<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/spock_traffic_surges.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2008:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2766-</id>
  <updated>2008-07-02T20:20:30Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Spock Traffic Surges - Number 1 Mover on Alexa</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.1</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2766</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/spock_traffic_surges.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=2766" title="Spock Traffic Surges - Number 1 Mover on Alexa" />
    <published>2007-08-20T21:00:59Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:07:52Z</updated>
    <title>Spock Traffic Surges - Number 1 Mover on Alexa</title>
    <summary>Since launching a few weeks ago, the people search engine Spock is experiencing very heavy traffic - according to the company and also external measures like Alexa. Spock is currently rated number 1 on the Movers and Shakers page on Alexa. Other Alexa stats indicate that the site is experiencing good growth in France, Germany,...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Richard MacManus</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Startups" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/spock_logo.png" align="right" vspace="5"
hspace="5" />Since launching a few weeks ago, the people search engine <a href="http://www.spock.com">Spock</a> is experiencing very heavy traffic - according to the company and also external measures like Alexa.  Spock is currently rated number 1 on the <a href="http://www.alexa.com/site/ds/movers_shakers?lang=en">Movers and Shakers page on Alexa</a>. Other <a href="http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details?q=&url=http://www.spock.com">Alexa stats</a> indicate that the site is experiencing good growth in France, Germany, U.K. and Belguim - as well as the U.S. The site is just outside the top 1000 websites in Alexa, so it is still small in terms of other mainstream search engines. However for a brand new site, its growth must be encouraging to the founders and investors.</p>
<p>The company told us they had 1 million unique visitors at launch and &quot;a very strong engagement from users&quot; - averaging 10 search pages per visitor. Spock has  indexed 1.5 billion records to date and they say they're &quot;adding more every day&quot;. <s>The site gets around 20 billion search queries about people per month and</s> the company says it is positioning itself to dominate the people search space. </p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/spock_alexa.png" /></p>
<p>Spock eventually aims to &quot;index everyone in the world&quot;, although they admit that right now you need &quot;a presence on the web&quot; to be sure of being in the system - since Spock indexes information from public sources only.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/spock_vertical_search_done_right.php">Alex Iskold reviewed Spock</a> for Read/WriteWeb at the end of June and his conclusion was that &quot;Spock is fascinating because of its focus and leverage of semantics. Using tags as relationships and the feedback loop strike me as having great potential to grow a learning system organically, in the matter that learning systems evolve in nature. Most importantly, it is pragmatic and instantly useful.&quot;</p>
<p>I have to admit I was initially a skeptic about Spock, because in the beta phase it seemed to be filled with Silicon Valley insiders and nobody else. As of now the site seems a little more 'democratic' and <a href="http://www.spock.com/Richard-MacManus">even I have a profile on there</a>. However, there are still glitches in the system. I've now tried 3-4 times to &quot;claim my profile&quot; and every time I get this error:</p>
<blockquote>
  <p>&quot;Uh Oh</p>
  <p>Looks like we're having problems right now. Try coming back in a bit.&quot;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>That may be something to do with the heavy demand, but it needs addressing. Even so, congratulations to Spock on the successful launch.</p>
<p><b>Update:</b> Spock contacted me to say that the 20 billion monthly Spock searches number is incorrect. That is in fact the total available market. I've struck out that statement from the post.</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2766-comment:22440</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2766" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/spock_traffic_surges.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/spock_traffic_surges.php#c22440" />
    <title>Comment from Glen Barnes on 2007-08-20</title>
    <author>
        <name>Glen Barnes</name>
        <uri>http://www.devour.co.nz</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.devour.co.nz">
        <![CDATA[<p>The whole claiming profile this is rather bad. I had to email support and they merged my data for me. What I want to be able to do is simply select the networks I know I am a part of and type in my details. The more networks they support the better.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-08-20T22:31:55Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2766-comment:22441</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2766" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/spock_traffic_surges.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/spock_traffic_surges.php#c22441" />
    <title>Comment from BeachBum on 2007-08-20</title>
    <author>
        <name>BeachBum</name>
        <uri>http://one-penny-project.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://one-penny-project.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the info on Spock.  When I first saw this I thought it was going to be about Star Trek.  I will check them out, thanks.</p>

<p>BeachBum</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-08-20T23:25:51Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2766-comment:22442</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2766" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/spock_traffic_surges.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/spock_traffic_surges.php#c22442" />
    <title>Comment from Andy on 2007-08-20</title>
    <author>
        <name>Andy</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I hope this thing never gets me. Someone more well-known is on the page for my name, so with a bit of luck I'm safe. What if I don't want to be "indexed" and easily searchable by any muppet with a keyboard?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-08-21T00:53:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2766-comment:22443</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2766" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/spock_traffic_surges.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/spock_traffic_surges.php#c22443" />
    <title>Comment from AGronowski on 2007-08-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>AGronowski</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I guess the author of this story missed the part about checking back the next day to see that the Alexa rating had plunged. Precipitously. Down into noise levels. Seriously, basing this story on an ALEXA RATING?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-08-21T12:19:36Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2766-comment:22444</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2766" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/spock_traffic_surges.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/spock_traffic_surges.php#c22444" />
    <title>Comment from Financier on 2007-08-22</title>
    <author>
        <name>Financier</name>
        <uri>http://www.aggregatefinance.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.aggregatefinance.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I don't understand the benefits of this People search engine over Goolge simple search? What makes their platform so much better? I'm yet to be convinced.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-08-22T09:49:27Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2766-comment:22445</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2766" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/spock_traffic_surges.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/spock_traffic_surges.php#c22445" />
    <title>Comment from Omad on 2007-08-22</title>
    <author>
        <name>Omad</name>
        <uri>http://omadsense.com/articles</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://omadsense.com/articles">
        <![CDATA[<p>I went, I saw, I did not like. I agree with Financier- whats the benefit? I hate google and would use google over this Spock......</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-08-22T12:51:34Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>