<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/on_copyright_youtube_punts.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2009:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3069-</id>
  <updated>2009-10-30T14:41:02Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for On Copyright: YouTube Punts</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.23-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3069</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/on_copyright_youtube_punts.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=3069" title="On Copyright: YouTube Punts" />
    <published>2007-10-15T21:58:03Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:08:12Z</updated>
    <title>On Copyright: YouTube Punts</title>
    <summary> digg_url = &apos;http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/on_copyright_youtube_punts.php&apos;; digg_bgcolor = &apos;#ffffff&apos;; digg_skin = &apos;compact&apos;; After more than a year of back and forth, YouTube has rolled out an official video filtering tool to protect the copyright of content owners unhappy that their content has been uploaded to the site. It&apos;s hard not to want to hold your breath now...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Marshall Kirkpatrick</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Analysis" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><font style="float: right"><script type="text/javascript">
digg_url = 'http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/on_copyright_youtube_punts.php';
digg_bgcolor = '#ffffff';
digg_skin = 'compact';
</script>
<script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js"
type="text/javascript"></script></font><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/youtube_logo_july07.png" align="left" hspace="5px" vspace="5px">After more than a year of back and forth, YouTube has <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2007/10/latest-content-id-tool-for-youtube.html">rolled out an official video filtering tool</a> to protect the copyright of content owners unhappy that their content has been uploaded to the site.  It's hard not to want to hold your breath now that it's finally here - it couldn't possibly be this simple, could it?
</p><p>
It can't - YouTube has chosen to follow the letter of the DMCA law only; today's announcement will not come close to satisfying angry rights holders.  It may or may not be enough to protect them in court.
</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>
Here's how it will work.  Offending content will have to be identified by rights holders, either by uploading it themselves or identifying it when someone else has without permission.  YouTube will then create a hash file to make sure that <em>that exact same file</em> is not uploaded again.  That's the crux of the issue right there.  The big rights holders want YouTube to block every instance of their song or video content being uploaded, whether it's the identical file or not.
</p><p>
It's opt-in copyright protection by blocking repeat upload of the same exact media file.  That's nowhere near what the big rights holders want.  What they really want may be to kick the legs out from under the media record-breaker that is GooTube.
</p><p>
The new service will only block content if blocking the content is what rights holders want, of course.  YouTube says it can't assume it knows.  Some may want to promote that content once it's discovered, or to monetize it with revenue sharing of ad money.  That seems possible, in theory, though the real impetus behind this whole system is to pull content.
</p><p>
If this is the kind of thing you're interested in, the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/t/video_id_about">video identification page</a> is an interesting read.  A year ago it looked like YouTube was going to license a third party filtering service, <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/web_news_mobile_ms_yahoo_nokia_myspace.php">like Audible Magic</a>, but all the options there may have proven technically imperfect.  Perhaps unable to nail the problem technically, it appears that Google has chosen to take a legalistic approach to the problem.</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3069-comment:24901</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3069" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/on_copyright_youtube_punts.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/on_copyright_youtube_punts.php#c24901" />
    <title>Comment from Richard MacManus on 2007-10-15</title>
    <author>
        <name>Richard MacManus</name>
        <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>This solution sounds very un-google like -- a manual process, and copyright holders can only do one at a time. Quite surprised they didn't use a technology like Audible Magic.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-10-15T22:31:02Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3069-comment:24902</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3069" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/on_copyright_youtube_punts.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/on_copyright_youtube_punts.php#c24902" />
    <title>Comment from Teemu Arina on 2007-10-15</title>
    <author>
        <name>Teemu Arina</name>
        <uri>http://tarina.blogging.fi</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://tarina.blogging.fi">
        <![CDATA[<p>Solong for the automatic detection, a promise given around the acquisition. The 10 minute limit is quite good forced filter already, but I guess other services will compete with longer videos.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-10-15T23:36:50Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3069-comment:24903</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3069" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/on_copyright_youtube_punts.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/on_copyright_youtube_punts.php#c24903" />
    <title>Comment from Deepak on 2007-10-15</title>
    <author>
        <name>Deepak</name>
        <uri>http://mndoci.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://mndoci.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I was under the impression that YouTube already uses Audible magic for audio and that the new technology uses image recognition to match video content and is not restricted to full length, but I could be wrong</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-10-16T01:54:36Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>