<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/openid_google_blogger_beta.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2008:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3331-</id>
  <updated>2008-07-07T14:16:08Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Microsoft, Yahoo! and the Effect on OpenID</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.1</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3331</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/openid_google_blogger_beta.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=3331" title="Blogger Beta Ships OpenID" />
    <published>2007-11-30T08:43:03Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:08:31Z</updated>
    <title>Blogger Beta Ships OpenID</title>
    <summary>Google announced tonight that the new Blogger (nicknamed &apos;Blogger in Draft&apos;) will support OpenID-based commenting. Essentially it means that users of OpenID-enabled services - such as LiveJournal, WordPress and TypeKey - can comment on any Blogger blog using their accounts from those sites, rather than with Blogger/Google accounts. This is another small but significant step...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Richard MacManus</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Identity" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Google <a href="http://bloggerindraft.blogspot.com/2007/11/new-feature-openid-commenting.html">announced tonight</a> that the new <a href="http://www.blogger.com">Blogger</a> (nicknamed 'Blogger in Draft') will support OpenID-based commenting. Essentially it means that users of OpenID-enabled services - such as LiveJournal, WordPress and TypeKey - can comment on any Blogger blog using their accounts from those sites, rather than with Blogger/Google accounts.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/blogger_openid.png" /></p>
<p>This is another small but significant step on the way to an open identity system on the Web, something that we here at Read/WriteWeb have been <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/user_centric_identity_call_to_action.php">promoting</a>. Incidentally you may be wondering if we will 'eat our own dogfood' and implement OpenID on this blog -- it is in the plan for our big re-design, which is coming very soon!</p>
<p><a href="http://daveman692.livejournal.com/">Thanks David Recordon</a> for the heads up.</p>]]>
      
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3331-comment:27361</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3331" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/openid_google_blogger_beta.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/openid_google_blogger_beta.php#c27361" />
    <title>Comment from Elf on 2007-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Elf</name>
        <uri>http://www.createlf.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.createlf.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Again open but not enough, why only for comments, why not allow openID based authentication on for google accounts?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-30T09:12:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3331-comment:27362</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3331" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/openid_google_blogger_beta.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/openid_google_blogger_beta.php#c27362" />
    <title>Comment from Vishal Sharma on 2007-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Vishal Sharma</name>
        <uri>http://sharmavishal.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://sharmavishal.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I agree with  ELF why not take  this further... Its just too little.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-30T09:23:19Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3331-comment:27363</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3331" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/openid_google_blogger_beta.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/openid_google_blogger_beta.php#c27363" />
    <title>Comment from Zach Beauvais on 2007-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Zach Beauvais</name>
        <uri>http://www.zachbeauvais.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.zachbeauvais.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I'm wondering how adding OpenID to R/WW will actually make a perceived change? At the moment, you just type in your name (required) Email (required - not published) and URL (optional). Is this not easier than signing in?</p>

<p>What is the advantage? Is it in tracking comments? Now, I like  the idea of having a single ID (blimey, but I have a lot of ID's!), but when a system is so easy to comment on (such as the one I'm using now), what's the reason for adding a sign in at all?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-30T10:20:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3331-comment:27364</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3331" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/openid_google_blogger_beta.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/openid_google_blogger_beta.php#c27364" />
    <title>Comment from allen stern on 2007-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>allen stern</name>
        <uri>http://www.centernetworks.com/openid-needs-more-marketing-conversation</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.centernetworks.com/openid-needs-more-marketing-conversation">
        <![CDATA[<p>I posted my notes from my call with JanRain last week:<br />
<a href="http://www.centernetworks.com/openid-needs-more-marketing-conversation" rel="nofollow"><a href="http://www.centernetworks.com/openid-needs-more-marketing-conversation" rel="nofollow">http://www.centernetworks.com/openid-needs-more-marketing-conversation</a></a></p>

<p>OpenID needs a marketing team, the technology is there.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-30T12:41:39Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3331-comment:27365</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3331" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/openid_google_blogger_beta.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/openid_google_blogger_beta.php#c27365" />
    <title>Comment from Matthew Griffin on 2007-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Matthew Griffin</name>
        <uri>http://bitsonewmedia.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://bitsonewmedia.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>For many applications, I think OpenID is a great concept. But I stand with Zach in asking how addding OpenIDmake will actually make a change? Most sites you comment on regualarly remember your personal info anyway so you don't have to retype it.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-30T12:47:40Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3331-comment:27366</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3331" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/openid_google_blogger_beta.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/openid_google_blogger_beta.php#c27366" />
    <title>Comment from Malachi Petunia on 2007-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Malachi Petunia</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Why use it for comments only? I suggest that it is an ideal test-bed for OpenID as yet-to-be-discovered flaws in the system can be found without opening the blogger account to wanton destruction. Currently comments are protected by CAPTCHAs so it is a baby step with very light impact if it fails.</p>

<p>Not "too little too late", but "just the right amount" given the maturity of the protocol.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-30T13:23:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3331-comment:27367</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3331" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/openid_google_blogger_beta.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/openid_google_blogger_beta.php#c27367" />
    <title>Comment from Ben on 2007-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ben</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>To "eat your own dogfood" means to use it internally.  It would make sense if you made the admin account for R/WW use Open ID--but that would not be that impressive! :)  I think what you meant to say was "walk the talk."  Yeah, I'm anal.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-30T23:44:46Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3331-comment:27368</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3331" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/openid_google_blogger_beta.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/openid_google_blogger_beta.php#c27368" />
    <title>Comment from ryan on 2007-12-03</title>
    <author>
        <name>ryan</name>
        <uri>http://snarfed.org/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://snarfed.org/">
        <![CDATA[<p>thanks for the plug! we're looking forward to the full rollout, and to provider support...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-12-03T18:07:23Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>