<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_presently_set_for_launch.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2008:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2891-</id>
  <updated>2008-05-09T18:11:05Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Google Presently Set For Launch Next Week</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.1</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2891</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_presently_set_for_launch.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=2891" title="Google Presently Set For Launch Next Week" />
    <published>2007-09-14T20:02:37Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:08:01Z</updated>
    <title>Google Presently Set For Launch Next Week</title>
    <summary> Google&apos;s powerpoint competitor is expected to be released very soon, according to reports circulating. The Inquirer says the product will be called Presently. It wouldn&apos;t surprise me if Presently is unveiled at TechCrunch40 next week - TechCrunch was coy about this in their blog post, but they noted earlier this week that Google would...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Richard MacManus</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="News" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[      <p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/googleapps_feb07.gif" align="left" hspace="5" vspace="5"/>Google's powerpoint competitor is expected to be released very soon, according to reports circulating. <a href="http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=42352">The Inquirer says</a> the product will be called Presently. It wouldn't surprise me if Presently is unveiled at TechCrunch40 next week - TechCrunch was coy about this in <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/14/google-presently-powerpoint-clone-could-be-days-away/">their blog post</a>, but they noted earlier this week that Google would be announcing something.</p>
                              <p>The lead-up to Presently: in June Google announced its <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_acquires_zenter.php">acquisition of Zenter, </a>a company that made software for creating online slide presentations. Zenter's technology was added to Tonic Systems, a technology for presentation creation and document conversion. Tonic Systems was <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/poll_is_eric_schmidt_kidding.php">acquired in April</a> by Google. In a blog post <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2007/04/were-expecting.html">in June</a>, Google said that a presentations app was due by the end of summer. Well the end of summer is just a week away, so current speculation is almost certainly accurate. </p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>Will this finally close the loop on Google's nascent Web Office suite? The table below shows that presentations is the only major app currently missing from Google Apps. It still won't make Google Apps any more ready for the enterprise, as both <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/microsoft_10_reasons_against_google_apps.php">Microsoft</a> and <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/zimbra_google_apps_not_quite_ready_for_enterprise.php">Zimbra</a> were at pains to point out this week. But with the <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_apps_goes_after_enterprise_market_capgemini.php">CapGemini partnership</a> intact, it inches Google another step towards a true Microsoft Office competitor.</p>
                              <h2>Web Office Suite: Core Products</h2>
<p>
<table width="530" border="1">
<tr>
<td width="105"></td>
<td width="85"><b>Email</b></td>

<td width="85"><b>Calendar</b></td>

<td width="85"><b>Word processing</b></td>
<td width="85"><b>Spreadsheets</b></td>
<td width="85"><b>Presentation</b></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="105">Google Apps</td>
<td width="85">Y, Gmail</td>
<td width="85">Y, Google Calendar</td>

<td width="85">Y, Google D & S</td>

<td width="85">Y, Google D & S</td>
<td width="85">Y (Zenter + Tonic)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="105">Zoho</td>
<td width="85">Y, Zoho Mail (private beta)</td>
<td width="85">Y, Zoho Mail (private beta)</td>

<td width="85">Y, Zoho Writer</td>
<td width="85">Y, Zoho Sheet</td>

<td width="85">Y, Zoho Show</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="105">ThinkFree</td>
<td width="85">N</td>
<td width="85">N</td>
<td width="85">Y, ThinkFree Write</td>

<td width="85">Y, ThinkFree Calc</td>
<td width="85">Y, ThinkFree Show</td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td width="105">Zimbra</td>
<td width="85">Y</td>
<td width="85">Y</td>
<td width="85">Y</td>
<td width="85">Y</td>

<td width="85">N</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="105">Microsoft Office Live</td>

<td width="85">Y</td>
<td width="85">Y</td>
<td width="85">N</td>
<td width="85">N</td>
<td width="85">N</td>

</tr>
</table></p><br />]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2891-comment:23669</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2891" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_presently_set_for_launch.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_presently_set_for_launch.php#c23669" />
    <title>Comment from Milt Martin on 2007-09-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>Milt Martin</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>You are missing a very important column in your comparison, i.e. "Database"</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-09-15T00:04:30Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2891-comment:23670</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2891" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_presently_set_for_launch.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_presently_set_for_launch.php#c23670" />
    <title>Comment from Tim Samshuijzen on 2007-09-15</title>
    <author>
        <name>Tim Samshuijzen</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I was just about to post "what about databases?" when I saw Milt Martin's post. I therefore agree with Milt.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-09-15T11:38:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2891-comment:23671</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.2891" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_presently_set_for_launch.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_presently_set_for_launch.php#c23671" />
    <title>Comment from Duncan on 2007-09-15</title>
    <author>
        <name>Duncan</name>
        <uri>http://www.duncanriley.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.duncanriley.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Richard<br />
Trust me: I wasn't being coy, I honestly don't know what launches are at TC40 although I should know shortly :-). It could be this, it could be something else, no idea at this stage.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-09-15T20:58:30Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>