<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_at_work_slacking_or_networking.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2008:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2778-</id>
  <updated>2008-07-02T20:20:26Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Facebook at Work - Slacking or Networking?</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.1</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2778</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_at_work_slacking_or_networking.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=2778" title="Facebook at Work - Slacking or Networking?" />
    <published>2007-08-22T20:03:31Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:07:53Z</updated>
    <title>Facebook at Work - Slacking or Networking?</title>
    <summary><![CDATA[Earlier this week a Sydney Morning Herald article claimed that Facebook &quot;may be costing Australian businesses $5 billion a year.&quot; The quote is from an analytics firm called SurfControl, in a report which calculated &quot;that if an employee spends an hour each day on Facebook, it costs the company more than $6200 a year. There...]]></summary>
    <author>
      <name>Richard MacManus</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Analysis" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/facebook-logo.jpg" align="left" hspace="5" vspace="5" />Earlier this week a <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2007/08/19/1187462087940.html">Sydney Morning Herald article</a> claimed that Facebook &quot;may be costing Australian businesses $5 billion a year.&quot; The quote is from an analytics firm called SurfControl, in a report which calculated &quot;that if an employee spends an hour each day on Facebook, it costs the company more than $6200 a year. There are about 800,000 workplaces in Australia.&quot; <b>Update:</b> CNET <a href="http://news.com.com/2100-1029_3-6203889.html">reports on a poll</a> where 43 percent of workers said that their employer blocks Facebook access completely.</p>
<p>I appeared on a breakfast business news TV show this morning, here in New Zealand, to discuss the SurfControl report. This post was written the night before, to get my thoughts together before going on the telly. Although in the end I only got to speak twice - and I barely touched on the main benefits of social networks in the workplace.</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/46/135691534_9dc5b1a257.jpg?v=0" /><br />
    <em><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/niallkennedy/135691534/">Image: Niall Kennedy</a></em></p>
<p>In response to the SurfControl report, others have already pointed out that you can make 'slacker calculations' about anything - email, IM, etc. And to be frank, yes employees can waste time on social networks (or blogs) while they're supposed to be working. </p>
<p>But let's look at the positive benefits of social networks. As the <a href="http://facereviews.com/2007/08/20/facebook-is-a-waste-of-time-aka-how-i-sell-my-web-control-product-fire/">Face Reviews site noted</a>, Facebook &quot;can actually make employees more efficient; streamline connections and communication, etc.&quot; It also points out that Facebook is fast becoming the ultimate aggregation platform and so arguably it is more time-efficient. Let's look at those points more closely...</p>
<h2>Facebook Work Apps Are Collaborative Tools</h2>
<p>Facebook actually has many work-related apps. Read/WriteWeb's Josh Catone wrote a post called <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/top_10_facebook_apps_work.php">Top 10 Facebook Apps: Work</a> in July, during R/WW's facebook Week. Josh noted that the Facebook platform has over 1800 apps - with the most popular ten applications reaching over 46 million users. To break it down more, there are about 1700 Facebook applications with over 100 users and about 800 with over 1000 users (source: Facebook).</p>
<p>The 10 Work apps that Josh covered included:</p>
<ul><li>To Do</li>
  <li>Email</li>
  <li>Calendar</li>
  <li>Online Office</li>
  <li>Online word processing</li>
  <li>Groupware</li>
</ul>
<p>All of the above are useful Facebook applications that can be aggregated onto the same page. Also, the best of these Work apps can provide <strong>collaborative benefits</strong> not available on desktop apps. For example, the <a href="http://apps.facebook.com/thirtyboxes/">30 Boxes calendar</a> app includes SMS reminders and a built-in to-do list function. You can also share upcoming events to your Facebook profile. </p>
<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/fb-calendar.jpg" /></p>
<p>A commenter on the above post pointed out that  the Zoho online office app on Facebook is a collaborative tool. You can work on Documents, Spreadsheets and Presentations, and then request collaborative feedback from a group in Facebook - more info on that <a href="http://scissormonkey.wordpress.com/2007/07/03/zoho-does-facebook-a-walk-through/">here</a>.</p>
<p>So, there are Facebook apps that can help you get some work done. Although let's be frank, this isn't the main reason you join a social network like Facebook. The main reason is to network with people.</p>
<h2>Groupware</h2>
<p>Networking with people usually means joining groups of like-minded people, or even just people with whom you share a common interest or cause. For example <a href="http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2767426144">Read/WriteWeb has its own group</a>, with over 800 members. Admittedly we haven't done much with the group yet, but we could use it to collaborate with our readers or provide regular messages.</p>
<p>Groups on Facebook let you network with your colleagues and business associates, which has many intangible benefits - it may even lead to new business. For example, being a tech publisher I'm part of the <a href="http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2575002400">The Semantic Web - Benefits, Education & Outreach</a> group and the <a href="http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2208499259">Web 2.0 (Entrepreneurs)</a> one.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p>Facebook <a href="http://static.ak.facebook.com/press/facebook_statistics.pdf">currently has</a> more than 31 million active users. While it started out as a college social network, the fastest growing demographic is those 25 years old and older - the working generation.</p>
<p>However the top 10 apps on Facebook indicate that it's still used as a social 'play' tool. The top 10 applications include: Top Friend, Graffiti, iLike, Fortune Cookie, Horoscopes, X Me, Video, SuperPoke!, Free Gifts, and Movies, all with more than 3 million users. </p>
<p>So clearly Facebook can, and certainly is, being used at least a little bit each day to 'waste time' at work. And companies are rightly concerned about limiting such use. Most corporates these days have an Internet use policy, to manage that. But let's not forget the positive benefits of Facebook at work - its aggregation of apps and people, the collaborative tools available, the groupware. </p>
<p>But more importantly -- social networks are part of our media climate these days, so looking at just the cons of them is missing the bigger picture. Facebook can and does have many networking benefits, that ultimately may help the bottom line. And if it doesn't, well give your employees a break - they are only human!</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2778-comment:22559</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2778" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_at_work_slacking_or_networking.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_at_work_slacking_or_networking.php#c22559" />
    <title>Comment from Con von Hoffman on 2007-08-22</title>
    <author>
        <name>Con von Hoffman</name>
        <uri>http://www.collateraldamage.biz</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.collateraldamage.biz">
        <![CDATA[<p>There's no story here. SurfControl's people managed to score a major PR success with a most questionable study. Sophos seems to have followed suit (my hats off to them for getting away with having so many outlets essentially re-write their press release). Does anyone really think Facebook, et al., are bigger time wasters than solitaire or everything else on the Web. The press fell for this one and should be ashamed of themselves. There's a longer critique of the coverage of these two stories at my blog collateraldamage.biz</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-08-22T20:34:51Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2778-comment:22560</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2778" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_at_work_slacking_or_networking.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_at_work_slacking_or_networking.php#c22560" />
    <title>Comment from Darren on 2007-08-22</title>
    <author>
        <name>Darren</name>
        <uri>http://darrenstuart.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://darrenstuart.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>lets face it this is SurfControl scaremongering to sell their filter services to business. </p>

<p>Its like a company that sells gags releasing a report that talking loses company X amount of revenue in a year and oh by the well we sell gags to stop it...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-08-22T20:46:04Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2778-comment:22561</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2778" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_at_work_slacking_or_networking.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_at_work_slacking_or_networking.php#c22561" />
    <title>Comment from Mario Sundar on 2007-08-22</title>
    <author>
        <name>Mario Sundar</name>
        <uri>http://blog.linkedin.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.linkedin.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>You may have heard of LinkedIn?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-08-22T23:00:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2778-comment:22562</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2778" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_at_work_slacking_or_networking.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_at_work_slacking_or_networking.php#c22562" />
    <title>Comment from Mario Sundar on 2007-08-22</title>
    <author>
        <name>Mario Sundar</name>
        <uri>http://blog.linkedin.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.linkedin.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>:) How did that happen? Here's the rest of the comment, Richard: </p>

<p>I'm a Facebook user myself and love to track my social activities (esp. movie reviews) on it. From the apps you pointed out my personal favorites are top friends and movies. </p>

<p>Personally though I like to keep the two (personal and professional) separate. However, sharing my to-do list w/ my friends sounds tempting :) </p>

<p>Thanks for an interesting post. BTW, I recently covered your SezWho app on my personal blog. Check it out here: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/3dup4b" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3dup4b" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/3dup4b</a></a></p>

<p>Disclosure: I'm LinkedIn's Community Evangelist. Feel free to let me know if you've any questions on LinkedIn.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-08-22T23:18:19Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2778-comment:22563</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2778" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_at_work_slacking_or_networking.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_at_work_slacking_or_networking.php#c22563" />
    <title>Comment from michael on 2007-08-22</title>
    <author>
        <name>michael</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>We live in a world where relationships are becoming increasingly fluid yet increadingly important - i think its crucial to encourage even personal networking in the workplace.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-08-23T02:48:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2778-comment:22564</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2778" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_at_work_slacking_or_networking.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_at_work_slacking_or_networking.php#c22564" />
    <title>Comment from Ray on 2007-08-22</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ray</name>
        <uri>http://virtureality.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://virtureality.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Are we in a production line building part number 47692FCKOF?</p>

<p>The right next thing to do is far more important than doing the same thing "more efficiently".</p>

<p>You're not going to make connections and discover new ways of doing things if you don't "waste time" in the traditional sense.</p>

<p>The real question should be: <br />
Did you lose productivity, or fall behind on innovating your way forward?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-08-23T03:00:18Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2778-comment:22565</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2778" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_at_work_slacking_or_networking.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_at_work_slacking_or_networking.php#c22565" />
    <title>Comment from Jamie Stephens on 2007-08-22</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jamie Stephens</name>
        <uri>http://www.blueroot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.blueroot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Funny enough, I did work for a company that asked me to construct a MySpace page for them for networking purposes on the same day they had MySpace and Facebook banned for all employees.  Seriously.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-08-23T04:43:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2778-comment:22566</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2778" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_at_work_slacking_or_networking.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_at_work_slacking_or_networking.php#c22566" />
    <title>Comment from Rex Dixon on 2007-08-22</title>
    <author>
        <name>Rex Dixon</name>
        <uri>http://rexduffdixon.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://rexduffdixon.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I think the funny thing is that I work for two companies that use Facebook as their bases of business! </p>

<p>Lending Club - you might have heard about them yesterday on their Series A round financing; the usual haunts.</p>

<p>Lookery - might have heard of them also; they were covered on the usual haunts. </p>

<p>Rex<br />
Director of Social Media Content, Lending Club<br />
Publisher Relations, Lookery</p>

<p>... Yup.. I have to use Facebook! hahahah... :)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-08-23T05:04:46Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2778-comment:22567</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2778" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_at_work_slacking_or_networking.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_at_work_slacking_or_networking.php#c22567" />
    <title>Comment from Omad on 2007-08-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Omad</name>
        <uri>http://omadsense.com/articles</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://omadsense.com/articles">
        <![CDATA[<p>It may be true, but the same can be said for all the internet. I know that I set up many of my marketing durine the work week hours becuase "employees" wrong or right spend a lot of time online during work hours.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-08-23T13:41:10Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2778-comment:22568</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2778" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_at_work_slacking_or_networking.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_at_work_slacking_or_networking.php#c22568" />
    <title>Comment from Rusty Weston on 2007-08-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Rusty Weston</name>
        <uri>http://www.myglobalcareer.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.myglobalcareer.com">
        <![CDATA[<p><br />
In a way Facebook reminds me of AOL in its heyday. Lots to do. Lots of people (including kids), groups, and innovations. You wouldn't call AOL business-y. I hope FB figures out a more elegant way for members to toggle between personal & professional. If they ask me, I have some suggestions for them (and for LI, too, Mario)! I blogged about this recently for Fast Company:<br />
<a href="http://blog.fastcompany.com/experts/rweston/2007/08/careers_misadventures_on_faceb.html" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://blog.fastcompany.com/experts/rweston/2007/08/careers_misadventures_on_faceb.html" rel="nofollow">http://blog.fastcompany.com/experts/rweston/2007/08/careers_misadventures_on_faceb.html</a></a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-08-23T22:29:25Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>