<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/2008_web20_enterprise_forrester.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2008:/1/tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5518-</id>
  <updated>2008-05-09T18:06:37Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for 2008: The Year Web 2.0 Hits the Enterprise, Says Forrester</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.1</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5518</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/2008_web20_enterprise_forrester.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=5518" title="2008: The Year Web 2.0 Hits the Enterprise, Says Forrester" />
    <published>2008-01-28T16:42:01Z</published>
    <updated>2008-01-28T16:44:26Z</updated>
    <title>2008: The Year Web 2.0 Hits the Enterprise, Says Forrester</title>
    <summary>According to Forrester Research, there will be &quot;strong demand&quot; for web 2.0 tools in the enterprise in 2008. Even though 42% of enterprises say adding web 2.0 tools is not on their agenda, according to a Q3 2007 survey, Forrester expects that half of those will change their mind and embrace web 2.0 tools by...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Josh Catone</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Enterprise" />
    
    <category term="Trends" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img border="0" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/lightbulbs.jpg" width="150" height="113" />According to Forrester Research, there will be "strong demand" for web 2.0 tools in the enterprise in 2008.  Even though 42% of enterprises say adding web 2.0 tools is not on their agenda, according to a Q3 2007 survey, Forrester expects that half of those will change their mind and embrace web 2.0 tools by year end. In the report "<a href="http://www.forrester.com/go?docid=43882">Top Enterprise Web 2.0 Predictions For 2008</a>," analyst Oliver Young gives three reasons why he thinks 2008 is the year that "IT departments will take their heads out of the sand and embrace web 2.0 technologies."</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>For the sake of clarity, Forrester's definition of web 2.0 is, "A set of technologies and applications that enable efficient interaction among people, content, and data in support of collectively fostering new businesses, technology offerings, and social structures."</p>

<p>Young gives three reasons he things deployment of web 2.0 will sneak onto enterprise agendas in 2008:</p>

<p>
<ol>
<li><b>IT guys are already using web 2.0</b> - According to Young, many IT departments and shops have been using web 2.0 tools for internal tasks like project management and support ticketing.  The utility of these deployments will encourage them to push web 2.0 tools out more broadly in the enterprise.</li>
<li><b>If you can't beat 'em, join 'em</b> - When big business is unable to stem the use of Software as a Service tools and things like social networks by employees, rather than allow untested software and services on their networks, they will "mitigate risk by deploying enterprise-class tools in their stead."</li>
<li><b>They make you look cool</b> - "For IT departments aspiring to be more relevant to the business," writes Young, "enterprise web 2.0 tools will be a high-impact, low-cost method to show leadership and innovation."</li>
</ol>
</p>

<h2>RSS Will Lead the Way</h2>

<p>Forrester predicts that RSS will be the most popularly deployed web 2.0 tool in the enterprise over the coming year.  "Forrester expects 2008 to be a banner year for RSS and specifically enterprise RSS," says Young, concluding that many of the companies that discovered utility in blogs and wikis last year will realize that RSS is necessary to push that content to users.  "While 9% of enterprise firms expect to consider the use of RSS in 2008, we believe that number will be close to 20% by year-end."</p>

<p>But while RSS might be the most important driver of enterprise web 2.0 adoption in 2008, Forrester expects social networking to still be the buzz word du jour.  "Expect the adoption of social networking solutions for business to accelerate dramatically in 2008 with many firms looking for internal social networking solutions," predicts the research firm.</p>

<p>While Forrester expects the big boys -- IBM, Jive, etc. -- to rule the roost, they note that "nearly any vendor that uses the term 'social networking' will get at least some consideration." Though, Forrester also expects Microsoft SharePoint to "steamroll" the market, and will reap the most rewards from a shift toward web 2.0 thinking in the enterprise market.</p> 

<p>Though the report puts a lot of stock in RSS and social networking, according to their enterprise survey, the technologies that more enterprises are actually <i>planning</i> to invest in over the next 12 months are discussion boards and wikis.  Forrester, though, expects that it is these technologies that will drive the further adoption of RSS.</p>

<p>What do you think? Is the enterprise ready for web 2.0?  Has web 2.0 already arrived in the enterprise? Lets us know in the comments below.</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5518-comment:45869</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5518" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/2008_web20_enterprise_forrester.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/2008_web20_enterprise_forrester.php#c45869" />
    <title>Comment from Voice Over Guy on 2008-01-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>Voice Over Guy</name>
        <uri>http://amazingvoicetalent.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://amazingvoicetalent.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I have heard a lot about web 2.0 lately, I have a myspace account and blog a bit myself.</p>

<p>I don't really understand or see how companies will effectively use Web 2.0 all that much yet...</p>

<p>It doesn't really seem like (at least on the properties that I am familiar with) make that big of a difference for your company (especially if it's B2B like mine).</p>

<p>Are there any web 2.0 properties that are geared specifically towards B2B?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-28T17:40:02Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5518-comment:45871</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5518" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/2008_web20_enterprise_forrester.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/2008_web20_enterprise_forrester.php#c45871" />
    <title>Comment from Search◆ Engines Web on 2008-01-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>Search◆ Engines Web</name>
        <uri>http://searchengines.wordpress.com/2008/01/18/video-archives-of-worst-moments-of-past-century/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://searchengines.wordpress.com/2008/01/18/video-archives-of-worst-moments-of-past-century/">
        <![CDATA[<p><i>///rather than allow untested software and services on their networks, they will "mitigate risk by deploying enterprise-class tools in their stead.</i></p>

<p>That is all well and good if there was certainty that all of those tools will remain supported and guaranteed to be secure.</p>

<p>But imagine when the concern over data ownership is disputed.  And imagine wanting to transfer data to a supported client based solution - once one is found that meets all of an Enterprises requirements.</p>

<p>Most Enterprises are extremely security conscious - how many would want to risk taking a chance with something they have no direct control over</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-28T18:23:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5518-comment:45872</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5518" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/2008_web20_enterprise_forrester.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/2008_web20_enterprise_forrester.php#c45872" />
    <title>Comment from Don Jones on 2008-01-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>Don Jones</name>
        <uri>http://www.venturedeal.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.venturedeal.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Some of the more forward-looking venture capital guys are now focused on Enterprise 2.0, so this sounds right.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-28T18:28:59Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5518-comment:45889</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5518" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/2008_web20_enterprise_forrester.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/2008_web20_enterprise_forrester.php#c45889" />
    <title>Comment from Erik Mallinson on 2008-01-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>Erik Mallinson</name>
        <uri>http://gravelroadstudios.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://gravelroadstudios.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Forrester is always out-of-touch. Really.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-29T04:34:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5518-comment:45893</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5518" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/2008_web20_enterprise_forrester.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/2008_web20_enterprise_forrester.php#c45893" />
    <title>Comment from ReadWriteWeb reader on 2008-01-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>ReadWriteWeb reader</name>
        <uri>http://www.24im.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.24im.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Couldn't help but throw the shameless plug in for <a href="http://www.24im.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.24im.com</a></p>

<p>Enterprise 2.0 (or SaaS in general) burns brightest in companies like Salesforce, Netsuite, and, to lesser extent 37signals. But, why stop there? There are plenty of applications that are less mission-critical than, say, a Salesforce.com but provide huge productivity boon.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-29T08:07:03Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5518-comment:45923</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5518" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/2008_web20_enterprise_forrester.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/2008_web20_enterprise_forrester.php#c45923" />
    <title>Comment from Aaron Fulkerson on 2008-01-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Aaron Fulkerson</name>
        <uri>http://mindtouch.com/blog</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://mindtouch.com/blog">
        <![CDATA[<p>It's hard to deny that this space is seeing dramatic and rapid growth. MindTouch's Deki Wiki has seen remarkable growth in adoption over the last 6 months. We're now regularly seeing 1,200 downloads every day. The kind of bottoms-up technology deployment that we're delivering coupled with our product's ability to mashup "Web 2.0" services and apps is clearly striking a chord in the enterprise. Not only are our adoption numbers setting a new standard, but the conversions to paying customers have been fantastic! 2008 is indeed going to be a very exciting year in this space. Zoli mentions a potential recession. The good news for vendors like MindTouch is that it's likely the case that this would serve to boost interest in our low-cost, enterprise ready, and highly flexible open source offering. :-) </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-29T22:17:18Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5518-comment:46080</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5518" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/2008_web20_enterprise_forrester.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/2008_web20_enterprise_forrester.php#c46080" />
    <title>Comment from Chris Yeh on 2008-02-03</title>
    <author>
        <name>Chris Yeh</name>
        <uri>http://blog.pbwiki.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.pbwiki.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with Aaron and Oliver that 2008 is shaping up as a banner year.  PBwiki is also seeing rapid increases in adoption of collaboration tools in the enterprise.  We've added 100,000 new wikis in just the past few months, and we're starting to see bigger enterprise deals.</p>

<p>In one recent enterprise deal, we were able to point the decision maker to a number of employees that were already using PBwiki within the enterprise.  The best testimonial is a successful use case within the prospect's own organization!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-02-03T22:24:36Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>