<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/will_podcasting_survive.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2008:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2807-</id>
  <updated>2008-07-02T20:20:10Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Will Podcasting Survive?</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.1</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2807</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/will_podcasting_survive.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=2807" title="Will Podcasting Survive?" />
    <published>2007-08-28T17:02:36Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:07:55Z</updated>
    <title>Will Podcasting Survive?</title>
    <summary> digg_url = &apos;http://digg.com/tech_news/Will_Podcasting_Survive&apos;; digg_bgcolor = &apos;#ffffff&apos;; digg_skin = &apos;compact&apos;; Part of the Digestion Phase that we wrote about last week includes evaluating technology trends. We can identify a clear set of winners: online video and online photo are taking off, vertical search engines are making great progress, MySpace and Facebook are the new social...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Alex Iskold</name>
      <uri>http://www.adaptiveblue.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Analysis" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><font style="float: right"><script type="text/javascript">
digg_url = 'http://digg.com/tech_news/Will_Podcasting_Survive';
digg_bgcolor = '#ffffff';
digg_skin = 'compact';
</script>
<script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript"></script></font>
<img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/podcasting-icon.jpg" vspace="5" hspace="5" align='left' width="150"> Part of the <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_digestion_phase_how_we_got.php">Digestion Phase</a>
that we wrote about last week includes evaluating technology trends. We can identify a clear
set of winners: online video and online photo are taking off, vertical search engines are making great progress, MySpace and
Facebook are the new social phenomenon, etc. But not everything we have recently invented is working out.
</p>

<p>I remember being in a cab in New York City listening to John Furier's podcast coverage of DEMO 2006 and thinking it was nothing short of inspiring. Later that year when my company launched its own product at DEMOFall,
it was even more inspirational to be interviewed by John. So when I saw the news a few days ago that <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/16/watching-technorati-and-podtech-fall-apart/">John leaving PodTech</a>, I was particularly sad. Certainly things were complicated and the company was in trouble,
but the reason it was upsetting to me is because John is one of the major figures behind the podcasting movement.</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>PodTech has been doing much more than just podcasting, of course, but John's departure leads to a question: What is going on
with podcasting in general? We certainly no longer hear about it as much as we did in the past. Is it because it simply became part of
our culture that we take for granted? Unlikely. It seems that podcasting has not really made it into our daily lives.
In this post we look at podcasting and try to decipher why it never got big.</p>

<h2>Podcasts As An Evolution of Radio</h2>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/podcasting-evolution.jpg" vspace="5" hspace="5"></p>

<p>The original idea of a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Podcast">podcast</a> was simple. Take the an audio broadcast (radio), let everyone do it (user generated)
and then throw it on top of RSS to let people consume the content on demand. Unlike the radio, which is programmed, limited
and sequential, podcasts are rich and can be consumed whenever people like. Technically anyone with a decent
microphone, a computer, and recording software can create a podcast. And since broadband is now widespread,
consuming large audio files over the web is no longer an issue. So when podcasting came onto the scene in 2004 it made a lot of
sense to many people and quickly became popular.</p>

<h2>A Look At Podcasting As A Trend</h2>

<p>But recently there seems to have been a decrease in enthusiasm over podcasts. Before we look into the reasons why,
lets take a look at these three trend graphs below and draw a couple of conclusions from them. The <strong>podcast</strong> trend appears to have stagnated, while
<strong>podcasting</strong> has just been going out of fashion at a steady clip. Podcasting as a trend seems to be
by far less popular than <strong>blog</strong> and <strong>video</strong> (although to be fair, video
may include more than online video).</p>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/podcast-trends1.jpg" vspace="5" hspace="5" width="530px"></p>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/podcast-trends2.jpg" vspace="5" hspace="5" width="530px"></p>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/podcast-trends3.jpg" vspace="5" hspace="5" width="530px"></p>

<h2>Why Podcasting Is Stagnating</h2>

<p><strong>Competition with Video and Blogs</strong></p>

<p>The first trouble for podcasts is that they compete with online video and blogs. Videos are cooler, shorter, can be consumed
on demand, and satisfy multiple senses.  Podcasts, on the other hand, are something you need to specifically listen to.
They typically consist of a discussion you need to be able to focus on to follow. As a result, podcasts can't really compete with music, which is something that many of us can enjoy while working.
</p>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/podcasting-blogposts.jpg" vspace="5" hspace="5" width="530px"></p>

<p>Blogs are also a threat, because people spend a lot of time reading them. Blogs and podcasts require different
levels of concentration. We can skim through blogs, but its harder to skim through podcasts. We are used to reading
web pages, but listening to a lengthy discussion without a visual is not something that we're used to on the web.
Most radio content is music or news, so the content
itself and the format in which podcasts are delivered presents an adoption challenge.</p>

<p><strong>Limited Applicability</strong></p>

<p>The attention that podcasts demand presents another problem. When can we listen to them? It seems that the most natural
place would be while commuting, instead of listening to the radio. The only barrier there is that content producers need to keep
the content up to date. This isn't a big barrier, because the updates happen automatically. So this works - we listen to
podcasts while commuting or traveling. That is, however, a rather specific and limited time and perhaps not a large enough window of attention to allow podcasts to flourish. And revisiting the content issue,
when we are coming home from work, do we really want to listen to a sophisticated discussion? Maybe not.
</p>

<p><strong>Monetization is a Challenge</strong></p>

<p>As with any new medium there needs to be a path to revenue. Podcasts must rely on advertising to make money since it is very unlikely that many people would pay for them. The difficulty is measuring reach. Of course,
you can argue that consumption can be tracked through RSS subscriptions, but RSS measurement is a very inexact science and further, may not be
as appealing to advertisers who are likely to be biased toward web ads.</p>

<p>Another issue
is when to inject advertising in the podcast itself. Podcasters catering to a sophisticated early adopter audience that
might get quickly annoyed if presented with many irrelevant ads. The only model that appears to have worked well thus far is sponsorship, but how much money can be made this way?</p>

<p><strong>Competition From Big Media</strong></p>

<p>The last problem may be delivering the final blow to podcasting -- competition from big media companies.
They all quickly figured out that recycling their audio content into podcasts is cheap and easy. So many of them have done just that.
NPR, CNN, and National Geographic, for example, make their content available as podcasts. Looking at what is
popular on iTunes we see very few independently produced podcasts, but rather a top downloads page that is dominated by the pros:</p>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/top-podcasts.jpg" vspace="5" hspace="5" width="530px"></p>

<h2>Conclusion</h2>

<p>It appears that podcasts are not picking up steam, and rather, podcasting is actually slowing down.
There is not enough incentive for people to jump exclusively into podcasting because of tight competition
from video, blogs, big media and a lack of clear monetization methods. However, it does not mean that
podcasts are not here to stay.</p>
 
<p>One great thing that we already received from the podcasting revolution is choice. Media companies
were forced to micro chunk and give us their content on our terms. We now can consume it in whatever way that we prefer, whenever we
want it.</p>

<p>And even though podcasting is not likely to become as popular as user generated video, we
were lucky to get a generation of people who emerged as outstanding podcasters: <a href="http://www.calacanis.com/category/podcast/">Jason Calacanis</a>,
<a href="http://ambermac.typepad.com/">Amber Mac</a> and of course, <a href="http://podtech.wordpress.com/">John Furrier</a>. No matter
what happens next with podcasting, what has been done is already important. Not necessarily in a huge way, but in a meaningful way.
</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2807-comment:22826</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2807" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/will_podcasting_survive.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/will_podcasting_survive.php#c22826" />
    <title>Comment from Liquid Soap on 2007-08-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>Liquid Soap</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Personally, the commercial podcasts, with the exception of those which are little more than ads are more than welcome as they come on a regular basis and usually have quality content.Most of the podcasts in my podcatcher are commercial.I think that while people have content hungry mp3 players a limited supply of funds to buy music, podcasts will have a market.Also,do people more search for podcasts on google or within their podcatcher? Perhaps it would be better to look at download statistics?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-08-28T17:50:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2807-comment:22827</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2807" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/will_podcasting_survive.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/will_podcasting_survive.php#c22827" />
    <title>Comment from Jughead on 2007-08-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jughead</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>To say that podcasting is dead is jumping the gun in my opinion. With so many new innovations occuring simultaneously (online video, widgets, twitter, tagging, etc) it is a bit overwhelming for even the technological enthisiast. The mass of slightly less technical folks are just now learning what podcasts are and how they work. </p>

<p>I also don't agree that big media is going to hurt podcasting. To the contrary, I believe it will educate the masses and lead to further exploration once they are comfortable with how the technology operates and the inherent benefits of mobility, time-shifting etc. </p>

<p>For example, the other night I saw a plug on TV by the show "Damages" to download and listen to their podcast as well as record your own short podcast for the cast to listen to and respond to. This also includes brief visuals on where to find the podcast link on the website. This televised message of the promotional power of podcasting is powerful, informative and real. And it's the tip iceberg of the big media exploitation of podcasts.</p>

<p>As far as being relinquished to a commuting medium, that is essentially the only time that radio dominates these days. And last time I checked, worldwide radio is a billion dollar industry. Podcasting is poised to take a significant chunk of that advertising away. It won't be easy growth for podcasting. It will just take some time. </p>

<p>Don't nail the coffin shut just yet.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-08-28T18:32:50Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2807-comment:22828</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2807" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/will_podcasting_survive.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/will_podcasting_survive.php#c22828" />
    <title>Comment from Tim McCormack on 2007-08-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>Tim McCormack</name>
        <uri>http://www.iRent2u.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.iRent2u.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Amara's law states that we tend to overestimate the effect of a technology in the short run and underestimate the effect in the long run.</p>

<p>Podcasting is not only here to stay, but will have a major impact on the world much larger than you envision. Personally I see podcasting going through a phase equivalent to "Crossing the Chasm". It is moving from innovators to the early majority, but it is a tough move. It grew extremely rapidly to begin with, and it takes some time for people to find out what great content is available. Everyone I have introduced to podcasting has been as blown away as I am by the incredible content that is available.</p>

<p>Unless you envision people starting to commute less (a dream, a nice one - but a dream) people will be looking for ways to turn their wasted commute time into something both pleasurable and productive. There is no easier, cheaper, and better way to do this than to listen to podcasts.</p>

<p>I learned more in two years of commuting to my MBA program and listening to podcasts than I probably did in my classes.  Anyone who isn't listening should be. I strongly recommend "The Entrepreneurial Thought Leader Seminar Series" from Stanford, and "The Churchill Club". Both are top notch and beyond price - yet they are free!</p>

<p>Tim McCormack<br />
iRent2u.com - the Online Rental Marketplace</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-08-28T18:38:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2807-comment:22829</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2807" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/will_podcasting_survive.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/will_podcasting_survive.php#c22829" />
    <title>Comment from rick gregory on 2007-08-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>rick gregory</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Alex, </p>

<p>One more thing that's a challenge - discovery. The big media names have a built-in audience, but the small independent does not. They may have better content, but it's not easy to discover them. Much of that happens when you hear of them via a blog link, a mention somewhere, etc. </p>

<p>That said, I wonder if podcasts will become the new radio in the sense that we seem to be moving toward a world where people want to control what they see and hear and when they see and hear it. Certainly public radio could use this method to encourage donations - donate and get access to your shows without the annoying pledge pitches in them. Whether on demand consumption of video and audio can work this way and make money is an open issue. </p>

<p>The commute time issue IS, despite Tim's comment above, a real issue. Everyone has a radio in their car - most do not have MP3 players and most of those have no easy way to download podcasts to them. That may change, probably will... but it will only change that the rate at the rate of new car purchases weighted by how many come with such a technology in them and modifed by some small percentage of people who retrofit their existing auto. Mass transit commuters are a better bet - but I wonder how many people want to listen to serious content on their commute with regularity.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-08-28T19:10:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2807-comment:22830</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2807" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/will_podcasting_survive.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/will_podcasting_survive.php#c22830" />
    <title>Comment from Jon Silvers on 2007-08-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jon Silvers</name>
        <uri>http://blogbitesman.net</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogbitesman.net">
        <![CDATA[<p>I agree with Liquid Soap (above) that the professional podcasters have the better content. I would be happy to listen to amateur podcasts if they were produced as well and contained quality content. My top 5 podcast picks are almost all created by the professionals, <a href="http://blogbitesman.net/2007/03/12/my-top-5-podcast-picks." rel="nofollow"><a href="http://blogbitesman.net/2007/03/12/my-top-5-podcast-picks." rel="nofollow">http://blogbitesman.net/2007/03/12/my-top-5-podcast-picks.</a></a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-08-28T19:53:27Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2807-comment:22831</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2807" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/will_podcasting_survive.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/will_podcasting_survive.php#c22831" />
    <title>Comment from Eytan on 2007-08-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>Eytan</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>As an iPod user for 5 years now, I rarely used Podcasts. I was/am an NPR junkie, and as soon as the radio attachment for the iPod was available, I snatched that up.<br />
But on June 29th, I got an iPhone - and the Radio attachment did not work. So how was I to get my NPR news?<br />
Well, I decided to give Podcasts another try, and for the first time, because I was FORCED into synchronization, realized the power of autoupdates and the transfer of bookmarks between the device and the computer. My whole usage pattern has changed, and now I take my news shows with me on the way to work every day.<br />
I don't know about other people, but I know I could not live anymore WITHOUT podcasts....</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-08-28T19:56:56Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2807-comment:22832</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2807" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/will_podcasting_survive.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/will_podcasting_survive.php#c22832" />
    <title>Comment from Manoj on 2007-08-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>Manoj</name>
        <uri>http://www.blogbard.com/blog/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.blogbard.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Thanks Alex for a very insightful post.</p>

<p>"Technically anyone with a decent microphone, a computer, and recording software can create a podcast. "</p>

<p>==> While this may be true for professional podcasters, this is not really true for those who do it as a hobby. An unprofessional recording almost invariably ends up with a lot of background noise and artifacts, which a professional recorded podcast from multimedia biggies like CNN don't have. <br />
Another important point to note about podcasts is the quality of voice. Even if the technical issues regarding audio recording are somehow taken care of, not every blogger  can match "Anderson Cooper of CNN's" voice quality and intonation.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-08-28T21:23:56Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2807-comment:22833</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2807" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/will_podcasting_survive.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/will_podcasting_survive.php#c22833" />
    <title>Comment from rod / techfold.com on 2007-08-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>rod / techfold.com</name>
        <uri>http://techfold.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://techfold.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Two usage scenarios for media:</p>

<p>Business/SeriousStuff: Podcasting is a horrendous way to transmit serious information - its unparseable without sitting through it in realtime.</p>

<p>Entertainment: There are so many other options with equal marginal benefit (entertainment value) that require less effort. Compare turning on your car radio to (i) finding, (ii) subscribing, (iii) synchronizing, (iv) connecting ipod to car radio, (v) finding & starting desired podcast.</p>

<p>IMHO podcasting was a nerdgasm hype flare up. I'm sure it will continue to have a dedicated but small audience. Compare it to SecondLife.</p>

<p>In any event - good examination!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-08-28T21:24:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2807-comment:22834</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2807" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/will_podcasting_survive.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/will_podcasting_survive.php#c22834" />
    <title>Comment from Daniel on 2007-08-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>Daniel</name>
        <uri>http://www.daniels.net.nz</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.daniels.net.nz">
        <![CDATA[<p><em>They typically consist of a discussion you need to be able to focus on to follow. As a result, podcasts can't really compete with music, which is something that many of us can enjoy while working.</em></p>

<p>I was just thinking about this last night. Podcasts are great, sure, but you have to pay attention to them. When I was a podcast listener (not anymore because of this), I would put on a podcast, listen for a little while get a little edgy cause I'm not doing anything else (or the conversation is a little boring). So I go onto something that I should've done a while ago, but then I become focused on that and lose track of the podcast. I then snap out of it when they all laugh on the podcast or something, so I backtrack to see what was so funny. It goes like this until the podcast ends.</p>

<p>Vlogs on the other hand I don't mind sitting back and watching, I guess because our eyes are getting some visual stimulation too. I greatly prefer Diggnation the video rather than Diggnation the podcast now and of course you can actually see what these guys are talking about.</p>

<p>The other thing I see a problem with is software. There is no good usable podcatchers outside of iTunes. They all have these little, annoying quirks. For example, Juice would sometimes stop downloading for no reason so you have to download it again, or DopplerRadio is still in beta so still has these randomly annoying bugs. Apple are the only ones who have successfully integrated podcasts into their media player, but some are still to try (Windows Media Player) or dumb it down and lost the essence of it (Winamp).</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-08-29T02:33:56Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2807-comment:22835</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2807" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/will_podcasting_survive.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/will_podcasting_survive.php#c22835" />
    <title>Comment from Jared on 2007-08-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jared</name>
        <uri>http://redcact.us</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://redcact.us">
        <![CDATA[<p><i>"One great thing that we already received from the podcasting revolution is choice. Media companies were forced to micro chunk and give us their content on our terms. We now can consume it in whatever way that we prefer, whenever we want it."</i></p>

<p>The method of content distribution that came from podcasting is an important result. No longer do big broadcasters monopolize the airwaves. It has created a more level playing field for big media and the little guys to compete on. </p>

<p>I personally see this means of distribution playing in favor of smaller 'netcasting' companies like Twit.tv because they produce content whose quality is closer on par with larger broadcasters. But who's to say some dude in his mom's basement, speaking into a can can't create interesting, entertaining and insightful content?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-08-29T05:13:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2807-comment:22836</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2807" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/will_podcasting_survive.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/will_podcasting_survive.php#c22836" />
    <title>Comment from Roy Osherove on 2007-08-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Roy Osherove</name>
        <uri>http://CommunityHacker.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://CommunityHacker.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Why is it that trackbacks to this blog post do not appear in this page? is this deliberate? I blogged and refereced the article as well as used the trackback URL and nothing.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-08-29T08:44:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2807-comment:22837</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2807" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/will_podcasting_survive.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/will_podcasting_survive.php#c22837" />
    <title>Comment from Dan on 2007-08-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Dan</name>
        <uri>http://pacificpelican.us</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://pacificpelican.us">
        <![CDATA[<p>Lots of the tech podcasts are really, really boring.  I think that might be part of the problem.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-08-29T11:45:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2807-comment:22838</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2807" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/will_podcasting_survive.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/will_podcasting_survive.php#c22838" />
    <title>Comment from Doug Taylor on 2007-08-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Doug Taylor</name>
        <uri>http://podcastpeople.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://podcastpeople.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Alex,</p>

<p>I agree with some of your points, but the fact of the matter is that podcasts can contain audio or video. The conception that poadcasting is an audio only technology stems only from it's humble roots, but it is truly just a distribution mechanism for content of any kind. See our counter post at <a href="http://blogbitesman.net/2007/03/12/my-top-5-podcast-picks" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://blogbitesman.net/2007/03/12/my-top-5-podcast-picks" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://blogbitesman.net/2007/03/12/my-top-5-podcast-picks" rel="nofollow">http://blogbitesman.net/2007/03/12/my-top-5-podcast-picks</a></a></a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-08-29T16:30:55Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2807-comment:22839</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2807" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/will_podcasting_survive.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/will_podcasting_survive.php#c22839" />
    <title>Comment from Whitney on 2007-08-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Whitney</name>
        <uri>http://www.ldpodcast.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.ldpodcast.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Podcasting seems simple enough- pick a topic, sit in front of a mic and hit record, right?  It's a little more complicated than that if you want to have a show that has legs and will live a while.  </p>

<p>I think there are people who started out in podcasting, but quickly found out that editing your own audio, doing search engine optimization, and treating it like a job takes time. </p>

<p>There are going to be shows that fade out, and that can lead to a false assumption that podcasting is dying.  And there are going to be traditional broadcasters that go into podcasting because it it simply repurposing content.  I would argue they already have an audience and good production values- of course those will be instant wins.</p>

<p> TV and Radio were not immediately adopted the first day they hit the market; Podcasting is still in its beginning.<br />
The great thing is traditional media can't cover all the topics we're interested in; niche topics abound and grow their own audience.</p>

<p>Podcasting is far from dead; it may not be as shiny new anymore,; but those still in the space are more experienced and are working towards higher quality- and even better, no one has to ask for permission to be "good enough:.  Your own energy and determination will determine whether you will get the success you wish.  Or not.</p>

<p>I for one, won't be quitting any time soon.</p>

<p>And all you have to do is look at the phenomenal growth of Podcamp to understand that interest is still climbing, not declining.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-08-29T21:02:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2807-comment:22840</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2807" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/will_podcasting_survive.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/will_podcasting_survive.php#c22840" />
    <title>Comment from x on 2007-08-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>x</name>
        <uri>http://www.whuffie.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.whuffie.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Podcasts and radio will merge. Radio is just a slow bureaucratic machine. Podcast like audio books will always have a niche market. I agree video is HUGE. But one doesn't need me for that, eh?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-08-29T23:05:10Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2807-comment:22841</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2807" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/will_podcasting_survive.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/will_podcasting_survive.php#c22841" />
    <title>Comment from Ryan on 2007-08-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ryan</name>
        <uri>http://mediatrending.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://mediatrending.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I think the reach of podcasting will require true audio portability in the form of iPod docks as standard features in cars. There's just too much to compete with podcasts: AM/FM, sat radio, audio books, and music to say nothing of video/web. </p>

<p>The closest equivalent medium from my standpoint is audio books (i.e., Audible.com). Most audio book fanatics I know (myself included) listen to them in the car during a commute. That's a very limited space to compete in. People are on the web all day for work (or at school) and watching short video clips are much more easily consumed as a diversion.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-08-30T13:21:30Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2807-comment:22842</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2807" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/will_podcasting_survive.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/will_podcasting_survive.php#c22842" />
    <title>Comment from Leesa Barnes on 2007-08-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Leesa Barnes</name>
        <uri>http://www.leesabarnes.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.leesabarnes.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Where do I begin?</p>

<p>1. Podcasting is not radio. Podcasting is not a format, it's a delivery method, plain and simple.</p>

<p>2. Monetization is a challenge because people focus on advertising and sponsorship as the sole means to make money with a podcast. I just finishing a 400-page book on how to make money podcasting. And not an ebook, a real book. And there's only 1 chapter on advertising and sponsorship. So, unless I'm out to lunch, there are tons of ways to make money with a podcast.</p>

<p>3. As Doug said earlier, podcasts are either audio or video. So, podcasting can't compete with video because it is video (or audio). So, let's get that straight, please.</p>

<p>So many other points, but my comment will turn into an epic. I'll just blog about my thoughts and link back to you.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-08-30T15:06:51Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2807-comment:22843</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2807" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/will_podcasting_survive.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/will_podcasting_survive.php#c22843" />
    <title>Comment from John C. Havens on 2007-08-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>John C. Havens</name>
        <uri>http://www.blogtalkradio.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.blogtalkradio.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Great post with lots of good, specific insights. </p>

<p>That said, as Leesa Barnes pointed out, people need to stop thinking of podcasts as their own paradigm.  Podcasting is a distribution method that allows your listeners to subscribe to audio/video via RSS.  NPR has podcasts of shows you hear on terrestrial radio.  IBM has internal podcasts for their sales force.  Microsoft just launched a great internal podcast platform called Academy Mobile for their 70,000+ work force.  </p>

<p>All due respect, it doesn't make a difference what anyone feels about podcasting, and I tire of the "video is better than audio" conversation.  They are different.  Where can I not engage in video?  When I drive or when I surf online.  Stats show that most people click on audio podcast content and then minimize while they surf.  You can do this with videos if the audio is the main component.  </p>

<p>There is also a huge amount of podcasting (audio and video)in the educational realm.  Plus there are other companies besides Podshow offering great content who are/will be monetizing via interstitial ads.  Plus sponsorships where hosts read messages.  </p>

<p>I think it's more accurate to say interest has not waned in podcasting, but people are waiting to see how the monetization side of things will really kick in three to six months from now.  Audio and video wise, podcasting is here to stay.  Period.  Individuals and companies who don't make it part of their marketing arsenal are as behind the times as those who don't have a website are today.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-08-30T17:23:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2807-comment:22844</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2807" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/will_podcasting_survive.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/will_podcasting_survive.php#c22844" />
    <title>Comment from Andrew Terry on 2007-08-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Andrew Terry</name>
        <uri>http://andrewterry.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://andrewterry.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>An interesting article, but I don't agree that:<br />
<i>Videos are cooler, shorter, can be consumed on demand, and satisfy multiple senses. Podcasts, on the other hand, are something you need to specifically listen to. They typically consist of a discussion you need to be able to focus on to follow.</i><br />
I listen to a number of podcasts, some of which could be described as both cool <i>and</i> short. In addition, podcasts are something that fits easily into our multi-tasked world. I listen to podcasts during my daily commute, while running or cleaning, or cooking whereas the nature of video requires that I give it my full attention.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-08-30T20:39:16Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2807-comment:22845</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2807" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/will_podcasting_survive.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/will_podcasting_survive.php#c22845" />
    <title>Comment from James Lewin on 2007-08-31</title>
    <author>
        <name>James Lewin</name>
        <uri>http://www.podcastingnews.com/2007/08/31/readwrite-web-podcasting-trouble-fortunately-clueless/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.podcastingnews.com/2007/08/31/readwrite-web-podcasting-trouble-fortunately-clueless/">
        <![CDATA[<p>This article is spectacularly bad. </p>

<p>Here's an alternate view on this topic:<br />
<a href="http://www.podcastingnews.com/2007/08/31/readwrite-web-podcasting-trouble-fortunately-clueless/" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.podcastingnews.com/2007/08/31/readwrite-web-podcasting-trouble-fortunately-clueless/" rel="nofollow">http://www.podcastingnews.com/2007/08/31/readwrite-web-podcasting-trouble-fortunately-clueless/</a></a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-08-31T14:41:47Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2807-comment:22846</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2807" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/will_podcasting_survive.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/will_podcasting_survive.php#c22846" />
    <title>Comment from Will Stewart on 2007-08-31</title>
    <author>
        <name>Will Stewart</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><br />
A very interesting article, but you should be aware that many of your readers are from the UK where radio is no longer programmed or sequential. With the BBC's playback service we can now listen to public broadcasts anytime within 7 days of the original broadcast. </p>

<p>Very little of what the BBC broadcasts could be described as limited, either in terms of content or quality.</p>

<p>With BBC radio we are talking quality not US radio.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-08-31T15:35:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2807-comment:22847</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2807" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/will_podcasting_survive.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/will_podcasting_survive.php#c22847" />
    <title>Comment from Rob Safuto on 2007-08-31</title>
    <author>
        <name>Rob Safuto</name>
        <uri>http://www.rawvoice.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.rawvoice.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>You've made good conclusions from bad data. You are determining the growth of podcasting based on google searches on the word and by iTunes featured shows. These things have little to do with podcasting growth.</p>

<p>Look a little deeper and you will see that event activity around podcasting has increased exponentially in the last year. More than sixteen PodCamp events this year while there were only two last year. A three day expo while last year it was only two days and in a smaller hall.</p>

<p>And lets talk numbers of shows. We're seeing many new shows hitting our communities. I believe that the number of independently produced shows over the last year have at least doubled. That's hardly dying.</p>

<p>Finally, since when do video shows not qualify as podcasts? All of our communities support both audio and video podcasts. We see that there is a strong demand for both audio and video shows. So growth in video means growth in podcasting as a medium.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-08-31T20:42:10Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2807-comment:22848</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2807" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/will_podcasting_survive.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/will_podcasting_survive.php#c22848" />
    <title>Comment from Todd Cochrane on 2007-08-31</title>
    <author>
        <name>Todd Cochrane</name>
        <uri>http://www.rawvoice.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.rawvoice.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Will Podcasting Survive is a very funny byline and completely without merit. As all know I am heavily vested in the space and watch the medium on a day to day basis. </p>

<p>We work with media buyers, podcasters, and companies getting there message delivered by podcast. The space continues to grow and great deal of money is being poured into it by advertisers as well.</p>

<p>Shows continue to grow in audience size each month and we see more content coming online. Having worked the advertising side for a couple of years now, we see a lot more money being invested because companies are waking up to the ROI potential.</p>

<p>While some people want content that is of high production value I relish in the fact that people can pick up a microphone and reach 100's of thousands of people if they choose and their is nothing big media can do about it.</p>

<p>While pundits are looking for the next big thing and posers are starting to stick there nose in the space those of us that work the medium everyday know what the medium is delivering and what the future potential is.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-08-31T22:25:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2807-comment:22849</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2807" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/will_podcasting_survive.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/will_podcasting_survive.php#c22849" />
    <title>Comment from Kurt Kragh S√∏rensen - IntraTeam A/S on 2007-09-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>Kurt Kragh S√∏rensen - IntraTeam A/S</name>
        <uri>http://www.IntraTeam.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.IntraTeam.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I started listening to podcast in June this year and I get a lot of good information that way. I listen to <a href="http://www.forimmediaterelease.biz/" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.forimmediaterelease.biz/" rel="nofollow">http://www.forimmediaterelease.biz/</a></a> for an hour twice a week. I listen to it when I drive, travel og paint windows etc. That's where I cannot watch TV or video.</p>

<p>I see podcast as a good alternative to reading.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-09-01T19:55:13Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>