<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_has_friendfeed_envy_a.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2008:/1/tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6642-</id>
  <updated>2008-12-03T21:33:56Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Facebook has Friendfeed Envy: Adds Comments to Mini-Feed</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.23-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6642</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_has_friendfeed_envy_a.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=6642" title="Facebook has Friendfeed Envy: Adds Comments to Mini-Feed" />
    <published>2008-06-25T18:50:00Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-25T21:26:59Z</updated>
    <title>Facebook has Friendfeed Envy: Adds Comments to Mini-Feed</title>
    <summary>According to a post on the Facebook blog, Facebook will add the ability to comment on items in the Mini-Feed today, making it even more similar to Friendfeed. Within the last few months, Facebook started to allow users to aggregate their items from various external social media, photo, and bookmarking sites such as Flickr, del.icious,...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Frederic Lardinois</name>
      
    </author>
    
    <category term="Facebook" />
    
    <category term="News" />
    
    <category term="Social Networks" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img alt="facebook-logo.png" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/facebook-logo.png" />According to <a href="http://blog.facebook.com/blog.php?post=20877767130">a post on the Facebook blog</a>, Facebook will add the ability to comment on items in the Mini-Feed today, making it even more similar to <a href="http://friendfeed.com">Friendfeed</a>. Within the last few months, Facebook started to allow users to aggregate their items from various external social media, photo, and bookmarking sites such as <a href="http://flickr.com">Flickr</a>, <a href="http://del.icio.us/">del.icious</a>, and <a href="http://stumbleupon.com">StumbleUpon</a>.</p>

<p>With this latest announcement, Facebook is starting to encroach even more on Friendfeed's territory.</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p><font style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><script type="text/javascript">digg_url = 'http://digg.com/tech_news/Facebook_has_Friendfeed_Envy_Adds_Comments_to_Mini_Feed';digg_bgcolor = '#ffffff';digg_skin = 'normal';</script><script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript"></script></font>According to the announcement post on the Facebook blog, you can now "easily converse around friends' statuses, application stories, new friendships, videos, and most other stories you see on their profile. Just click on the comment bubble icon to write a comment or see comments other people have written." This is, of course, exactly what you would do in Friendfeed.</p>

<p><img alt="facebook-comments.png" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/facebook-comments.png" /></p>

<p>Facebook will also handle long comment threats very similar to the way Friendfeed deals with them. The feed will show up to 8 comments by default, with the ability to click and show more - which is exactly the way Friendfeed handles this as well.</p>

<p>Facebook, however, is not going to change the order of items in the Mini-Feed the way Friendfeed does. Friendfeed pushes items with new comments to the top of the page. This approach would probably not be too useful in Facebook, where users typically see far fewer items in their feeds than the typical Friendfeed user.</p>

<p>While Friendfeed aggregates items from a far larger pool of services than Facebook and has a lot of features that Facebook still has to copy, it is clear that Facebook is at least getting some ideas from Friendfeed's (and also <a href="http://www.plaxo.com">Plaxo's</a>) playbook here. </p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6642-comment:58816</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6642" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_has_friendfeed_envy_a.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_has_friendfeed_envy_a.php#c58816" />
    <title>Comment from Lauren on 2008-06-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>Lauren</name>
        <uri>http://www.dtelepathy.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.dtelepathy.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I may be alone here, but I actually intensely dislike the Newsfeed and Minifeed features. I was definitely of the "invasive privacy problem" camp when they first came out. </p>

<p>Don't get me wrong, I now scroll through my Newsfeed. Acquiescence through repeated exposure. </p>

<p>But, overall, I have pretty stringent privacy settings. You have to be my friend to see ANYTHING. I'm running a one-woman Iron Curtain show over here. But, let's be real. 500-some Facebook "friends" have made it past the curtain. I'd still prefer that, when I end a relationship or when someone posts pictures of me from horrible, gravity-defying angles, 500 people don't greet that sight at the top of their login screen. </p>

<p>Friendfeed envy? No, thanks.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-25T19:49:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6642-comment:58817</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6642" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_has_friendfeed_envy_a.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_has_friendfeed_envy_a.php#c58817" />
    <title>Comment from Phil Nash on 2008-06-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>Phil Nash</name>
        <uri>http://www.unintentionallyblank.co.uk</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.unintentionallyblank.co.uk">
        <![CDATA[<p>This is pretty cool, only the other day I saw someone's Facebook status and wanted to reply much like I would with Twitter, and now I can on anything. Good idea Facebook, even if it's been done before.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-25T19:51:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6642-comment:58825</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6642" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_has_friendfeed_envy_a.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_has_friendfeed_envy_a.php#c58825" />
    <title>Comment from MG Siegler on 2008-06-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>MG Siegler</name>
        <uri>http://friendfeed.com/parislemon</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://friendfeed.com/parislemon">
        <![CDATA[<p>frederic out of curiousity, why'd you create a rww frederic filter rather than just using the name feature for posts under RWW?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-25T23:12:13Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6642-comment:58826</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6642" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_has_friendfeed_envy_a.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_has_friendfeed_envy_a.php#c58826" />
    <title>Comment from Frederic on 2008-06-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>Frederic</name>
        <uri>http://friendfeed.com/frederic</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://friendfeed.com/frederic">
        <![CDATA[<p>because I'm an idiot and hadn't seen that feature in FF - but mostly I built it for myself - going to switch it out with the name feature now :)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-25T23:30:18Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6642-comment:58828</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6642" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_has_friendfeed_envy_a.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_has_friendfeed_envy_a.php#c58828" />
    <title>Comment from MG Siegler on 2008-06-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>MG Siegler</name>
        <uri>http://friendfeed.com/parislemon</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://friendfeed.com/parislemon">
        <![CDATA[<p>;)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-25T23:52:57Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6642-comment:58836</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6642" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_has_friendfeed_envy_a.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_has_friendfeed_envy_a.php#c58836" />
    <title>Comment from Daniel Addington on 2008-06-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>Daniel Addington</name>
        <uri>http://www.thelonelytraveller.com.au</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thelonelytraveller.com.au">
        <![CDATA[<p>I think lifestreaming fundamentally undermines meaningful conversations and connections in the real world, though some believe data portability and aggregation into feeds facilitates conversations which would otherwise never occur (keeping up to date with people you rarely see).</p>

<p>Will technology/Facebook eventually become the facilitator of all our anecdotes to our friends?</p>

<p>Will we get to the point where lifestreaming is so integrated with our lives that we feel the need to post something online as soon as it happens?</p>

<p>I believe we will, and mobile phones will allow this to occur at an absolutely micro level. We are already seeing this happen with the iphone and Twitter.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-26T04:30:08Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6642-comment:58851</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6642" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_has_friendfeed_envy_a.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_has_friendfeed_envy_a.php#c58851" />
    <title>Comment from stats on 2008-06-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>stats</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Facebook cancelled my account on Sunday for too much "activity". WTF?!?!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-26T09:11:54Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>