<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rumor_microsoft_powerset.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2008:/1/tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6652-</id>
  <updated>2008-09-24T11:43:16Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Rumor: Microsoft to Acquire Powerset for $100 Million</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.1</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6652</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rumor_microsoft_powerset.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=6652" title="Rumor: Microsoft to Acquire Powerset for $100 Million" />
    <published>2008-06-26T22:35:33Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-27T00:08:20Z</updated>
    <title>Rumor: Microsoft to Acquire Powerset for $100 Million</title>
    <summary>Venturebeat reports that Microsoft might be close to acquiring the San Francisco based semantic search engine Powerset for about $100 Million. No announcement has been made yet by either party. We contacted Microsoft, but did not get an answer beyond &quot;Microsoft does not comment on rumors or speculation.&quot; We will update this post once we...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Frederic Lardinois</name>
      
    </author>
    
    <category term="News" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/powerset_livesearch.jpg"  /></p><p><a href="http://venturebeat.com/2008/06/26/microsoft-to-buy-semantic-search-engine-powerset-for-100m-plus/">Venturebeat reports</a> that Microsoft might be close to acquiring the San Francisco based semantic search engine <a href="http://powerset.com">Powerset</a> for about $100 Million. No announcement has been made yet by either party. We contacted Microsoft, but did not get an answer beyond "Microsoft does not comment on rumors or speculation." We will update this post once we receive more information.</p>

<p>Rumors about Microsoft's interest in Powerset had been swirling around the Valley since last month, when Dan Farber first brought up the possibility in a <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13953_3-9940887-80.html">post on CNet</a>.</p>
]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>Powerset launched The consumer-facing side of Powerset currently only searches Wikipedia articles, but Microsoft is most likely more interested in using the underlying technology for its own search products like <a href="http://www.live.com/">Live Search</a>. Powerset's specialty iproviding answers through natural language queries like "When was Henry VIII born?" Powerset <a href="http://www.parc.com/research/projects/natural_language/">licensed this technology</a> from Xerox PARC. </p>

<p>Having backing from Microsoft could help the small company to expand beyond Wikipedia and start indexing more of the Internet. Powerset's technology is still unproven to work well for anything but Wikipedia, but if Powerset does manage to scale beyond this, then it would <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/powerset_and_hakia_quest_for_semantic_web.php">allow users to by-pass Google's keyword driven search</a> in favor of just getting a direct answer to a large number of their questions.</p>

<p><img alt="live.png" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/live.png"  /></p>

<p>Mircosoft's search products have struggled to gain any ground back from Google's search. Currently, Google has <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/googles_us_search_market_dominance.php">almost a 70% share</a> of the search market, while MSN/Live Search has about 9.5%. </p>

<p>Powerset's capabilities have generally received very positive reviews and in his original piece on this, <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13953_3-9940887-80.html">Dan Farber already argued</a> that Powerset's ability to create connections between concepts, relationships, and meanings could give it a heads-up over Google's keyword and PageRank driven search.</p>

<p>We first reviewed <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/powerset_vs_google.php">Powerset vs. Google</a> in May and at the time, Josh Catone's impression wasn't quite as positive and he concluded that "Powerset doesn't do a markedly better job of finding answers than Google for most queries."<p>

<p>Powerset was funded in a <a href="http://www.powerset.com/news/seriesa.pdf">$12.5 Million Series A round</a> by Foundation Capital, Founders Fund and various angel investors.</p>


<p>For a more in-depth look at the state of semantic search in general, see also Alex Iskold's article on the <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/semantic_search_the_myth_and_reality.php">myth and reality of semantic search</a>.]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6652-comment:58921</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6652" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rumor_microsoft_powerset.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rumor_microsoft_powerset.php#c58921" />
    <title>Comment from Technology Slice on 2008-06-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>Technology Slice</name>
        <uri>http://technologyslice.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://technologyslice.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I think they are taking a leaf out of Google's book and acquiring anything they can't match.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-27T01:58:46Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6652-comment:58924</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6652" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rumor_microsoft_powerset.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rumor_microsoft_powerset.php#c58924" />
    <title>Comment from Troy Peterson on 2008-06-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>Troy Peterson</name>
        <uri>http://www.addoursearch.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.addoursearch.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Damnit... And I was so looking forward to using this service too.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-27T04:01:06Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6652-comment:58935</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6652" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rumor_microsoft_powerset.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rumor_microsoft_powerset.php#c58935" />
    <title>Comment from Shuhel on 2008-06-27</title>
    <author>
        <name>Shuhel</name>
        <uri>http://www.insidedesi.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.insidedesi.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>LOL at the above post.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-27T09:22:12Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6652-comment:58939</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6652" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rumor_microsoft_powerset.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rumor_microsoft_powerset.php#c58939" />
    <title>Comment from Shiva on 2008-06-27</title>
    <author>
        <name>Shiva</name>
        <uri>http://www.mindinspirations.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.mindinspirations.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I did not find anything interesting or surprising with powerset.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-27T10:16:14Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6652-comment:58944</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6652" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rumor_microsoft_powerset.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/rumor_microsoft_powerset.php#c58944" />
    <title>Comment from Falafulu Fisi on 2008-06-27</title>
    <author>
        <name>Falafulu Fisi</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Can anyone do some real investigative journalism to find out if in fact the rumor started from some anonymous Powerset management personnels or its VC financial backers. You know, creating a false rumor intensionally inflates the value of the company. Once another vendor see that Powerset is worth $100 mils they will try and get into the bidding war.</p>

<p>It will be interesting if it turned out that Microsoft never had any interest in Powerset after all. If Powerset is a publicly listed company, I bet that there will investigation by the SEC.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-27T12:58:34Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>