<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2009:/1/tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6145-</id>
  <updated>2009-11-23T19:11:44Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Enterprise 2.0 To Become a $4.6 Billion Industry By 2013</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.23-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6145</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=6145" title="Enterprise 2.0 To Become a $4.6 Billion Industry By 2013" />
    <published>2008-04-21T04:01:00Z</published>
    <updated>2008-04-21T23:33:10Z</updated>
    <title>Enterprise 2.0 To Become a $4.6 Billion Industry By 2013</title>
    <summary>Enterprise 2.0: $4.6B Industry By 2013</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Sarah Perez</name>
      <uri>http://www.sarahintampa.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Enterprise" />
    
    <category term="Features" />
    
    <category term="Trends" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/cloud.jpg">A new <a href="http://www.forrester.com/go?docid=43850" target="_blank">report</a> released today by <a href="http://www.forrester.com" target="_blank">Forrester Research</a> is predicting that enterprise spending on Web 2.0 technologies is going to increase dramatically over the next five years. This increase will include more spending on social networking tools, mashups, and RSS, with the end result being a global enterprise market of $4.6 billion by the year 2013.</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>This change is not without its challenges. Although there is money to be made in the industry by vendors, Web 2.0 tools by their very nature are defined by commoditization; as is much of the new social media industry, a topic we touched on briefly <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/content_is_becoming_a_commodity.php" target="_blank">here</a>, when discussing how content has become a commodity. </p>

<p>For vendors specifically, there are 3 main challenges to becoming successful in this new industry, including:</p>

<ol>
  <li>I.T. shops being wary of what they perceive as &quot;consumer-grade&quot; technology</li>

  <li>Ad-supported web tools generally have &quot;free&quot; as the starting point</li>

  <li>Web 2.0 tools will have to now compete in a space currently dominated by legacy enterprise software investments</li>
</ol>

<h2>What is Enterprise Web 2.0?</h2>

<p>Most technologists segment the Web 2.0 market between &quot;consumer&quot; Web 2.0 technologies and &quot;business&quot; Web 2.0 technologies. So what does Enterprise 2.0 include then?</p>

<p>Well, what it doesn't include is consumer services like <a href="http://www.blogger.com" target="_blank">Blogger</a>, <a href="http://www.facebook.com" target="_blank">Facebook</a>, <a href="http://www.netvibes.com" target="_blank">Netvibes</a>, and <a href="http://www.twitter.com" target="_blank">Twitter</a>, says Forrester. These types of services are aimed at consumers and are often supported by ads, so they do not qualify as Enterprise 2.0 tools. </p>

<p>Instead, collaboration and productivity tools based on the concepts of web 2.0, but designed for the enterprise worker will count as being Enterprise 2.0. In addition, for-pay services, like those from BEA Systems, IBM, Microsoft, Awareness, NewsGator Technologies, and Six Apart will factor in. </p>

<p>Enterprise marketing tools have also expanded to include Web 2.0 technologies. For example, money spent on the creation and syndication of a Facebook app or a web site/social network widget could be considered Enterprise 2.0. However, pure ad spending dollars, including those spent on consumer Web 2.0 sites, will not count as Enterprise 2.0.</p>

<h2>Getting Past the I.T. Gatekeeper</h2>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/IT_guy.png" align="right">One of the main challenges of getting Web 2.0 into the enterprise will be getting past the gatekeepers of traditional I.T. Businesses have been showing interest in these new technologies, but, ironically, the interest comes from departments outside of I.T. Instead, it's the marketing department, R&amp;D, and corporate communications pushing for the adoption of more Web 2.0-like tools.</p>

<p>Unfortunately, as often is the case, the business owners themselves don't have the knowledge or expertise to make technology purchasing decisions for their company. They rely on I.T. to do so - a department that currently spends 70% of their budget maintaining past investments. </p>

<p>Despite the absolute mission-critical nature of I.T. in today's business, the department is often provided with slim budgets, which tends to only allow for maintaining current infrastructure, not experimenting with new, unproven technologies.</p>

<p>To make matters worse, I.T. tends to view Web 2.0 tools as being insecure at best, or, at worst, a security threat to the business. They also don't trust what they perceive to be &quot;consumer-grade&quot; technologies, which they don't believe have the power to scale to the size that an enterprise demands.</p>

<p>In addition, I.T. departments currently work with a host of legacy applications. The new tools, in order to compete with these, will have to be able to integrate with existing technology, at least for the time being, in order to be fully effective. </p>

<p>Finally, given the tight budgets, there is still a chance that even if a particular tool does meet all the requirements to get in the door at a particular company, I.T. or other company personnel utilizing the service may try to exploit the free version of the service if the price point for the &quot;enterprise&quot; version gets to be too high. They may also choose to look for a free, open source alternative.</p>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/web20_adoption.png"><i>Enterprise 2.0 Adoption</i></p>

<h2>How Web 2.0 Will Reach $4.6 Billion</h2>

<p>All that being said, the Web 2.0 market, as&#160; small as it is now, is, in fact, growing. In 2008, firms with 1000 employees or more will spend $764 million on Web 2.0 tools and technologies. Over the next five years, that expenditure will grow at a compound annual rate of 43%.</p>

<p>The top spending category will be social networking tools. In 2008, for example, companies will spend $258 million on tools like those from <a href="http://www.awarenessnetworks.com/home/" target="_blank">Awareness</a>, <a href="http://www.communispace.com/" target="_blank">Communispace</a>, and <a href="http://www.jivesoftware.com/" target="_blank">Jive Software</a>. After social networking, the next-largest category is RSS, followed by blogs and wikis, and then mashups.</p>

<p>The vendors expected to do the best in this new marketplace will be those that bundle their offerings, offering the complete package of tools to the businesses they serve.</p>

<p>However, newer, &quot;pure&quot; Web 2.0 companies hoping to capitalize on this trend will still have to fight with traditional I.T. software for a foothold, specifically fighting with the likes of Microsoft and IBM. Many I.T. shops will choose to stick with their existing software from these large, well-known vendors, especially now that both are integrating Web 2.0 into their offerings. </p>

<p>Microsoft's SharePoint, for example, now includes wikis, blogs, and RSS technologies in their collaboration suite. IBM offers social networking and mashup tools via their Lotus Connections and Lotus Mashups products and SAP Business Suite includes social networking and widgets.</p>

<p>What this means is that much of the Web 2.0 tool kit will simply &quot;fade into the fabric of enterprise collaboration suites,&quot; says Forrester. By 2013, few buyers will seek out and purchase Web 2.0 tools specifically. <em>Web 2.0 will become a feature, not a product.</em></p>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/web20spending.png"><i>Enterprise 2.0 Spending</i></p>

<h2>Other Trends</h2>

<p>Other trends will also have an impact on this new marketplace, including the following:</p>

<p><strong><u>External Spending Will Beat Internal Spending</u></strong>: External Web 2.0 expenditure will surpass internal expenditure in 2009, and, by 2013, will dwarf internal spending by a billion dollars. Internally, companies will spend money on internal social networking, blogs, wikis, and RSS; externally, the spending patterns will be very similar. Social networking tools that provide customer interaction, allowing customers the ability to create profiles, join discussion boards, and read company blogs, for example, will receive more investment and development over the next five years.</p>

<p><strong><u>Europe &amp; Asia Pacific Markets Grow:</u></strong> Europe and Asia Pacific will become more substantial markets in 2009. Fewer European companies have embraced Web 2.0 tools, leaving much room for growth. Asia Pacific will also grow in 2009.</p>

<p><strong><u>Web 2.0 Graduates from &quot;Kids' Stuff&quot;:</u></strong>&#160; Right now, it's people between the ages of 12 and 17 that are the more avid consumers of social computing technology, with one-third of them acting as content creators. Meanwhile, only 7% of those 51-61 do the same. However, this is another trend that is going to change over the next few years. By 2011, Forrester believes that users of Web 2.0 tools will mirror users of the web at large.</p>

<p><strong><u>Retirement of Baby Boomers:</u></strong> As with many things, it takes the passing of the older generation from executive status into retirement before a true shift can occur. Over the next three years, millions of baby boomers will retire and the younger workers brought in to fill the void will not only want, but will <em>expect</em> similar tools in the office as those they use at home in their personal lives.</p>

<h2>What It All Means</h2>

<p>For vendors wanting to play in the Enterprise 2.0 space, there are a few key takeaways to be learned from this research. For one, they can help ensure their success in this niche by selling across deployment types. That is, plan to grow beyond just selling to either the internal or external market. </p>

<p>Another option is to segment the enterprise marketplace by industry and then by company size. Some industries are more customer-focused than others when it comes to the external market, so developing customized solutions for a particular industry could be a key to success. For internal tools, focusing efforts on deploying enterprise grade tools that include things like integration or security will help sell products to larger customers. Other&#160; levels of service can be designed specifically for the SMBs, featuring simple, self-provisioning products to help cut down on costs.</p>

<p>Finally, vendors looking to grow should consider making a name for themselves in the Europe or Asia Pacific markets, where the opportunity comes from the expected increased investment rates for Web 2.0/Enterprise 2.0 in those geographic regions.</p>

<p>However, the most valuable aspect of this change for vendors is the knowledge they obtain about how to run a successful SaaS business - something that will help propel them into the next decade and beyond and, ultimately, will provide more value than any single Web 2.0 offering alone ever will.</p>
]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6145-comment:52681</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6145" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php#c52681" />
    <title>Comment from SearcH◆ EngineS WEB on 2008-04-20</title>
    <author>
        <name>SearcH◆ EngineS WEB</name>
        <uri>http://searchengines.wordpress.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://searchengines.wordpress.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The success of Enterprise 2.0 is a result of the continuous improvements in hardware technology  and the mainstreaming of high bandwidth.</p>

<p>The software budgets of SMBs caused some of  them to pirate client software in the last decade.</p>

<p>Now that awareness is being raised - SAAS has become a possible option as well as outsourcing remotely</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-04-21T04:54:45Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6145-comment:52682</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6145" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php#c52682" />
    <title>Comment from Ajay on 2008-04-20</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ajay</name>
        <uri>http://readerszone.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://readerszone.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>web 2.0 is good platform for enterprises <br />
it's basically sharing information with each other so it will definaitly improve the productivity</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-04-21T05:21:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6145-comment:52684</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6145" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php#c52684" />
    <title>Comment from Corey on 2008-04-20</title>
    <author>
        <name>Corey</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>A perfect example of a Web 2.0 company that is trail blazing into Enterprise 2.0 is MindTouch.  This was mentioned in an information week blog post: <a href="http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2008/04/mindtouch_puts.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2008/04/mindtouch_puts.html</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-04-21T05:29:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6145-comment:52685</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6145" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php#c52685" />
    <title>Comment from kayvaan on 2008-04-20</title>
    <author>
        <name>kayvaan</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I'm a little skeptical that Forrester can clearly distinguish between regular old SaaS and "Web 2.0" applications.  The line is fuzzy anyway.</p>

<p>Your article implies that Microsoft has an existing for-pay Web 2.0 Enterprise app?  I'm curious what that is.</p>

<p>That said, I'm all for Web 2.0 in the Enterprise.  Whatever the heck that means. :)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-04-21T05:40:18Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6145-comment:52686</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6145" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php#c52686" />
    <title>Comment from Vibhu Norby on 2008-04-20</title>
    <author>
        <name>Vibhu Norby</name>
        <uri>http://www.tattle.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.tattle.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>You define Enterprise 2.0 as tools based on web 2.0 concepts designed for enterprise workers, and then make the case that IT departments won't switch to them because of security fears, which is why the enterprise model is for-pay.</p>

<p>This is an absurd concept that is found repeated everywhere - that somehow, when you pay money, you get better security in your application. There is no relationship between paying money and security. It’s false. The real relationship is between paying and usefulness. Are you getting something that you can't get without paying?</p>

<p>Facebook and other popular web services have just as much on their hands to deal with when it comes to security as most any business.</p>

<p>The real story is that big software companies are playing the security card to undermine their new competitors.</p>

<p>That being said, why can't enterprise be ad-supported? Advertisers would be glad to subsidize enterprise applications for enterprise workers. There's a lot of value there that isn't being exploited.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-04-21T06:07:04Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6145-comment:52691</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6145" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php#c52691" />
    <title>Comment from alan p on 2008-04-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>alan p</name>
        <uri>http://www.broadstuff.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.broadstuff.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>We're in the middle of a market sizing exercise for SaaS and PaaS plays, and its amazing how the same buckets of money appear in multiple different segments in these researchers' reports - this being yet another example :)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-04-21T08:24:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6145-comment:52692</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6145" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php#c52692" />
    <title>Comment from Sherif Mansour on 2008-04-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>Sherif Mansour</name>
        <uri>http://www.blog.sherifmansour.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.blog.sherifmansour.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Great article RWW. Its amazing to see enterprise 2.0 Grow. <a href="http://blog.sherifmansour.com/?p=200" rel="nofollow">I've blogged about the growth patterns in the Enterprise Wiki adoption space I have seen from my enterprise</a>. Its been amazing to see how rapid the uptake has been.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-04-21T08:57:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6145-comment:52694</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6145" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php#c52694" />
    <title>Comment from impl.emented.com on 2008-04-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>impl.emented.com</name>
        <uri>http://impl.emented.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://impl.emented.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Enterprise 3.0 anyone?</p>

<p>In the meantime check out my <a href="http://impl.emented.com/2008/04/20/web-30-the-semantic-implicit-mobile-or-distributed-web/">comprehensive overview of Web 3.0</a>.<br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-04-21T09:08:55Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6145-comment:52695</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6145" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php#c52695" />
    <title>Comment from scalleywag on 2008-04-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>scalleywag</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>The funniest part of all this is your (accurate) depiction of the IT department belief that web 2.0 / consumer internet tech "can't scale" to "enterprise scale".  Hello?  PHP, Python, Perl based consumer sites have scaled FAR MORE than J2EE / .Net "enterprise" technologies have, that is a FACT that sites such as Facebook, Google, etc. prove daily.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-04-21T09:10:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6145-comment:52698</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6145" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php#c52698" />
    <title>Comment from Mike Riversdale on 2008-04-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>Mike Riversdale</name>
        <uri>http://work.miramarmike.co.nz</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://work.miramarmike.co.nz">
        <![CDATA[<p>Mighty - as long as I can hang on until 2013 I'll be rolling in the money, won't my wife and kids be happy :-)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-04-21T10:19:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6145-comment:52699</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6145" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php#c52699" />
    <title>Comment from Dennis Howlett on 2008-04-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>Dennis Howlett</name>
        <uri>http://www.accmanpro.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.accmanpro.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Link to the report is dead?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-04-21T10:22:45Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6145-comment:52708</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6145" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php#c52708" />
    <title>Comment from Phil Bradley on 2008-04-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>Phil Bradley</name>
        <uri>http://www.philb.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.philb.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I'd also like to point out that another key group which is leading a charge towards internal use of Web 2.0 resources is that of the library or information centre. I'm spending almost all of my time these days going around the country talking to librarians, running workshops, lecturering, doing demonstrations and so on. </p>

<p>Librarians are really keen on getting involved with Web 2.0 technology and this article is absolutely on the money. IT staff are all too often used as a police force inside an organisation regardless of what they might want to do.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-04-21T13:22:49Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6145-comment:52713</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6145" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php#c52713" />
    <title>Comment from Sarah Perez on 2008-04-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>Sarah Perez</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@kayvaan: the for-pay Microsoft application referenced is SharePoint. The latest version incorporates blogging tools, Wikis, and RSS feeds for content. </p>

<p>@Dennis H.: link is working for me...?</p>

<p>@Vibhu: I agree. When I worked in I.T., although it was not an enterprise (we had less than 1000 employees), I had to do some convincing to get IT mgr to believe that running Spiceworks was OK and safe to do since it is ad-supported. It is a hard concept for old-schoolers to wrap their minds around.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-04-21T15:19:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6145-comment:52716</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6145" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php#c52716" />
    <title>Comment from Paul Dandurand on 2008-04-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>Paul Dandurand</name>
        <uri>http://www.piematrix.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.piematrix.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>It's great to see another great RRW post for the enterprise market.</p>

<p>In the past, building complex enterprise software took tens of millions to build before charing their first dime (unless if they got their clients to pay for "custom" development, which the vendor retained as IP). Today's Web 2.0 technology can be built with much less cost and get out to the market 10 to 100 times faster. I see a shift in investment going towards introducing free lower featured versions to garnish market interest. This is especially true for low budget value targeted at individuals or small groups. For enterprise-wide Web 2.0 solutions that need corporate approval, I agree with <a href="http://abovethenoise.blogspot.com/2008/02/business-software-and-freemium-business.html" rel="nofollow">Perry Mizota</a> that the freemium model may not work when decisions need come from above. He favors the 30-day free trial approach.</p>

<p>As for competition, ease-of-use can be one differentiator. Few read or need user manuals in the Web 2.0 world. As the younger workforce enters IT, will they sit still for days of training needed to learn complex legacy systems? How about the sales departments? They are already complaining about taking time for classes or digging through help files. </p>

<p>In addition to simplicity, Web 2.0 models could offer new options not found in legacy systems, such as <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crowdsourcing" rel="nofollow">crowdsourcing</a> (which I'm investigating).</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-04-21T15:42:11Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6145-comment:52717</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6145" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php#c52717" />
    <title>Comment from Nicole Simon on 2008-04-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>Nicole Simon</name>
        <uri>http://crueltobekind.org</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://crueltobekind.org">
        <![CDATA[<p>@scalleywag it is not about technical scale. It is about working together with the rest of the enterprise.</p>

<p>It starts with user administation and rights and does not end at feeding results back into ERP software. </p>

<p>And the security 'threat' is an existing one for the pure fact that oh so many web 2.0 companies start with saying to IT "you give me your data to our servers" - at which point the discussion ends.</p>

<p>'for pay' also is about having reliable contracts to have somebody to go to when you implement something on a critical level and have reliable service contracts.</p>

<p>And why not have spying web services taking out relevant attention information out of a company and work with them, hm? yeah right.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-04-21T15:50:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6145-comment:52722</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6145" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php#c52722" />
    <title>Comment from Jose Miguel Cansado on 2008-04-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jose Miguel Cansado</name>
        <uri>http://tech-talk.biz/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://tech-talk.biz/">
        <![CDATA[<p><br />
Predicting about 2013 and beyond. Do you think Microsoft will be a strong part of this Enterprise 2.0?</p>

<p><a href="http://tech-talk.biz/2008/04/21/microsoft-apocalypse-2018/" rel="nofollow">http://tech-talk.biz/2008/04/21/microsoft-apocalypse-2018/</a><br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-04-21T18:46:58Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6145-comment:52727</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6145" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php#c52727" />
    <title>Comment from Jason M. Lemkin on 2008-04-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jason M. Lemkin</name>
        <uri>http://www.echosign.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.echosign.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>This is a very interesting piece.  To us at EchoSign, especially the chart of Enterprise 2.0 adoption.  Our leads in the larger enterprise are a much larger % of our base than we had initially expected.  The larger the company, the more they are looking for 2.0 solutions, we've found.  Our SMB and SOHO customers by contrast are principally acquired virally -- which matches this data, that they aren't looking ...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-04-21T20:12:19Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6145-comment:52739</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6145" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php#c52739" />
    <title>Comment from Ravi Govil on 2008-04-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ravi Govil</name>
        <uri>http://kmlearning.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://kmlearning.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>It aligns with the trends that we are also seeing in the enterprise market. </p>

<p>Enterprises are keen in adopting web 2.0 principles in both external and internal aspects. Knowledge Management is being replaced with web 2.0 collaboration and social networking applications. The executives understand the need, but knowledge of web 2.0 and how to implement is still missing. They are opting for less risky web 2.0 pilot applications instead of realigning their business strategy with web 2.0. But I am sure success of pilot applications will lead to bigger initiatives. It is just a matter of time and confidence.</p>

<p>I would also like to see and discuss the corporations who have adopted enterprise 2.0 in a big way.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-04-21T21:32:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6145-comment:52741</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6145" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php#c52741" />
    <title>Comment from deanwhitney.myopenid.com on 2008-04-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>deanwhitney.myopenid.com</name>
        <uri>http://www.deanwhitney.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.deanwhitney.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Funny thing, because I had a call with L&D today to discuss approaches to share learning content, media, files etc., across offices. They have no idea they are talking about Enterprise 2.0. The discussion of using Ning, Blip.tv, Scribd and integrating our LDAP info to NING; sounds more like some kind of IT work around when its really an SOA strategy.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-04-21T21:42:18Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6145-comment:52745</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6145" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php#c52745" />
    <title>Comment from H W on 2008-04-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>H W</name>
        <uri>http://dreamfortunetelling.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://dreamfortunetelling.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I see the industry's trend greatly. I would like to know how this web 2.0 tools will change the consumer-side industry like entertainment as well as enterprise market even though that is well-written by many people.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-04-21T23:18:59Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6145-comment:52760</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6145" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php#c52760" />
    <title>Comment from Beth from Avenue Z on 2008-04-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>Beth from Avenue Z</name>
        <uri>http://www.lifeonavenuez.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.lifeonavenuez.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Perfect timing on this post! I've been talking to one of my clients, a Web 2.0 company, about the problem of the IT department. Thanks for the update.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-04-22T04:56:48Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6145-comment:52787</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6145" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php#c52787" />
    <title>Comment from BEŞİKTAŞ on 2008-04-22</title>
    <author>
        <name>BEŞİKTAŞ</name>
        <uri>http://www.besiktascarsisi.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.besiktascarsisi.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>ultras</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-04-22T13:27:16Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6145-comment:52789</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6145" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php#c52789" />
    <title>Comment from söve on 2008-04-22</title>
    <author>
        <name>söve</name>
        <uri>http://www.sove.name.tr</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.sove.name.tr">
        <![CDATA[<p>thank you</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-04-22T13:28:08Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6145-comment:52788</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6145" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php#c52788" />
    <title>Comment from söve on 2008-04-22</title>
    <author>
        <name>söve</name>
        <uri>http://www.sove.name.tr</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.sove.name.tr">
        <![CDATA[<p>thank you</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-04-22T13:28:08Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6145-comment:52792</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6145" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php#c52792" />
    <title>Comment from okenews on 2008-04-22</title>
    <author>
        <name>okenews</name>
        <uri>http://okenews.blogsome.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://okenews.blogsome.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Im not understand ??<br />
How Web 2.0 Will Reach $4.6 Billion??</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-04-22T13:58:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6145-comment:53874</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6145" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php#c53874" />
    <title>Comment from Liz on 2008-05-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Liz</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>"Commoditization"? This unword reminds me of "affordance", "componentry", "combinatorial", "criticality", "monotonicity", and "processible"...other nonwords I keep reading in technology business literature. You all should really look at a dictionary once in a while as there are actual words in the English language which convey the ideas I think you are aiming at. Reading these made-up, trying to sound fancy, nonwords is like hearing fingernails on a chalkboard.<br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-05-05T19:38:11Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6145-comment:53950</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6145" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php#c53950" />
    <title>Comment from Charlie Blake Thomas on 2008-05-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Charlie Blake Thomas</name>
        <uri>http://www.huddle.net</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.huddle.net">
        <![CDATA[<p>I think the point missed in this post is that Enterprise 2.0 is about collaboration and leveraging expertise previously hidden within the organisation. Is blogging truly collaborating? RSS is simply an alternative to email alerts. Wikis are places to leave comments and store some content but don't inspire collaboration.</p>

<p>My view is that enterprise 2.0 will evolve beyond a mashup of all the existing tools described above. It will evolve in to a deeper understanding of the networks that actually make enterprises tick. The IT department will end up buying the tools to help support these networks but not actually buying the applications themselves. The users will have already found them and be using them.</p>

<p>Having worked in large organisations, the biggest pain is duplication of effort and building a support structure that can help you learn more quickly. True enterprise collaboration is about helping employees to work together more effectively, not about giving them current web 2.0 technologies bundled in one application suite. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-05-06T12:20:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6145-comment:54064</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6145" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php#c54064" />
    <title>Comment from Christopher S. Rollyson on 2008-05-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Christopher S. Rollyson</name>
        <uri>http://www.executivesguide-linkedin.com/blog/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.executivesguide-linkedin.com/blog/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Long-in-the-tooth assumptions lurk here and muddle things up. For example:</p>

<p>The “inside” (enterprise) and the “outside” (consumer) are blurring, so the report’s reliance on the enterprise boundary paints a false sense of separation. For example, read about <a href="http://www.fastforwardblog.com/2007/11/28/serena-has-adopted-facebook-as-their-intranet/" rel="nofollow">Serena Software's front ending their enterprise intranet with Facebook</a>.</p>

<p>The report discounts the importance of cross-boundary collaboration. It references IBM Lotus and Microsoft SharePoint tools as successfully bolting on wikis, blogs, RSS and social networking.  However, the report failed to point out that these tools are <a href="http://www.globalhumancapital.org/archives/206-Noodle-IV-Web-2.0-Pureplays-vs.-Enterprise-Vendors-A-Real-Battle.html" rel="nofollow">very limited in their ability to go cross-boundary</a>. Maybe I’ve read too much John Hagel, but I also observe that maximum innovation takes place at the edges, the boundaries.</p>

<p>The report takes too much of an “us and them” attitude toward “enterprise” vendors and pureplays.  CIOs will add the most value by adopting both, and they should key their adoption off their CMOs and CCOs (Chief Customer Officer).</p>

<p>For more, see <a href="http://www.executivesguide-linkedin.com/blog/?p=63" rel="nofollow">Tripping Over False Assumptions about Enterprise 2.0</a>.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-05-07T04:04:19Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>