<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/blockbuster_kiosks_still_a_bad_idea.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2009:/1/tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6449-</id>
  <updated>2009-10-30T14:00:46Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Blockbuster Kiosks: Still a Bad Idea</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.23-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6449</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/blockbuster_kiosks_still_a_bad_idea.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=6449" title="Blockbuster Kiosks: Still a Bad Idea" />
    <published>2008-06-02T15:02:58Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-03T04:47:36Z</updated>
    <title>Blockbuster Kiosks: Still a Bad Idea</title>
    <summary>Blockbuster Kiosks: Still a Bad Idea</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Josh Catone</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Features" />
    
    <category term="Online Video" />
    
    <category term="Products" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img border="0" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/blockbuster-logo.jpg" width="150" height="98" />Blockbuster is struggling, and seems to be trying as hard as it can to keep that moniker. Even though the company's <a href="http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2008/05/15/blockbuster-eats-brains.aspx">finance's are looking up</a>, it continues to make one questionable move after another in its attempt to compete with Netflix, Apple, and Amazon.  From its decision to try <a href="http://www.techmeme.com/080509/p34#a080509p34">buying Circuit City</a> -- another struggling retailer -- in some crazy scheme to sell movies and TVs in the same store, to the company's latest hair-brained move: in-store movie download kiosks.</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>Blockbuster first <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/blockbuster_sees_future.php">started talking kiosks</a> last November, and last week unveiled the prototype to the press.  The kiosks will work like this:  Customers will visit a Blockbuster store and connect a supported digital media device to the in-store kiosk -- at launch, that will only include devices made by Archos.  For a trial run at a few stores in the Dallas, Texas area, Blockbuster's kiosks will have a limited selection of movies, but CEO James Keyes hopes that will change in the future as the company plans to get more studios on board.</p>

<p>Last November, we expressed skepticism about the kiosk plan.  "The major advantage [Blockbuster] had over Netflix was the ability to offer free in-store rentals if people returned mailed videos to the store," we wrote.  An in-store kiosk cuts the convenience level in half -- now that you're not getting anything mailed to you, you're forced to make a trip to the store, and there is no longer any reason for Blockbuster to offer free rentals.</p>

<p>Much of Blockbuster's good news was at the store level where mechandising revenue rose 19.7% over last year.  But as <a href="http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2008/05/29/willy-wonka-and-the-blockbuster-factory.aspx">the Motley Fool points out</a>, in-store kiosks might hurt that revenue stream.  "I thought the purpose of winning foot traffic at the store level was to grow incremental impulse-item sales," writes Rick Aristotle Munarriz. "Folks walking in to use an automated kiosk are unlikely to bother with conventional checkout lines."</p>

<h2>What About Redbox?</h1>

<p>While it's true that <a href="http://www.redbox.com/">Redbox</a> DVD rental kiosks already have 6800 locations in the US -- more than Blockbuster -- and that the company is moving toward an IPO, Blockbuster's kiosks aren't the same.  Redbox works because the kiosks are placed in locations that already have a lot of retail foot traffic -- such as Wal-Mart, Walgreens, and grocery stores.  Redbox inspires impulsive movie rentals and is convenient for people already out doing other errands.</p>

<p>Blockbuster kiosks, on the other hand, would be in places you only visit if you're planning to rent a movie already. The convenience of no late fees is also diminished when you have to leave the house and download your movie to a portable device -- which may mean less than perfect video quality when you hook your device up to a television.</p>

<h2>The Future is in Downloads</h2>

<p>Last fall Keyes told reporters that he expects the DVD business to be a significant part of Blockbuster's business for at least 5 years, and that the kiosks are meant as a way to transition users toward a future of digital downloads.  Netflix agrees that in 5 years <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-9953489-7.html">the DVD business will be on the decline</a>, but Netflix is skipping the "transitional" period and moving straight to downloading movies <a href="http://www.last100.com/2008/01/03/netflix-partners-with-lg-to-deliver-movies-directly-to-tv/">directly to the TV</a>.</p>

<p>Blockbuster is also <a href="http://www.last100.com/2008/04/10/blockbuster-to-launch-set-top-box/">working on a set-top box</a>, which will put its acquisition of movie download service <a href="http://www.movielink.com/">Movielink</a> to use.  Unfortunately for Blockbuster, they'll be a late entry to a market that is already crowded with mammoth competitors, including Amazon, Apple, Netflix, and Microsoft.</p>

<p>Despite some good revenue news, Blockbuster still seems like a company that's making all the wrong moves as it struggles to transition to the digital world.</p>

<p>Perhaps the Onion says it best though, in the following news report.<br />
<center><embed src="http://www.theonion.com/content/themes/common/assets/videoplayer/flvplayer.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowScriptAccess="always" wmode="transparent" width="400" height="355" flashvars="file=http://www.theonion.com/content/xml/79397/video&autostart=false&image=http://www.theonion.com/content/files/images/VIDEO_STORE_article.jpg&bufferlength=3&embedded=true&title=Historic%20%E2%80%98Blockbuster%E2%80%99%20Store%20Offers%20Glimpse%20Of%20How%20Movies%20Were%20Rented%20In%20The%20Past"></embed></center></p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6449-comment:56679</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6449" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/blockbuster_kiosks_still_a_bad_idea.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/blockbuster_kiosks_still_a_bad_idea.php#c56679" />
    <title>Comment from Paula Thornton on 2008-06-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>Paula Thornton</name>
        <uri>http://www.fastforwardblog.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.fastforwardblog.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Per former employee President doesn't understand digital at all. He's fired all the key digital people (esp. research). He's a 'retail' man. He apparently has channel myopia.</p>

<p>Seems obvious based on results.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-02T15:54:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6449-comment:56684</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6449" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/blockbuster_kiosks_still_a_bad_idea.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/blockbuster_kiosks_still_a_bad_idea.php#c56684" />
    <title>Comment from Simon Gilligan on 2008-06-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>Simon Gilligan</name>
        <uri>http://applebox.com.au</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://applebox.com.au">
        <![CDATA[<p>I think kiosks are an attempt to involve their franchisees in progressing their bricks and mortar model forward. These are the guys that have bought into the Blockbuster business, who are the real face of Blockbuster today and deliver Blockbuster the majority of its earnings. Yet, they are missing out on revenue from Blockbuster's mail order play and also mindful that their business will eventually transition away from them.</p>

<p>But kiosks aren't the answer. They just don't scale. Anyone who runs a DVD store knows exactly how peaky the business is. When you've got 50 people all wanting to find a movie on a Sat night at 7pm, they aren't going to be queueing up at a couple of in-store kiosks.</p>

<p>In a sense Blockbuster have lost control of their business, because their franchisees have locked the group into a bricks and mortar operating model that isn't easy to change. They could innovate much more at the store level, but it's another thing altogether for the franchisees to run with whatever they come up with.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-02T16:41:14Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6449-comment:56691</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6449" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/blockbuster_kiosks_still_a_bad_idea.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/blockbuster_kiosks_still_a_bad_idea.php#c56691" />
    <title>Comment from Joel Price on 2008-06-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>Joel Price</name>
        <uri>http://www.joelprice.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.joelprice.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Here in San Diego and company called DVD Play has kiosks at many of the Vons grocery stores, many people I know, including myself, love it. I often ask why isn't Blockbuster doing this? I can only fault them for being late to the game. Of course, the future is downloads, but it's still not the way most people consume movies and won't be for at least 5 years in the most optimistic calculations. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-02T17:03:06Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6449-comment:56694</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6449" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/blockbuster_kiosks_still_a_bad_idea.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/blockbuster_kiosks_still_a_bad_idea.php#c56694" />
    <title>Comment from Josh Catone on 2008-06-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>Josh Catone</name>
        <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>@Joel: The thing with DVD Play kiosks (or Redbox, or any other) is, as you said, they're in the grocery store -- i.e., a convenient location for consumers.  For most people using these services, it's no longer, "I'm going to the video store to rent a movie," is is, "I'm going to do some shopping, and I'll pick up a movie while I'm there."  Many of these kiosks are in multiple stores so no matter what type of errands you set out to do, picking up a movie as well is convenient.  That convenience is lessened when you have to go into a separate store to do essentially the same thing.</p>

<p>The other problem with Blockbuster's kiosks as a transitional medium is that they're not using DVDs the way Redbox or your DVD Play services do.  They're using downloads to portable media devices -- and right now to just a single brand that doesn't have a huge share of the market.  If it's a transitional thing, you need to keep part of the process familiar -- that's the part that uses a physical disc.  Asking their customers to do two unfamiliar things -- use a kiosk and download to a portable media device -- just won't fly in my opinion.  Especially given that Netflix/Blockbuster Total Access or Redbox are generally  going to always be more convenient, as are any of the set top box or on-demand cable/satellite options. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-02T17:10:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6449-comment:56700</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6449" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/blockbuster_kiosks_still_a_bad_idea.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/blockbuster_kiosks_still_a_bad_idea.php#c56700" />
    <title>Comment from allen on 2008-06-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>allen</name>
        <uri>http://www.insidetransit.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.insidetransit.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>could this be a play to try to keep their stores alive?</p>

<p>i agree that downloads are the future</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-02T18:21:10Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6449-comment:56702</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6449" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/blockbuster_kiosks_still_a_bad_idea.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/blockbuster_kiosks_still_a_bad_idea.php#c56702" />
    <title>Comment from Brick Marketing on 2008-06-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>Brick Marketing</name>
        <uri>http://www.brickmarketing.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.brickmarketing.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Downloads are okay but the time that it takes to sometimes download and the idea of watching movies all on computer screens isn't very appealing - we agree that the kiosks within supermarkets are the most convenient and the fact that some charge only $1 for a one night rental.  Not shabby compared to Blockbuster's $3-$4 prices. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-02T18:26:11Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6449-comment:56703</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6449" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/blockbuster_kiosks_still_a_bad_idea.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/blockbuster_kiosks_still_a_bad_idea.php#c56703" />
    <title>Comment from James Lewin on 2008-06-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>James Lewin</name>
        <uri>http://www.podcastingnews.com/2008/05/31/blockbuster-to-test-stupid-idea-you-know-is-going-to-fail/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.podcastingnews.com/2008/05/31/blockbuster-to-test-stupid-idea-you-know-is-going-to-fail/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Josh </p>

<p>Nice analysis.</p>

<p>When I heard this news, I had <a href="http://www.podcastingnews.com/2008/05/31/blockbuster-to-test-stupid-idea-you-know-is-going-to-fail/" rel="nofollow">similar thoughts</a>.</p>

<p>The future is downloads, from your home network or wirelessly. The big question for Blockbuster is how to remain relevant in a world of Internet video rentals.</p>

<p>What do you think that they should be doing to stay relevant?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-02T18:32:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6449-comment:56704</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6449" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/blockbuster_kiosks_still_a_bad_idea.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/blockbuster_kiosks_still_a_bad_idea.php#c56704" />
    <title>Comment from Josh Catone on 2008-06-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>Josh Catone</name>
        <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>@James: I think their best hope for the future is to get cracking on getting Movielink integrated with a set-top box.  It sucks for their franchisees, but I think disc rental is a dying business -- it might take 5-10 years, but eventually we'll all be on downloads and limited disc rental via mail/Redbox-like new release kiosks.  In my opinion, anyway.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-02T18:38:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6449-comment:56711</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6449" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/blockbuster_kiosks_still_a_bad_idea.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/blockbuster_kiosks_still_a_bad_idea.php#c56711" />
    <title>Comment from sull on 2008-06-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>sull</name>
        <uri>http://sull.outputs.it</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://sull.outputs.it">
        <![CDATA[<p>I don't think this is a horrible idea and wont be so hasty in proclaiming this to be another blockbuster flop.</p>

<p>First thing that comes to mind is Bandwidth usage.  That is... our at home bandwidth usage.  If we start downloading massive amounts of data so we can watch high quality movies at home without requiring discs, then at some point, your ISP will become more apparent to you.  That is to say... don't count on only paying the low monthly price you signed up for.  <br />
You will likely be deemed a heavy user and have to pay more or have download restrictions etc.   So in this respect, hopping over to your local blockbuster store and using Their bandwidth to download a few movies would become a solution, not an inconvenience.  </p>

<p>And is it truly an inconvenience to go to a B&M Blockbuster store?  ALL of us used to do this and sometimes, I actually miss the ritual.  Think about all the other reasons we have for physically moving our selves to real life locations to get stuff we want or need.... got milk?  beer run.  cigs. gas. library. coffee. lunch. bookstore.  etc.  <br />
why is renting a movie any different?  just because an alternative is possible (downloading at home) doesnt nec mean that anything else is a huge inconvenience.  some wojld argue that downloading at home is not convenient, especially with many having less than reliable internet service.  </p>

<p>Now IF Blockbuster B&M stores could transform into a cooler environment... a place to hang out, lounge, eat, socialize, tv rooms, internet etc... well then they would really be onto something.  How many people enjoy hanging out at a coffee house with internet?  Make blockbuster a pseudo movie getting social environment and then upselling and impulse-purchasing can be built into the space as it would in any other space.  Make Blockbuster social and not a download assembly line... and all should be fine.  No?</p>

<p>So those are two angles to consider.  Bandwidth and Social Spaces.  Maybe one day, this would be the norm.  One day, we will download our movies from thousands of locations.  "Powered by Blockbuster"?  Maybe.  </p>

<p>Sull</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-02T19:33:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6449-comment:56712</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6449" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/blockbuster_kiosks_still_a_bad_idea.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/blockbuster_kiosks_still_a_bad_idea.php#c56712" />
    <title>Comment from Steve on 2008-06-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>Steve</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I just don't see any value at all for the consumer in going to a kiosk vs picking up a DVD.  Now they have to buy yet another device (at least at the beginning) when they already have a player for all the DVDs on the shelves and they're presumably comfortable with how their players work.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-02T19:43:08Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6449-comment:56753</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6449" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/blockbuster_kiosks_still_a_bad_idea.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/blockbuster_kiosks_still_a_bad_idea.php#c56753" />
    <title>Comment from Simon Gilligan on 2008-06-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>Simon Gilligan</name>
        <uri>http://applebox.com.au</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://applebox.com.au">
        <![CDATA[<p>Thinking about it (especially with the latest Blockbuster prototype stores), Blockbuster are really trying to transition their franchisees into a different retail model. Makes sense .. replace DVD rental revenue with games/electronics/whatever. Leverage their store floor space. Franchises shouldn't really care, as long as their business continues to earn.</p>

<p>As for the DVD rental business .. everything is playing nicely into the hands of subscription models. Redboxes might be convenient but they only work as a business because their overheads are so low that they don't need to earn much (or service many people). They've truly commoditised DVD rental, but focusing only on the hits (ie current popular releases) is going to leave a large part of the rental market unfulfilled. ie, watching a movie is part driven by convenience to access the DVD, but also the ability to find a movie you actually WANT to watch.</p>

<p>So if you want to find a movie outside of the flattened/hits only/populist redbox catalogue, where do you go? Netflix or Blockbuster online. Blockbuster B&M stores are so mainstream that they can't really re-adjust and offer a different rental model because they themselves push all their customers into the same new release mentality.  </p>

<p>But anyway .. yeah kiosks I reckon are a dud. VideoEzy here in Australia has announced they are going to try the same thing. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-03T00:02:39Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6449-comment:56780</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6449" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/blockbuster_kiosks_still_a_bad_idea.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/blockbuster_kiosks_still_a_bad_idea.php#c56780" />
    <title>Comment from Michael on 2008-06-03</title>
    <author>
        <name>Michael</name>
        <uri>http://cybersurge.org</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://cybersurge.org">
        <![CDATA[<p>I say "let'em go bankrupt" if they don't get it then why do we need them around?</p>

<p>I think that it is inherent for us to try and figure out ways for Blockbuster to survive but unfortunately there is no evidence that anyone who is working for that company has any type of business sense in the world we live in today. Blockbuster may have been huge 5-10 years ago but now that digital downloads are starting up and DVDs are just one step away from being a thing of the past they just can't move quick enough.</p>

<p>Blockbuster is a brick and mortar store in a world of digital downloads.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-03T09:26:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6449-comment:56794</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6449" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/blockbuster_kiosks_still_a_bad_idea.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/blockbuster_kiosks_still_a_bad_idea.php#c56794" />
    <title>Comment from sull on 2008-06-03</title>
    <author>
        <name>sull</name>
        <uri>http://sull.outputs.it</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://sull.outputs.it">
        <![CDATA[<p>there are some good comments on this alleyinsider.com post:</p>

<p><a href="http://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/5/why_blockbusters_movie_kiosks_wont_fix_blockbuster" rel="nofollow">http://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/5/why_blockbusters_movie_kiosks_wont_fix_blockbuster</a></p>

<p>i think this is a good direction for blockbuster.  critics should look beyond the curve to see the potential here.<br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-03T14:18:46Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6449-comment:56821</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6449" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/blockbuster_kiosks_still_a_bad_idea.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/blockbuster_kiosks_still_a_bad_idea.php#c56821" />
    <title>Comment from Dan Kinart on 2008-06-03</title>
    <author>
        <name>Dan Kinart</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I'm with Sull.<br />
One needs to think past the "test" stage.<br />
Do you think they will only have kiosks in their stores? I doubt they are that shortsighted.<br />
Who says they aren't looking ahead 4-5 years for the next digital form factor to replace DVDs and banking on future?<br />
Who says they won't have 10 kiosk in a store, or 20?<br />
How much would be saved in cost of disks, labor to duplicate, cost of packaging, cost of shipping and distribution. Not to mention reduction of carbon footprint?<br />
Not to mention UNLIMITED copies of titles. <br />
Sure, downloading straight to TV is coming (ask Sony)<br />
but some people are still watching movies on their VCR, right?.<br />
The flash memory phase may last for 10-15 years.<br />
After that Blockbuster will be in the download straight to TV business.<br />
Dan</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-03T19:34:59Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6449-comment:56823</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6449" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/blockbuster_kiosks_still_a_bad_idea.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/blockbuster_kiosks_still_a_bad_idea.php#c56823" />
    <title>Comment from Tim Burke on 2008-06-03</title>
    <author>
        <name>Tim Burke</name>
        <uri>http://www.kiosk-blog.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.kiosk-blog.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Years ago I dreamed of a kiosk for Blockbuster's, that would simply let me look up where in their store a particular movie was located.  I went to see if they had any Warren Miller fliks just before ski season.  I looked for a good 10 minutes, then asked an associate, who walked around the store looking... until they finally went to a large 3 ring binder of all of their titles... flipping, searching, checking different spellings, until determining that it must not be in their inventory.  Well, if they had a kiosk, I could have done a search myself against their database. And got the same answer in 2 minutes.  </p>

<p>I could see this kiosk having cross promotional upselling, recommended titles based on my search, and even tied to my blockbuster card so they can market directly to my taste in movies. </p>

<p>The download idea is a low value option to me, since I would do all of this at home.  And most Americans do have internet access and a computer.  But this may be of value to those who do not, or are anti - Itunes people, unbanked, etc.   With their deep pockets, it doesn't hurt to do a pilot program to determine if it has legs.  And if they have that network of kiosks, there are future options that could be integrated that may not be apparent today. If nobody tries, then nobody would ever be able to determine if it can become successful.  There have been crazier concepts that have worked well for other industries.  </p>

<p>Oh, and if you like my "title search kiosk" idea, look up our company for details!  <br />
 </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-03T20:03:30Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6449-comment:56861</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6449" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/blockbuster_kiosks_still_a_bad_idea.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/blockbuster_kiosks_still_a_bad_idea.php#c56861" />
    <title>Comment from Ken Beuck on 2008-06-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ken Beuck</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I would like to stick my foot in the door about your BlockBuster Kiosk review. you are acusing BlockBuster is not of understanding their customer base, remember they own Circuit City were the donwload devises are sold for the interface for these downloads this carries another profit to the bottom line. I can see Circuit City with 10-20 of these kiosk in each store for the movie buyers also plus it's the point of purchasing advertizments also adds to the bottom line with these kiosk's also.<br />
Oceanside Ken    </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-04T11:25:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6449-comment:56873</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6449" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/blockbuster_kiosks_still_a_bad_idea.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/blockbuster_kiosks_still_a_bad_idea.php#c56873" />
    <title>Comment from Joe on 2008-06-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Joe</name>
        <uri>http://www.medlawplus.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.medlawplus.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Couple of thoughts.  1) Love the Onion vid!  2) A large segment of the US population still is without high speed internet.  Large swaths of rural America lack internet.  These people still rent videos.  As Redbox proves, video rental is not dead but the Blockbuster model is dying a slow death.  How to keep their stores relevant and profitable?  How to compliment the stores?  Why not copy the Redbox model and blanket the universe with their kiosks? </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-04T14:14:28Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>