<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/data_portability_web_personalization.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2011:/1/tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6065-</id>
  <updated>2011-04-29T11:47:13Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Why Data Portability is Important For Web Personalization</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.35-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6065</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/data_portability_web_personalization.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=6065" title="Why Data Portability is Important For Web Personalization" />
    <published>2008-04-09T03:27:28Z</published>
    <updated>2008-04-09T03:34:23Z</updated>
    <title>Why Data Portability is Important For Web Personalization</title>
    <summary><![CDATA[Fifteen or so years into the evolution of the web, we already have many of the key ideas and technologies in place to start describing and sharing personal preference information - or what we might colloquially call &quot;taste&quot; - in order to personalize web experiences. So, why haven't we yet seen widespread adoption of web...]]></summary>
    <author>
      <name>Guest Author</name>
      
    </author>
    
    <category term="Trends" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/mystrands_tastes_apr08c.jpg" />Fifteen or so years into the evolution of the web, we already have many of the key ideas and technologies in place to start describing and sharing <strong>personal preference information</strong> - or what we might colloquially call &quot;taste&quot; - in order to personalize web experiences. So, why haven't we yet seen widespread adoption of web personalization?  Mostly because user expectations and online business models haven't yet evolved to the point that user-controlled, ‘open taste’ sharing is a viable option. However, the <a href="http://dataportability.org">dataportability.org</a> initiative suggests that we may have reached a turning point.</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p><em>This is a guest post by <a href="http://www.mystrands.com/corp/bios/rick_hangartner.vm">Dr. Rick Hangartner</a>, MyStrands Chief Scientist</em>.</p>
<p> The DataPortability project taps into the strong conviction, engendered by the do-it-yourself nature of the web 2.0 movement, that individuals should &quot;have control over their data by determining how they can use it and who can use it&quot;. This extends to an inherent belief that that it has not been a lack of effective technology that has held back this new culture of open data sharing, but rather business models that have been over-reliant on laying a proprietary claim to some portion of that data. </p>
<h2>Taste sharing is a DataPortability use case</h2>
<p>We express our online tastes any time we <strong>make a choice</strong> between the various alternatives available to us.  Some of our choices may be characterized by the number of times we select each option  when repeatedly confronted with the same choice - for example the number of songs of each genre we play when we select music.  Other choices may be expressed subjectively, such as assigning one to five stars to movies we watch, when we are asked to rate our preferences for the different alternatives. In yet other cases, we may in effect be giving estimates for the number of times we would expect to select each alternative, such as when we are asked if we are likely to buy a product or vote for something.  Virtually any online experience we have includes one or more instances in which we make conscious choices reflecting our preferences. </p>
<p>For the more theoretically inclined amongst us, we can view a choice as somewhat analogous to a random experiment and our relative preferences as measures of the different possible outcomes of the experiment.  The collection of such experiments that we participate in as a matter of course in our web experiences paints a vivid picture of our taste. For the more pragmatic: <strong>each time we make choices, we generate data which empirically describes our preferences</strong>. This is data that can be encapsulated and shared just like any other picture, blog post, video, or other piece of online content that we create; and which the DataPortability project is focused on.</p>
<h2>A few ideas for open taste sharing</h2>
<p>As a DataPortability use case, <strong>open taste sharing</strong> embodies and embraces the culture shift that the Web 2.0 movement represents.  With regard to data ownership, the DataPortability concept has even more succinct expression: our tastes should be ours to share, or not.  This puts the user in control of their online experience, so they can set the boundaries of how much they want to share and with whom. Similarly, there is no need to invent new or proprietary technologies to simply identify, encapsulate, and share taste-related data.  </p>
<p>A little thought by websites about how to identify and summarize our relative preferences on their site is enough to do the job - along with OpenID, OAuth, and a little task-specific XML for markup.  However clearly this kind of data sharing also raises new privacy concerns, which is part of the work-in-progress for the entire DataPortability project.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/mystrands_taste_apr08.jpg" /><br /><em>Image by MyStrands</em></p>
<p>Perhaps the most interesting challenge lies in educating businesses to thoroughly and thoughtfully examine their current ideas about user data, so they can better understand and enthusiastically embrace The Web 2.0 Golden Rule: &quot;Do for other web experiences providers as they would do for you - under our control as the owners of our taste data - and the blessings of networks effects for taste data shall be yours.&quot; </p>
<p><em>This is a guest post by Dr. Rick Hangartner, MyStrands Chief Scientist. You can follow Dr. Hangartner on <a href="http://blog.mystrands.com/"><strong>the MyStrands blog</strong></a>.</em></p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6065-comment:52469</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6065" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/data_portability_web_personalization.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/data_portability_web_personalization.php#c52469" />
    <title>Comment from Mark Scrimshire on 2008-04-17</title>
    <author>
        <name>Mark Scrimshire</name>
        <uri>http://ekive.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://ekive.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Data Portability is critical not just to web personalization but also to our Personal Health Records. THe PHR is the next battleground in healthcare and the user, the subject of the PHR should have control.</p>

<p>The healthcare industry can learn a lot from the work of the data portability initiative.</p>

<p>I address this on my blog</p>

<p><a href="http://ekive.blogspot.com/2008/04/health-20-healthcare-and-data.html" rel="nofollow">http://ekive.blogspot.com/2008/04/health-20-healthcare-and-data.html</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-04-18T06:48:30Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6065-comment:51477</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6065" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/data_portability_web_personalization.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/data_portability_web_personalization.php#c51477" />
    <title>Comment from Dennis McDonald on 2008-04-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Dennis McDonald</name>
        <uri>http://www.ddmcd.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.ddmcd.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Let's say that I am an online social network owner. I spend money and staff time inventing a unique and creative proprietary process to enable members of my social network to describe their personal preferences ("tastes," using your terminology) in a way that can improve the ability they have to create and engage in, say, a fulfilling romantic relationships with other members of my network. </p>

<p>Let's also say that I as the social network owner use appropriate intellectual property law to protect that process from being used in an unauthorized fashion by my competitors. </p>

<p>Is there a disconnect between (a) the idea of my members being able to move their preference data to other (potentially competing) online networks, and (b) my ability to protect my own intellectual property and competitive advantage?</p>

<p>Yes, I know the devil is in the details, but as you suggest, this issue of ownership is at the heart of being able to move data from one system to another.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-04-09T20:12:40Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6065-comment:51473</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6065" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/data_portability_web_personalization.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/data_portability_web_personalization.php#c51473" />
    <title>Comment from Chris Saad on 2008-04-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Chris Saad</name>
        <uri>http://www.faradaymedia.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.faradaymedia.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Great post Rick :)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-04-09T19:27:12Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6065-comment:51426</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6065" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/data_portability_web_personalization.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/data_portability_web_personalization.php#c51426" />
    <title>Comment from Vladimir on 2008-04-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Vladimir</name>
        <uri>http://www.ubervu.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.ubervu.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Data Portability is a great initiative but I don't see real world implementations pretty soon. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-04-09T12:58:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6065-comment:51386</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6065" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/data_portability_web_personalization.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/data_portability_web_personalization.php#c51386" />
    <title>Comment from 113.com on 2008-04-08</title>
    <author>
        <name>113.com</name>
        <uri>http://113.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://113.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Very important topic for the next 10 years..</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-04-09T05:13:50Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6065-comment:51384</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6065" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/data_portability_web_personalization.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/data_portability_web_personalization.php#c51384" />
    <title>Comment from Ben Clemens on 2008-04-08</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ben Clemens</name>
        <uri>http://www.practicalist.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.practicalist.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>There is an existing prototype for the XML you mention, "APML", or "Attention Profile Markup Language" (apml.org and apml.pbwiki.com). Not sure it's the final solution, but it seems like a step in the right direction and addresses taste in a more general way. Totally agree and support that new proprietary tech is not needed!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-04-09T05:08:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6065-comment:51371</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6065" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/data_portability_web_personalization.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/data_portability_web_personalization.php#c51371" />
    <title>Comment from John on 2008-04-08</title>
    <author>
        <name>John</name>
        <uri>http://human3rror.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://human3rror.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Interesting post.  It's also relatively amusing since a phrase that I particularly like to use is "tasty"... is your site, content, user experience, or info-architecture designed for "tastiness"?</p>

<p>I chuckle.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-04-09T03:53:06Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6065-comment:51368</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6065" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/data_portability_web_personalization.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/data_portability_web_personalization.php#c51368" />
    <title>Comment from Ajay Pathak on 2008-04-08</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ajay Pathak</name>
        <uri>http://readerszone.com/microsoft/hyper-v-rc-availability-on-windows-update.html</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://readerszone.com/microsoft/hyper-v-rc-availability-on-windows-update.html">
        <![CDATA[<p>can all these provide a common id for accessing all these application because in every website we have to enter the same information again and again<br />
this will also reduces the total number of email account over the web <br />
ex for gmail i have gamil for yahoo i have yahoo <br />
why i have to maintain so many different account and the same person has the same identity but different user name across different web application  </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-04-09T03:42:37Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>
