<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_profile_tabs.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2009:/1/tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5754-</id>
  <updated>2009-11-23T19:32:16Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Will Facebook Profile Tabs Lead to Better Apps?</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.23-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5754</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_profile_tabs.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=5754" title="Will Facebook Profile Tabs Lead to Better Apps?" />
    <published>2008-02-27T04:12:54Z</published>
    <updated>2008-02-27T19:03:44Z</updated>
    <title>Will Facebook Profile Tabs Lead to Better Apps?</title>
    <summary>One of the big social news stories this evening was Facebook&apos;s announcement that it is actively working on a redesign to user profiles that would break the profile page down into three, main tabbed components. A &quot;Wall&quot; tab that would mash up the current mini-feed and message wall, an &quot;About&quot; tab that includes bio information,...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Josh Catone</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Facebook" />
    
    <category term="Products" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img border="0" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/facebook-logo.jpg" width="100" height="35" />One of the big social news stories this evening was <a href="http://www.techmeme.com/080226/p141#a080226p141">Facebook's announcement</a> that it is actively working on a redesign to user profiles that would break the profile page down into three, main tabbed components.  A "Wall" tab that would mash up the current mini-feed and message wall, an "About" tab that includes bio information, and a "Photos" tab, which is pretty self explanatory.  Notably absent from the mix is a prominent place for applications.</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>Applications will still have space on the profile page in the right hand side bar, but obviously that space is limited. They'll also have exposure on the Wall tab, which will mash in content from the mini-feed, which can receive updates from applications.  According to a <a href="http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=8143972909">note posted by Facebook</a> on a <a href="http://www.facebook.com/FacebookPreviews">previews page</a> the company has set up to allow people to give feedback during the design process, users will also be able to add "additional tabs where you can feature your favorite applications." (Because "Photos" is actually an application, that tab as seen in the screenshot provided by Facebook [below] might actually be optional and a demonstration of an app tab.)</p>

<p>What does more restricted space for applications means?  Facebook hopes that it translates to better apps.  In a <a href="http://developers.facebook.com/news.php?blog=1&story=87">blog post</a> last Friday alerting developers of the upcoming changes, Facebook encouraged "application developers to focus on building applications that facilitate communication, generate meaningful activity, and increase users' trust," noting that any applications that "don't provide value and meaning for users" would face "challenges" under the new profile layout.</p>

<p><img border="0" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/facebook-profile-tabs.jpg" width="523" height="604" /></p>

<p>We noted last month that Facebook applications may have <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/have_facebook_apps_peaked_in_popularity.php">peaked in popularity</a> and that a lot of people are beginning to feel "app fatigue."  We suggested then that the solution for developers to overcome app fatigue, and to overcome stricter rules being imposed by Facebook about how applications can be spread via invites was simple: make better applications.</p>

<p>Facebook's looming profile design changes seem to be aimed squarely at the large number of apps that have been developed for its platform that don't add much utility.  Once upon a time, people flocked to Facebook in large part because it had a cleaner design than rival social networks.  But the launch of the Platform last May started Facebook down the road toward cluttered profiles <a href="http://www.web-bandit.com/lee/2008/02/25/is-your-facebook-cluttered/">like this one</a>.  Clearly, the social network is attempting to push people toward trimming down their use of applications that provide little utility, and rather focusing on applications that offer "meaningful activity," as they phrase it.</p>

<p>This is a long term strategy for Facebook.  In the near term, getting people to stop using silly apps (or at least place less emphasis on them and use them less) means fewer page views and less ad inventory.  But in the long term, getting developers to create more apps that have real utility for people, will get more people to rely on Facebook for more of their daily activity -- which furthers the goal of building the Facebook platform into a web operating system.</p>

<p>It is, however, important to take these changes with a grain of salt.  What Facebook is showing off now is early in the design process and is not set to drop until Spring, so changes are certainly possible. The social network is inviting users to participate in the design process by <a href="http://www.facebook.com/FacebookPreviews">giving feedback on iterations</a> of the new profile design.</p>

<p>What do you think of Facebook's planned tabbed profiles?  Will it result in better apps?  Will diminish the clutter that has begun to take hold of many Facebook profiles? Let us know your thoughts in the comments.</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5754-comment:47820</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5754" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_profile_tabs.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_profile_tabs.php#c47820" />
    <title>Comment from Tim Jones on 2008-02-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>Tim Jones</name>
        <uri>http://blog.webstruxure.co.nz/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.webstruxure.co.nz/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Will Facebook's planned tab profiles help to diminish the clutter on Facebook profiles? I'd like to think so, because the great advantage Facebook has over MySpace is its clearer, cleaner, more professional user interface. Facebook's increasing clutter erodes that advantage. But the tabbing won't help if people just fill up each tab with junk.</p>

<p>Will the planned tab profiles result in better apps? We'll have to wait and see whether each app gets a separate tab, or whether there's some other way of laying them out. But I think a lot of responsbility for app fatigue lies with users: if we all "just said no" to those invitations to send each other gifts, attacks, hugs, and movie quizzes, then we wouldn't have such trouble finding meaningful information on each others' profiles.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-02-27T05:05:44Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5754-comment:47822</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5754" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_profile_tabs.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_profile_tabs.php#c47822" />
    <title>Comment from MUW on 2008-02-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>MUW</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Orkut had this for a long time. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-02-27T05:37:01Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5754-comment:47830</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5754" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_profile_tabs.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_profile_tabs.php#c47830" />
    <title>Comment from Rodney Rumford on 2008-02-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>Rodney Rumford</name>
        <uri>http://www.facereviews.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.facereviews.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Josh,<br />
Spring cleaning part 2. I think this is a step in the right direction for making facebook profile pages move engaging. It allows users to segment and then create additional tabs for their favorite app. It will in fact prove to be more interesting.</p>

<p>facebook keeps changing and evolving these profile pages... first favicon app navigation, then extended profiles, now this.</p>

<p>It will be interesting to see how many apps gets deleted by users in this new reshuffling process. A huge uninstall trend/surge took place with the extended profile implementation.</p>

<p>At least I commend facebook for reaching out proactively to spread the word instead of surprising developers with no pre-warning.</p>

<p>Cheers! Rodney Rumford</p>

<p>More thoughts on this here: <a href="http://facereviews.com/2008/02/26/new-improved-tabbed-facebook-profiles/" rel="nofollow">http://facereviews.com/2008/02/26/new-improved-tabbed-facebook-profiles/</a> </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-02-27T07:28:41Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5754-comment:47865</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5754" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_profile_tabs.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_profile_tabs.php#c47865" />
    <title>Comment from Mary Specht on 2008-02-27</title>
    <author>
        <name>Mary Specht</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I'm eager to know if app developers will have to do a great deal of redesigning in response to a potentially different layout. And Rodney, I agree, it's helpful that they've been open about their redesign process to give developers a heads up. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-02-27T15:21:49Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5754-comment:47895</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5754" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_profile_tabs.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_profile_tabs.php#c47895" />
    <title>Comment from theharmonyguy on 2008-02-27</title>
    <author>
        <name>theharmonyguy</name>
        <uri>http://theharmonyguy.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://theharmonyguy.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Another plus is that this may get developers to think outside the profile box.  I've seen so many applications that rely heavily on a profile box, but not every application needs a profile box.  I think the potential for completely canvas-based applications is quite underrated.  A tab on a profile is very similar to a canvas page, and I'm sure developers will be vying for users to add their apps as tabs.  That could lead to applications which go beyond the simplicity and smallness of a profile box and actually lead to some game-changing social applications.</p>

<p>Of course, I've used words like "may" and "could" several times here. :)  Only time will tell, but I still say the "killer Facebook app" has not yet been written.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-02-27T19:31:08Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>