<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/yokia_why_nokia_should_buy_yahoo.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2008:/1/tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5588-</id>
  <updated>2008-07-03T21:47:25Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for 2008 Web Predictions</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.1</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5588</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/yokia_why_nokia_should_buy_yahoo.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=5588" title="Yokia! Why Nokia Should Buy Yahoo" />
    <published>2008-02-07T20:08:00Z</published>
    <updated>2008-02-07T20:27:18Z</updated>
    <title>Yokia! Why Nokia Should Buy Yahoo</title>
    <summary>Syndicated from last100, our digital lifestyle blog Forget Microsoft, News Corp. or even Apple. Nokia, the world&apos;s no.1 mobile handset maker, should buy Yahoo. Or so says Information Week&apos;s Stephen Wellman, who puts forward a compelling argument: If Nokia is repositioning itself as a Web services company, to combat falling profit margins on its hardware,...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Steve O&apos;Hear, last100 editor</name>
      
    </author>
    
    <category term="Analysis" />
    
    <category term="Mobile Services" />
    
    <category term="Yahoo" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><em><a href="http://www.last100.com/2008/02/07/yokia-why-nokia-should-buy-yahoo/">Syndicated from last100</a>, our digital lifestyle blog</em></p>

<p><img src="http://www.last100.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/yokia.png" title="Yokia! Why Nokia should buy Yahoo" alt="Yokia! Why Nokia should buy Yahoo" />Forget Microsoft, News Corp. or even Apple. Nokia, the world's no.1 mobile handset maker, should buy Yahoo. Or so says <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2008/02/the_top_5_reaso.html">Information Week's Stephen Wellman</a>, who puts forward a compelling argument: If Nokia is <a href="http://www.last100.com/2007/08/29/nokia-announces-online-musc-store-takes-aim-at-apple-and-mobile-carriers/">repositioning itself as a Web services company</a>, to combat falling profit margins on its hardware, then acquiring Yahoo would help to give the company a much needed presence on the desktop (not just mobile), as well as beef up its Web offerings and Internet brand recognition in general. </p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>"Nokia is now a Web company, not just a handset maker. But, the company acts as if the Web is just mobile and has no desktop component. This isn't a very smart strategy", writes Wellman. All of Nokia's mobile web rivals: Google, Microsoft and, of course, Yahoo all have desktop products.</p>

<p>"These Web giants are leveraging their vast desktop Web audiences to grow their mobile initiatives. While Nokia has tons of mobile phone customers, it doesn't have as many Web application users", notes Wellman.</p>

<p><img src="http://www.last100.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/yahoo_nokia.png" title="Yahoo on Nokia" alt="Yahoo on Nokia" align="right" />As well as gaining a presence on the desktop, a Yahoo acquisition would help Nokia to further develop its range of location-based services (building on its purchase of GPS company Navteq), again to fend off challenges from Google. Ditto mobile advertising. In addition, Yahoo would give Nokia an instant bump in its U.S. brand recognition. Despite claiming a 40% worldwide market share for mobile phones, Nokia doesn't compete nearly as well in North America.</p>

<p>Overall, however, a combined Yahoo/Nokia (Yokia!) would provide Google with a formidable competitor in the pending battle for the mobile web. This is, as ex-Microsoftee <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7x_IywfgHE">Robert Scoble likes to point out</a>, the real reason why Microsoft is attempting an aggressive takeover of Yahoo.</p>

<p>Alternatively, a nightmare scenario exists for both Microsoft and Yahoo: Yahoo sells it ad business to Google in return for an ad-revenue partnership. Meanwhile, the Open Handset Alliance starts to produce real results and Google's Android becomes a widely adopted mobile OS. The result? Google dominates the mobile Web (i.e. mobile ads) as it does on the desktop.</p>

<p><strong>What do you think? Should Nokia merge with Yahoo? And yes, before you ask, Nokia does have the cash.</strong></p>

<p><em>This post is <a href="http://www.last100.com/2008/02/07/yokia-why-nokia-should-buy-yahoo/">syndicated from last100</a>, our digital lifestyle blog covering Internet TV, digital music, Mobile Web and more. You can <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/last100">subscribe to last100 here</a>.</em></p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5588-comment:46356</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5588" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/yokia_why_nokia_should_buy_yahoo.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/yokia_why_nokia_should_buy_yahoo.php#c46356" />
    <title>Comment from Stephen Wellman on 2008-02-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Stephen Wellman</name>
        <uri>http://www.overtheair.biz</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.overtheair.biz">
        <![CDATA[<p>And the most obvious reason Nokia should buy Yahoo: Flickr.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2008/02/flickr_the_bigg.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2008/02/flickr_the_bigg.html</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-02-07T22:26:06Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5588-comment:46361</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5588" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/yokia_why_nokia_should_buy_yahoo.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/yokia_why_nokia_should_buy_yahoo.php#c46361" />
    <title>Comment from MySchizoBuddy on 2008-02-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>MySchizoBuddy</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Nokia doesn't have the cash, it has only $9B in cash and short term investments.<br />
<a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?fstype=bi&q=NYSE:NOK" rel="nofollow">http://finance.google.com/finance?fstype=bi&q=NYSE:NOK</a></p>

<p>Nokia's stock however is pretty good</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-02-08T02:39:16Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5588-comment:46378</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5588" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/yokia_why_nokia_should_buy_yahoo.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/yokia_why_nokia_should_buy_yahoo.php#c46378" />
    <title>Comment from kuldeep on 2008-02-08</title>
    <author>
        <name>kuldeep</name>
        <uri>http://www.moviepresslive.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.moviepresslive.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>If you are considering Nokia as a option, then why not Apple....it would be much better and both can benefit heavily from this.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-02-08T09:02:47Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5588-comment:46383</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5588" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/yokia_why_nokia_should_buy_yahoo.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/yokia_why_nokia_should_buy_yahoo.php#c46383" />
    <title>Comment from Emre Sokullu on 2008-02-08</title>
    <author>
        <name>Emre Sokullu</name>
        <uri>http://emresokullu.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://emresokullu.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Steve, there is one thing I'm sure - they'll need to change their name before entering the Turkish market. It doesn't sound so good in Turkish :)</p>

<p>Great points btw...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-02-08T10:11:09Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5588-comment:46479</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5588" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/yokia_why_nokia_should_buy_yahoo.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/yokia_why_nokia_should_buy_yahoo.php#c46479" />
    <title>Comment from davidlian on 2008-02-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>davidlian</name>
        <uri>http://www.davidlian.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.davidlian.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>But I'm wondering why Microsoft (with pretty decent web services) would need Yahoo! if not for users....and Flickr.</p>

<p>Would it be money better spent for them to buy out Motorola's ailing handset division?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-02-11T02:55:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5588-comment:47126</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5588" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/yokia_why_nokia_should_buy_yahoo.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/yokia_why_nokia_should_buy_yahoo.php#c47126" />
    <title>Comment from A.T. on 2008-02-19</title>
    <author>
        <name>A.T.</name>
        <uri>http://silpol.blogspot.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://silpol.blogspot.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>oh, please, no - we don't need that Americana slack, we have enough own EU one.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-02-19T19:00:54Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>