<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/delicious_preview_next_gen_search.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2008:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2855-</id>
  <updated>2008-09-24T12:13:12Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Delicious Preview - Next Gen Search For Yahoo?</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.1</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2855</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/delicious_preview_next_gen_search.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=2855" title="Delicious Preview - Next Gen Search For Yahoo?" />
    <published>2007-09-07T12:59:23Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:07:58Z</updated>
    <title>Delicious Preview - Next Gen Search For Yahoo?</title>
    <summary>A new version of Delicious (sans dots) was released as a private preview today. I got an invite and have been poking around. Techcrunch got the exclusive on the story, so they have a full review up. But in my initial quick tests, a couple of features immediately stood out for me. We&apos;ve written a...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Richard MacManus</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="News" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/delicious_logo_sept07.png" align="left" hspace="5" vspace="5" />A new version of <a href="http://preview.delicious.com/">Delicious</a> (sans dots) was released as a private preview today. I got an invite and have been poking around. Techcrunch got the exclusive on the story, so they have a <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/exclusive-screen-shots-and-feature-overview-of-delicious-20-preview/">full review up</a>. But in my initial quick tests, a couple of features immediately stood out for me. We've written a number of times before on Read/WriteWeb about how del.icio.us, sorry Delicious, can be used as a very effective <strong>search engine</strong>. Likewise, Alex Iskold has also written before about Delicious as <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/recommendation_engines.php">a recommendation system</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
  <p>&quot;...the del.icio.us approach holds intriguing possibilities of self-organizing classification and recommendation systems. With enough users and more tweaking, social tagging can result in a system that works equally well for books, wine and music.&quot;</p>
</blockquote>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>In another post, Alex <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/how_social_sites_reveal_audience_likes.php"> also called it</a> a &quot;a gem of hidden information&quot;. Indeed, given that some of the comments on our <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/10_future_web_trends.php">10 Future Web Trends</a> post suggested crowd sourcing as a future trend worth watching, it seems to me that Delicious as a general crowd-sourced search solution is close to becoming a reality. As an example, a quick search for &quot;web future&quot; in Delicious Preview displayed a lot of popular (and some very old) links. But they were quality links, useful resources. Which is mostly what you want from a search engine. </p>
<p>So Delicious Preview is kind of like PageRank, only it's run via crowd sourcing. It's not an algorithm that primarily determines results (although that is a part of it), but thousands of 'votes' by Delicious users.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/delicious_sept07a.jpg" /></p>
<p>Another thing worth noting is Delicious' move towards becoming a social network, as founder <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/delicious_social_network.php">Joshua Schachter spoke to R/WW about</a> exactly one year ago. Some of these networking features are already on the current del.icio.us, but have become more refined in the new version. Here's a couple of screenshots.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/delicious_sept07b.png" /></p>
<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/delicious_sept07c.jpg" /></p>
<p>Overall, Delicious still feels like an experiment in progress. But there could be profound implications for Delicious' owner, Yahoo - particularly in search. Yahoo is known to be pushing 'social search' as a way to compete with Google (Answers, Flickr, Delicious, etc), and the new Delicious Preview is another move in refining that vision.</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2855-comment:23298</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2855" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/delicious_preview_next_gen_search.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/delicious_preview_next_gen_search.php#c23298" />
    <title>Comment from Yakov on 2007-09-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Yakov</name>
        <uri>http://www.quintura.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.quintura.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Having seen the screenshots of a new version, I have to say that the service needs better visual representation of tags.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-09-07T17:08:01Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2855-comment:23299</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2855" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/delicious_preview_next_gen_search.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/delicious_preview_next_gen_search.php#c23299" />
    <title>Comment from Thejesh GN on 2007-09-08</title>
    <author>
        <name>Thejesh GN</name>
        <uri>http://www.thejeshgn.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thejeshgn.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Yes. I think thats what they are trying to do. With the kind and volume of urls they have the search results might be very relevant.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-09-08T08:20:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2855-comment:23300</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2855" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/delicious_preview_next_gen_search.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/delicious_preview_next_gen_search.php#c23300" />
    <title>Comment from Naser on 2007-09-08</title>
    <author>
        <name>Naser</name>
        <uri>http://atunu.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://atunu.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>As long as del.icio.us isn't introducing a "Local Archive/Cache" feature, I'm not sinking my teeth on the same sandwich again. I'm still quite satisfied with Furl.</p>

<p>Besides, this looks like another facebookish makeover. Why in the world is everyone so desperate for looks? Why can't they improve the basic-features first?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-09-08T12:03:28Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2855-comment:23301</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2855" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/delicious_preview_next_gen_search.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/delicious_preview_next_gen_search.php#c23301" />
    <title>Comment from Erkko on 2007-09-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Erkko</name>
        <uri>http://northerndialogue.blogspot.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://northerndialogue.blogspot.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Moving forward with Delicious is a great idea from Yahoo, as it still is one of the best implemented services using tagging and living proof of user filtered searching. </p>

<p>I also like the change of name, just hated those dots in the name.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-09-09T17:28:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2855-comment:23302</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2855" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/delicious_preview_next_gen_search.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/delicious_preview_next_gen_search.php#c23302" />
    <title>Comment from Andy Pipes on 2007-09-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Andy Pipes</name>
        <uri>http://mypipeline.co.uk/blog</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://mypipeline.co.uk/blog">
        <![CDATA[<p>I'd personally like to see a lot more with tag bundle relationship modeling and closed (private) tag networks, for information sharing etc. Seems that delicious is missing a trick there.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-09-10T06:49:51Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2855-comment:23303</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2855" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/delicious_preview_next_gen_search.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/delicious_preview_next_gen_search.php#c23303" />
    <title>Comment from Naren Reddy on 2007-09-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>Naren Reddy</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Don't kill del.icio.us after delicious offical launch.<br />
Also in Delicious don't try to put too much content in the front page like yahoo.com</p>

<p>Make it simple and elegent & user frinedly.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-09-26T16:59:34Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>