<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/results_data_portability_future.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2009:/1/tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6405-</id>
  <updated>2009-11-23T18:55:00Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Results: Data Portability&apos;s Future</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.23-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6405</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/results_data_portability_future.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=6405" title="Results: Data Portability's Future" />
    <published>2008-05-26T23:37:55Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-27T00:02:18Z</updated>
    <title>Results: Data Portability&apos;s Future</title>
    <summary>A couple of weeks ago we ran an interactive game on the topic of Data Portability. We had a great response, with 680 people playing the game. Here now are the results, showing how RWW readers think 5 of the major players - Google, Microsoft, MySpace, Facebook, and the non-profit Data Portability Project - will...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Richard MacManus</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Analysis" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/datagame.jpg" width="150" height="113" />A couple of weeks ago we ran <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/play_the_news_data_portability.php">an interactive game on the topic of Data Portability</a>. We had a great response, with 680 people playing the game. </p>

<p>Here now are the results, showing how RWW readers think 5 of the major players - Google, Microsoft, MySpace, Facebook, and the non-profit Data Portability Project - will play out the future of Data Portability.</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>To remind you of the background to the game. Recently three major players in the social networking space each announced independent competing approaches to making profile and friend data portable. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/myspace_data_availability.php">MySpace Data Availability</a> was followed by <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_answers_myspace_with_facebook_connect.php">Facebook Connect</a> and then <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_friend_connect_manages.php">Google Friend Connect</a> after that.  With all of these competing APIs, how this will play out is anyone's guess. So we created an interactive app from <a href="http://www.impactgames.com/">Impact Games</a> that lets you model how each of the major players will impact the data portability movement, as well as share your opinions about what they <em>should</em> do.</p>

<h2>The Results</h2>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/dpgame1_may08.png" /></p>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/dpgame2_may08.png" /></p>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/dpgame3_may08.png" /></p>

<p>A reminder that the 'opinion' category is what you <em>hope will happen</em> and 'prediction' is what you <em>think will happen</em>.</p>

<p>Two points were consistent with our expectations:</p>

<ul>
<li>The majority hoped Facebook will merge, yet predicted that they <em>won't</em>.</li>
<li>The majority hoped Microsoft will advocate open standards, yet most expected them to launch a competing platform.</li>
</ul>

<p>One result that surprised us was that many people didn't expect the Data Portability Project to endorse a specific platform. <a href="http://readwritetalk.com/2008/05/06/chris-saad-co-founder-of-dataportabilityorg/">Given their roadmap</a>, this would not have been our guess.</p>

<p>For more on the topic of the future of Data Portability, see Chris Messina's post today on <a href="http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2008/05/23/the-battle-for-the-future-of-the-social-web/">the battle for the future of the social web</a> and <a href="http://500hats.typepad.com/500blogs/2008/05/chris-messina-i.html">Dave McClure's response</a>.</p>

<p>What do you think of the results? Do you think Facebook and Microsoft will listen to what early adopters think they should do?</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6405-comment:56101</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6405" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/results_data_portability_future.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/results_data_portability_future.php#c56101" />
    <title>Comment from MyMesh.com on 2008-05-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>MyMesh.com</name>
        <uri>http://www.mymesh.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.mymesh.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Great game for useful opinions. Good strategy (albeit common) to raise profile of "Data Portability" alongside Facebook and Microsoft :-)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-05-27T05:27:09Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6405-comment:56110</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6405" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/results_data_portability_future.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/results_data_portability_future.php#c56110" />
    <title>Comment from Darren on 2008-05-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>Darren</name>
        <uri>http://Http://crowdstatus.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://Http://crowdstatus.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I think it will go nowhere unless w3c or a boby like that picks it up. Tbh it all seems like someone self promoting something which is not a massive issue. Getting the contacts out is all thats needed really.  </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-05-27T06:53:14Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6405-comment:56117</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6405" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/results_data_portability_future.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/results_data_portability_future.php#c56117" />
    <title>Comment from George Koiliaris on 2008-05-27</title>
    <author>
        <name>George Koiliaris</name>
        <uri>http://www.wadja.com/petty01</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.wadja.com/petty01">
        <![CDATA[<p>It is perfectly understood that everyone want a piece of the Data Portability/Openess pie. My guess is that FB and Microsoft will either create and promote their own Open Standards, yet still behind walled gardens, or they will merge.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-05-27T08:31:16Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6405-comment:56228</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6405" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/results_data_portability_future.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/results_data_portability_future.php#c56228" />
    <title>Comment from Sesli Sohbet on 2008-05-27</title>
    <author>
        <name>Sesli Sohbet</name>
        <uri>http://www.birsesver.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.birsesver.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I think it s a great idea good work guys hope you the best. Keep it up.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-05-28T06:57:33Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>