<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/friendfeed_vs_socialthing.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2008:/1/tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5881-</id>
  <updated>2008-05-09T18:04:26Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for FriendFeed vs SocialThing!</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.1</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5881</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/friendfeed_vs_socialthing.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=5881" title="FriendFeed vs SocialThing!" />
    <published>2008-03-15T01:05:09Z</published>
    <updated>2008-03-15T01:08:16Z</updated>
    <title>FriendFeed vs SocialThing!</title>
    <summary>In the past year there has been an explosion in social media. Where once we had only to worry about managing our Facebook or MySpace networks, we&apos;re now each creating a seemingly infinite number of feeds. The burden of this data is a lot to manage, but if social media is to remain useful, then...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Blake Robinson</name>
      
    </author>
    
    <category term="Analysis" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/fflogo.jpg">In the past year there has been an explosion in social media. Where once we had only to worry about managing our Facebook or MySpace networks, we're now each creating a seemingly infinite number of feeds. The burden of this data is a lot to manage, but if social media is to remain useful, then steps must be taken to alleviate the strain of information.</p>

<p>One approach is to aggregate information about our and our friends' activities across all the networks we participate in at one location.  Such locations are commonly called "lifestreaming applications."  Two of these applications, <a href="http://friendfeed.com">FriendFeed</a> and <a href="http://socialthing.com">SocialThing!</a>, have taken <a href="http://www.techmeme.com/080314/p70#a080314p70">a particularly high profile</a> in the past few days.</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<h2>The Services</h2>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/friendfeedscreen.jpg" align="right" hspace="5px" vspace="5px">We predicted that the network of networks <a href="http://friendfeed.com">FriendFeed</a> would be <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/sxsw_breakout_app_of_2008.php">the breakout app of SXSW 2008</a>.  It's not clear how big an impact that event made on the service but in the days following, it's blown up.   In FriendFeed, friends create accounts and add all of their independent feeds from blogs, bookmarking, music services etc. Then the service aggregates your friends' feeds into one concise stream.  It currently supports 28 services ranging from Amazon Wishlists to Zooomr photos to more common feeds like Twitter, Facebook and Flickr.  </p>

<p>Sean Ammirati interviewed the founders of FriendFeed at ReadWriteTalk in February (<a href="http://readwritetalk.com/2008/02/04/bret-taylor-paul-buchheit-co-founders-friendfeed/">podcast+transcript</a>).  Tech blogger <a href="http://www.louisgray.com/live/">Louis Gray</a> has taken the lead in covering FriendFeed and related services.  See also satire site <a href="http://www.friendfeedfeed.com/>FriendFeedFeed</a>.</p>

<center><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/sthing600.jpg" width="600" height="194"></center>

<p><a href="http://www.socialthing.com">SocialThing!</a> is the new kid on the (new) block and still in private beta. It currently supports just six services (Twitter, Pownce, Flickr, Facebook, Livejournal and Vimeo), but looks considerably prettier than FriendFeed - in case that matters to anyone. I had a chance to speak to the SocialThing! developers at SXSW and they assured me that everything was in place for new services to start becoming available quickly.</p>

<p><strong>Key Differences</strong></p>

<p>FriendFeed has a bit of a head start, but even barring that, there are more intuitive features in place despite its visual shortcomings. The most notable is that it links you to your friends' content even if you don't have access to a particular service. The reason is that when you friend someone on FriendFeed, that person has generated an actual account on the service, so they've elected to port in all of their desired feeds. So my friends can read my Ma.gnolia links even if they're a Del.icio.us users and vice versa. It's in this feature that its real power lies.</p>

<p>The reason SocialThing! will face pitfalls is that it's really just an RSS aggregator and as such, it doesn't do anything that you couldn't just do with your regular aggregator. Because FriendFeed creates a new network, it can do a variety of entirely new tasks, like suggesting new friends, a feature that I've found to be remarkably accurate in predicting individuals whom I'd actually be interested in. Additionally, FriendFeed adds functions such as inline commenting and "like" (thumbs up for a particular item) that add to the social experience.</p>

<h2>Why FriendFeed is Better</h2>

<p>Social media will continue to escalate for the foreseeable future, but it will become increasingly unlikely that you'll have accounts for every service out there. With FriendFeed, you don't have to, because of its network of networks, you can just coast along with the few accounts you're comfortable with, but still have access to friendly content across the board. This is the true innovation and it's the reason users will adopt FriendFeed over an RSS wrapper like SocialThing!</p>

<p>These are just the two most prominent of many lifestreaming services that have launched recently.  See the <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/lifestreaming_primer.php">ReadWriteWeb primer on lifestreaming</a> from January and our <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/35_lifestreamin_apps.php">list of 35 lifestreaming apps</a> from last month. While Facebook's newsfeed has been copied by almost every other social network online, other innovators and entrepreneurs are aiming to offer more powerful versions of the same idea in standalone, cross-application lifestreaming services.</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5881-comment:49338</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5881" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/friendfeed_vs_socialthing.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/friendfeed_vs_socialthing.php#c49338" />
    <title>Comment from Josh on 2008-03-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>Josh</name>
        <uri>http://www.intensewebmedia.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.intensewebmedia.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Blake,<br />
I respectfully disagree. </p>

<p>In my opinion SocialThing is dramatically easier to use and more fluid than FriendFeed. I don't believe FriendFeed is a bad service and to be honest I think there is room for more than one player in this niche.</p>

<p>Still, I prefer SocialThing! </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-03-15T03:21:12Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5881-comment:49339</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5881" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/friendfeed_vs_socialthing.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/friendfeed_vs_socialthing.php#c49339" />
    <title>Comment from Pb30 on 2008-03-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>Pb30</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Here's why I prefer Socialthing:<br />
- I don't want another social network combining social networks, I want to aggregate my friends activity in one place, and typical RSS readers don't work all that well with social feeds<br />
- I don't want to re-add all my friends somewhere else, or add them on Digg, then find them on Friendfeed. I just have to friend the person once on whatever service, and they'll show up in Socialthing. <br />
- Socialthing adds some extra functionality depending on the service (one click to reply to a tweet, or view Pownce replies). It's a bit more than an RSS wrapper<br />
- Socialthing uses their profile picture</p>

<p>Here's my problems with Friendfeed:<br />
- Most of my friend aren't on it, and adding imaginary friends takes way too many clicks, it needs to be redesigned<br />
- It doesn't stay in sync with my friends list at the service<br />
- I can't search by profile URL, just by name. And I'm not told if an imaginary friend joins Friendfeed.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-03-15T04:00:46Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5881-comment:49340</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5881" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/friendfeed_vs_socialthing.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/friendfeed_vs_socialthing.php#c49340" />
    <title>Comment from pb30.myopenid.com on 2008-03-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>pb30.myopenid.com</name>
        <uri>http://twitter.com/pb30</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://twitter.com/pb30">
        <![CDATA[<p>Also note that Socialthing previously supported more services, like Digg, delicious, Youtube, etc but they were disabled after being TechCrunch'ed</p>

<p>See their blog:<br />
"[UPDATE] We have temporarily disabled a couple of services from displaying during this heavy time. We’re working out ways to turn them back on and will let you know just as soon as that happens."</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-03-15T04:19:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5881-comment:49342</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5881" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/friendfeed_vs_socialthing.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/friendfeed_vs_socialthing.php#c49342" />
    <title>Comment from Ben Taylor on 2008-03-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ben Taylor</name>
        <uri>http://blog.bogdind.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.bogdind.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I guess I should disclose that I was, for over a year, involved in socialthing's development. What I did there is up for debate, I guess.</p>

<p>I don't comment on the stuff I read about it, but a friend shared this story using Google Reader's magic (I got the notification through FriendFeed, which I prefer and will explain later.) I feel this post should be called, "I think FriendFeed is better than socialthing! and here is why." You nail some points on the head, and you're way off on others.</p>

<p>The following is my opinion, and my opinion alone.</p>

<p>You say, "The reason SocialThing! will face pitfalls is that it's really just an RSS aggregator and as such, it doesn't do anything that you couldn't just do with your regular aggregator."</p>

<p>That's not the reason it will face pitfalls, but OK. Socialthing! is more than "just an RSS aggregator..." I would argue that FriendFeed is just an RSS aggregator, but that's personal preference I guess. </p>

<p>Google Reader doesn't give me the ability to respond to Tweets or Pownce notes, update other services, or display all of that in an orderly fashion. Neither does FriendFeed. I can leave a comment to someone's Tweet or Pownce note, but that person has to log into the FriendFeed site to see it. Not a fan of that. I can use Socialthing! to respond to a Tweet, and that response can be viewed on Twitter.com, or any of the multiple third party apps that start with a lower cased, "t". </p>

<p>Socialthing! the "RSS aggregator," gives you the ability to access information you can't get through an RSS feed because it hooks into the other services that it supports using the APIs provided. I can see the latest photos my friends have posted to Facebook through socialthing! I can't do that with an RSS aggregator because that information isn't available on an RSS feed, and I'm not sure if FriendFeed is able to display that information. I haven't tried. My only FriendFeed friend hasn't posted any photos to Facebook since I signed up for it several weeks ago.</p>

<p>Yes, FriendFeed has a lot of power behind it. It's made by some former Googlers, and didn't they cross the million dollar mark in funding not too long ago? Socialthing! has an up hill battle on its hands. It's a David and Goliath situation, but I believe the two can co-exist in the world. It's more like a console war, and not a format war. </p>

<p>There is some great talent behind the socialthing! brand. Ben Brightwell is a Jedi when it comes to coding, and the guy is dedicated. I've seen him come home from working a full shift at Geek Squad, work on a project until the wee hours of the morning, get an hour or so of sleep, and repeat the process again the next day. He's an ace guy to have in charge of the site's development, and I'm sure the other two developers are also ace. Brian DeWitt is another excellent person to have on board. I've worked with him on other projects. The man is just great, but my point is, they may lack the spiffy resume the FriendFeed guys have, but they can get stuff done, and probably surpass the FriendFeed guys.</p>

<p>Even though socialthing! supports less services, what you're able to do with that information beats the pants off of what you can do with FriendFeed's interpretation. </p>

<p>Now, here is what I think socialthing's pitfall is, and why I prefer FriendFeed. Socialthing! is prettier. I agree, but being the pretty girl and implementing a lot of AJAX wizardry comes with a hefty price.  Try accessing socialthing! on a mobile device that isn't made by Apple. Fire up Internet Explorer and try to, "get your digital life in order."</p>

<p>You can't.</p>

<p>Socialthing! caters to the Mac crowd right now, and that's a badthing! (hehe). FriendFeed has socialthing! beat in the accessibility department, and that can make or break a site. Both services show me what my friends are doing, but I'm limited on what I can use to view this information if I use socialthing! I can access FriendFeed on my Windows Mobile device with little problem. Sure, I'm not looking at an optimized version of the site, and the header is a little jacked, but I can still access the information the site provides on a plethora of platforms. </p>

<p>You can't ask someone to download and install a different browser, or buy an expensive device to access your site. That's how most people who are, "turned away," might feel. Adding support for Internet Explorer, the market leader, later on down the road is a bad idea. Hey, I hate IE too, but if being a niche is their goal, and being THE site for this sort of stuff isn't, then I'm wrong. Dead wrong.</p>

<p>I know the site is in private beta right now, and the fixes for their accessibility problems are coming soon (I can read blog), but they have a lot of stuff on their, "it's coming soon," plate right now. FriendFeed is open for public consumption, and it plays nice with others. Having both is redundant, and most people might feel that it's one or the other. (I can live with both.)</p>

<p>This is getting really long in the tooth, so I'll end this now. I do tend to be wordy.</p>

<p>-Ben<br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-03-15T06:09:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5881-comment:49347</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5881" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/friendfeed_vs_socialthing.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/friendfeed_vs_socialthing.php#c49347" />
    <title>Comment from Tom M on 2008-03-15</title>
    <author>
        <name>Tom M</name>
        <uri>http://tommoor.tumblr.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://tommoor.tumblr.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Personally, i follow a lot of RSS feeds and a lot of web news and as you say friendfeed and socialthing are getting a lot of attention recently.. I feel like everyone here is in a little bubble though with sentances like 'we're now each creating a seemingly infinite number of feeds'</p>

<p>..well i am. But 99% of the everyday people i know arent! I am a university student in the UK and yesterday asked everyone i could find on my course and not one of them had even HEARD of twitter or friendfeed. I think there is a larger problem here in that your average joe doesn't want to sign up for 5-10 services and then aggregate that data - and it is going to be a long time before they do, if ever.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-03-15T11:37:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5881-comment:49349</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5881" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/friendfeed_vs_socialthing.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/friendfeed_vs_socialthing.php#c49349" />
    <title>Comment from Rob Diana on 2008-03-15</title>
    <author>
        <name>Rob Diana</name>
        <uri>http://regulargeek.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://regulargeek.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I understand there is a huge amount of hype surrounding these two services, but they are not the only players. SocialThing's ability to comment on the feeds could be the big differentiator. However, these sites do not have the extensive coverage of Profilactic. They now cover 150 sites! Granted they have some work to do as well, but they should be getting much more press than they do. I think it will be interesting to see how all of these sites fare in the long run and SocialThing is definitely one to keep your eyes on.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-03-15T12:03:51Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5881-comment:49350</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5881" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/friendfeed_vs_socialthing.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/friendfeed_vs_socialthing.php#c49350" />
    <title>Comment from Nicole Simon on 2008-03-15</title>
    <author>
        <name>Nicole Simon</name>
        <uri>http://crueltobekind.org</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://crueltobekind.org">
        <![CDATA[<p>Yes, it is really great that there is yet another service including everything from everywhere, doubled or trippled information in some cases without giving ME the chance to choose what I want.</p>

<p>At least Plaxo's Pulse allows me to set "never display this" or "never display this from person X" and this ways gives me a chance to reduce the load of redundant information.</p>

<p>Plus: Wonderful that there is yet another system to provide on site information rather than going for the in app ways to communicate. Why should anyone comment on a blog when he or she can do it in 35 or more different life steam apps?</p>

<p>How silly of me to expect something innovative in managing information overflow rather than adding even more to it ...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-03-15T12:21:07Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5881-comment:49351</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5881" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/friendfeed_vs_socialthing.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/friendfeed_vs_socialthing.php#c49351" />
    <title>Comment from Serviced apartments bangalore on 2008-03-15</title>
    <author>
        <name>Serviced apartments bangalore</name>
        <uri>http://manjunatharesidency.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://manjunatharesidency.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>There is just too much social networking happening... at this rate my head is going to explode soon...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-03-15T12:33:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5881-comment:49355</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5881" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/friendfeed_vs_socialthing.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/friendfeed_vs_socialthing.php#c49355" />
    <title>Comment from GraemeThickins on 2008-03-15</title>
    <author>
        <name>GraemeThickins</name>
        <uri>http://www.tech-surf-blog.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.tech-surf-blog.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>wait till you see PeopleBrowsr -- I got a private demo at Graphing Social Patterns/ETech, and it blew me away</p>

<p>the Aussies are coming!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-03-15T15:12:56Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5881-comment:49381</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5881" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/friendfeed_vs_socialthing.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/friendfeed_vs_socialthing.php#c49381" />
    <title>Comment from Steve on 2008-03-15</title>
    <author>
        <name>Steve</name>
        <uri>http://bagofspoons.net</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://bagofspoons.net">
        <![CDATA[<p>I've tried a few aggregators. I wanted something that allowed me keep track of what friends were up to and also something I could post so that they could see what I am up to. I don't expect my friends to join the same services as me and that includes aggregators. A lot of my friends are just not that geeky.</p>

<p>I've played with Pownce, Muhgshot and Onaswarm and found them all lacking in some way.</p>

<p>I have settled on Friendfeed as it lets me create imaginary friends for my own convenience. I doesn't cover every service out there, but you can include anything with a feed and even multiple instances from each service.</p>

<p>If I happen to be on the same service as a friend then I can check their updates there, but that requires me to go to that site. Meanwhile I have a FF gadget on my iGoogle page that lets me see any updates.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-03-15T21:43:41Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5881-comment:49385</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5881" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/friendfeed_vs_socialthing.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/friendfeed_vs_socialthing.php#c49385" />
    <title>Comment from Matt on 2008-03-15</title>
    <author>
        <name>Matt</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Blake... you nailed it... great post. you said exactly what I felt but couldn't put in the right words... ty!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-03-15T22:27:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5881-comment:49395</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5881" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/friendfeed_vs_socialthing.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/friendfeed_vs_socialthing.php#c49395" />
    <title>Comment from vanderwal on 2008-03-15</title>
    <author>
        <name>vanderwal</name>
        <uri>http://vanderwal.net/random/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://vanderwal.net/random/">
        <![CDATA[<p>This is a silly post. There are 35 to 40 services doing the same thing and RRW picks 2 to say who is best? None of the services are more than a feature in another service. In fact, from my own use Jaiku had one of the best tools from an end user perspective as the individual receiving the aggregated feed can unsubscribe from sources and not have to get the whole feed if that is not what the person cares about.</p>

<p>FriendFeed breaks things more than it fixes. Commenting on a feed item with out it going back to the source breaks one hell of a lot more than it fixes. This leads to needing another tool or service to repair what FriendFeed breaks. Pointless.</p>

<p>I have been looking for tools that can do what these services do, but then work like TechMeme or TailRank to filter and aggregate to clean up feed repetition of subjects. AI and IR researchers have been doing this for 10 years or more. It is about time these get smart not fighting over who has different colored shoelaces (it is about that petty).</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-03-16T01:50:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5881-comment:49405</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5881" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/friendfeed_vs_socialthing.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/friendfeed_vs_socialthing.php#c49405" />
    <title>Comment from Matt on 2008-03-15</title>
    <author>
        <name>Matt</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I hear a lot of valid arguments being made around this topic for the rights of the blogger/publisher to "own" the comments being made to their content. But i think it's very important that the line not be blurred when it comes to the users owning their content... the comments. </p>

<p>The countless people who consume and communicate are the true blood of the big awesome machine, to have the ability to etch their opinions on whatever surface they see fit... whatever floats their boat, is very important.  It is the responsibility of all the services they chose to make a part of their daily lives to find a way to harmonize and allow the users their options while sharing all communication on the topic... so not only should the streaming/aggregations services try to share the comments they receive back with the bloggers, but the bloggers/blogging software needs to make sure to share the conversation back. I like the idea of the users having the opinionsphere following them around... the more filters and drill down options the various services want to pepper into their integration to make their experience stand out the better... ;)  it's good for the users and the web in general to keep the momentum going on the topic of the users owning their information... data portability, etc... </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-03-16T06:45:39Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5881-comment:49414</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5881" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/friendfeed_vs_socialthing.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/friendfeed_vs_socialthing.php#c49414" />
    <title>Comment from Andrew J Scott on 2008-03-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>Andrew J Scott</name>
        <uri>http://blog.urbanhorizon.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.urbanhorizon.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I agree with the general sentiment here - I dont believe the comparison and assumption that FriendFeed will win out is true at all. Socialthing have a slightly different approach and the ability to reply in-line is also a boon.</p>

<p>Their interface is slicker and when interfacing with such a large amount of data that does make a big difference.</p>

<p>I agree they will have to innovate more than simply be an RSS aggregator; but having chatted to Matt my opinion is they have plenty of innovation up their sleeve.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-03-16T11:33:46Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5881-comment:49437</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5881" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/friendfeed_vs_socialthing.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/friendfeed_vs_socialthing.php#c49437" />
    <title>Comment from Malachi Safford on 2008-03-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>Malachi Safford</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>The best forces I've found are the ideas that one imparts..it's among the most imperishable of events,trans-linear and transmittable.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-03-16T19:07:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5881-comment:49455</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5881" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/friendfeed_vs_socialthing.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/friendfeed_vs_socialthing.php#c49455" />
    <title>Comment from faizal on 2008-03-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>faizal</name>
        <uri>http://fullfilth.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://fullfilth.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>i have test both of it and i can see bright future of socialthing because:</p>

<p>-ppl already tired of social networking, ppl need tool that help them aggregate and summarize what their contact do<br />
-socialthing (st) have option to rename contact name, some of my contact use differnt username for different services, so this feature will help<br />
-ability to reply directly from st page for twitter/pownce<br />
-from st help page they also plan to allow ppl blog from there! abd maybe comment from they!<br />
-st have option to hide own news</p>

<p>afaik fb will offer similar thing in the future, let see how it goes ...</p>

<p>btw i have another 8 invites, ctck me if someone need it.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-03-17T00:36:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5881-comment:49462</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5881" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/friendfeed_vs_socialthing.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/friendfeed_vs_socialthing.php#c49462" />
    <title>Comment from Alex on 2008-03-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>Alex</name>
        <uri>http://eroi.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://eroi.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I signed up for both this week.  SocialThing! is better IMO, as it was really easy to get setup and I like being able to reply through it.</p>

<p>FriendFeed told me there was noone I knew on it, and Facebook doesn't seem to work well on it (status updates, etc...).</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-03-17T04:17:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5881-comment:49491</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.5881" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/friendfeed_vs_socialthing.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/friendfeed_vs_socialthing.php#c49491" />
    <title>Comment from Stephen Paul Weber on 2008-03-17</title>
    <author>
        <name>Stephen Paul Weber</name>
        <uri>http://singpolyma.net/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://singpolyma.net/">
        <![CDATA[<p>RE socialthing! just an aggregator - not true, it lets you interact with your networks (reply on twitter, etc) and gives you access to your private data on the services (twitter private messages &c)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-03-17T13:34:12Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>