<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/2008_business_networking.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2008:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3350-</id>
  <updated>2008-07-07T14:15:45Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for 2008 Will Be The Year of Business Networking</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.1</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3350</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/2008_business_networking.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=3350" title="2008 Will Be The Year of Business Networking" />
    <published>2007-12-03T21:22:14Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-16T23:08:32Z</updated>
    <title>2008 Will Be The Year of Business Networking</title>
    <summary> digg_url = &apos;http://digg.com/tech_news/2008_Will_Be_The_Year_of_Business_Networking&apos;; digg_bgcolor = &apos;#ffffff&apos;; digg_skin = &apos;compact&apos;; In this post we will give you three reasons for that prediction, plus six specific predictions and one interesting dark horse. First, the three reasons why 2008 will be the year of Business Networking: 1. The US consumer economy will slow (maybe into Recession). Specifically...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Bernard Lunn</name>
      <uri>http://bernardlunn.wordpress.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Social Networks" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><font style="float: right"><script type="text/javascript">
digg_url = 'http://digg.com/tech_news/2008_Will_Be_The_Year_of_Business_Networking';
digg_bgcolor = '#ffffff';
digg_skin = 'compact';
</script>
<script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript"></script></font><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/business_networking_dec07.png" vspace="5" hspace="5" align="left" border="0" />In this post we will give you three reasons for that prediction, plus six specific predictions and one interesting dark horse. First, the three reasons why 2008 will be the year of Business Networking:</p>

<p>1. The US consumer economy will slow (maybe into <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/25/weekinreview/25goodman.html?_r=2&amp;oref=slogin&amp;oref=slogin">Recession</a>). Specifically this will weaken business models based on consumer advertising. Advertisers, entrepeneurs and investors will switch their attention to B2B.</p>
<p>2. Consumer-focussed Web 2.0 start-ups are in a &#8220;<a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_digestion_phase_how_we_got.php">digestion phase</a>&#8220;. We don&#8217;t really need more innovation. We want innovation, its fun and interesting, but what we need is monetization of existing innovation. Entrepreneurs will turn to the quicker monetization options within B2B.</p>
<p>3. Advertisers (and the media that serve them) will seek increasing diversification from 'faith based advertising' (aka CPM); and business markets will offer better options for subscription and transactional models. There is room for 'quick payback innovation' in this area.</p>

<p>Now for the six specific predictions about Business Networking:</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p><strong>1. There will be a globalization roll-up.</strong> There are business networks in Germany (<a href="http://www.xing.com/">Xing</a>) and France (<a href="http://www.viadeointhenews.com/english/news/default.asp?id=1">Viadeo</a>) where <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/linkedin_and_the_future_of_business_social_networks.php">LinkedIn</a> does not play well, for simple language reasons. The same may be true in other non-English speaking markets (if not, the land grab is still open folks!). The globalization roll-up will be driven by two facts:: a) switching cost is high in practice - ask a German to switch to LinkedIn or an American to switch to Xing to find out why; b) there is tremedous business value in building business contacts internationally, so the network that can make that happen will do very well.</p>
<p><strong>2. LinkedIn will either do an IPO or will be acquired.</strong> The reason: a globalization roll-up requires a public currency. If they don&#8217;t do an IPO, then LinkedIn will be acquired by a company like Newscorp that has a public currency and can make this happen.</p>
<p><strong>3. Facebook will stay consumer NetGen focussed and will not be a major player in Business Networking.</strong> This is controversial and already the subject of a specific prediction (see <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/poll_linkedin_facebook_business_contacts.php">our recent poll</a>).</p>

<p><strong>4. Business Networking models and services will evolve and there will be a lot of room for innovation.</strong> Reducing the cost of B2B business development is a really, really big deal. Today&#8217;s services are only scratching the surface of the potential. Niche feature-specific start-ups will be acquired by the big networks.</p>
<p>5. Some of the smarter <strong>traditional B2B Media firms</strong> will wake up to the fact that <strong>Business Networking can be their core proposition online</strong> and that they can leverage their niche audiences. They will need to do this before the big networks cross over into their niches.</p>
<p><strong>6. Plaxo and LinkedIn will merge.</strong> This will be enabled by a common VC owner (<a href="http://www.sequoiacap.com/">Sequoia</a>) and will be driven by the need to bulk-up pre the IPO that is needed to win the globalization land grab.</p>
<p>Now for the &#8220;dark horse&#8221; - Xing. They are the LinkedIn of Germany. My random one person survey of my nephew who lives in Germany found that he is a committed user who gets real value. They are a dark horse because they are already publicly traded. Their stock only trades in Germany and you cannot find their information on Yahoo Finance or Google Finance, so they are effectively invisible to US investors. However it is a relatively simple for them to get listed on NASDAQ as well. If they do that before LinkedIn does, a Xing IPO could get interesting!</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3350-comment:27529</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3350" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/2008_business_networking.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/2008_business_networking.php#c27529" />
    <title>Comment from the constantskeptic on 2007-12-03</title>
    <author>
        <name>the constantskeptic</name>
        <uri>http://www.constantskeptic.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.constantskeptic.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Totally agree about Linkedin.... although I do believe that Facebook will add features that enable it to gain a following of business networking oriented users (possibly a separate subset of Facebook, with a CNAME like business.facebook.com or something like that) thanks for the predictions.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-12-03T22:59:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3350-comment:27530</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3350" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/2008_business_networking.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/2008_business_networking.php#c27530" />
    <title>Comment from Allen Stern on 2007-12-03</title>
    <author>
        <name>Allen Stern</name>
        <uri>http://www.centernetworks.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.centernetworks.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>you realize your crunchy friend gigaom said the same thing yesterday - tho yours is more indepth :)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-12-03T23:09:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3350-comment:27531</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3350" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/2008_business_networking.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/2008_business_networking.php#c27531" />
    <title>Comment from Miles Sims on 2007-12-03</title>
    <author>
        <name>Miles Sims</name>
        <uri>http://www.smallworldlabs.com/blog</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.smallworldlabs.com/blog">
        <![CDATA[<p>I think business networks also map to customer value based on content vs consumer networks that usually rely on a specific feature or 'take' on the market to make it.</p>

<p>A business utilizes a network to improve their existing product or services - not as their only way generate revenue.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-12-03T23:23:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3350-comment:27532</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3350" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/2008_business_networking.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/2008_business_networking.php#c27532" />
    <title>Comment from yellek on 2007-12-03</title>
    <author>
        <name>yellek</name>
        <uri>http://yellek.org</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://yellek.org">
        <![CDATA[<p>"The same may be true in other non-English speaking markets (if not, the land grab is still open folks!).". Not specific to LinkedIn but to a lot of web 2.0 startups there are a large number that are ignoring even the English speaking global market. This creates a great opportunity for US based companies to create global brand loyalty by comparison with their introspective peers or for global startups to eat the US companies' lunch. Google and Yahoo get this, other companies need to follow their lead.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-12-03T23:59:03Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3350-comment:27533</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3350" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/2008_business_networking.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/2008_business_networking.php#c27533" />
    <title>Comment from Pick Up Artist 4 Life on 2007-12-03</title>
    <author>
        <name>Pick Up Artist 4 Life</name>
        <uri>http://www.BecomingAPUA.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.BecomingAPUA.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I'm interested in seeing that Facebook has in plans. It is considered to be a $15 billion dollar company, but I haven't seen much to make it of value.</p>

<p>The only value is the user information, and you can see how difficult the users can be about giving out their private information voluntarily.</p>

<p>Adam</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-12-04T04:01:45Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3350-comment:27534</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3350" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/2008_business_networking.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/2008_business_networking.php#c27534" />
    <title>Comment from Esdee on 2007-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Esdee</name>
        <uri>http://myspace.com/facesfaces</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://myspace.com/facesfaces">
        <![CDATA[<p>You're probably right that the bigger players in business networking will be acquired, probably early next year.<br />
I doubt that the offers will be comparable to an offer for Facebook though, even if the business networks provide bigger value to their users.<br />
Why? <br />
Because there are more iPods sold in the US and the world than Blackberries...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-12-04T15:29:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3350-comment:27535</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3350" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/2008_business_networking.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/2008_business_networking.php#c27535" />
    <title>Comment from Emergent Future on 2007-12-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Emergent Future</name>
        <uri>http://www.futureconverged.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.futureconverged.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>2008 Will Be The Year of Internet Mobile Devices<br />
2008 Will Be The Year of Social Advertisement  <br />
2008 Will Be The Year of Digital Readers <br />
2008 Will Be The Year of Giant Global Graph <br />
2008 Will Be The Year of Social Advertisement<br />
2008 Will Be The Year of Immersive Devices  <br />
2008 Will Be The Year of Avatars <br />
2008 Will Be The Year of Mobile Mapping <br />
2008 Will Be The Year of Digital Collaboration         <br />
2008 Will Be The Year of Me <br />
...</p>

<p>and of course <br />
2008 Will Be The Year of Business Networking</p>

<p>Which one? I leave the choice to you.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-12-04T16:53:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3350-comment:27536</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3350" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/2008_business_networking.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/2008_business_networking.php#c27536" />
    <title>Comment from Paul Chaney on 2007-12-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Paul Chaney</name>
        <uri>http://www.conversationalmediamarketing.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.conversationalmediamarketing.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>While I enjoy the 360 degree view that Facebook rendors of me - both the personal and business sides - I'd prefer to use it strictly as a business networking app. Unless it can morph into something that's more useful than "Superpokes" and "Funwalls" I don't see its potential as having longevity. </p>

<p>In my view, it would be nice if Zuckerberg and Co. could create a business users edition. (My college-aged son, who is a FB veteran, would appreciate that as well.)</p>

<p>In lieu of that, it's my hope that LinkedIn can become more robust. I do like prediction #6, that LinkedIn and Plaxo would merge. That would bring about the almost perfect platform.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-12-09T14:46:07Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3350-comment:42447</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3350" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/2008_business_networking.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/2008_business_networking.php#c42447" />
    <title>Comment from Garrey Goodman on 2007-12-17</title>
    <author>
        <name>Garrey Goodman</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I think that this article makes an accurate prediction but I believe that the B2B market will fragment. The masses will move from giant services like Linked-In and Facebook to niche sites like <a href="http://www.referralkey.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.referralkey.com</a> and <a href="http://www.zolve.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.zolve.com/</a> which can better serve their member-base with revenue generating tools not just and endless list of contacts. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-12-18T07:03:06Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>