<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/groupware_20_collectivex_launches_groupsites.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2008:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2769-</id>
  <updated>2008-09-24T12:14:07Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Groupware 2.0 - CollectiveX Launches Groupsites</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.1</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2769</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/groupware_20_collectivex_launches_groupsites.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=2769" title="Groupware 2.0 - CollectiveX Launches Groupsites" />
    <published>2007-08-21T08:32:10Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:07:52Z</updated>
    <title>Groupware 2.0 - CollectiveX Launches Groupsites</title>
    <summary>Social networking startup CollectiveX has just launched a new product called Groupsites. TechCrunch has the details of Groupsites, noting that it&apos;s a combination of discussion forums, email lists, calendars and social networks. Groupsites are free to use and there are privacy options. Current use cases include membership groups and clubs, social networks, and company Intranets...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Richard MacManus</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Startups" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/collectivex_logo_aug07.jpg" align="left" hspace="5" vspace="5" />Social networking startup <a href="http://www.collectivex.com/">CollectiveX</a> has just launched a new product called Groupsites. <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/20/collectivex-launches-groupsites/">TechCrunch has the details</a> of Groupsites, noting that it's a combination of discussion forums, email lists, calendars and social networks. Groupsites are free to use and there are privacy options. Current use cases include membership groups and clubs, social networks, and company Intranets and workgroups. It's a wide-ranging and flexible product, but essentially it is a DIY social network - similar to services like Ning and PeopleAggregator that <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/battle_of_the_diy_social_networks.php">we profiled recently</a>. </p>
<p>It might seem like covering your bases to have a product that can be used in so many different ways - by consumers as social networks, by enterprises as workgroups, by clubs as a mix of both. But it reflects the trend of 'the consumerization of the Enterprise'. In the enterprise, social networks have come to be known as groupware. Ebrahim Ezzy wrote an excellent <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/groupware_primer.php">Groupware primer</a> for R/WW back in November. He defined groupware as &quot;applications that facilitate real-time communication, coordination and collaboration amongst groups of people.&quot; </p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>He then defined the term 'Social Groupware', meaning &quot;products [that] allow the creation of remotely hosted user-groups, special-interest groups - or any other group of like-minded people who share similar passions, interests and goals.&quot; Clearly CollectiveX is one of these types of products. But it has evolved from a product that used to focus only on private groups (most of them professional), to one where the audience is broader and a mix of consumer and enterprise. </p>
<p>I like where CollectiveX is headed, although I'll be interested to see if the product can effectively be branded as both enterprise and consumer. I don't know of many other products which try to cover both use cases, as they usually require difference features. Basecamp for example is a different beast than Facebook. Let us know what you think in the comments.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/collectivex_example.jpg" /></p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2769-comment:22486</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2769" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/groupware_20_collectivex_launches_groupsites.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/groupware_20_collectivex_launches_groupsites.php#c22486" />
    <title>Comment from social networking on 2007-08-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>social networking</name>
        <uri>http://www.zooped.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.zooped.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Have you reviewed <a href="http://www.zooped.com" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.zooped.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.zooped.com</a></a> social networking yet?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-08-21T12:33:55Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2769-comment:22487</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2769" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/groupware_20_collectivex_launches_groupsites.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/groupware_20_collectivex_launches_groupsites.php#c22487" />
    <title>Comment from Dr Wigglesworth on 2007-08-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>Dr Wigglesworth</name>
        <uri>http://www.cmvinc.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cmvinc.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>how is zooped.com relevant to collectivex? Zooped is a myspace knockoff based on some software developed in India. It's not even in the same league.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-08-21T14:43:48Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2769-comment:22488</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2769" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/groupware_20_collectivex_launches_groupsites.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/groupware_20_collectivex_launches_groupsites.php#c22488" />
    <title>Comment from R Walden on 2007-08-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>R Walden</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I don't know how it will scale to enterprise, but on a small group level, CollectiveX is as slick as it gets right now.  Not as many fancy toys as Ning or nexo, but far better functionality for collaboration and communication than either.</p>

<p>For a fan site I'd go nexo (or Wetpaint), for a group trying to get work done, CollectiveX rocks.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-08-21T23:01:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2769-comment:22489</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2769" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/groupware_20_collectivex_launches_groupsites.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/groupware_20_collectivex_launches_groupsites.php#c22489" />
    <title>Comment from Clarence on 2007-08-22</title>
    <author>
        <name>Clarence</name>
        <uri>http://www.collectivex.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.collectivex.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>One of our unique challenges at CollectiveX is balancing the open communication requirements of small groups using Groupsites with the privacy needs of large (less intimate) groups.  As well as the needs of social oriented groups (social networks) using Groupsites vs. the needs and requirements of professional oriented groups using Groupsites as (social groupware).  </p>

<p>Our ability to provide a single platform that powers Groupsites that are social and professional, large and small, private and public while maintaining the privacy of our users will determine how successful we ultimately become.</p>

<p>We're up for the challenge and look forward to the ride ahead.</p>

<p>Clarence Wooten<br />
Founder & CEO<br />
CollectiveX.com</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-08-22T07:14:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2769-comment:22490</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2769" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/groupware_20_collectivex_launches_groupsites.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/groupware_20_collectivex_launches_groupsites.php#c22490" />
    <title>Comment from Kjinco on 2007-09-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>Kjinco</name>
        <uri>http://familyfun.collectivex.com/main/summary</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://familyfun.collectivex.com/main/summary">
        <![CDATA[<p>I have two groupsites on CollectiveX, one social and one professional. I'm no tech-head and find the groupsites easy to manage and use. CollectiveX provides a flexible platform that my group memebers are not intimidated by. Since I am NOT a tech-head, I surely do not use all the features to their fullest capabilities, but it seems to be working for us as we tend to be the 'most active' social group on the network. Another bonus: the Cx team is extremely responsive when an issue arises and has suggestions or remedies within 48hours. </p>

<p>Kudos to Clarence and his team!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-09-02T14:45:46Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>