<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/should_social_networks_be_regulated.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2009:/1/tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6479-</id>
  <updated>2009-10-30T14:01:09Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Should Social Networks Be Regulated?</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.23-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6479</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/should_social_networks_be_regulated.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=6479" title="Should Social Networks Be Regulated?" />
    <published>2008-06-05T15:15:00Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-05T15:39:14Z</updated>
    <title>Should Social Networks Be Regulated?</title>
    <summary>UK Says Yes, EU is Considering, is US Next? A recent study in the UK showed that most Britons have a strong desire for the regulation of social network sites like MySpace and Facebook. In fact, 9 out of 10 people said there should be tighter regulation and, according to today&apos;s The Guardian, 89% said...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Sarah Perez</name>
      <uri>http://www.sarahintampa.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Trends" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2067/2241700259_40ae34cb0a_t.jpg"><em><strong>UK Says Yes, EU is Considering, is US Next?</p>
</strong></em>
<p>A recent study in the UK showed that most Britons have a strong desire for the regulation of social network sites like MySpace and Facebook. In fact, 9 out of 10 people said there should be tighter regulation and, according to today's <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2008/jun/05/privacy.socialnetworking?gusrc=rss&amp;feed=technologyfull">The Guardian</a>, 89% said there should be a set of widely accepted rules to help prevent personal information from being abused.</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>The survey was performed by the Press Complaints Commission (PCC), a British regulatory body for printed newspapers and magazines that consists of representatives from all the major publishers. Since the PCC has been expanding their role, now monitoring internet and video content produced by newspapers, one wonders if they now want to dip their fingers into social network regulation as well. </p>

<p>Sir Christopher Meyer, the PCC chairman, warned of the dangers of posting content online to these sites, <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2008/jun/05/privacy.socialnetworking?gusrc=rss&amp;feed=technologyfull">saying</a>, <em>"there is a need for public awareness about what can happen to information once it is voluntarily put into the public domain."</em> In other words, people are posting content without thinking about the consequences and permanence of their actions. 

<h2>EU Considers Regulation, Too</h2>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/myspace-logo.jpg" align="right">This news about the British survey comes at the same time as the <a href="http://www.techworld.com/news/index.cfm?rss&amp;newsid=101598">EU is considering additional social network legislation and regulation</a> as well. The Executive Director of Europe's top Internet security agency, ENISA (European Network and Information Security Agency), Andreas Pirotti, recently called for expanding EU legislation &quot;to cover the taking of photos of people and posting them on the Internet,&quot; noting that there's no need to obtain consent before posting photos of others. </p>

<p>He also said there's a crucial need to educate people on how social networks work, claiming that most don't understand how the "friending" process works or how it's nearly impossible to erase material once it's online. </p>

<p>But is there really a need for regulation or is this just a scare tactic to help pave the way for ENISA's current power grab? ENISA was created in 2004 as a temporary body to oversee security measures in the EU for a duration of five years. Now, the European Commission wants to extend that&#160; to 2011 and is even considering a controversial proposal to merge them with an EU-wide telecom regulator.</p>

<h2>Is U.S. Next?</h2>

<p>It's not as if the U.S. hasn't considered social network regulation before, although here it often focuses on the safety of children. We have the controversial "Deleting Online Predators Act," (DOPA) and, around the same time that DOPA was introduced in 2006, Rep. Diana DeGette, a Colorado Democrat, <a href="http://news.cnet.com/Congress-targets-social-networking-sites/2100-1028-6089574.html?part=dht&amp;tag=nl.e433">proposed legislation</a> that would "require Internet service providers to retain activity logs to aid in criminal investigations, including ones involving child abuse." She then expanded that to include social networks as well. Our current presidential candidate John McCain <a href="http://news.cnet.com/Senator-Illegal-images-must-be-reported/2100-1028_3-6142332.html">has also drafted legislation</a> in the past that would require web sites offering user profiles (i.e. social networks) to delete user profile pages posted by sex offenders. </p>

<h2>Possible Consequences of Regulation</h2>

<p>Despite what may be good intentions on the part of legislators, having government and/or regulatory bodies get involved with how social networks operate could be a very slippery slope, both in the U.S. and worldwide. Once you start demanding social networks comply with certain rules and restrictions instead of just being governed by their own TOS, you're literally impacting an entire industry. There's more to social networks than just <a href="http://www.myspace.com">MySpace</a> and <a href="http://www.facebook.com">Facebook</a>. What about smaller networks like those provided by <a href="http://www.ning.com">Ning</a>, for example? What about social networks that are used in business like <a href="http://www.collectivex.com/">CollectiveX</a>? And if legislation is crafted to control this particular industry, when does that stop? </p>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/privacy-window.jpg" align="right">Another side effect of regulation and "raised awareness" could also be a change in behavior. In the PCC survey, 78% said they would change the information they put online if they thought it would be reproduced by mainstream media. Another recent <a href="http://www.kreativrauschen.com/blog/2008/06/04/data-retention-effectively-changes-the-behavior-of-citizens-in-germany/">survey of Germans</a> shows the social effects of surveillance - since the beginning of 2008, communication providers are required to record electronic communication - who communicated with whom, but not what was said. This data is stored for six months so that it could be made available to law enforcement in case of a crime. The problem with this is that the knowledge that communication is recorded has begun to change behavior - 11% of the people surveyed have already abstained from using phones, cell phones or email in certain occasions, especially in private matters like when contacting drug counselors, psychotherapists, or marriage counselors because of this data retention.</p> 

<p>This psychological effect could easily impact today's social networks as well if users truly understood how their content could be accessed, stored, saved, and shared with others. Many people believe they have control over the items they post online, but, yesterday, we were all reminded yet again that "<a href="http://valleywag.com/5012543/paris-hilton-lindsay-lohan-private-pics-exposed-by-yahoo-hack">your privacy is an illusion</a>," when a Yahoo hack opened up Paris and Lindsey's MySpace photos to the world. If all social networkers became educated as to what it means to post content online, would the social networks suffer a drought of content?</p>

<p>Do you agree that social networks in your country should be regulated? Let us know in the comments.</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6479-comment:57010</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6479" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/should_social_networks_be_regulated.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/should_social_networks_be_regulated.php#c57010" />
    <title>Comment from Ajat on 2008-06-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ajat</name>
        <uri>http://readerszone.com/google/google-diagnostic-page-for-websites.html</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://readerszone.com/google/google-diagnostic-page-for-websites.html">
        <![CDATA[<p>ya some regulation must be there to control the flow of unwanted information these websites </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-05T16:03:39Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6479-comment:57011</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6479" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/should_social_networks_be_regulated.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/should_social_networks_be_regulated.php#c57011" />
    <title>Comment from Ben Hughes on 2008-06-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ben Hughes</name>
        <uri>http://www.benhughes.name/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.benhughes.name/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Though obviously it would be a poor business decision and impractical, it would be fun to see Facebook or other sites react to loads of regulation by the UK, for example, to just block or cancel accounts in the country, with the attitude of "well if you're going to restrict us, then you won't have the privilege of using our service".  In the same respect it would have been nice if Google reacted in the same way by just blocking China rather than complying with its ridiculous filtering demands.  In recent events, companies' cancellation of affiliate contracts with the state of New York after NYS enacted out-of-state sales tax legislation was particularly satisfying.  Governments and voting citizens should be aware that the existence and use of services like Facebook is not a "right" and consequences to burdensome legislation should be felt.</p>

<p>Frankly I think regulation of these sites is inevitable, with the swarms of parents incapable of using or understanding technology complaining to lawmakers daily about their children's improper use of websites - as if it's the government's job to raise their children.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-05T16:10:06Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6479-comment:57012</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6479" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/should_social_networks_be_regulated.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/should_social_networks_be_regulated.php#c57012" />
    <title>Comment from Si on 2008-06-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Si</name>
        <uri>http://deadlamb.co.uk</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://deadlamb.co.uk">
        <![CDATA[<p>I think that any company with access to vast amounts of personal information about its users should be regulated to ensure they aren't abusing that knowledge. </p>

<p>Also, shouldn't alarm bells be ringing from the very fact that we can predict a downturn in users if they were more aware of what they're getting in to?</p>

<p><br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-05T16:11:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6479-comment:57027</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6479" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/should_social_networks_be_regulated.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/should_social_networks_be_regulated.php#c57027" />
    <title>Comment from JulesLt on 2008-06-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>JulesLt</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I think the article is missing some of the point of the survey - it wasn't about regulating the providers of social networking sites, so much as about regulating the use of information on those sites - i.e. can images on a social networking site be reproduced in a newspaper (it's an interesting question, as unlike a public blog, which is now accepted as being public speech, these are private sites, only accessible to members bound by ToC).</p>

<p>Ben -I'm old enough to remember what places looked like before anti-pollution regulation came in, and all the bitching about how much that would cost business, reducing their freedom to crap on your doorstep. </p>

<p>Equally, it amused me to see the same voices who complained about the burden of regulation, suddenly turn round and blame the sub-prime mortgage calculation on 'weak regulation' - rather than poor business decisions and poor investment decisions in backing those poor business decisions. <br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-05T17:53:47Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6479-comment:57080</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6479" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/should_social_networks_be_regulated.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/should_social_networks_be_regulated.php#c57080" />
    <title>Comment from Morgan on 2008-06-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Morgan</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I don't know what kind of dumbass would submit personal information to a site that they don't trust with it. And then double that for people that think their information would be abused but for government regulation. Yeah.</p>

<p>The subprime mortgage, if anything, was caused by heavy regulation. The entire industry was threatened years back if they didn't approve more mortgages, the belief at the time being that it was racially motivated.</p>

<p>Regulation doesn't really stop this stuff from happening, but it does cause a false sense of security and remove one more area of responsibility from users that could easily be dealt with through common sense. Oh well, people love their diapers.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-06T02:14:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6479-comment:57081</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6479" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/should_social_networks_be_regulated.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/should_social_networks_be_regulated.php#c57081" />
    <title>Comment from Falafulu Fisi on 2008-06-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Falafulu Fisi</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Government should bud out of private businesses , because it is private property rights. They (government) have no right to interfere or put in legislation to muzzle their operations.</p>

<p>Facebook, Google, Microsoft, IBM, and so on can do whatever they like with their properties. If suckers and naive people want to put their details out in the public domain as in Facebook, that is their choice, since Facebook didn't put a gun in their heads and demanded that they joined.</p>

<p>Leave businesses alone. For suckers and naive people out there who demanded that their detail that they have voluntarily given to Facebook, just bugger off. Request Facebook that your detail be taken down and you're free not to moan about what other private business owners do with your detail, simple as that.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-06T02:48:02Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6479-comment:57087</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6479" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/should_social_networks_be_regulated.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/should_social_networks_be_regulated.php#c57087" />
    <title>Comment from Jennifer on 2008-06-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jennifer</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I would love nothing more than to see these social networks regulated, or forced to shut down.</p>

<p>I am a mom, and my daughter like the rest of America had a MySpace page.  I followed all the safety tips, and made specific rules that my daughter was expected to follow. I checked her page almost daily, read her friend comments, etc. Another words, I was extremely diligent because it made me nervous that my 15 year old had "friends" she had never met!</p>

<p>June 6, 2006 is when my nightmare began. That particular day she was held hostage for 12 hours, drugged with cocaine, and raped twice before being let out on a street corner nearly 30 away from home. To make a long story short, she was terrified and would not talk. I was so out of my mind with fear, that all I could do was kiss and hold her. I made many fatal mistakes on that day, and should have listened to my intuition. I did however, have her drug tested the very next morning, and that's how I learned she had been drugged.</p>

<p>Like any parent, I demanded that the MySpace page be deleted. As further punishment, I took her cell phone and made it clear she would NEVER have contact with this person again. Problem solved, right? Not even close....</p>

<p>The next six months were pure hell! My 15 year old changed drastically, but I knew where she was at all times (or so I thought). A routine doctors appointment turned up a pregnancy; a pregnancy I knew nothing about and argued wasn't true. The kid still wouldn't talk..so I had her arrested and placed in juvenile detention. In California the age of consent is 18, and since she refused to talk to me, I gave some tough love of my own! I soon realized that I saved my daughters life.</p>

<p>I did my own investigation. I interrogated all of her friends, I called every phone number in her cell, and I searched her room. Again, to make a long story short what I learned has changed her life forever.  I forced her into an abortion, preserving the remains for DNA. We just made the funeral arrangements to have her 15-16 week twin babies cremated. Here is where I beg all parents to protect your children from social networks.</p>

<p>The police, my daughter(eventually), and me worked together and after a highly successful sting, arrested a 30 year old man. He was originally charged with 6 felony counts of rape, stalking, and drugging of a minor. Bail was set at 1/4 million dollars. The arrest took place on November 14, 2006 and I spent the next 17 months attending each and every court hearing. At the preliminary hearing, 6 additional felony charges were added. On April 8, 2008 justice was served! The defendant accepted a plea the day we were to begin trial. We had enough direct evidence and the testimony of the victim, to win a 34 year sentence. The defendant accepted a 20 year term, answered to all 12 charges, accepted two strikes, must register as a drug offender and a child sex offender, and upon his release will wear a GPS monitor for the remainder of his life; thanks to "Jessica's Law". What this man did to my daughter was sick, no doubt about it.</p>

<p>What makes me sick, is MySpace! The day the suspect was arrested, I began sending emails with documentation to MySpace.  Each and every email was ignored and never given any type of response. Needless to say, the suspect had access to computers in county jail, and logged on his page frequently. He continued to victimize my daughter by using MySpace to gain support and rally friends to harass her.  On the day of the sentencing hearing, I once again sent an email attaching proof of the crime....this time, I got a response. They simply stated that they would have to conduct their own investigation, and that did not mean they would ask a member to leave! So, I did some harassing of my own. First I forwarded their response to the Prosecutor; and boy did she have fun with that! And, I took the Plea documents that listed all 12 charges and his signature next to each, and I posted it as a bulletin addressed to all his "friends" on his personal page! And for the purpose of sincerity, I included a personal message about his two dead babies and the court order I got keeping him and/or family from ever knowing the burial location.</p>

<p>I know that our case might seem very extreme, and in many ways it is. But it happened because their was no regulation over who can view these kids pages. There is over 6,000 registered sex offenders who are members of MySpace and prey on children. I never really thought this would be my child, how about you?  Please, please we as parents need to fight to change how these social networks are operating.  </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-06T04:57:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6479-comment:57090</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6479" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/should_social_networks_be_regulated.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/should_social_networks_be_regulated.php#c57090" />
    <title>Comment from Falafulu Fisi on 2008-06-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Falafulu Fisi</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Jennifer, I feel sympathize with your daughter's tragic events she went through, however I am a strong Libertarian and I am a defender of property rights and an opponent of government interference with individual rights. The society can't shut everything down (ownership of properties) with every complain that comes up against something that should have been a personal responsibility from the start. </p>

<p>MySpace was not at fault here. This was solely your fault for   allowing a computer to be in your house in the first place. Remember, that MySpace didn't force your daughter with a gun to join them. Your daughter solely joined them on her free choice. </p>

<p>See, I am aware that there was a case in the US recently, where an obese person sued McDonald for his weight problem. I heard that the judge who presided over this case threw it out and thank God, commonsense prevailed. The obese guy cannot blame McDonald for his weight problem. The blame is entirely on himself and no one else. McDonald, KFC, Burger King and the likes can't be banned solely because some irresponsible obese individuals over-indulged themselves by eating in those fast food chain regularly which led to  their weight problems. The same applies here to your case, MySpace was not at fault.</p>

<p>By the way, I hate social networking sites, since I see it as useless. Some people say that it is good because you keep in touch with your friends, yeah right! I don't need to track 24 hour of what my friends are doing, such as which public toilet they've been to recently, which fast food chain they had their dinner at the weekend, which bars they went to last week and so on, (useless things to know about). For anyone who joins a social networking site, I summed it up in this way:</p>

<p>social networking == vain<br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-06T05:42:12Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6479-comment:57102</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6479" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/should_social_networks_be_regulated.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/should_social_networks_be_regulated.php#c57102" />
    <title>Comment from Spuds on 2008-06-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Spuds</name>
        <uri>http://spudswebnews.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://spudswebnews.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Why does everything have to be regulated. If you don't like what a site is doing or may do then leave or don't join in the first place.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-06T08:38:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6479-comment:57121</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6479" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/should_social_networks_be_regulated.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/should_social_networks_be_regulated.php#c57121" />
    <title>Comment from 轮胎模具 on 2008-06-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>轮胎模具</name>
        <uri>http://www.ssljmj.cn</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.ssljmj.cn">
        <![CDATA[<p>I think the article is missing some of the point of the survey - it wasn't about regulating the providers of social networking sites, so much as about regulating the use of information on those sites - i.e. can images on a social networking site be reproduced in a newspaper (it's an interesting question, as unlike a public blog, which is now accepted as being public speech, these are private sites, only accessible to members bound by ToC).</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-06T14:42:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6479-comment:57123</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6479" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/should_social_networks_be_regulated.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/should_social_networks_be_regulated.php#c57123" />
    <title>Comment from 轮胎模具 on 2008-06-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>轮胎模具</name>
        <uri>http://www.ssltmj.cn</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.ssltmj.cn">
        <![CDATA[<p>providers of social networking sites, so much as about regulating the use of information on those sites - i.e. can images on a social networking site be reproduced in</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-06T14:46:03Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6479-comment:57127</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6479" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/should_social_networks_be_regulated.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/should_social_networks_be_regulated.php#c57127" />
    <title>Comment from Rob Domanski on 2008-06-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Rob Domanski</name>
        <uri>http://thenerfherder.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://thenerfherder.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>In the past, Internet evangelists have consistently maintained that the government should stay away from meddling with the Web, and that attitude has largely served cyberspace well. However, if the overwhelming majority of people actually start to demand regulation, then it would be hard for any fan of democracy to suggest otherwise.<br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-06T15:11:45Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6479-comment:57130</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6479" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/should_social_networks_be_regulated.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/should_social_networks_be_regulated.php#c57130" />
    <title>Comment from Joe Darrin on 2008-06-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Joe Darrin</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Regulation of information in any regard is a mistake.  Information flourishes only when it is free.  By regulating the free flow of information we will hinder the progress of man kind.</p>

<p>Even if 90% of the population wanted this it would be a bad idea.  The masses react to emotion, not sound policy.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-06T15:33:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6479-comment:57135</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6479" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/should_social_networks_be_regulated.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/should_social_networks_be_regulated.php#c57135" />
    <title>Comment from Terry Ballantini on 2008-06-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Terry Ballantini</name>
        <uri>http://www.buddycheck.name</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.buddycheck.name">
        <![CDATA[<p>This is a valid question to consider. Many social sites, along with dating sites, can be accessed by any person anywhere and for the most part post items they wish. It is unfortunate that there are folks out there that want to con others for the pursuit of financial gain or harm. We provide an age and id verification service at www.BuddyCheck.name. There are adult sites, gaming, social sites that use these services we offer and they do provide a new level of security. However, as in anything - bad people will always  seek ways to go around the system to achieve what they want.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-06T16:02:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6479-comment:57141</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6479" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/should_social_networks_be_regulated.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/should_social_networks_be_regulated.php#c57141" />
    <title>Comment from Mary Allen on 2008-06-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Mary Allen</name>
        <uri>http://www.itincanada.ca</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.itincanada.ca">
        <![CDATA[<p>Why do you assume a change in behaviour is a undesirable?  Perhaps regulation would elevate the conversational level - certainly this would be a good thing in relation to sex offender profiles. Also, to suggest that it would be better for people to remain ignorant of how their online data can be used in the interest of avoiding content "drought" seems a tad irresponsible.  Whose interest does this approach really serve?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-06-06T16:41:43Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>