<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ten_common_objections_to_socia.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2008:/1/tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5395-</id>
  <updated>2008-05-09T18:07:17Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Ten Common Objections to Social Media Adoption and How You Can Respond</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.1</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5395</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ten_common_objections_to_socia.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=5395" title="Ten Common Objections to Social Media Adoption and How You Can Respond" />
    <published>2008-01-07T20:28:52Z</published>
    <updated>2008-01-08T03:07:37Z</updated>
    <title>Ten Common Objections to Social Media Adoption and How You Can Respond</title>
    <summary>Steve Outing wrote a very good article at Editor and Publisher on Friday about the need for cultural change inside the newpapers around the US (found via the wonderful CyberJournalist.net). That article got me thinking that people in many different industries probably hear many of the same objections to new, social media and online tools....</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Marshall Kirkpatrick</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Trends" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p>Steve Outing wrote a very good article at <a href="http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/columns/stopthepresses_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003690538">Editor and Publisher</a> on Friday about the need for cultural change inside the newpapers around the US (found via the wonderful <a href="http://www.cyberjournalist.net/whats-needed-in-2008-serious-newsroom-cultural-change/">CyberJournalist.net</a>).  That article got me thinking that people in many different industries probably hear many of the same objections to new, social media and online tools. ("It takes too much time, conversations online are insipid" etc.)</p>

<p>I decided to make a list of the Top 10 Objections to New Online Tools and What You Can Say in Response.  I surveyed my nearly 1300 friends on Twitter and got all kinds of thoughtful replies.</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>Below is that list; I hope you'll find it useful and leave comments helping to extend the conversation further. In my mind I'm thinking of everything from RSS and wikis to Twitter, Facebook and blogging.  Online tools that leverage social connections.</p>

<p>Last month we wrote about an initiative called <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_working_group.php">The Working Group</a> where people trying to bring about innovation in big companies.  Many readers probably know about Forrester analyst <a href="http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/">Jeremiah Owyang's fantastic blog</a>, where he explains social media in a business context, often in a format you can take directly to the boss.  There are lots of different resources available online to help the intrepid early adopter and I hope this list will be one of them.</p>

<p>Ultimately, I'm not yet convinced myself that persuading anyone is the way to go.  If you can make time on the side to use new tools and you can perform - perhaps the benefits can best speak for themselves.  If that's not the case inside of a company, I'm sure it is between two companies with different attitudes towards adoption of new social technologies.</p>

<p>ROI is the elephant in the middle of the room, and it's addressed a bit in item number ten below.  It's a topic I need more people to chime in on; I live and breathe this stuff and can articulate the benefits of it to a great degree, but it just speaks for itself to me too.  So if you're an ROI-head, pipe up.  Links, traffic, mindshare, connections between people and early access to actionable information are the things I usually cite without quantifying.</p>

<p>Let's get into the list though, and please do feel free to add your own thoughts as well.</p>

<h2>A List of Objections, Replies and Concessions Regarding Social Media and Tools</h2>

<p><strong>1. I suffer from information overload already.</strong></p>

<p>Possible replies:</p>

<p>Try just skimming messages in some fora - you may need to look closely at every email you get but you don't have to look at every Facebook friend's update.</p>

<p>The right tools for you will feel helpful in time, not like a burden.  Experiment for awhile with new tools and stick with the ones that deliver you the most high-quality information, whether those tools are high-quantity or not. (Thanks to <a href="http://www.aaronhockley.com/">Aaron Hockley</a> and <a href="http://lotusmedia.org/">Ruby Sinreich</a> for these thoughts.)</p>

<p>Check out tools like <a href="http://aiderss.com">AideRSS</a> and <a href="http://www.feedhub.com/">FeedHub</a> - just two examples of services aiming to improve the signal to noise ratio.</p>

<p>Times change and so do information paradigms. Get used to it.  The amount of information you had access to 3 years ago was infinitely more than people at any other point in history and we're in the middle of another huge leap right now.</p>

<p>Concession: If you think consuming all this new information is a challenge, wait until you try to find the time to make sense of it!  (Thanks to <a href="http://www.fullcirc.com/">Nancy White</a> for that thought.)</p>

<p></p>

<p><strong>2.  So much of what's discussed online is meaningless.  These forms of communication are shallow and make us dumber.  We have real work to do!</strong></p>

<p>Possible replies:</p>

<p>Much of it is not meaningless, but if you feel overwhelmed with meaninglessness - try subscribing to a search for keywords in a particular service and using that as your starting point for engagement.</p>

<p>Having a presence and starting a conversation is rarely a bad thing - bring quality conversation to a space and you'll find others ready to engage. (Thanks to <a href="http://verso.livejournal.com/">Banana Lee Fishbones</a>, obviously a fan of open, non-anonymous public communication :) for this articulation.)</p>

<p>Personal information can be very useful in understanding the context of more explicitly useful information.</p>

<p>If learning how the market feels about your organization, engaging with your customers and driving traffic to your web work - all very realistic goals for social media engagement - aren't work, then I don't know what is.  Even in the short term, strategic engagement with online social media will have a clear work pay-off.</p>

<p>Concession: The signal to noise ratio will be easier to maximize if you can find an experienced guide to learn from.  Just jumping into social media and new tools on your own will not neccesarily lead to a meaningful experience.  It could, but it will take longer.</p>

<p><strong>3. I don't have the time to contribute and moderate, it looks like it takes a lot of time and energy.</strong></p>

<p>Possible replies:</p>

<p>If you aren't going to eat that lunch of yours, I'd be happy to, thanks.</p>

<p>With practice, familiarity and technology fine-tuned with a little experience you'll find the time required will decrease.</p>

<p>You might consider this time spent on marketing or communication with existing customer base - perhaps there's something else in that department that isn't working well and could be replaced with online work.</p>

<p>Concession:<br />
Doing anything well does take time and energy.  You've obviously been thinking about this stuff a lot, it is important - and it's going to take time and energy.</p>

<p><strong>4.  Our customers don't use this stuff, the learning curve limits its usefulness to geeks.</strong></p>

<p>Possible replies:</p>

<p>You might be surprised to learn how many of your customers do already use these new tools. Even more will do so in the future.</p>

<p>The best designed tools are designed like good games - you can get small rewards right away and then learn more advanced skills to win bigger rewards.  Among online services that are intended for general audiences, only poorly designed ones are too geeky.</p>

<p>Many of these tools provide value vastly disproportionate to the literal number of people they reach.  These are like high-value focus groups where you'll gather information and preparation to engage with the rest of the world.</p>

<p>Try asking someone near you to give you an in-person demonstration of one of these tools.  You'll find it much easier to learn once you've seen the right paths taken to show what it can do.</p>

<p></p>

<p><strong>5. Communicators [bloggers, tweeters] are so fickle, better to stay unengaged than risk random brand damage.  We don't want hostile comments left about us on any forum we've legitimized.</strong></p>

<p>Possible replies:</p>

<p>If you need to, you can require that any comments left on your own site be approved before they appear.  This slows down the conversation but if it makes conversation possible for you then do it.</p>

<p>There are far fewer people who will take the time to say hostile things, even on the internet, than you might imagine.</p>

<p>Engage - you'll be appreciated more for it.  People are going to say what they are going to say - you can either let any criticism go unanswered or you can be the bigger person/brand for responding well.</p>

<p>Conversations are going to happen online, better to be engaged than to have it happening behind your back. (As articulated by <a href="http://siliconflorist.com/">Rick Turoczy</a>.)</p>

<p>It's ok, no one believes that anyone is perfect anymore.  Swing for the fences sometimes - you might strike out, but sometimes you'll hit a home run.</p>

<p>Even if you're not responding publicly, you should watch closely so you know what people are saying.  Maybe you don't have a blog, but subscribe to a blogsearch feed or alert for your company's name.  Maybe none of your people are on Twitter - you can subscribe to a feed for a search via <a href="http://terraminds.com">Terraminds</a>.</p>

<p>Concessions:<br />
Some of the critical things that get said about you online might not warrant a response.  Just decide which ones do and file the rest away somewhere.  </p>

<p>Communicating in this different context is very new and challenging for traditionally trained business people. Good luck.</p>

<p><br />
<strong>6. Traditional media and audiences are still bigger, we'll do new stuff when they do.</strong></p>

<p>Possible replies:</p>

<p>They already are, from blogging to online video to social networks to mobile to microblogging - big, established brands are already doing all of it.  They may be experimenting but they will bringing all their market dominance into the most useful social media sectors as soon as it suits them.  Will that be too late for you? It might be.</p>

<p>Traditional media audiences are also more passive - online audiences can engage with, rebroadcast and otherwise amplify your communication efforts.</p>

<p>Concessions:<br />
That's true and fair, if you think your business can thrive while taking that attitude towards a period of intense social and economic change then you just rock on with your bad self.  I'll be taking my love of innovation to the employer down the street.</p>

<p><strong>7. Upper management won't support it/dedicate resources for it.</strong></p>

<p>Possible replies:</p>

<p>A lot of technology adoption has for some time had to happen despite this reality.  People adopt new tools on their own at work, without permission.  They discover powerful ways to solve their problems and then they share them horizontally.</p>

<p>Compared to other expenses, meaningful engagement with new online technology does not have huge costs.</p>

<p>Concessions:<br />
Meaningful engagement with new technology does require some expenditure of time, energy and money.  If you're not willing to do this then you'll be unlikely to see big benefits.</p>

<p><strong>8. These startups can't offer meaningful security, they may not even be around in a year - I'll wait until Google or our enterprise software vendor starts offering this kind of functionality.</strong></p>

<p>Possible replies:</p>

<p>The skills you build and the connections you make will remain with you, though.  This is a paradigm shift underway more than it is about any particular tool.</p>

<p>Chose your tools carefully - expect data export as an option so you can back up or switch services whenever you need to.  This isn't widespread yet but the best tools allow it.</p>

<p>Concessions:<br />
You do need to be careful, but if you do so intelligently then the benefits can really outweight the risks.  It is very possible that any one of these services might shutter in a year or two, but you'll get a lot out of them in the meantime and hopefully won't lose access to your data if that happens.</p>

<p><strong>9. There are so many tools that are similar, I can't tell where to invest my time so I don't use any of it at all.</strong></p>

<p>Possible replies:</p>

<p>A little experimentation goes a long way. </p>

<p>Try asking people in your field who have some experience what tools they are using.</p>

<p>Try searching for keywords related to your work in various sites.  You'll find out that way which sites are best suited for you.</p>

<p>Concessions:</p>

<p>It's true, it can be very confusing and very few people are able to keep up with all the new services that are launching.  Don't worry about it, just do your best.</p>

<p><strong>10. That stuff's fine for sexy brands, but we sell [insert boring B2B brand] and are known for stability more than chasing the flavor-of-the-month.  We're doing just fine with the tools we've got, thanks.</strong></p>

<p>Possible replies:</p>

<p>Some of these things, RSS and wikis for example, aren't passing social fads - they are emerging best practices and the state of the art.  </p>

<p>ROI is very hard to measure, but try allocating a little  energy over time to experiment and see what kind of results you get.  From connections between people and projects, to search-friendly inbound links, to early access to important information - the benefits of engaging in new social media go on and on.</p>

<h2>Conclusions</h2>

<p>There are no conclusions, this is just a conversation.  Please feel free to add your thoughts in comments and check out the comments to read what others suggest as talking points when faced with these objections.</p>

<p><br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5395-comment:44865</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5395" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ten_common_objections_to_socia.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ten_common_objections_to_socia.php#c44865" />
    <title>Comment from David Scott Lewis on 2008-01-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>David Scott Lewis</name>
        <uri>http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidscottlewis</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidscottlewis">
        <![CDATA[<p>Marshall, I was observing the entire process on Twitter. (Yeah, it's nearly 5 am here in China, but that's another story.  I'm writing a review of semantic search tools for SemanticReport.)</p>

<p>Frankly, this was one of your weaker columns.  The responses, IMO, didn't adequately address most objections.</p>

<p>Stuff like read less, skim, read every 89th post, skip reading each alternate Thursday ... these are not solutions.</p>

<p>It's products/services like Twine that are the solution.</p>

<p>Not only does Twine provide one-click networking & discovery, but with its software smarts, it's a knowledge management tool that enables an user to sift through and make sense of the information fire hose we all face.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-07T21:00:19Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5395-comment:44867</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5395" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ten_common_objections_to_socia.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ten_common_objections_to_socia.php#c44867" />
    <title>Comment from Alan Wilensky on 2008-01-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Alan Wilensky</name>
        <uri>http://bizcast.typepad.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://bizcast.typepad.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I think that if one is a brand manager, you have access to top flight classical brand agencies on retainer, or are sampling the (currently hopelessly and comically bad) brand monitoring companies that mine the consumer generated corpus of text.</p>

<p>To make product management decisions based on a a product blog, or corporate social site, would be very unwise without precise details on the demographics and metrics being collected. </p>

<p>There is no doubt, however,that product managers in CE, professional electronics, and even more mundane durable goods sectors, need to investigate this new face of interaction.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-07T21:15:28Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5395-comment:44869</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5395" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ten_common_objections_to_socia.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ten_common_objections_to_socia.php#c44869" />
    <title>Comment from Lior Haner on 2008-01-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Lior Haner</name>
        <uri>http://yedda.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://yedda.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I think the fact people think that social media is flooding them/for geeks/uninteresting/not useful is because some sites just make the process too complicated instead of focusing on the simple basic needs. Even a space like search is still explorable with interesting approaches like Wikia search. Google has made it on being simple, and so has Wikipedia. There is still a huge audience out there that still don't get it, because they aren't getting the distilled benefit, no matter what's underneath. Currently, most people new to the web are seeing only clutter and features.</p>

<p>For example, if you have a simple question, you should be able to get a simple answer. OK, that last line was just plain shameless promotion. :-)<br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-07T21:18:11Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5395-comment:44873</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5395" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ten_common_objections_to_socia.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ten_common_objections_to_socia.php#c44873" />
    <title>Comment from Scot Duke on 2008-01-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Scot Duke</name>
        <uri>http://innovativebusinessgolf.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://innovativebusinessgolf.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I think you are going to have to be more specific to what industries would make these remarks.  Some businesses do have legitimate security issues with wading into using unproven social media tools.  As I totally agree that traditional offline audiences are still larger than the online population, I still would find it hard to believe that any business would totally ignore any opportunity to market to a new audience.   It comes down to offering a safe quality environment for social media.   Then the tools that are being created to heighten a business’ exposure to a new market will be accepted by more traditional businesses.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-07T21:40:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5395-comment:44875</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5395" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ten_common_objections_to_socia.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ten_common_objections_to_socia.php#c44875" />
    <title>Comment from Jeremiah Owyang on 2008-01-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jeremiah Owyang</name>
        <uri>http://web-strategist.com/blog</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://web-strategist.com/blog">
        <![CDATA[<p>Having gone through this at Hitachi (I as the community manager there) I've used numbers of adoption, looked at demographics and showed what competitors were doing.</p>

<p>Great resource Marshall</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-07T21:56:07Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5395-comment:44876</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5395" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ten_common_objections_to_socia.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ten_common_objections_to_socia.php#c44876" />
    <title>Comment from David Scott Lewis on 2008-01-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>David Scott Lewis</name>
        <uri>http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidscottlewis</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidscottlewis">
        <![CDATA[<p>In my comment (see # 1), I mentioned Twine.</p>

<p>Unfortunately, most people haven't had a chance to try Twine.</p>

<p>Truth be told, most people haven't even seen a demo of Twine!!</p>

<p>So here's the odd thing, voting for the Crunchies ends this Thursday.  Twine is up for the "Innovation" award.  But how can people vote for it if they haven't even seen a demo?  Yet, to ignore Twine is to ignore the Semantic Web.</p>

<p>Let's face it, all the other firms in the "Innovation" category are also doing cool things.  But Twine is game changing.  One-click social networking & auto-discovery, plus a knowledge management and collaboration tool -- for personal and business use.  It's a superset of today's best social bookmarking sites, beyond being a better contact management system like Facebook, and it even fills a gap in the online dating sphere by filling the void between Match.com and eHarmony -- and it's free.</p>

<p>Scoble recently did an interview with Twine's "Godfather," Nova Spivack.  Nova is the founder and CEO of Radar Networks, the company behind Twine.</p>

<p>Here's the video interview:  <a href="http://doiop.com/Twine-60Minutes_with_Scoble" rel="nofollow">http://doiop.com/Twine-60Minutes_with_Scoble</a> .</p>

<p>The Crunchies:<br />
<a href="http://vote.crunchies.techcrunch.com/category/view/innovation" rel="nofollow">http://vote.crunchies.techcrunch.com/category/view/innovation</a></p>

<p>When you get in on the Twine public beta, be sure to look me up.  My Twine user name is "davidlewis".  (You won't be able to miss me.)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-07T21:57:47Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5395-comment:44879</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5395" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ten_common_objections_to_socia.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ten_common_objections_to_socia.php#c44879" />
    <title>Comment from kayvaan on 2008-01-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>kayvaan</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><b>11. My contacts are fragmented amongst a plethora of different social networks or none at all.  I don't have a critical mass in any one social network.  Which network or networks do I choose to try to make an investment in and draw my contacts in?  I don't want to manage multiple profiles just because my network is fragmented.  Ugh - what a pain.  I guess I'll stick mainly with email because it's the true universal social network.  Anyway, a fair number of my contacts don't use ANY social media outside email.</b><br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-07T22:37:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5395-comment:44880</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5395" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ten_common_objections_to_socia.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ten_common_objections_to_socia.php#c44880" />
    <title>Comment from jennydecki on 2008-01-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>jennydecki</name>
        <uri>http://beyondmom.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://beyondmom.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>This is a GREAT article. It will not only help me in my business, it will also help the husband at his company.</p>

<p>In the past, I would just respond to objections with "Hater!"  Now I can sound eloquent and knowledgeable *grin*</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-07T22:55:10Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5395-comment:44887</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5395" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ten_common_objections_to_socia.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ten_common_objections_to_socia.php#c44887" />
    <title>Comment from JayJam on 2008-01-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>JayJam</name>
        <uri>http://jeremiahsjamison.wordpress.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://jeremiahsjamison.wordpress.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>At their core, these are all new communication media.  In my experience, there's been a learning curve that's yielded benefits over time.  Email over snail mail, mobile phones, IMs, versus POTs. Etc.  Any of these took work to figure out how to optimize versus past, but ultimately yield positive results.  Same's true with these new technologies, at a high level.</p>

<p>The other thing I'd say that's slightly different with blogging (broadly speaking, so I'd include Twitter, FBK, etc.) as a communication technology is that because its wide open 1: many style of communication, I find that it forces me to think more clealry when I communicate.  I've valued the benefits I've gotten from working to write a blog as a way to hone my opinions and communications as much as I've valued having access to so many people's thoughts. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-08T00:46:49Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5395-comment:44891</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5395" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ten_common_objections_to_socia.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ten_common_objections_to_socia.php#c44891" />
    <title>Comment from Joe Manna on 2008-01-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Joe Manna</name>
        <uri>http://www.joemanna.com/blog/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.joemanna.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>You've taken words out of my mouth and put it down. I often advocate social media to others who aren't familiar (I can't think of how many times I've said "aggregation" in the past week!)</p>

<p>I've responded to your article with a similar one. Sorry, you did take most of my thunder on this one. However, I think I make a few strong points. Check it out at <a href="http://www.joemanna.com/blog/10-win-wins-for-social-media-adoption-in-your-organization/" rel="nofollow">http://www.joemanna.com/blog/10-win-wins-for-social-media-adoption-in-your-organization/</a></p>

<p>Thanks!</p>

<p>~ Joe</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-08T01:19:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5395-comment:44899</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5395" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ten_common_objections_to_socia.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ten_common_objections_to_socia.php#c44899" />
    <title>Comment from Clay Newton on 2008-01-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Clay Newton</name>
        <uri>http://seriousaboutcamo.typepad.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://seriousaboutcamo.typepad.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I definitely have experienced some of the challenges here at my day job in ecomm at Bank of America. One of the challenges that I don't know how to deal with, and which isn't really talked about here, is: How to cope when the concepts of collaboration and social tools are fully supported, yet the tools that are adopted end up hampering all of the benefits of Social Media?</p>

<p>I did lots of different things, from "leading" workgroups dedicated to finding the best matched tools and strategies to our needs, to using tools in a guerrilla fashion. Ultimately, I was shot down when the workgroup's recommendations were overridden by "enterprise initiatives" that were similarly tasked and when a series of engagements with corporate lawyers left me shuddering and questioning my existence. </p>

<p>One of the things I have noticed is that for many people, installing their own Confluence wiki and using some hacked together internal tool is just fine in these types of environments. From and enterprise perspective, that just ensures more siloed data and less collaboration. </p>

<p>It goes without saying that this has a really negative effect on ROI for the business. When after months of usage a tool used by associates to collaborate gets shut down (taking with it all the collective knowledge, connections and functionality) it hits associate morale and productivity pretty hard as well.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-08T05:42:47Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5395-comment:44900</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5395" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ten_common_objections_to_socia.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ten_common_objections_to_socia.php#c44900" />
    <title>Comment from Dawn Foster on 2008-01-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Dawn Foster</name>
        <uri>http://fastwonderblog.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://fastwonderblog.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>It is interesting how many of these objections relate back to information overload. We increasingly have difficulties managing the stream of information vying for our attention every second of the day.  </p>

<p>Tools like RSS / Yahoo Pipes can really help people prioritize where they focus their attention, and I think we need to help people learn better ways of filtering this information to really help them overcome these objections. </p>

<p>I use Netvibes as my RSS reader with topics organized by tab and information organized by how important / credible it is. I have separate tabs for Web 2.0/social media, open source, community, Jive, and a few misc. tabs. Each one has the stuff that I want to pay the most attention to at the top with lower priority feeds near the bottom. It really helps me stay organized and focused on those things that are important to me.</p>

<p>Yahoo Pipes takes this one step further. You can aggregate information from multiple feeds and filter it by keywords and other items to create very specific targeted feeds. </p>

<p>The point is that we all have difficulty managing information overload and our attention stream; however, we can’t let this stop people from exploring new technologies and new ideas. The solution is not to avoid these new tools. Our focus should be on helping people find ways to better manage this stream of information in a way that increases, not decreases, their productivity.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-08T06:19:56Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5395-comment:44901</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5395" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ten_common_objections_to_socia.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ten_common_objections_to_socia.php#c44901" />
    <title>Comment from friarminor on 2008-01-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>friarminor</name>
        <uri>http://http:eedious.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://http:eedious.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Oftentimes, I just get this terrible headache about reading everything in the web and all i can do is close the laptop and lie down and close my eyes.  </p>

<p>However, due to compulsion or guilt of not doing the work of research, I get back on the web again.  All the time not really ever leaving the screen because when I close my eyes, the web pages and its content are still there inside my mind.</p>

<p>Fortunately, there's lousy broadband service to force me to take timeouts!</p>

<p>All that social media is turning me anti-social, kinda.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-08T06:32:11Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5395-comment:44910</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5395" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ten_common_objections_to_socia.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ten_common_objections_to_socia.php#c44910" />
    <title>Comment from Harald Felgner on 2008-01-08</title>
    <author>
        <name>Harald Felgner</name>
        <uri>http://www.felgner.ch</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.felgner.ch">
        <![CDATA[<p>Let's face it: Browsing the blogosphere during our nighttime occupations we take it for granted that everyone understands the sense and nonsense of all things Web 2.0. But that's quite distinct from our daytime job realities. Asking your IT department for a simple blog replacement of the outdated intranet CMS might bring you back to earth and prove that Web 1.0 might be arriving (if you are lucky) but trying to adopt social media and RSS in the workplace is like <a href="http://www.felgner.ch/2008/01/social_media_and_rss_adoption_in_business.html" rel="nofollow">reaching for the moon</a>.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-08T10:22:06Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5395-comment:44923</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5395" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ten_common_objections_to_socia.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ten_common_objections_to_socia.php#c44923" />
    <title>Comment from Pete Prestipino on 2008-01-08</title>
    <author>
        <name>Pete Prestipino</name>
        <uri>http://websitemagazine.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://websitemagazine.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Another objection I have heard repeatedly (at least from savvy execs) is that done correctly, the bandwidth demand (when done correctly) does not match up with the return (which is notoriously low if you're expecting sales, downloads, subscribers, etc). The response that seems to work on most that I have talked to is that acquiring even one genuine lead for many is sufficient. For example, if you're selling a 50K software deployment, it's a no brainer to engage.  </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-08T14:28:08Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5395-comment:44928</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5395" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ten_common_objections_to_socia.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ten_common_objections_to_socia.php#c44928" />
    <title>Comment from Ameel on 2008-01-08</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ameel</name>
        <uri>http://insanityworks.org/acme</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://insanityworks.org/acme">
        <![CDATA[<p>Another possible response for #7 (no upper management support): Social media adoption doesn't usually start with a directive (or permission or even funding) from upper management. The whole point of "social" in social media is that it starts at the grassroots level and then works its way up. Often, it is officially sanctioned only once upper management sees how beneficial it is -- and getting to that level usually takes a while. However, it is best if some responsible people at the grassroots level (a) steer and moderate it effectively and (b) seed it with content every now and then. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-08T14:48:47Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5395-comment:44930</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5395" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ten_common_objections_to_socia.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ten_common_objections_to_socia.php#c44930" />
    <title>Comment from Brian Payst on 2008-01-08</title>
    <author>
        <name>Brian Payst</name>
        <uri>http://www.unc.edu/~payst</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.unc.edu/~payst">
        <![CDATA[<p>Excellent post. I work in higher ed, so substitute departments for business and students for customers and the parallels are all there. We know our students are leveraging social tools for all they are worth, but we are really bad at dealing with systems that don't have a 10 year minimum life span. Becoming more flexible and being able to embrace what the larger markets are sending our way is critical to what we do and how we do it. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-08T14:59:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5395-comment:44934</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5395" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ten_common_objections_to_socia.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ten_common_objections_to_socia.php#c44934" />
    <title>Comment from bernard lunn on 2008-01-08</title>
    <author>
        <name>bernard lunn</name>
        <uri>http://bernardlunn.wordpress.com/about/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://bernardlunn.wordpress.com/about/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Marshall, that was a great post. You are on a roll in '08! I think tools can help, but fundamentally we need to re-learn mental disciplines and new ways to focus. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-08T15:54:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5395-comment:44991</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5395" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ten_common_objections_to_socia.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ten_common_objections_to_socia.php#c44991" />
    <title>Comment from Gab &quot;SEO ROI&quot; Goldenberg on 2008-01-08</title>
    <author>
        <name>Gab &quot;SEO ROI&quot; Goldenberg</name>
        <uri>http://seoroi.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://seoroi.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>In response to the ROI question</p>

<p>Look at it this way: start by focusing on the sales and create an affiliate program. Track revenue without engagement. Then, add social media. Track revenue again. I'm willing to bet you find some brand evangelists after you get involved with social media that earn you big sales dollars.</p>

<p>Another approach is to track the links you get. Then, find out what it would have cost you to buy those links. Guest-posting on a popular blog could get you an author footer with 2-3 links. If each of those is worth $300 - $500  (for traffic and SEs), who's to say that the ROI on developing that relationship wasn't worth it? Especially if it spreads and gets other bloggers linking. </p>

<p>Or if that one relationship turns into a series of guest posts. Suppose, conservatively, that it takes 30 - 40 hours over the course of a month or two months, in commenting, linking, stumbling etc to get that relationship set up. And it was done by an marketer earning above average at $50/hour (~100K a year).  So max you spent $2000 to build that relationship. You then pitch a three piece series of guest-posts and get it accepted. Each author box contains two links. At the mid-range value for these editorial links, of $400 a piece (I'm thinking a read-write web link or Problogger link), you've made $400. And the relationship is still there, so you can get more links on occasion when you do something noteworthy, send a long a tip (hattip link), etc etc. </p>

<p>And that valuation totally ignores the mindshare, RSS subscribers etc you gain from that. What if those guest posts, besides giving you links, are links to your newsletter? Can you say list-building?</p>

<p>ROI ... I think so!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-09T06:51:12Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5395-comment:45027</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5395" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ten_common_objections_to_socia.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ten_common_objections_to_socia.php#c45027" />
    <title>Comment from kernelkat on 2008-01-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>kernelkat</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>You didn't convince me.  I still think most of what is online is a waste of time.  You can't reduce information overload by increasing the amount of content your viewing and tools you are using online.  Why not advise people to take a break from the screen when they feel overwhelmed, or to ingest the information a little at a time, and don't feel the pressure to finish everything in one setting.  Stuff like that is more helpful.  </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-01-09T21:37:33Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>