<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/myspace_still_kicking.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2009:/1/tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5458-</id>
  <updated>2009-11-23T19:32:07Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Perspective: Myspace Still Kicking Facebook&apos;s Ass in Traffic</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.23-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5458</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/myspace_still_kicking.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=5458" title="Perspective: Myspace Still Kicking Facebook's Ass in Traffic" />
    <published>2008-01-16T23:52:32Z</published>
    <updated>2008-01-18T02:45:55Z</updated>
    <title>Perspective: Myspace Still Kicking Facebook&apos;s Ass in Traffic</title>
    <summary>While the media and Silicon Valley have lost our collective minds over the rise of Facebook over the past year, traffic analysts Hitwise released numbers today indicating that things are not as they might seem. Apparently, all the Facebook hype has not translated into a huge growth in social network market share among US users....</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Marshall Kirkpatrick</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Analysis" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/myspace150.jpg">While the media and Silicon Valley have lost our collective minds over the rise of Facebook over the past year, traffic analysts <a href="http://hitwise.com">Hitwise</a> released numbers today indicating that things are not as they might seem.  Apparently, all the Facebook hype has not translated into a huge growth in social network market share among US users.  Hitwise says that Myspace received 72.32% of US visits to the top ten social networks in December 2007, while Facebook received just over 16%.  </p>

<p>How about year over year growth?  Facebook had 10.59% marketshare in December 2006, Hitwise says.  Myspace dropped from nearly 79%.  It appears that social networking has grown in general; though Facebook posts impressive numbers of new users, in terms of sheer visits Myspace is nearly keeping up with its growth.</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<h2>Other Networks Growing Too</h2>

<p>If we assume that Facebook is growing rapidly then the relatively similar marketshare numbers year over year indicate it's actually the entire sector that's growing.  Though trailing in the distance of the big two, market share percentages have held steady or grown for the next services in line as well: Bebo, BlackPlanet, ClubPenguin, GaiaOnline, MyYearbook and Hi5 have unchanged or increased marketshare numbers according to the same metric.<br />
<center><br />
<img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/Picture%20262.png" ><em>Chart from Hitwise</em></center></p>

<h2>The Hype</h2>

<p>Tech bloggers write about Facebook all the time, I feel like every coffee shop I visit is filled with laptops open to Facebook and Richard MacManus (in transit to the US as we speak) says he just saw a whole magazine about Facebook in the airport.  CEO Mark Zuckerberg was on 60 Minutes last weekend, interviewed by a reporter who marveled at the most basic social networking functionality.</p>

<p>The Facebook platform, valuation and scandals have all caught the imagination of much of the press.  Many of our readers, however, are less thrilled with the direction Facebook is going. Two of our most popular posts of late were <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/early_facebook_user_15_questions.php">an interview with a disgruntled early Facebook user</a> and our coverage of the <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/hide_facebook_apps.php">just released Facebook feature</a> that lets users hide the overhyped applications in their profile!</p>

<h2>Tom's Still Got Friends</h2>

<p>Meanwhile, millions and millions of people are still happily logging into MySpace to communicate with their friends.  I spent some time on MySpace last night, exploring the profile pages of family and friends and was shocked to see that all the music players on the site are now sponsored by Zune.  It was news to me but I'm told it's been that way for weeks.  I haven't been able to find a single shred of coverage of that deal on any of the top tech blogs - but I would assume it's helping sell more Zunes than ever.</p>

<p>Numbers like those from Hitwise always need a grain of salt, but the next time someone tells you "by this time next year, everything you invest in will be built on top of Facebook," (as Tribe.net founder Mark Pincus <a href="http://www.unionsquareventures.com/2008/01/zynga_game_netw.html">reportedly</a> told Fred Wilson last year) - you just send them over here to this post and then see what they say.</p>

<p>Facebook is interesting but Myspace is where the users are, still.</p>

<h2>Is Classism Part of this Story?</h2>

<p>It's entirely possible that people actually know about this already, but that the technocratic classes are excited as they (we) are about Facebook for another reason.  Money.  It's been documented and is generally understood that Facebook users tend to come from wealthier demographics that are more invested in the high-end economy than are Myspace users.  </p>

<p>There has certainly been a lot of innovation at Facebook, and that innovation is more accessible to developers than the still-forthcoming Myspace Platform, but how much of this excitement about Facebook is really grounded in the perception that it's the Junior LinkedIn - the path to yuppie pockets.  If people mock niche social networks aimed explicitly at <a href="http://www.millionaires24.com/">wealthy</a> or <a href="http://ysn.com/">upwardly mobile</a> people - why is it more polite to focus on a social network widely understood as yuppie-focused (Facebook) as the future of everything important on the internet?  How often does the press pay attention to BlackPlanet.com?  Not very often, as far as I can tell.</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5458-comment:45427</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5458" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/myspace_still_kicking.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/myspace_still_kicking.php#c45427" />
    <title>Comment from Charles on 2008-01-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>Charles</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Problem with these stats is they just tally visits.</p>

<p>A prime differentiator of Facebook is level of engagement: the average visitor on Facebook consumes 50 page views, much higher level of engagement than other sites.</p>

<p>Another reason to get excited is the platform API.</p>

<p>Engagement + demographics + platform = potential for monetization.</p>

<p>Some students writing apps for Stanford's facebook class got six-figure revenue streams in the short period between app launch and the final exam.</p>

<p>Try that with MySpace or any other wannabee platform.</p>

<p><br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-17T00:53:40Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5458-comment:45428</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5458" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/myspace_still_kicking.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/myspace_still_kicking.php#c45428" />
    <title>Comment from Marshall Kirkpatrick on 2008-01-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>Marshall Kirkpatrick</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Charles, you may be right but I would also contend that Facebook app "engagement" nubers have been surprisingly low in general.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-17T01:27:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5458-comment:45430</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5458" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/myspace_still_kicking.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/myspace_still_kicking.php#c45430" />
    <title>Comment from Nic Hodges on 2008-01-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>Nic Hodges</name>
        <uri>http://nichodges.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://nichodges.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I don't think it's necessarily all about money. MySpace showed us where email will go in the future, Facebook is showing us where the web will go, including advertising. And it's primarily for this reason that Facebook gets so much more coverage than MySpace (both inside and outside tech circles).</p>

<p>To not see coverage of the Zune deal isn't that surprising, it's a deal that mirrors a big corporate sponsoring a stadium or sports event, whereas the development of advertising on Facebook gives us a glimpse into where we'll be in 5, 10 or 20 years. </p>

<p>The great thing about the dialogue that's been going on with regards to Facebook's implementation of advertising is that it exists in the first place, so we're slowly getting a feel for what people will and will not accept in online advertising with regards to privacy, intrusion on experience, and relevance. This is something that hasn't really existed online up to this point.</p>

<p>The movement of the userbase isn't that important when you look at it like this. Both Facebook and MySpace have a large enough userbase that they can easily attract outsiders to develop for their platforms, and through this process we can see how regular people want to use the web in their everyday lives.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-17T04:11:04Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5458-comment:45432</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5458" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/myspace_still_kicking.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/myspace_still_kicking.php#c45432" />
    <title>Comment from Malan D. on 2008-01-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>Malan D.</name>
        <uri>http://malandarras.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://malandarras.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>what i don't think any of these things take into consideration is the absolute hundreds and hundreds of thousands of the following groups of people that use MySpace.</p>

<p>Spammers: How many of these accounts and page views are spammers using the site to blast cell phone site links all over the place?</p>

<p>Bands: It's a known fact that bands use all sorts of bots to boost their profile views and song plays (even the majors). I knew a MySpace user that used a bot that refreshed her MySpace profile every 4 seconds in 17 different windows all day while she was at work. For an average 8 hour work day that's 15,300 page views PER DAY by ONE person.</p>

<p>just a thought... i'm sure there are several other categories of people that manipulate myspace for some sort of gain that are also adding to their huge stats.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-17T04:16:04Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5458-comment:45436</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5458" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/myspace_still_kicking.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/myspace_still_kicking.php#c45436" />
    <title>Comment from Phil on 2008-01-17</title>
    <author>
        <name>Phil</name>
        <uri>http://www.unintentionallyblank.co.uk</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.unintentionallyblank.co.uk">
        <![CDATA[<blockquote><p>How often does the press pay attention to BlackPlanet.com?</p></blockquote>

<p>I've been reading this blog for over a year and I've <em>never</em> heard of BlackPlanet.com!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-17T08:13:16Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5458-comment:45437</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5458" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/myspace_still_kicking.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/myspace_still_kicking.php#c45437" />
    <title>Comment from jd on 2008-01-17</title>
    <author>
        <name>jd</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>It's not hype. MySpace is a pile of dog crap that is rapidly being overtaken by Facebook...if it hasn't already: "Facebook has nearly caught up to MySpace with 93 million unique visitors worldwide versus MySpace’s 105 million. And in minutes spent on the site, it has actually surpassed MySpace with 21 billion minutes for Facebook versus 17 billion minutes for MySpace."</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-17T08:19:45Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5458-comment:45446</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5458" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/myspace_still_kicking.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/myspace_still_kicking.php#c45446" />
    <title>Comment from RS on 2008-01-17</title>
    <author>
        <name>RS</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Classism is definitely a part of it.  People can sugarcoat and rationalize it all the want, but in the grand scheme of things the appeal is not that different from Target v/s Walmart, Mac v/s PC, or Starbucks v/s McDonalds.  As it continues to grow that allure will gradually diminish, but the perception is still clearly there.</p>

<p>I'm just glad the Facebook hype seems to fading a bit (even if growth is still going strong.)  It was getting to the point starting this time last year where almost every tech site/blog was falling all over itself to praise Facebook.  A year later I think a lot of people are finally realizing that Facebook isn't quite as unique as they once thought and has a LOT of growing up to do if it wants to be a serious player with a real business model and revenue stream REMOTELY worth its hype.  And I'm not just talking about ludicrous theoretical valuations that occurred at the height of the (now waning?) Web 2.0 bubble.  Advertisers will come for the audience, but they'll only pay according to the value they think they can receive.  And right now  social media as a whole is still struggling to find sustainable models.  There's currently no game changing platform on the scale of GoTo/Adwords in sight (and social media might never find a hit like that) but it'll still be interesting to watch.  I'm just glad to see a little perspective finally setting in.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-17T15:28:27Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5458-comment:45449</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5458" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/myspace_still_kicking.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/myspace_still_kicking.php#c45449" />
    <title>Comment from PJ Brunet on 2008-01-17</title>
    <author>
        <name>PJ Brunet</name>
        <uri>http://www.ferodynamics.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.ferodynamics.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I think it's because all Facebook pages look the same, there's no personality to it, it's mechanically cold, sterile, predictable.  But Myspace allows you to express yourself, reveal a bit of who you are.  Myspace is about "you" and your music, your interests, etc.  That's why it's called "Myspace" and that's how it plays out visually.  However Facebook feels like a Microsoft Windows application.</p>

<p>To quote the band Interpol, </p>

<p>"You should be in my space<br />
You should be in my life<br />
You should be in my space<br />
You should be in my life<br />
You could be in my space"<br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-17T17:21:17Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5458-comment:45462</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5458" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/myspace_still_kicking.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/myspace_still_kicking.php#c45462" />
    <title>Comment from FrugalName.com on 2008-01-17</title>
    <author>
        <name>FrugalName.com</name>
        <uri>http://FrugalName.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://FrugalName.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Before you buy into the hype read this from the Wikipedia article about the company providing the stats:</p>

<p>The Hitwise product is a commercial platform whereby customers pay Hitwise a premium to access data reports for their vertical. A common use of Hitwise is to measure market share on the internet.</p>

<p>Hitwise is of unique value to internet marketers because its data about web traffic and keyword search volumes comes directly from internet service providers. As such, the data represents a broader sample of total web browsing trends than other similar ranking sources that rely upon a panel of users who have opted to install a free browser toolbar or other monitoring software running on their local computer.</p>

<p><br />
Can we say Biased?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-17T20:39:56Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5458-comment:45473</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5458" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/myspace_still_kicking.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/myspace_still_kicking.php#c45473" />
    <title>Comment from josh on 2008-01-17</title>
    <author>
        <name>josh</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Blackplanet deserves more coverage just for being the #4 social network right now, not to mention the fact that they were were a pioneer in the industry. They launched in 1999 for god's sake!!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-17T23:39:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5458-comment:45474</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5458" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/myspace_still_kicking.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/myspace_still_kicking.php#c45474" />
    <title>Comment from Don Jones on 2008-01-17</title>
    <author>
        <name>Don Jones</name>
        <uri>http://www.venturedeal.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.venturedeal.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Aside from Fb's recent bumps, it seems to have all the PR advantages, which are helping it in public.  Also helps in attracting seemingly unlimited amounts of venture capital, here and abroad.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-17T23:56:59Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5458-comment:45475</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5458" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/myspace_still_kicking.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/myspace_still_kicking.php#c45475" />
    <title>Comment from frank smith on 2008-01-17</title>
    <author>
        <name>frank smith</name>
        <uri>http://eflame.com.au</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://eflame.com.au">
        <![CDATA[<p>yeah, I dont understand why facebook gets so much publicity compared to myspace. Myspace is so much bigger than facebook. i found a blog, that mentioned the latest facebook clone, <a href="http://www.opentopix.com/topic/tech-news/myspace-is-still-much-bigger-than-facebook" rel="nofollow">http://www.opentopix.com/topic/tech-news/myspace-is-still-much-bigger-than-facebook</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-17T23:59:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5458-comment:45476</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5458" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/myspace_still_kicking.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/myspace_still_kicking.php#c45476" />
    <title>Comment from Ed Kohler on 2008-01-17</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ed Kohler</name>
        <uri>http://www.technologyevangelist.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.technologyevangelist.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>When I look at the numbers, I see one site that's growing and one that's shrinking. And the one that's growing is the one getting big investments, developers excited, and users that marketers seem very excited about reaching.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-17T23:59:55Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5458-comment:45477</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5458" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/myspace_still_kicking.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/myspace_still_kicking.php#c45477" />
    <title>Comment from D on 2008-01-17</title>
    <author>
        <name>D</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Could it be that way because Myspace appeals to spammers, aspiring 'models', advertisers and politicans whereas Facebook is more about connecting real people together through social networking?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-18T00:30:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5458-comment:45480</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5458" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/myspace_still_kicking.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/myspace_still_kicking.php#c45480" />
    <title>Comment from Jon on 2008-01-17</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jon</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>MySpace a few years ago used to be what Facebook is like now.  Used to be a place to keep up with your friends - new and old without the spammers.  I wonder how much of that percentage of myspace is spammers?</p>

<p>I wonder what is the life cycle of these social networks?  Will MySpace be as popular in five years or will virtual world social networks like <a href="http://Hive7.com" rel="nofollow">http://Hive7.com</a> or <a href="http://Sleep.FM" rel="nofollow">http://Sleep.FM</a> or <a href="http://cyworld" rel="nofollow">http://cyworld</a> be the social networks of the future?  </p>

<p>MySpace and Facebook will ultimately become less significant as the genre innovates beyond what it is today!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-18T04:12:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5458-comment:45484</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5458" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/myspace_still_kicking.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/myspace_still_kicking.php#c45484" />
    <title>Comment from Simon Small on 2008-01-17</title>
    <author>
        <name>Simon Small</name>
        <uri>http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details/australianopen.com?site0=facebook.com&amp;site1=myspace.com&amp;y=p&amp;z=3&amp;h=400&amp;w=700&amp;range=3y&amp;size=Large</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details/australianopen.com?site0=facebook.com&amp;site1=myspace.com&amp;y=p&amp;z=3&amp;h=400&amp;w=700&amp;range=3y&amp;size=Large">
        <![CDATA[<p>Stats are funny things, if you compare Alexa with these stats then you don't know who to believe.</p>

<p><br />
try going to Alexa and comparing the two sites.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-18T07:06:10Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5458-comment:45486</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5458" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/myspace_still_kicking.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/myspace_still_kicking.php#c45486" />
    <title>Comment from Spuds on 2008-01-17</title>
    <author>
        <name>Spuds</name>
        <uri>http://www.fampeo.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.fampeo.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>MySpace may be winning but it is still very ugly.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-18T07:25:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5458-comment:45490</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5458" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/myspace_still_kicking.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/myspace_still_kicking.php#c45490" />
    <title>Comment from ande on 2008-01-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>ande</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I was just wondering weather these apparent hits had something to do with Facebooks extensive use of AJAX and that you essential hit facebook once and never leave it, whereas when you goto myspace you jump from static page to static page ...</p>

<p>?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-18T08:50:57Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5458-comment:45509</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5458" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/myspace_still_kicking.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/myspace_still_kicking.php#c45509" />
    <title>Comment from RS on 2008-01-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>RS</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>To the people questioning the Hitwise service or questioning its bias, its status is generally as well respected as Nielsen Netratings and Comscore.  Just because you might not like the numbers (why that would be is beyond me - it's just a website) doesn't mean you have to automatically attack the source's credibility.  That's just childish, especially when you obviously know next to nothing about the analytics field.</p>

<p>That being said, you should never take the data from one service exclusively and preach it as gospel.  We usually look at data from multiple services and take a more aggregate approach.  Even the free services (Alexa, Compete, Quantcast) can be useful for gaining perspective to help triangulate what the 'real' numbers might actually be.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-18T17:33:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5458-comment:45514</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5458" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/myspace_still_kicking.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/myspace_still_kicking.php#c45514" />
    <title>Comment from TW on 2008-01-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>TW</name>
        <uri>http://www.thetechbrief.com/2008/01/16/top-10-lives-businesses-and-reputations-ruined-due-to-facebook/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thetechbrief.com/2008/01/16/top-10-lives-businesses-and-reputations-ruined-due-to-facebook/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I agree!</p>

<p>Read this news on Facebook!</p>

<p><br />
<a href="http://www.thetechbrief.com/2008/01/16/top-10-lives-businesses-and-reputations-ruined-due-to-facebook/" rel="nofollow">http://www.thetechbrief.com/2008/01/16/top-10-lives-businesses-and-reputations-ruined-due-to-facebook/</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-18T18:13:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5458-comment:45553</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5458" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/myspace_still_kicking.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/myspace_still_kicking.php#c45553" />
    <title>Comment from Make Money Online on 2008-01-19</title>
    <author>
        <name>Make Money Online</name>
        <uri>http://maximizingrevenuetips.blogspot.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://maximizingrevenuetips.blogspot.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Myspace is good but slow and it has very stupid design.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-20T02:24:39Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>