<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/for_some_startups_blog_coverage_matters.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2011:/1/tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6375-</id>
  <updated>2011-04-29T11:34:40Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for For Some Startups, Blog Coverage Really Matters</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.35-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6375</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/for_some_startups_blog_coverage_matters.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=6375" title="For Some Startups, Blog Coverage Really Matters" />
    <published>2008-05-22T19:40:35Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-23T00:21:22Z</updated>
    <title>For Some Startups, Blog Coverage Really Matters</title>
    <summary>Today, I came across a site from Red Hat called Mugshot that neither I nor Sarah Perez had ever heard of. Mugshot is an open source lifestream aggregation service that went overlooked in our list of 35 such sites last February (though it was mentioned in a comment left about a week later). Mugshot has...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Josh Catone</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Trends" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img border="0" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/mugshot-logo.jpg" width="150" height="40" />Today, I came across a site from Red Hat called <a href="http://www.mugshot.org/">Mugshot</a> that neither I nor Sarah Perez had ever heard of.  Mugshot is an <a href="http://developer.mugshot.org/">open source</a> lifestream aggregation service that went overlooked in our list of <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/35_lifestreamin_apps.php">35 such sites</a> last February (though it was mentioned in a comment left about a week later).  Mugshot has clearly flown under the radar -- <i>for 2 years</i>! Though it wasn't always a lifestream aggregator, the Mugshot project was <a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20060531-6955.html">launched 2 years ago</a>.  So why has Mugshot stayed small while <a href="http://www.friendfeed.com/">FriendFeed</a> has blown up?</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>The answer, it would seem, is that FriendFeed was anointed early on as a darling of new media, while Mugshot -- and other lifestreaming services -- have struggled to get attention from the early adopter press (read: blogs like this one).</p>

<p>But let's back up a second.  Press attention doesn't always translate to success.  When Yahoo! Photos closed in favor of Flickr <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flickr_eats_yah.php">last May</a>, Flickr was actually the smaller of the two sites, even though it got the lion's share of press mentions.  We noted recently that <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/hitwise_social_network_traffic_apr08.php">MySpace takes 75%</a> of social networking traffic, but according to Technorati they only get about half as many mentions as Facebook on high authority blogs.</p>

<p>On the other hand, for a service like Mugshot that appeals mainly to early adopters, the <a href="http://redeye.firstround.com/2006/05/53651.html">TechCrunch 53,651</a> (now more like 950,000) is a vitally important.   Technorati says that Mugshot has only been linked to 917 times -- only a couple of times by a top-tier blogs, and never in a dedicated post over the past year that we could find.  FriendFeed, meanwhile, has been linked to over 14,000 times, and nearly every top-tier blog has written about the service multiple times.  Techmeme reports 137 headlines about FriendFeed, for Mugshot: just 3, and all came around the project's launch two years ago.</p>

<p>The reason blog mentions matter less for sites like Facebook and Flickr are because, let's face it, social networking or photosharing aren't as hard to sell to the mainstream as say lifestreaming, so early adopters aren't necessarily technology geeks (for Facebook it was college students, for Flickr it was photographers).  Other factors matter more to driving adoption of sites targeted at the mainstream.  For sites that target tech and web early adopters, however, that's less true, and mentions on blogs like this one become a lot more important to building early inertia.</p>

<p>It would appear that the tech blog echochamber has the potential to work against new services targeted at early adopters.  If a new service relies on early adopters, it appears that it will only have a chance if it can get love from early adopter blogs.  Even though Mugshot seems like a very capable lifestream aggregator and predated FriendFeed -- and it is open source to boot -- it has not had much of an impact because FriendFeed has dominated the new media news cycle.  The echochamber effect of the tech blogosphere only served to make that news domination more pronounced and make it that much harder for competing services to gain traction.</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6375-comment:55973</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6375" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/for_some_startups_blog_coverage_matters.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/for_some_startups_blog_coverage_matters.php#c55973" />
    <title>Comment from Michael on 2008-05-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>Michael</name>
        <uri>http://cybersurge.org</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://cybersurge.org">
        <![CDATA[<p>Blog coverage is essential because blogs are the new way people find out about new things, if no one knows about your service then no one will use it.</p>

<p>It is very strange though how things turn out, I wonder why FriendFeed has become everyones favorite life aggregater when there are so many out there and some of them may even be better than FriendFeed.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-05-25T17:08:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6375-comment:55964</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6375" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/for_some_startups_blog_coverage_matters.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/for_some_startups_blog_coverage_matters.php#c55964" />
    <title>Comment from Kevin Long on 2008-05-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>Kevin Long</name>
        <uri>http://www.justmeans.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.justmeans.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Blogs have been huge for our PR in the last month. </p>

<p>Traditional PR will only cover "the next big thing"<br />
Blog PR will cover "what might be the next big thing" </p>

<p>Our JustMeans social media site was covered by Max Gladwell who's story was then featured as a guest writer on SustainLane and then made it on the front of Digg.com - huge site visit increase for us. <br />
  </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-05-25T15:36:50Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6375-comment:55954</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6375" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/for_some_startups_blog_coverage_matters.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/for_some_startups_blog_coverage_matters.php#c55954" />
    <title>Comment from Ernst-Jan Pfauth on 2008-05-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ernst-Jan Pfauth</name>
        <uri>http://thenextweb.org/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://thenextweb.org/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I've written a post this article, asking my readers if they'd like to read articles about really early stage start-ups. This sparked an interesting discussion: <a href="http://thenextweb.org/2008/05/24/blog-coverage-necessary-for-start-ups-to-survive/" rel="nofollow">http://thenextweb.org/2008/05/24/blog-coverage-necessary-for-start-ups-to-survive/</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-05-25T10:41:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6375-comment:55827</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6375" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/for_some_startups_blog_coverage_matters.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/for_some_startups_blog_coverage_matters.php#c55827" />
    <title>Comment from Ivailo on 2008-05-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ivailo</name>
        <uri>http://www.retaggr.com/Card/Ivailo</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.retaggr.com/Card/Ivailo">
        <![CDATA[<p>Great post. Completely agree.</p>

<p>What would you say is a good way to approach bloggers to ask them to have a look at a new service?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-05-23T16:39:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6375-comment:55812</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6375" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/for_some_startups_blog_coverage_matters.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/for_some_startups_blog_coverage_matters.php#c55812" />
    <title>Comment from pazarlama on 2008-05-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>pazarlama</name>
        <uri>http://www.agpazarlama.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.agpazarlama.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>thanks :)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-05-23T14:07:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6375-comment:55803</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6375" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/for_some_startups_blog_coverage_matters.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/for_some_startups_blog_coverage_matters.php#c55803" />
    <title>Comment from visakhcr on 2008-05-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>visakhcr</name>
        <uri>http://bonchibuji.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://bonchibuji.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>In my blog, I wrote a post <a href="http://bonchibuji.blogspot.com/2008/04/10-reasons-why-linkspank-sucks.html" rel="nofollow">10 Reasons Why Linkspank Sucks</a>. Site founder Andrew gave a prompt reply(in comments)about all the issue I had raised and some of them were corrected very fast...</p>

<p>After sometime, I wrote another post <a href="http://bonchibuji.blogspot.com/2008/05/3-stars-for-linkspank.html" rel="nofollow">3 Stars for Linkspank</a> which talked about how they reacted to my post and what I like about the site.</p>

<p>Then I noticed that one link was geting lot of importance (called "spanks") in Linkspank. It was called <a href="hhttp://ilovethesoundofmyvoice.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">10 Reasons Why visakhcr Sucks</a>. Looks like it was written by a Linkspank developer. </p>

<p>Anyway, I wanted to just share my story with Readwriteweb readers....</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-05-23T11:39:16Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6375-comment:55766</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6375" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/for_some_startups_blog_coverage_matters.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/for_some_startups_blog_coverage_matters.php#c55766" />
    <title>Comment from Mircea on 2008-05-22</title>
    <author>
        <name>Mircea</name>
        <uri>http://www.mytestbox.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.mytestbox.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Sometimes blogs says: "oh no! Not another service like this!" (which they might have been covered already)...like many times Mike Arrington says...</p>

<p>And because important blogs get many requests or pitches every day it's quite easy actually to pass something which can be interesting....</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-05-23T01:59:59Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6375-comment:55757</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6375" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/for_some_startups_blog_coverage_matters.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/for_some_startups_blog_coverage_matters.php#c55757" />
    <title>Comment from HappyTutors.com - Connect Tutors with Students &amp; Parents on 2008-05-22</title>
    <author>
        <name>HappyTutors.com - Connect Tutors with Students &amp; Parents</name>
        <uri>http://www.happytutors.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.happytutors.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>It is all about your target audience. If you can get attention from a blog with the same segments, your business will defintely have more advantage over others. But in general, it's always a good thing to have coverage on the blogosphere, the user-generated marketplace.</p>

<p><br />
HappyTutors.com <br />
~ Connect Tutors with Students & Parents ~</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-05-22T22:47:48Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6375-comment:55756</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6375" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/for_some_startups_blog_coverage_matters.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/for_some_startups_blog_coverage_matters.php#c55756" />
    <title>Comment from eelcoh on 2008-05-22</title>
    <author>
        <name>eelcoh</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I recall that when Red Hat started Mugshot, the idea was that of the 'online desktop'. You can read more about this initiative here at Havoc Penningtons blog:<br />
<a href="http://ometer.com/online-desktop.html" rel="nofollow">http://ometer.com/online-desktop.html</a></p>

<p>That leads to a more important reason why Mugshot did not take off: although there are clients for Windows and OS X, it never really got out of the Red Hat & Fedora communities. Also, the fact that Pennington, a leading person in the Red Hat and Gnome community, has left the company (to start litl.com) is not a good sign for Mugshot. </p>

<p>However, there are still chances it will grow into something interesting, since it is an open source project.<br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-05-22T22:35:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6375-comment:55748</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6375" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/for_some_startups_blog_coverage_matters.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/for_some_startups_blog_coverage_matters.php#c55748" />
    <title>Comment from Mikael Bergkvist on 2008-05-22</title>
    <author>
        <name>Mikael Bergkvist</name>
        <uri>http://www.widgetplus.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.widgetplus.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Well, blogs ARE extremly important. So much so, that being a startup, one sometimes overreact in any responses to them. A good blog is what gives the web it's lifeblood, it's nerve, since it oftens offers a much more insightful coverage of a certain topic or startup than the 'normal' press does.<br />
Objectivity can be good, but sometimes it's also a bit on the 'dry' side.<br />
Also, blogs are independent in a way that massmedia sometimes isn't, especially when owned by someone with a clear political agenda. (read 'FOX news')<br />
Also, individual voices can speak of things that major corporations cannot, in fear of losing advertisers.<br />
They dont have to be 'politically correct' if they dont want to.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-05-22T21:38:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6375-comment:55744</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6375" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/for_some_startups_blog_coverage_matters.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/for_some_startups_blog_coverage_matters.php#c55744" />
    <title>Comment from Matt on 2008-05-22</title>
    <author>
        <name>Matt</name>
        <uri>http://www.aroxo.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.aroxo.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Guys - a great article. Some impressive mental leaps were needed to see the wood from the trees here, and a great message to sell to any start-up.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-05-22T21:11:14Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6375-comment:55740</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6375" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/for_some_startups_blog_coverage_matters.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/for_some_startups_blog_coverage_matters.php#c55740" />
    <title>Comment from Deepak on 2008-05-22</title>
    <author>
        <name>Deepak</name>
        <uri>http://mndoci.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://mndoci.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I don't know bout that.  I tried out Mugshot when it first came out as did some of my other bio-brethren, but IIRC pretty much none of us found much use for it, or liked its interface.  On the other hand, Friendfeed has been a huge hit.  Yes part of it is coverage, but usability has a lot to do with it as well.  Perhaps where coverage has the most impact is by driving critical mass, cause we will end up where our friends are.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-05-22T20:50:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6375-comment:55738</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6375" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/for_some_startups_blog_coverage_matters.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/for_some_startups_blog_coverage_matters.php#c55738" />
    <title>Comment from Peter Cooper on 2008-05-22</title>
    <author>
        <name>Peter Cooper</name>
        <uri>http://www.petercooper.co.uk/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.petercooper.co.uk/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I don't think this is always true. Feed Digest was a cutting edge service when it launched almost three years ago but it got very little press, mostly because I wasn't interested in courting any. Even when Michael Arrington got in touch, I asked him to hold fire as I wanted to scale with the users I was getting (about 100 signups a day) rather than collapse under the weight of many new ones. In retrospect this was a rather bad move as I was too focused on technology over business. Still, not a bad exit at the end of the day and I've learnt a lot!</p>

<p>The interesting side effect to all of this is that I've managed to stay rather low profile, despite being one of the small group to bootstrap a Web 2.0 startup, get angel funding, and then make a profitable exit :) Lessons definitely learned, although being under the radar is not as bad as you'd think..</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-05-22T20:42:27Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6375-comment:55731</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6375" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/for_some_startups_blog_coverage_matters.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/for_some_startups_blog_coverage_matters.php#c55731" />
    <title>Comment from Martin on 2008-05-22</title>
    <author>
        <name>Martin</name>
        <uri>http://martinfrindt.net/blog</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://martinfrindt.net/blog">
        <![CDATA[<p>What about lifestream.fm? Its the same... </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-05-22T20:22:14Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6375-comment:55729</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6375" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/for_some_startups_blog_coverage_matters.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/for_some_startups_blog_coverage_matters.php#c55729" />
    <title>Comment from Rob D on 2008-05-22</title>
    <author>
        <name>Rob D</name>
        <uri>http://regulargeek.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://regulargeek.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Blog coverage is immensely important. If nobody talks about it, then nobody knows about it. I launched YackTrack on a Sunday evening around a month ago. Your own Sarah Perez get wind of it somehow (probably through twitter at some polint) and covered it the first full day it was live. </p>

<p>If she did not cover it, nobody would know it existed because it has no external funding and has not advertised on any other sites. FriendFeed had the ears of VCs and got some good funding, and that always creates buzz.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-05-22T20:16:16Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>
