<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/it_20_changing_technology_and_business_impact.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2008:/1/tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6487-</id>
  <updated>2008-12-03T21:37:46Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for I.T. 2.0</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.23-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6487</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/it_20_changing_technology_and_business_impact.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=6487" title="I.T. 2.0" />
    <published>2008-06-06T12:53:28Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-06T23:56:39Z</updated>
    <title>I.T. 2.0</title>
    <summary>I.T. 2.0: How Changing Tech is Impacting Business</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Sarah Perez</name>
      <uri>http://www.sarahintampa.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Features" />
    
    <category term="Trends" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><em><strong>How Changing Technology is Having Big Impacts on Business</strong></em></p>
<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/IT_guy.png">In case you haven't heard yet - the I.T. world is changing. The rise of social computing technologies, generally branded as "Web 2.0" and including things like wikis, blogs, social networking, RSS, and more are slowly making their way into the business world. This new movement is called Enterprise 2.0, and it's no small shift. They're even having <a href="http://www.enterprise2conf.com/">a conference</a> about it next week. But the change encompasses more than just the introduction of new, social software into the formerly stodgy business world - it also includes the movement of server software from in-house data centers to the cloud, the rise of a mobile workforce, the rebirth of thin client computing, a self-provisioning user base, and more.</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<h2>I.T. 2.0</h2>

<p>This next big shift is on the horizon, but you can see it coming. Today, there still may be plenty of businesses employing "classic geeks" in their I.T. Department, but that's about to change. Don't misunderstand - the world will always need a good engineer, but the I.T. leaders of tomorrow - the ones guiding the business in the use of their computer resources, the ones working with the CEOs to execute the vision and direction via information technology - they will no longer be what we think of as the classic "computer geek." You know the type - the stereotypical introvert, who's more comfortable behind the glow of computer screen than interacting with the rest of the human race. The one who likes to speak in acronyms that only he or she understands. The ones who know how to do <em>everything </em>from a command prompt. These folks will be a dying breed...at least around the office. </p>

<p>Instead, tomorrow's computer "geek" will be a true member of the business team as opposed to the mysterious man behind the curtain who you only notice when something goes wrong. So what does the "new geek" need to know to run tomorrow's I.T. Department? An entirely new skill set, as it turns out. Here's a short list, but feel free to add to it in the comments:</p>

<h2>Enterprise 2.0 </h2>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/web20_business.jpg" align="right">No, the CEO isn't going to walk up to you and say <em>"Hey, I've been thinking we should deploy some Enterprise 2.0 software 'round here" </em>- those guys never use the same words we do and that isn't about to change. A good I.T. person, though, knows how to interpret "user-speak" and present them with the tools they need even if they didn't know how to ask for them in our language. If anything, they're going to be more likely to say something like: <em>"Sending out an email newsletter seems outdated - I wish there was a better way to communicate with our customers,"</em> or <em>"I wish there was an easier way to keep up with the industry news," </em>or <em>"Wow, how many different versions of this documentation is saved on our intranet, anyway?"</em> The old I.T. guy might mumble and turn their head, but the I.T. 2.0 guy knows to say <em>"Blog! RSS! Wikis!"</em> instead. </p>

<p>Still, it's not going to be as simple as just knowing the terminology. Now it's up to you to recommend the platform - will you be maximizing the investment you have in SharePoint, which already includes many Web 2.0 tools, or do you need a more customized solution? If so, whose? Those are the questions the new I.T. guy will need to answer - and yes, they will still need technical skills to do so, but there's a big difference between knowing those answers and knowing how to properly adjust the MTU size in Windows XP.</p>

<h2>Cloud Services</h2>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/cloud.jpg" align="right">I.T. 2.0 means computing moves to the cloud. Where today's businesses are running their servers in-house and behind the firewall, tomorrow's servers will be hosted by someone else. Microsoft, for example, will be offering hosted services for many of their server products from <a href="www.microsoft.com/exchange/services/default.mspx">Exchange</a> to BizTalk, SQL to SharePoint, and more. The <a href="http://www.mosbeta.com">Microsoft Online Services beta</a> is underway and <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/exec/billg/speeches/2008/06-03teched.mspx">Bill Gates is talking</a> about a future where millions of servers will live in their data centers. </p>

<p>And that's just one option. Google's coming after the business world, too. At first, it was just a simple offering of an easy-to-use but rapidly evolving web office suite that could be easily deployed with minimal expense, but then they added <a href="www.google.com/a/help/intl/en/admins/editions.html">Google Apps for your domain</a>, complete with admin dashboards and security settings, <a href="http://sites.google.com/ ">Google Sites</a> for team collaboration, and <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_web_security_for_enterprise.php">Google Web Security for Enterprise</a>. Clearly, they're well aware that there's a niche they can  fill with a set of web tools that take advantage of this new always-on computing world. </p>

<p>Microsoft and Google are big names, but it's just scratching the surface of cloud computing. You also have <a href="http://aws.amazon.com/">Amazon's Web Services</a> numerous <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_as_a_Service">SaaS</a> offerings, and more. The I.T. 2.0 guy will need to know not just what software is best for the company, but whether or not it should run behind the firewall, in the cloud, or a combination of both.</p>

<h2>The Mobile Workforce</h2>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/wifi%20users-sm.jpg" align="right">The new workforce won't be tied down. With near-ubiquitous broadband and a growing employee roster of Gen Y workers, being mobile will be the norm, not the exception. The mobility that used to be reserved for only the well-traveled sales force, will now be available to almost everyone. Most office workers, except for the very bottom-rungs of time-clock punchers will be issued laptops, not desktops - the blessing and the curse of the mobile worker. Work-from-home won't be considered a perk, but a necessity. </p>

<p>The I.T. department, though, will have to adapt their current solutions to fit this new workforce - one that's not always connected to the company network, but surfing unprotected Wi-Fi from their local coffee shop or their own home wireless network. I.T. will need to find ways to push through the security updates and patches their users need, even if they're never remoting in to the company network. I.T. also needs to be more wary of lost and stolen company laptops filled with company data. Many companies are already turning to <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/virtualization/default.mspx">virtualization</a> to solve this problem. Users will only have the illusion of a personalized desktop - their data will really live on servers instead. Welcome back to thin client computing. </p>

<h2>A Self-Provisioning User Base</h2>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/tech_populism2_sm.png" align="right">This new trend, dubbed "<a title="" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/technology_populism_risks_rewards.php">Tech Populism</a>" by Forrester Research, is referring to the new user base of digitally savvy workers. As the boomers retire and Gen Y starts to fill in the ranks, I.T. will be dealing with a technologically-smart crowd of young workers who aren't afraid to find their own tools for the job. Intranet site too kludgy? They'll build their own on Google Sites, Microsoft Live Workspace, Basecamp, or any of a number of other similar team collaboration platforms available. File too big for email? They'll upload it to Box.net, Google Docs, Zoho, SkyDrive, or whatever other preferred file-sharing/storage service they're used to using. I.T. guys turning a blind eye to this practice will soon have their necks on the line when it's revealed that confidential data is in the cloud protected only behind the salesperson's password of "FIDO." </p>

<p>So, what's an I.T. guy to do? They can't lock down the whole internet, no matter how hard they try. Instead, I.T. is going to have to know the business - <em>really know the business</em> - and anticipate the needs the company's employees are going to have. Then, the challenge will be to research, locate, and deploy solutions that provide the ease-of-use the employees want, but also the security measures I.T. needs.</p>

<h2>Conclusion</h2>

<p>With all these changes, the new I.T. person will be very different than they are today. Those that have the skills of an engineer and the knowledge needed to run I.T. 2.0 are going to be superstars, but they also might be rare. Engineers used to the day-to-day technicalities of running a company network won't necessarily find themselves out of job - it's just that their workplace will change. They'll be moving out to the data centers where they'll work to keep the cloud up-and-running. Meanwhile, back at the office, the socially savvy, I.T. "facilitator" of Enterprise 2.0 will be running the show. </p>

<em><small><p>Self-provisioning users - Image courtesy of <a href="http://www.forrester.com/Research/Document/Excerpt/0,7211,44664,00.html">Forrester Research</a>; Photo credit for Web 2.0 logos: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/shopping2null/395271458/">shopping2null</a></p></small></em>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6487-comment:57126</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6487" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/it_20_changing_technology_and_business_impact.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/it_20_changing_technology_and_business_impact.php#c57126" />
    <title>Comment from Jean-Marc Liotier on 2008-06-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jean-Marc Liotier</name>
        <uri>http://serendipity.ruwenzori.net/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://serendipity.ruwenzori.net/">
        <![CDATA[<p>A distinction between functional and technical roles has existed ever since there has been a symbiosis between the business and its infrastructure - which is as long as there have been businesses and infrastructures. The "classic geeks" won't morph into a social creatures with awesome communications skills just by virtue of being labeled 2.0 : there are already transverse project managers who usually have the responsibility of doing that sort of intercultural diplomacy between users and developers. Responding to the clamor for more functionality, be it 1.0 or 2.0 is part of understanding and managing users requirements which must then be matched with the technological landscape. Business as usual for project managers...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-06T14:49:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6487-comment:57128</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6487" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/it_20_changing_technology_and_business_impact.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/it_20_changing_technology_and_business_impact.php#c57128" />
    <title>Comment from Dusan on 2008-06-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Dusan</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Now this article made me smile :) Looks like Sarah already knows the future. Sarah, did you know that without those "classical geeks" you wouldn't be writing articles on RWW? classical geek / IT guy or however you call them will always be there, supporting everything from bottom underground, keeping your data safe, servers healthy, etc. These guys will always be there no matter if they look weird to you while sitting all the neights behind the command line. Think what you want, but for those who knows, the command line is fastest way to operate any computer.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-06T15:15:11Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6487-comment:57131</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6487" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/it_20_changing_technology_and_business_impact.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/it_20_changing_technology_and_business_impact.php#c57131" />
    <title>Comment from Matthew on 2008-06-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Matthew</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Aside from being a gold mine to create buzzwords, I see very little business value or insight in this Enterprise 2.0 concept.</p>

<p>I think everyone needs to take a deep breath concerning all of this social media/tech populism/bubble 2.0 hysteria and realize more emphasis should be put on fixing the existing IT problems that most enterprises face, as oppose to constantly investing in every new technology that some analyst firm can attach a buzzword to.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-06T15:35:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6487-comment:57132</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6487" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/it_20_changing_technology_and_business_impact.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/it_20_changing_technology_and_business_impact.php#c57132" />
    <title>Comment from Lauire on 2008-06-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Lauire</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I agree that to become a social enterprise you have to focus more on the "I" versus the "T".  This is not about the technology anymore.  It is about people.  You actually need more social scientists versus computer scientists to truly realize the social enterprise.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-06T15:55:14Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6487-comment:57138</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6487" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/it_20_changing_technology_and_business_impact.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/it_20_changing_technology_and_business_impact.php#c57138" />
    <title>Comment from Sarah Perez on 2008-06-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Sarah Perez</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@Dusan - I didn't mean to imply that we don't need or value engineers - I said "don't misunderstand - the world will always need a good engineer," - it's just that the "computer guy" at work is going to be more of an I.T. facilitator than an engineer in the future.  </p>

<p>@Matthew - I disagree - it's not a bubble. At my last job in the boring ol' financial industry, we were beginning to rev up to a new version of Sharepoint because it had built-in tools like blogs, wikis, and RSS. IBM offers social networking and mashup tools via their Lotus Connections and Lotus Mashups products and SAP Business Suite includes social networking and widgets - Enterprise 2.0 may come at you via more traditional server products, but it's coming. Here are some figures to back that up: <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php">http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-06T16:18:40Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6487-comment:57147</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6487" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/it_20_changing_technology_and_business_impact.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/it_20_changing_technology_and_business_impact.php#c57147" />
    <title>Comment from Phil on 2008-06-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Phil</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>No mention of SalesForce and APPExchange? Even when discussing Google's offering? I think that's a glaring omission.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-06T17:54:47Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6487-comment:57148</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6487" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/it_20_changing_technology_and_business_impact.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/it_20_changing_technology_and_business_impact.php#c57148" />
    <title>Comment from john andrews on 2008-06-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>john andrews</name>
        <uri>http://www.johnon.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.johnon.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Just becauae you're IT experience is sub-optimal doesn't mean your perspective is a world vision. The "good" IT people are now *re-building* those systems you're admiring... the Web 2 systems which were poorly planned, poorly designed, and poorly executed. They had to rush to market, because consumers & capitalists adopted this same "it's new, it's got gradients, rounded corners, and reflections, so it must be good" mentality. But don't let that jade your view of IT. </p>

<p>Just because your CFO insisted on hiring only twenty-somethings to staff IT, doesn't mean she was right. The price is being paid in competitiveness. If you could track productivity, would you see your distracted tech-savvy workforce as most productive at doing their jobs, or speaking 133t-speak and finding the next job? </p>

<p>Keep following the pack with your "Enterprise 2" adoption of systems which look good and promise a lot but don't actually deliver robustly, and the rest of the world will keep shopping in our stores with their more powerful money.</p>

<p>If you want to write the real story, write about just how many of today's companies are becoming irrelevant to their markets, and how information access (via those tech tools) is enabling today's tech-savvy "worker" to work for herself instead of "the man". Write about the new transparency, which exposes the profit sources to those who question the status quo. And when you see how your modern tech-savvy "worker" chooses when and how much she will work for how much benefit, you'll see the real future. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-06T18:03:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6487-comment:57151</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6487" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/it_20_changing_technology_and_business_impact.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/it_20_changing_technology_and_business_impact.php#c57151" />
    <title>Comment from djacobs on 2008-06-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>djacobs</name>
        <uri>http://d-jacobs.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://d-jacobs.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>With the increase usage of a broad, non-standard term such as "Web 2.0", which is just a change in internet culture, do we really need people giving stupid names to changes in the off-line world?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-06T18:50:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6487-comment:57158</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6487" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/it_20_changing_technology_and_business_impact.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/it_20_changing_technology_and_business_impact.php#c57158" />
    <title>Comment from Kingsley Joseph on 2008-06-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Kingsley Joseph</name>
        <uri>http://www.successforce.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.successforce.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Seconding Phil there. All those things you talk about in a sense of anticipation are happening right now at salesforce.com customers.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-06T19:36:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6487-comment:57174</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6487" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/it_20_changing_technology_and_business_impact.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/it_20_changing_technology_and_business_impact.php#c57174" />
    <title>Comment from Stuart on 2008-06-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Stuart</name>
        <uri>http://www.totalwebsitemanagement.com.au</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.totalwebsitemanagement.com.au">
        <![CDATA[<p>Sorry Sarah, I don't know where you've been but the idea of "tomorrow's servers will be hosted by someone else" is nothing new and it sure isn't in the future ... it's been around for years.</p>

<p>One of my daughters is a Unix Systems Engineer for a major multi-national company that specialises in hosting, managing and maintaining other big companies' servers. They run everything from a major railroad's signalling sytem to the entire server network for a state police force.</p>

<p>So please don't tell us that this is all the future because it's really all a bit historical now.</p>

<p> </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-06T22:35:11Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6487-comment:57185</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6487" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/it_20_changing_technology_and_business_impact.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/it_20_changing_technology_and_business_impact.php#c57185" />
    <title>Comment from IT Gangsta on 2008-06-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>IT Gangsta</name>
        <uri>http://www.youtube.com/user/ITgangsta</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.youtube.com/user/ITgangsta">
        <![CDATA[<p>CHURCH!</p>

<p>This is EXACTLY what I'm trying to say. I represent IT 2.0, gangsta-style. I'm OG from DOS 3.0/help desk days and am definitely not the stereotypical IT worker. I represent the new breed of hustlaz chasin that paper in the IT world with not only tech skills, but with mad style and communication skills.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-07T01:45:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6487-comment:57204</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6487" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/it_20_changing_technology_and_business_impact.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/it_20_changing_technology_and_business_impact.php#c57204" />
    <title>Comment from Kris on 2008-06-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Kris</name>
        <uri>http://krisvandenbergh.be</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://krisvandenbergh.be">
        <![CDATA[<p>My belief is that the gab between business and IT will still exist, no matter how great the impact of social services and new technologies on the Web is. We just need people who have skills of both worlds who are able to translate the business requirements more effectively. Communication is relevant more than ever, and if people are indeed going to work from home and in the cloud enterprises need to be changed. </p>

<p>Since the Internet has become more transparent than ever, it is a necessity for companies to monitor social networking sites, because this is where people reside nowadays and this is the place where they will talk about your product or service. New questions arise such as "Is my information safe using your service". New security issues pop up, et cetera. It is also clear that we will no longer use text based command line tools, but rich Internet applications. User experience, accessibility (everywhere on any device) and portability are becoming more important. </p>

<p>The stereotypical IT worker will still exist, but we need are in need for IT workers with new profiles. I see for example a more important role for the information architect. In any case, I do not believe that the technical IT worker will change. He will still be the introvert guy who does database administration, but he might work from home. But what about software development? Will the "team" work from home? I don't believe that is an option. Some things will change, others remain the same.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-07T17:07:13Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6487-comment:57216</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6487" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/it_20_changing_technology_and_business_impact.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/it_20_changing_technology_and_business_impact.php#c57216" />
    <title>Comment from Dan D on 2008-06-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Dan D</name>
        <uri>http://dmarcd.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://dmarcd.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Being in the IT industry while also following the Web 2.0 world, I wrote a post about something along the lines of this a couple weeks ago (at <a href="http://dmarcd.com/2008/05/06/im-going-to-lose-my-job-and-so-might-you/)." rel="nofollow">http://dmarcd.com/2008/05/06/im-going-to-lose-my-job-and-so-might-you/).</a> Nice to know others agree with me.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-07T21:07:55Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6487-comment:57217</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6487" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/it_20_changing_technology_and_business_impact.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/it_20_changing_technology_and_business_impact.php#c57217" />
    <title>Comment from Milt on 2008-06-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Milt</name>
        <uri>http://www.prattarmyairfield.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.prattarmyairfield.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>The time has come to resurrect the term (and the jobs that go with it) used in the 1960's... Systems Analyst.<br />
I should know, as I was one after cutting my teeth as a "Scientific Applications Programmer" then learning detail departmental aerospace business functions while doing "Systems Analysis and Design" for a given area of expertise.<br />
Your article parallels the job description of a Systems Analyst from the mainframe era:<br />
Act as IT architectural liaison and project manager between programming staff and business users,<br />
Processing on remote centralized server (i.e. mainframe or minicomputer),<br />
Thin clients (i.e. secure, dumb terminals)<br />
Personalized Desktops (i.e. user Profiles with access lists for apps)<br />
In the 80's and 90's System Analysts and Programmers were merged (at least in the minds of human rersources dept.) into "Programmer/Analysts" which was a bad idea.<br />
It seems once again, Management now realizes the need for a person who speaks both Programmereze and Dilbertspeak and understands both!<br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-07T21:09:41Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6487-comment:57223</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6487" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/it_20_changing_technology_and_business_impact.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/it_20_changing_technology_and_business_impact.php#c57223" />
    <title>Comment from Robert Scoble on 2008-06-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Robert Scoble</name>
        <uri>http://scobleizer.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://scobleizer.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>This is exactly why we started WorkFastTV over at <a href="http://www.fastcompany.tv" rel="nofollow">http://www.fastcompany.tv</a> this week. Good look at the trends.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-07T23:41:08Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6487-comment:57262</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6487" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/it_20_changing_technology_and_business_impact.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/it_20_changing_technology_and_business_impact.php#c57262" />
    <title>Comment from Jean-Marc Liotier on 2008-06-08</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jean-Marc Liotier</name>
        <uri>http://serendipity.ruwenzori.net/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://serendipity.ruwenzori.net/">
        <![CDATA[<p>@Milt : analysts and programmers may be a single persons in small shops, but in the larger companies the distinction has never ceased to exist. The analysts may live under different names including the the generic "project manager" name they are often labeled with but the role remains the same. The need for dual culture that you describe is indeed more important than ever, and businesses are well aware of that : for the last ten years this is what I have been continually selling myself on and subsequently getting recruited on. To speak with the the construction manager, businesses still need architects - both functional and technical.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-08T17:15:58Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6487-comment:57307</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6487" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/it_20_changing_technology_and_business_impact.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/it_20_changing_technology_and_business_impact.php#c57307" />
    <title>Comment from Steve Graham on 2008-06-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Steve Graham</name>
        <uri>http://serviceorientedinfrastructure.wordpress.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://serviceorientedinfrastructure.wordpress.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I have just started to blog on some of the implications of Web 2.0 on traditional IT service management.  <a href="http://serviceorientedinfrastructure.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow">http://serviceorientedinfrastructure.wordpress.com/</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-09T12:21:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6487-comment:57309</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6487" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/it_20_changing_technology_and_business_impact.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/it_20_changing_technology_and_business_impact.php#c57309" />
    <title>Comment from Clikspy on 2008-06-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Clikspy</name>
        <uri>http://www.clikspy.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.clikspy.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Interesting insights! Makes the geeks think again.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-09T13:45:01Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6487-comment:57355</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6487" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/it_20_changing_technology_and_business_impact.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/it_20_changing_technology_and_business_impact.php#c57355" />
    <title>Comment from Real Programmer on 2008-06-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Real Programmer</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Haha bloody ha. I've been listening to this sort of crap since the 1960s. The problem is what it always was - pig ignorant IT managers with bugs up their arses. The scenario presented here will never happen for the simple reason that while computers may be taught to speak plain English and to 'think' logically, IT managers can not. And, of course, the IT managers can't be replaced with intelligent human beings because they might start questioning the criminal behavior of their employers. And ALL big corporations are criminal, not just Enron. In fact corporations were invented by criminals as a way of hiding their identities and escaping personal liability for their criminal actions. Now you see what happens when you put an intelligent person capable of delivering working computer systems into a large corporation. The very first system that gets observed and analyzed is the criminality. It's actually hilarious, since computer systems design/programming and "political correctness" are mutually exclusive modes of thought (or, more correctly, non-thought in the case of "political correctness" as one must be a complete idiot to succomb to it).</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-09T22:57:04Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6487-comment:57370</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6487" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/it_20_changing_technology_and_business_impact.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/it_20_changing_technology_and_business_impact.php#c57370" />
    <title>Comment from frank on 2008-06-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>frank</name>
        <uri>http://www.uoha.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.uoha.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Great Information blog !  Thank you for keeping up the good work. I look forward to returning to your blog, and learning more from you ! <br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-10T02:30:14Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6487-comment:57495</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6487" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/it_20_changing_technology_and_business_impact.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/it_20_changing_technology_and_business_impact.php#c57495" />
    <title>Comment from Baris on 2008-06-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>Baris</name>
        <uri>http://www.baris-solution.de</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.baris-solution.de">
        <![CDATA[<p>Nice article but I can say, that all the IT 2.0 Stuff are bad for the IT and Data Security e.g. Google, in my opinion. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-10T17:37:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6487-comment:57502</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6487" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/it_20_changing_technology_and_business_impact.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/it_20_changing_technology_and_business_impact.php#c57502" />
    <title>Comment from Amazed on 2008-06-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>Amazed</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Wow!  I am amazed at the ignorance of some of these people posting.  First, do you people read what you write before you submit it?  More importantly, what Sarah is saying is absolutely true.  I have seen this trend in my last three positions all of which were in different industries.  I have been the classic "computer geek" as well as an IT Director for a large organization and companies are definitely looking for IT people with vision.  It is so important to know your business and work closely with the company leaders as well as the staff so that you can understand what the needs are.  The fact that so many new hires can fix their own computer rather than call the help desk should scare IT staff into finding that new niche.  Yes, there will always be a need for engineers but with the wave of outsourcing that is hitting there will be less of a need and the ones that do remain will need to relocate to areas that are less likely to be hit by a disaster which translates to a crappy new home town!  SharePoint is replacing the company intranet, public folders, archiving software, and giving users an area to collaborate.  Eventually all you will need is a web browser to do your job, you can pretty much integrate all of your applications into SharePoint now and access it from anywhere.  It is just a matter of time before more company leaders realize this and bring in new IT managers that know how to implement these technologies and know how to integrate themselves into the company workforce in such a way that they are bringing these technologies to the users before the user realizes that they want it.</p>

<p>Thanks for the article Sarah!  To those of you who doubt....open your eyes!  You must be working in East Germany where they haven't quite caught up to the rest of the world yet!<br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-10T18:11:46Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6487-comment:57675</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6487" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/it_20_changing_technology_and_business_impact.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/it_20_changing_technology_and_business_impact.php#c57675" />
    <title>Comment from Computer User on 2008-06-12</title>
    <author>
        <name>Computer User</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Yup, I was one of the first million on line. Yup I had a 486 while every one had a 386. Yup I had a company e-mail address before they were free. Yup I did instant messaging to avoid dialing.Yup, I dont use any of them any more.</p>

<p>Fads come and GO, It's called innovation. Beta fails, VHS wins, DVD topples VHS, Playstation tries to overthrow DVD. THE WORLD CONTINUES TO SPIN!  </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-12T16:13:08Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6487-comment:57694</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6487" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/it_20_changing_technology_and_business_impact.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/it_20_changing_technology_and_business_impact.php#c57694" />
    <title>Comment from Ryan McCauley on 2008-06-12</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ryan McCauley</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I think this article describes more the transition towards IT being more involved in the business than actual "Business 2.0". As a "Programmer/Analyst" in a formal IT department, we're seeing the need for people who understand the business as well as understanding IT, and can act as a liaison between the two. It's not enough for IT to just design what the user asks for - they have to see the business need that resulted in the request and design to solve the problem that it presents. To accomplish this, there really needs to be business understanding in IT, and people who can code to a spec without an understanding of the end user who is actually going to be using the product every day as a dying group.</p>

<p>The 2.0 mentality is really more that the knowledge is in the hands of the people who do the work every day, and companies are starting to treat those people's expertise with the respect is deserves. While the people at the top may understand the vision of "where the business is going", they can be disconnected from the customer and how the business is operating day-to-day, since that's the realm of the front-line workers. That's the beauty of the collaboration brought on by the 2.0 revolution - blogs and wikis allow upper management to stay in touch with the customers through their workers, which ultimately leads to a management team not only driven by sales figures and customer satisfaction surveys, but by real live customer interactions, and which results in a product that's more relevant to the market.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-12T21:31:59Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6487-comment:57943</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6487" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/it_20_changing_technology_and_business_impact.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/it_20_changing_technology_and_business_impact.php#c57943" />
    <title>Comment from Jorge Cunha on 2008-06-15</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jorge Cunha</name>
        <uri>http://ittechguys.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://ittechguys.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>The World is changing all the time and what i know is that companies and IT managers, Developer's have to focus like the last 20 years on the customer business needs and on good user interface.</p>

<p>Keep it Simple.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-16T01:45:49Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>