others likely store
the information in the relational databases, but they expose it only as HTML. Effectively, this makes
the information useless to individuals who would like to use it to receive other services.</p>

<h2>Who Owns the Attention Data Anyway?</h2>

<p>Before looking at what can be done to unlock the attention information, it makes sense to ask if this is
even a valid thing to do. Consumers who are aware of the issue and want to participate in the Attention Economy
feel strongly about ownership of personal information.</p>

<p>However, the matters are not simple, and likely less favorable
to consumers that one might think. When we sign up for services like Amazon or Netflix in the fine print we are
are agreeing to their terms of service. Typically, it is stated explicitely that the behavioral information belongs
to business and not individuals. After all these companies are offering us a service.</p>

<p>On the other hand, this is a private information that they hold hostage.  Clearly, in the case of the financial
industry not being able to export information would be outrageous. So what is the difference between my bank
and Amazon? Not much as far as I am concerned, since I transact with each and view each as a service.</p>

<h2>An Attention Organization</h2>

<p>Because the matters are so complex and unclear we need an organization and law makers to step in and 
define the rules of engagement. A non-profit called <a href="http://www.attentiontrust.org">Attention Trust</a>
made an early attempt to define the <a href="http://www.attentiontrust.org/principles">principles of attention</a> on behalf of consumers. The principles that it laid out
ensure that the user is in control and, thus, made the Attention Economy possible. Unfortunately today the organization
is stagnating and has not made much progress lately in getting adoption in the industry.</p>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/attention-trust-data.jpg" vspace="5" hspace="5" width="530"></p>

<p>Assuming that Attention Trust can make a come back or another organization can take over the effort,
the crux of the problem is not only to formulate the principles of attention, but also to
lobby lawmakers and get the industry to reach a consensus. Even more importantly, there needs be a set of standards
focusing on attention.</p>

<p>An early example of a standard is <a href="http://www.apml.org">Attention Profiling Markup Language (APML)</a>,
which focuses on making consumer attention portable. It is certainly a step in the right direction, but it is not rich enough
to capture semantic attention. For example, there is no concept of a book or a movie, the attention is represented
as a set of tags. Such approach would make it impossible to build specific filters for things like books and movies.</p>

<h2>Attention Standards</h2>

<p>The technical details aside, the fact is that it is better to have an incomplete standard than no standard at all.
To get us to the real attention economy we need a set of standards that would facilitate it. First, each
silo that captures a users attention needs to provide an interface to access it.</p>

<p> This can be done in two
ways, either by storing information in proprietary format and implementing a standard way for other services to fetch it or
by writing the attention information directly into a standard, outside attention store. The latter solution is much better
technically, because it would uncouple attention capturing from attention services. However, it is unlikely that
companies like Amazon and Netflix would go as far as storing their customer information in an outside web service.
</p>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/opening-attention-silos.jpg" vspace="5" hspace="5"/><p>

<p>Beyond the standards for storage, there need to be format standards which define attention metadata.
The simplest example of such format is line-based format used by the Attention Recorder extension offered by Attention Trust.
This format captures a timestamped click stream with the user's browsing activity. The problem is that this format
is not rich enough to capture complex interactions like buying a book or renting a movie. The format needs to be extensible
to incorporate new kinds of objects. RDF is a natural choice but the challenge is to agree on specifics.
</p>

<h2>Conclusion</h2>

<p>The Attention Economy is an interesting, intriguing concept that remains a fairly elusive in reality.
To enable individuals to control the information which is currently locked in silos all over the web is a daunting and somewhat unapproachable task. Modern services like del.icio.us and Flickr recognize the importance
and the benefits of being good citizens and letting other services access their information, but
among older web players opening up this way is a taboo.</p>

<p>If the Attention Economy is ever going to happen, there needs to
be a strong organization forcing it along. The organization needs to drive a set of technical standards
and advocate the adoption both to the law makers and the businesses.</p>

<p> What do you think can be done?
Is global Attention Economy on the web important to us or can we do without out?</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2660-comment:21523</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2660" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/towards_the_attention_economy_opening_silos.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/towards_the_attention_economy_opening_silos.php#c21523" />
    <title>Comment from Chris Saad on 2007-07-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Chris Saad</name>
        <uri>http://www.particls.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.particls.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Alex the concept of capturing 'types' has been discussed in the APML workgroup and is still up for debate. The spec is still being worked on and, as I have mentioned to you before, you are always welcome to contribute!</p>

<p>Also, you may be interested that we launched an APML remixing service called Engagd.com - Engagd makes it possible to turn lifestreams and clickstreams (which are essentially Attention Data) into APML via a simple UI or API.</p>

<p>Engagd can also be used to filter/rank RSS feeds based on APML.</p>

<p>We plan on adding more web-services over time. And we encourage others to build their own APML support/services - it's an open standard for everyone.</p>

<p>Cluztr, iStalkr and Dandelife have already committed to supporting APML using the Engagd APIs</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-30T14:44:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2660-comment:21524</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2660" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/towards_the_attention_economy_opening_silos.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/towards_the_attention_economy_opening_silos.php#c21524" />
    <title>Comment from Josh Catone on 2007-07-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Josh Catone</name>
        <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I think I kind of disagree with this statement (or at least, the implied reasons for it):</p>

<blockquote><p>Clearly, in the case of the financial industry not being able to export information would be outrageous. So what is the difference between my bank and Amazon? Not much as far as I am concerned, since I transact with each and view each as a service.</p></blockquote>

<p>Unless it is mandated by law to allow portability of banking data (and it could be -- I really don't know), I think the only reason it would be outrageous if you couldn't is because that's how it is right now -- that's what you're used to.  I think exporting your personal data is a service that banks offer than has become an industry standard (i.e., all banks, or almost all banks, offer it).  On the other hand, in retail, no one offers that service.</p>

<p>I could be wrong, as I said, and it could be a mandate (rather than a service).  But otherwise, it is a service and not an obligation.  So the difference between the bank and Amazon is that in retail, exporting of personal data is not a standard service.  If an Amazon competitor (like Overstock) offered that service, you can bet they'd be more likely to follow suit.  Without mandate by law, though, as you point out, I am not convinced that would happen as most users aren't asking for it and it would be an added expense to offer (and it doesn't appear to the retailer that it would help their bottom line -- especially given that attention data gives them a competitive advantage, as you said... why share it unless it is required or users demand it or it is an industry standard practice?).</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-30T15:22:06Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2660-comment:21525</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2660" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/towards_the_attention_economy_opening_silos.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/towards_the_attention_economy_opening_silos.php#c21525" />
    <title>Comment from Sam Sethi on 2007-07-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Sam Sethi</name>
        <uri>http://www.blognation.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.blognation.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Hi Alex</p>

<p>Another good post but you fail to move the conversation on from last year.  In a SPIN model - you describe the "Situation" (attention economy), "Problem" (silo'd data) but don't really discuss the "Implications" (without portability of attention we will not get intelligent discovery), you do however touch on the "Need" for an open standard (APML). </p>

<p>As Chris Saad mentions, lifestream companies (aggregated attention capture) are beginning to break down the silos and the biggest lifestream application today is Facebook, although  it sadly doesn't support APML (or any internet standard for that matter).   </p>

<p>Using FB's new app platform I can aggregate my behaviour (twitter, plazes, skype, google reader, last fm etc) and broadcast that on my profile for my friends.  The aggregated mini-feed allows my friends to "manually" discover what I am doing,reading, listening to etc as it appears in their mini-feed within their profile. </p>

<p>Two things are therefore needed. </p>

<p>1. Firstly Facebook needs to partner/buy wunderLoop which takes profiled attention data and provides related advertising. The advertising on Facebook is contextual/demographic rather than behavioural based on the user which is pants. </p>

<p>2. An automated application needs to take all of this individual attention data from me and my friends and create a new list that shows what all of my friends are now doing in some order of priority and ranking.  This would become my discovery engine. i.e most the people I know and trust have listened to this track or watched that movie or bought that book.  That would probably influence me to do the same and then supported attentional advertising would help me decide where best to buy it from based on price, availability etc.</p>

<p>IMHO Social Networks are the first stage to discovery engines.  now if only we could get Facebook and others to store my attention in APML, I could even trade my APML to a trusted third party to find me alternatives outside of my own circle of friends. </p>

<p>The best example of this actually working is the Google Reader app in Facebook.  Try it and see how it shows which articles that I subscribe to have been read by my friends. If this now contained the implicit and explicit data about how long, what they rated it etc it would be a great attentional application. </p>

<p>Finally I agree the attention economy is coming it will take another few years. I am working on a little side project that combines Atom Publishing Protocol and APML.  i.e All of your Attention is stored in a SQLite "atom" store and entered via HTTP POST.  It could be queried via HTTP GET or QUERY and even content deleted (as it is yours) via HTTP DELETE.   </p>

<p>Only time will tell if FB, Google or Amazon etc will actually care about allowing users to share attention.  I am not holding my breadth given the fact that social networks won't allow us to share our social networks yet via XFN - thus forcing us to recreate them every time. (except Plaxo and/or Dopplr).</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-30T15:25:27Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2660-comment:21526</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2660" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/towards_the_attention_economy_opening_silos.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/towards_the_attention_economy_opening_silos.php#c21526" />
    <title>Comment from Joe Duck on 2007-07-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Joe Duck</name>
        <uri>http://joeduck.wordpress.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://joeduck.wordpress.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Alex this is an excellent article, though I'm skeptical of your conclusion that a powerful organization is the only hope to "force along" an Attention based economy.   Google probably holds the richest attention-based data and analyisis tools and it appears unlikely they'll do a lot to give users control of this.   Rather than trying to put the Attention genie back in the bottle or control it, I want to see *severe* legal remedies if this info is abused.   For example if a search engine sells somebody's data to a health insurer and they are denied coverage I think lawsuits are in order.  High and superior standards of privacy will quickly evolve from the commercial side if their deep pockets are at risk.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-30T16:03:57Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2660-comment:21527</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2660" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/towards_the_attention_economy_opening_silos.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/towards_the_attention_economy_opening_silos.php#c21527" />
    <title>Comment from Nitin on 2007-07-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Nitin</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>This is such an interesting take on such a simple thing.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-30T16:23:18Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2660-comment:21528</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2660" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/towards_the_attention_economy_opening_silos.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/towards_the_attention_economy_opening_silos.php#c21528" />
    <title>Comment from Vera on 2007-07-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Vera</name>
        <uri>http://verabass.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://verabass.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>An interesting topic. Some related thoughts from a non-tech consumer pov:</p>

<p>Statistics which are useful to a big business show overall growth or trends, and are usually drilled down primarily for better defining demographics and therefore informing marketing target and focus. Large quantities of statistical data compensate for all sorts of anomalies.</p>

<p>These large quantities of statistical data don't have the same meaning to us as individuals, and our personal data collection has a different meaning to them than it does to us also.</p>

<p>The proprietary attitude that most companies have is derived from relationship to their direct competition rather than to their customers.</p>

<p>Collection of these types of statistics is a fact of life today, and we can as easily be providing them by walking into Best Buy or Sears as by shopping on Amazon.</p>

<p>Large marketers, and even most long tail niche marketers who want to collect a deeper, richer database, do so with our consent and would probably be happier with the results if we improved their data by making it cleaner.</p>

<p>Your attention service model could possibly be conceived (from the human rather than programming structure pov) as a mutually beneficial structure. Participating online retailers and marketers could benefit from the exchange by, say, having some useful percentage of users better define their own data (they could also come up with things such as benefits from participating in surveys, etc.).</p>

<p>The storage model could also be conceived this way, although it seems to me unnecessarily more complicated in a number of ways, including allocating higher cost, more security issues, etc. Most (non-tech, anyway) people would be more comfortable with importing their personal info into a destop program with light and specific db function than with having it sent to a 3rd party 'entity'.</p>

<p>The way (imo) in which attaching dollar value to attention is being discussed is also sometimes confusing since it has come to include online advertising programs based on individual traffic and social medium. This is a new and different way of measuring and valuing traffic that is either in its infancy or a temporary construction.</p>

<p>When we spent most of our time on sites, and in groups or forums, with no advertising, we did not think about attaching any dollar value to that, other than perhaps in terms of its impact on the rest of our lives.</p>

<p>Vera</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-30T16:58:49Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2660-comment:21529</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2660" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/towards_the_attention_economy_opening_silos.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/towards_the_attention_economy_opening_silos.php#c21529" />
    <title>Comment from jose on 2007-07-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>jose</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>There should be also an organization taking care of the customer¬¥s privacy too, and a solid law to punish its infringement. It¬¥s a very complete article, full of info. Congratulations.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-30T21:22:04Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2660-comment:21530</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2660" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/towards_the_attention_economy_opening_silos.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/towards_the_attention_economy_opening_silos.php#c21530" />
    <title>Comment from Morgan on 2007-07-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Morgan</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Any laws or new organizations with enforcement power make it that much more difficult for new businesses to start, as there are new hurdles and new legal liabilities.</p>

<p>This 'problem' is exactly as important as there are people willing to make decisions based on its usage. As in, people that care about attention information portability (not me), should make their decisions based on their desires in a way that doesn't affect everyone else.</p>

<p>Lobbying businesses to include this kind of thing is fine. Lobbying for legislature is just cowardly. It says "I know no one really cares, and I don't care enough to pay a premium for this service, but I know better than everyone and I want it so everyone should share the costs of getting there." No thanks.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-30T23:05:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2660-comment:21531</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2660" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/towards_the_attention_economy_opening_silos.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/towards_the_attention_economy_opening_silos.php#c21531" />
    <title>Comment from Tom on 2007-07-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Tom</name>
        <uri>http://fedoralreserve.wordpress.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://fedoralreserve.wordpress.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>This is the future in big shiny flashy letters. So much becomes possible if you have your attention data. Discovery of content and people is just one thing that will happen when we leverage our data.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-30T23:15:57Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2660-comment:21532</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2660" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/towards_the_attention_economy_opening_silos.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/towards_the_attention_economy_opening_silos.php#c21532" />
    <title>Comment from Thomas Spicer on 2007-07-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Thomas Spicer</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I see what you are trying to discuss, but I think it is the language that you use that trips me up. If you premise the article with "attention economy" it might benefit from some discussion of the "economy" is rather than a sundry of concepts mashed up.</p>

<p>attention economy, attention information, attention trust attention silos...</p>

<p>One of the better, albiet confusing at times, writings on the subject is from the folks at bubblegeneration or liquidgeneration<br />
<a href="http://www.bubblegeneration.com" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.bubblegeneration.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.bubblegeneration.com</a></a></p>

<p>How they delve into the actual economic impacts of "attention" in an ever increasing digital world is one of the better POVs on I have read.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-31T02:55:01Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2660-comment:21533</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2660" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/towards_the_attention_economy_opening_silos.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/towards_the_attention_economy_opening_silos.php#c21533" />
    <title>Comment from Baskar S on 2007-07-31</title>
    <author>
        <name>Baskar S</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><br />
Hi Alex, </p>

<p>Interesting article. </p>

<p>I have been thinking on why this should be limited to the online world. A lot of commerce/interests lie offline too. Most of us buy groceries in brick-n-mortar stores, as well as experience sports in the stadium.</p>

<p>Covering all of the activities is key to get a comprehensive<br />
coverage. </p>

<p>I am not sure that law enforcement of any sort will work. <br />
We need consumers to clamour for this, and this will happen if they see benefits. So it should be driven by market forces of some sort.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-31T08:54:58Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2660-comment:21534</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2660" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/towards_the_attention_economy_opening_silos.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/towards_the_attention_economy_opening_silos.php#c21534" />
    <title>Comment from Joel on 2007-07-31</title>
    <author>
        <name>Joel</name>
        <uri>http://www.browserlessweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.browserlessweb.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I just want to quickly touch on something Vera said...I think that only for the concept of exporting and owning attention data to catch on is to show a direct benefit to businesses. I'm thinking of some kind of system where you build up one master "profile" based on a large variety of inputs and then make that profile available as an API to big companies like amazon and overstock so that they can show you products and send you alerts. You would benefit by eliminating noise and the retailers would benefit by increased sales from showing you products you're more likely to buy. There are of course major hurdles, ie convincing all of the retailers that the benefits are worth the cost and finding someone who could bring everyone together. But the opportunity exists and I think that sooner or later someone will take advantage of it.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-07-31T16:58:39Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2660-comment:21535</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2660" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/towards_the_attention_economy_opening_silos.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/towards_the_attention_economy_opening_silos.php#c21535" />
    <title>Comment from Chris Saad on 2007-08-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>Chris Saad</name>
        <uri>http://www.particls.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.particls.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@Joel </p>

<p>That's what Engagd.com does. It's an API for building Attention Profiles based on a variety of inputs and then for users to allow access to that profile.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-08-01T10:13:26Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2660-comment:21536</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2660" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/towards_the_attention_economy_opening_silos.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/towards_the_attention_economy_opening_silos.php#c21536" />
    <title>Comment from Jim Bursch on 2007-08-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jim Bursch</name>
        <uri>http://blog.mymindshare.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.mymindshare.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Over at MyMindshare.com, we treat attention as private property. Here is the My Mindshare 10-point Declaration -- just substitute mindshare with attention:</p>

<p>My Mindshare/Attention 10-Point Declaration</p>

<p>1. My mindshare/attention is mine.</p>

<p>2. My mindshare/attention has real monetary value.</p>

<p>3. I have a right sell, trade, or keep my mindshare/attention as I choose.</p>

<p>4. Nobody is entitled to take my mindshare/attention without my permission.</p>

<p>5. Unsolicited and intrusive advertising amounts to mindshare/attention theft.</p>

<p>6. Mindshare/attention theft is wrong.</p>

<p>7. I have a right to resist mindshare/attention theft.</p>

<p>8. I demand media that does not deal in stolen mindshare/attention.</p>

<p>9. I support media that respects my mindshare/attention.</p>

<p>10. The world is better when individuals control their mindshare/attention and their media.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-08-07T17:24:26Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>