<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flickr_introduces_traffic_stats.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2008:/1/tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3419-</id>
  <updated>2008-07-02T20:15:21Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Flickr Introduces Traffic Stats for Pro Users</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.1</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3419</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flickr_introduces_traffic_stats.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=3419" title="Flickr Introduces Traffic Stats for Pro Users" />
    <published>2007-12-13T18:55:23Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-17T08:43:56Z</updated>
    <title>Flickr Introduces Traffic Stats for Pro Users</title>
    <summary>Users with a pro account at Flickr are now able to view a variety of interesting statistics about the viewers of their photos. Heather Champ said in a post on the Flickr blog this morning that the stats are intended to &quot;give you all sorts of insight into how people arrive at your photos.&quot;...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Marshall Kirkpatrick</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Products" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/flickr_jan07.jpg" align="left" hspace="5px" vspace="5px">Users with a pro account at <a href="http://flickr.com">Flickr</a> are now able to view a variety of interesting statistics about the viewers of their photos.  Heather Champ said in a post on the <a href="http://blog.flickr.com/en/2007/12/13/stats-stats-baby/">Flickr blog</a> this morning that the stats are intended to "give you all sorts of insight into how people arrive at your photos."</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>
Viewer numbers are a big deal for many Flickr users and Champ says this is one of their most requested features.  <strong>In a world increasingly full of user generated content platforms, offering users basic traffic stats like referring URLs ought to be standard practice.</strong> Offering these numbers to premium subscribers makes a lot of sense.  I expect this will be one more practice that Flickr blazes the trail on, only to be followed by others in a wide variety of markets.</p>
<p>The stats feature needs to be activated by the user.  Large screenshots of the process can be found on <a href="http://blog.extraface.com/2007/12/13/flickr-stats-new-flickr-feature-on-the-way/">the blog of consultant Dave Coustan</a>, where I learned about the news myself.</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3419-comment:28175</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3419" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flickr_introduces_traffic_stats.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flickr_introduces_traffic_stats.php#c28175" />
    <title>Comment from Rob Cottingham on 2007-12-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>Rob Cottingham</name>
        <uri>http://www.socialsignal.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.socialsignal.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Very interesting news. I'd say "good news" without hesitating except for my inner artist, who wonders about diverting creative expression into crowd-pleasing. I know, I know... nobody's forcing you to switch stats on, let alone heed them... but it's hard to avoid letting the currents of public attention shape your creative choices.</p>

<p>But what the hell: for the most part I (heart) analytics, so bring 'em on. :)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-12-13T20:41:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3419-comment:28176</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3419" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flickr_introduces_traffic_stats.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flickr_introduces_traffic_stats.php#c28176" />
    <title>Comment from kayvaan on 2007-12-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>kayvaan</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Rob - I hear you, but let's face it - Art is at least as much the relationship between the viewer and the art than it is the relationshipo between the artist and the art (of course, the artist is ALSO a viewer).</p>

<p>So, yes, there is the potential of just doing things for the gratification of attention, but isn't that an issue with art <i>anyway</i>..? Regardless of whether the artist can get additional stats or not? :)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-12-13T21:07:18Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3419-comment:28177</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:72.47.210.69,2007://1.3419" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flickr_introduces_traffic_stats.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flickr_introduces_traffic_stats.php#c28177" />
    <title>Comment from marc on 2007-12-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>marc</name>
        <uri>http://www.dogballsblog.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.dogballsblog.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Awesome news.. BTW.. time to change the flickr logo... they're out of 'gamma' and now "loves you."</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-12-13T22:58:20Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>