<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/googles_us_search_market_dominance.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2009:/1/tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6054-</id>
  <updated>2009-10-30T14:12:42Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Google&apos;s US Search Market Dominance Hits All Time High</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.23-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6054</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/googles_us_search_market_dominance.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=6054" title="Google's US Search Market Dominance Hits All Time High" />
    <published>2008-04-07T20:51:21Z</published>
    <updated>2008-04-08T06:03:34Z</updated>
    <title>Google&apos;s US Search Market Dominance Hits All Time High</title>
    <summary>Traffic analysts Hitwise released new numbers today finding that Google&apos;s marketshare in US searches rose last month to an all time high of 67% of searches performed. Yahoo! Search (20%), MSN Search (5.25%) and Ask.com (4%) trail far behind but aren&apos;t insignificant either. At this time last year Google was at 64% and MSN was...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Marshall Kirkpatrick</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/google-logo.jpg">Traffic analysts <a href="http://hitwise.com">Hitwise</a> released new numbers today <a href="http://view.exacttarget.com/?j=fe641572746c037c7711&m=fefc1774726706&ls=fdec117370610c7a7c14717d&l=fe8f157671600d7a74&s=fe7f13767c6c05757c&ju=fe33157470640179701771">finding</a> that Google's marketshare in US searches rose last month to an all time high of 67% of searches performed.  Yahoo! Search (20%), MSN Search (5.25%) and Ask.com (4%) trail far behind but aren't insignificant either.</p>

<p>At this time last year Google was at 64% and MSN was at 9%. Momentum remains with Google, but is that momentum inevitable?  Could things change?  We've written about three ways that it could.</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<h2>Innovation</h2>

<p>Some have argued that Google's approach to search is outdated and slow to change.  Apparently it's working just fine for them today, but there's a world of opportunities for other innovators to come up with a better search experience. We wrote about this situation in our recent post titled "<a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/how_vulverable_is_google_on_se.php">How Vulnerable is Google in Search?</a>"</p>

<p>Hitwise tracks 46 other search engines as well, which added up for a combined 1.7% of searches last month.  46 alternative search engines is like a week's work for our network blog <a href="http://altsearchengines.com">AltSearchEgines</a>, check it out if you'd like to learn about the rest of the industry, including some that may become the challengers of the future.</p>

<h2>Semantic Web</h2>

<p>Yahoo! is #2 today, but is taking the lead in support for standards based microformats and semantic web indexing.  Yahoo! announced that <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/yahoo_supports_semantic_web.php">it would index semantic markup three weeks ago</a>.  Since semantic markup could enable improvements in search quality by orders of magnitude, this could be a turning point for Google and Yahoo! </p>

<p>As we explained when that announcement was made:<br />
<blockquote>Today, a web service might work very hard to scour the internet to discover all the book reviews written on various sites, by friends of mine, who live in Europe. That would be so hard that no one would probably try it. The suite of technologies Yahoo! is moving to support will make such searches trivial. Once publishers start including things like hReview, FOAF and geoRSS in their content then Yahoo!, and other sites leveraging Yahoo! search results, will be able to ask easily what it is we want to do with those book reviews. Say hello to a new level of innovation.</blockquote></p>

<p>We'd like to get an update on the Yahoo! semantic indexing announcement, though, and presumably this is the kind of thing that Google will do soon as well.</p>

<h2>Privacy Backlash</h2>

<p>As Google grows continually stronger and more knowledgeable, the importance of the social contract between the company and its customers becomes increasingly more important.  Google has not been as good as it needs to be about taking clear steps to guarantee security and prevent misuse of user data - including its own misuse of that data!  </p>

<p>We wrote in February about how <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/how_microsoft_can_beat_google.php">Microsoft's new levels of engagement with oppenness and data portability could offer an avenue to challenge Google</a>, but few of our readers agreed in comments.  You know what they say, though - if your mouth gets washed out with soap, you may be saying something important!</p>

<p>It may not be Microsoft that challenges Google, but it certainly seems possible that users will draw the line somewhere and look to limit Google's omniscience.  </p>

<p>Perhaps not, though.  Perhaps Google's search dominance will continue to grow and grow, month over month, year over year.  Someday, if you want to know about your genetic propensity for a particular disease, <a href="https://www.23andme.com/">you'll just as the Google</a>.  If you want to know what your kids are doing at home while you're away, you'll <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/06/08/google-research-prototypes-ambient-audio-contextual-content/">just ask the Google</a>.  Certainly today when we want to know what's on the web, a clear majority of us <em>just ask the Google</em>.</p>

<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image"><img alt="smarket.png" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/smarket.png" width="600"  class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;"/></span></p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6054-comment:51205</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6054" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/googles_us_search_market_dominance.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/googles_us_search_market_dominance.php#c51205" />
    <title>Comment from jstokes on 2008-04-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>jstokes</name>
        <uri>http://www.Malltropolitan.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.Malltropolitan.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I am no longer a fan of google. since they decided to drop the ranking of my website. For no apparent reason whatsoever. One minute malltropolitan.com was a level six then next thing I know its not.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-04-07T22:11:11Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6054-comment:51206</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6054" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/googles_us_search_market_dominance.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/googles_us_search_market_dominance.php#c51206" />
    <title>Comment from StareClips.com on 2008-04-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>StareClips.com</name>
        <uri>http://www.stareclips.com/?share</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.stareclips.com/?share">
        <![CDATA[<p>That's because it's an affiliate spam site.<br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-04-07T22:21:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6054-comment:51207</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6054" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/googles_us_search_market_dominance.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/googles_us_search_market_dominance.php#c51207" />
    <title>Comment from diystartupnews.com on 2008-04-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>diystartupnews.com</name>
        <uri>http://diystartupnews.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://diystartupnews.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I think people use google because there is nothing else to use and habit, the results coming out of google now are at a all time low. I get one good result per page max now. Its alright if you are searching everyday stuff but as soon as you want details your screwed.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-04-07T23:02:04Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6054-comment:51212</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6054" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/googles_us_search_market_dominance.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/googles_us_search_market_dominance.php#c51212" />
    <title>Comment from Mrinal on 2008-04-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Mrinal</name>
        <uri>http://mrinal.vox.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://mrinal.vox.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Marshall - It is pretty amazing how a product with nothing viral about it, no switching cost for users (now of course, it does) has gone to get this market share and very importantly, mind share!</p>

<p>Do you/Hitwise have pure number of searches done?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-04-08T01:46:02Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6054-comment:51216</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6054" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/googles_us_search_market_dominance.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/googles_us_search_market_dominance.php#c51216" />
    <title>Comment from ajay on 2008-04-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>ajay</name>
        <uri>http://readerszone.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://readerszone.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>i also found that people from non it background only know one search engine "Google"<br />
i ask what is Google they reply me "Google is the place where we get all the that we want"<br />
even they don't know about the live search or yahoo search </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-04-08T03:38:12Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6054-comment:51217</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6054" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/googles_us_search_market_dominance.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/googles_us_search_market_dominance.php#c51217" />
    <title>Comment from John Duran on 2008-04-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>John Duran</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.malltropolitan.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.malltropolitan.com</a> is still one of the best sites to shop online, closely followed behind by ShopNBC. There are others also, that for some reason google don't seem to like.  Can you imagine what would happen if Google eventually succeeds in buying Yahoo?  Go figure!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-04-08T03:43:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6054-comment:51224</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6054" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/googles_us_search_market_dominance.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/googles_us_search_market_dominance.php#c51224" />
    <title>Comment from Dan Grossman on 2008-04-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Dan Grossman</name>
        <uri>http://www.dangrossman.info</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.dangrossman.info">
        <![CDATA[<p>Marshall, you must've left an italic tag open since all these comments are in italics.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-04-08T05:53:48Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6054-comment:51323</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6054" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/googles_us_search_market_dominance.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/googles_us_search_market_dominance.php#c51323" />
    <title>Comment from Justin on 2008-04-08</title>
    <author>
        <name>Justin</name>
        <uri>http://www.arcticsoft.net</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.arcticsoft.net">
        <![CDATA[<p>Please stop your spamming of malltroplitan.com. its pretty annoying and you wonder why google dropped you? Learn seo techniques without being annoying. Don't just travel around link dropping, build more content to your site and become an authority. Remember when you are linking to your site, it should be relevant and justified, don't do it for a link. If you want to declare your site as a place to shop, don't do it on a blog about search engines and relevant results.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-04-08T21:59:18Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6054-comment:51325</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6054" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/googles_us_search_market_dominance.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/googles_us_search_market_dominance.php#c51325" />
    <title>Comment from Son Nguyen on 2008-04-08</title>
    <author>
        <name>Son Nguyen</name>
        <uri>http://blog.trungson.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.trungson.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I just switched to Yahoo and find that the results are just as good as Google's.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-04-08T22:06:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6054-comment:51329</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6054" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/googles_us_search_market_dominance.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/googles_us_search_market_dominance.php#c51329" />
    <title>Comment from Mark on 2008-04-08</title>
    <author>
        <name>Mark</name>
        <uri>http://www.spam.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.spam.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>The spammers don't even realise all these URLS are nofollow so will do jack for their SEO. ;)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-04-08T22:20:44Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6054-comment:51356</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6054" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/googles_us_search_market_dominance.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/googles_us_search_market_dominance.php#c51356" />
    <title>Comment from Laurence on 2008-04-08</title>
    <author>
        <name>Laurence</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I will use Google as long as it continues to load faster than the yahoo home page. When I'm doing a search I don't care about news, entertainment, dating, autos, finance, groups, etc... There are literally hundreds of links on the Yahoo! home page and a total of 16 on the Google home page. The google page is just much more simple and that's what makes it work. If you were on a slow connection the Yahoo page would take longer to load than searching on google and then loading the proper result page for most site.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-04-09T02:15:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6054-comment:51379</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6054" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/googles_us_search_market_dominance.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/googles_us_search_market_dominance.php#c51379" />
    <title>Comment from Bobby Charlton on 2008-04-08</title>
    <author>
        <name>Bobby Charlton</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@Laurence:<br />
Try ysearch.com or search.yahoo.com</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-04-09T04:40:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6054-comment:51383</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6054" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/googles_us_search_market_dominance.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/googles_us_search_market_dominance.php#c51383" />
    <title>Comment from Martin on 2008-04-08</title>
    <author>
        <name>Martin</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>67% is an US all time high? Are Yahoo and MSN so much better in english-speaking countries?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-04-09T05:08:03Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6054-comment:51675</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6054" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/googles_us_search_market_dominance.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/googles_us_search_market_dominance.php#c51675" />
    <title>Comment from Ajay on 2008-04-11</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ajay</name>
        <uri>http://readerszone.com/mozilla/most-insecure-browser-mozilla-firefox.html</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://readerszone.com/mozilla/most-insecure-browser-mozilla-firefox.html">
        <![CDATA[<p>Laurence add some stuff on u r igoogle home page u will find that both yahoo and google are taking same time <br />
try to complare ysearch and google search page <br />
u will find that both are taking same time <br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-04-11T09:17:47Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6054-comment:52600</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6054" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/googles_us_search_market_dominance.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/googles_us_search_market_dominance.php#c52600" />
    <title>Comment from David on 2008-04-19</title>
    <author>
        <name>David</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Justin, don't pay attention to the spammers, they are show spoilers and more annoying than you think. The fact is that these are sales people and the company may not necessarily be aware of what they are doing.  They get commission for to bring in sale but they don't what to spend any money so they just start dropping links.  I know this for a fact because the company in question is a big company.  I have even bought at least two items from the company.  The company itself spends money advertising on Google and Yahoo, that's how I got to find them.  What we can do is report them to the company in question, hoping that the company acts upon our information.  Again, I don't think it has anything to do with the company.  If the company was on google's top list before and now it's not,  it is because of sales people like this.  Giving them seo technique or content building tip isn't going to help a sales person. Lol.  But do you think yahoo is being stubborn by not succumbing to google?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-04-19T15:32:30Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>