<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2008:/1/tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688-</id>
  <updated>2008-09-24T11:42:55Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Is Email In Danger?</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.1</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=6688" title="Is Email In Danger?" />
    <published>2008-07-02T06:13:09Z</published>
    <updated>2008-07-03T01:36:20Z</updated>
    <title>Is Email In Danger?</title>
    <summary>Is Email In Danger?</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Alex Iskold</name>
      <uri>http://www.adaptiveblue.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Analysis" />
    
    <category term="Features" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/email_july08/p0.jpg"/>Human history is one of progressive improvement in communication. From the 20th century mail was a fundamental form of communication. The invention of <em>electronic</em> mail (email) changed two things. It became <strong>cheap to send mail</strong>, and <strong>delivery was instant</strong>. Email became favored for both corporate and personal communication.</p>

<p>But email faces increasing competition. Chat, text messages, <a href="http://www.twitter.com">Twitter</a>, social networks and even lifestreaming tools are chipping away at email usage. In this post we take a look at what's happening and assess if email is in danger. </p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<h2>The Twitter Problem</h2>
<p><strong><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/email_july08/p1.jpg" width="150" align="left" />Twitter</strong> was invented because there was a gap in public broadcast communication. Doing Twitter over email would be clunky, if not impossible. The ability to post your personal statuses, decoupled from the ability to subscribe to people you're interested in, put Twitter on the map. People are sending direct messages via Twitter instead of sending an email.</p>

<p>Email is perceived as work, while Twitter is still thought of as fun. Twitter messages are short, use is casual, and Twitter is a cute piece of technology loved by the earlier adopter crowd. People send Tweets complaining their Inbox is full.</p>

<p>The Twitter experience is lighter because of the user interface. With Twitter, we're presented with a scrollable list of messages.</p>

<p>With email we need to select the message and drill into it. Traditionally email clients show only the subject line, so even if the message is short, the user needs to click. And all these clicks add up.</p>

<h2>The Outlook Problem</h2>
<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/email_july08/p2.jpg" align="left" />Email is a workhorse. <strong>Microsoft</strong> realised that business people want one tool to do it all, so email was enhanced with calendar, to do lists and other features.</p>

<p>The problem: all this was slammed on top of email, which became the entry point into a black hole known as <strong>My Inbox</strong>. Short and long messages, business and personal emails, tasks, events - all stacked on top of each other.</p>

<p><strong>Outlook</strong> is a powerful piece of software that lets you organise and sort, but you have to drive it. For many, email is hard work and a mess that needs to be dealt with.</p>

<p>Simpler email clients, like <strong>Gmail</strong>, focus on how to be a better email client instead of being a hammer for all problems. An innovation like aggregating conversations has huge impact on productivity.</p>

<p>In the years Microsoft was adding more buttons to the toolbar, they should have invested more on the core innovation around email and productivity. Wiring in NLP and semantics to extract things like People, Events and Places would be a good start. Designing emails around use cases like "this is a meeting, this is a project, this is a friend" would go a long way towards helping avoid the Inbox clutter.</p>

<h2>Breaking Down Email</h2>

<p>Since email was the first killer app for the web, it's used for everything. We're now observing a fragmentation cycle where we're discovering better ways of passing around information and getting things done.</p>

<p>Email is fundamentally great at substantial person-to-person communication. The following <strong>diagram</strong> illustrates why email is facing competition. It cannot effectively support broadcast (except for spam) and it's still poor at helping with tasks and projects.</p>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/email_july08/p3.jpg" /></p>
<p>Tools like <strong>Basecamp</strong> and <strong>Highrise</strong> from <strong>37Signals</strong> are showing there's a way to better project management and CRM while leveraging information in emails. If the <strong>Twitter</strong> service stabilises it's likely to win over people permanently because of its simplicity and playfulness.</p>

<p>Social networks incorporate direct messaging and chats, making it easy for people to talk directly, bypassing email. These communications are easier than email; they're integrated into the flow and more accessible. To be fair, they're aimed for brief messages.</p>

<p>The increasing speed of our lives and global connectivity reduces the need for lengthy emails. If we're in touch more often, then we reveal less every time we talk. Shorter, more frequent exchanges are replacing the lengthier communication of the past.</p>
<h2>Corporate Safe Haven?</h2>
<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/email_july08/p4.jpg" align="right" />Even if consumers shift away from email, it is difficult to see how enterprises could. <strong>Microsoft</strong> has done a wonderful job winning that market and ensuring companies would not function without an <strong>Exchange</strong> server. A typical proprietary bloatware, Exchange and Outlook handle it all. It doesn't seem feasible for companies to shift away from email anytime soon.</p>

<p>Likely we will see two trends. <strong>Google</strong> will continue to champion its solution, which, if successful, will bring much needed simplicity to email.</p>
<p>The second trend is simpler project management tools to reduce the functions needing to be done with email. The challenge is that they need to be seamlessly integrated with the email, ideally leveraging its content and automatically generating tasks, events, contacts, etc.</p>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>

<p>Email has been the blockbuster and the <strong>Internet</strong> killer app for the past few decades, but it doesn't have a monopoly. New more contextual ways to communicate are emerging and slicing pieces of the email pie, particularly in the consumer market.</p>

<p>We're likely to see a consumer shift from email towards more compact forms of communication, but in the enterprise the email hold is strong and unlikely to be replaced any time soon.</p>

<p><font style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><script type="text/javascript">digg_url = 'http://digg.com/tech_news/Is_Email_In_Danger';digg_bgcolor = '#ffffff';digg_skin = 'normal';</script><script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript"></script></font><em>What do you think about the future of email? How have your communication patterns been evolving? What communication tools do you prefer to email?</em></p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688-comment:59249</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php#c59249" />
    <title>Comment from Srini Kumar on 2008-07-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>Srini Kumar</name>
        <uri>http://timelog.metanotes.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://timelog.metanotes.com">
        <![CDATA[<p><br />
Wow.</p>

<p>We've got something you might like.</p>

<p>It's a psychology problem.  Emails are:<br />
* more complicated than they may seem<br />
* not quick <br />
** five prompts stare at you as you compose<br />
** not like the twitter one-prompt simplicity thang<br />
** therefore not super on a smartphone<br />
* intrusive on others (or you)<br />
** every email from a friend screams "read me now"<br />
** lots emails people send are actually "for your information" not "read me now"<br />
* generally a tedious burden revolving around OTHERS<br />
** time spent on email is usually not time spent on your own projects</p>

<p>OK so we built this:<br />
* <a href="http://timelog.metanotes.com" rel="nofollow">http://timelog.metanotes.com</a></p>

<p>a super simple private journal that supports direct messaging.  all you have to do is @username to send a thought to someone else on your team.  but the primary goal is to turn your smartphone (ANY smartphone) into a moleskine - your notes are rendered taggable, so you can file them as you go and track various activity threads of yours and others.  it also auto-converts URLs so you can use it to share links quickly.</p>

<p>the "read me now" problem is the root of the angst over email.  what you really isn't a REPLACEMENT for email so much as a "third space" where you can populate and carefully disseminate your stream of consciousness and swim in that of others.  good times !  :)  your email isn't and won't ever go away, but you need that third space or else people are going to throw tiny darts at you whenever they simply want to keep you informed.</p>

<p>- srini kumar<br />
ceo<br />
metanotes.com</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-02T07:07:48Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688-comment:59251</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php#c59251" />
    <title>Comment from Gerrit Eicker on 2008-07-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>Gerrit Eicker</name>
        <uri>http://Wir-sprechen-Online.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://Wir-sprechen-Online.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>You missed one important development: It's internal wikis that replace eMails in corporate settings.</p>

<p>Smile! Gerrit - <a href="http://We-speak-Online.com/" rel="nofollow">We speak Online.</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-02T07:33:18Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688-comment:59253</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php#c59253" />
    <title>Comment from David Thomas on 2008-07-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>David Thomas</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>For working in a small team IM Chat (Skype VS 4 is Awesome) with Group Chat and history is brilliant.</p>

<p>I hardly ever send emails to ask a a question anymore and since I need to ask many questions a day and also answer many questions that is great.</p>

<p>Keeps track of a thread much better than outlook does and requires no ongoing maintenance.</p>

<p>I am finding Facebook useful for keeping up with people I don't work with. Again it keeps the thread oganised around who you are talking to.</p>

<p>The what you are doing now tag is good for giving you a reason to email - Men need this.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-02T07:46:44Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688-comment:59254</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php#c59254" />
    <title>Comment from Steve Boyd on 2008-07-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>Steve Boyd</name>
        <uri>http://www.emtek.net.nz</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.emtek.net.nz">
        <![CDATA[<p>I don't think emails going to disappear anywhere, it's just too useful.</p>

<p>IMO search + email are still the 2 main killer apps for the web, though networking apps have certainly come a very long way.</p>

<p>At my work (~40 employees, ~5 i work closely with) we only use email + the phone (remember that thing) + walk to other persons desk :), though email is the main one.  Not sure i'd even want IM if it were an option, sometimes I want to be able to ignore people cos i'm focussing on something else.</p>

<p>Email is the perfect way to communicate with outside businesses.  There really isn't any thing else that's even close, phone included (try attaching a pdf to one of those :)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-02T08:00:59Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688-comment:59255</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php#c59255" />
    <title>Comment from Mikael Bergkvist on 2008-07-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>Mikael Bergkvist</name>
        <uri>http://www.widgetplus.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.widgetplus.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Of course email is in danger.<br />
It's the one app among all the PC apps that absolutly needs to be 'online' in order to function properly.<br />
If it can't access the web, it can't access the incoming mail.<br />
In that sense, it duplicates what a browser does, and as the saying go, you shouldn't needlessly duplicate things.<br />
Evolution tends to get rid of such things.</p>

<p>Email is a trivial application, and it's already webcentric, so how it's supposed to survive in the long run is a real mystery to me.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-02T08:45:45Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688-comment:59257</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php#c59257" />
    <title>Comment from Dominiek on 2008-07-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>Dominiek</name>
        <uri>http://dominiek.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://dominiek.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Nice writeup!</p>

<p>@Gerrit Good point, in the company I work for now I can already see a substantial part of the conversation moving to the company Wiki. I'm eagerly awaiting mashups that tie in email with these wikis. For example 37Signal7s backpack allows you to email to your notes page. This would add great value to enterprises that indeed will keep on using email for a while.</p>

<p>I think soon many companies will start switching to Gmail and the like. Although many are very biased of handing over data to third party services. Of course this will change soon, just like people started using banks to store their money at some point. When I start my company soon I would be crazy not to use something like Gmail.</p>

<p>That also makes me think about (and laugh a little bit) companies that centred their entire existence around supporting Exchange Servers :] </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-02T09:01:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688-comment:59258</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php#c59258" />
    <title>Comment from Govy on 2008-07-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>Govy</name>
        <uri>http://justagovy.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://justagovy.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I agree that email is an old technology, but it is extremely useful. Additionally, it's been around for so long that anyone above the age of 30 has already integrated it into their daily lives at work, home, etc. Slowly other services like IM, wikis, "tweets," etc are working their way into people's lives, but email is in no danger of being taken over anytime in the near future. What will drive adoption of these other services/products is full adoption in the work environment. Since many organizations block social networking tools, or have email clients ingrained into their business process, web application processes, etc it's going to be hard to change that.</p>

<p>The other advantage that email has over these other services is the archival, search, and folder management ability. Email is great because if I get an email from someone, when I'm done I can save it to a folder, drag it around, archive it, etc. Then if I have to go back to it...weeks or months later...I can easily search all of my folders, browse through my folders, etc. I can reorganize my folders if I want, restore old archives that have all of my emails, etc. With an IM client, tweet, etc I simply do not have that level of organizing/archival/search superiority. It really is "instant" but also "dead" shortly after it's sent. Sure, I can log my IMs, but there's still no useful system for searching or organizing all of those messages.</p>

<p>If someone would build a client (Outlook-ish like) but that seamlessly integrated IMing, wiki history, etc all through the traditional folder/organizing/search structure like email (also including the ability to tag items on the fly), then that would easily spread adoption of those services.</p>

<p>The trick is getting people, who don't use various technologies, to use them without having them KNOW they're using them. If you can provide that level of transparency then it'll spread adoption. It also doesn't help that people refer to them as wikis, IMs, tweets, blogs, etc. If you refer to them as "communication products" or tools to "enhance our business/communications process" then they don't immediately have that reputation attached them as being "kid things" or "that stuff my teenager chats on." They are powerful business solutions when used appropriately, but they come with a reputation attached because of what they're called and because of how they're portrayed by "older" generations. It's the "older" generations that need the convincing. Not younger ones like many of us.</p>

<p>Now, I want all of that done by...yesterday :)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-02T09:28:17Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688-comment:59263</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php#c59263" />
    <title>Comment from Joe Clark on 2008-07-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>Joe Clark</name>
        <uri>http://joeclark.org/weblogs/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://joeclark.org/weblogs/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Would E-mail really be in danger if people knew how to use it and their software enforced the right way to use it? Yes, I am inevitably talking about top-posting and HTML mail (without the latter of which phishing would simply not exist).</p>

<p>E-mail indeed does not work when attempting to have an actual conversation with some Outlook twit who top-posts everything and "typesets" it using Comic Sans. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-02T11:24:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688-comment:59264</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php#c59264" />
    <title>Comment from Louise on 2008-07-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>Louise</name>
        <uri>http://passpack.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://passpack.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>As strong as project management tools and social networking apps are in Web2.0, email is a classic and will take something much more potent than a 'thought exchange' service or an 'organizer' to be eliminated. </p>

<p>I think something like 200 billion emails are sent daily. That's a pretty big number to contend with. </p>

<p>Louise </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-02T11:25:49Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688-comment:59265</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php#c59265" />
    <title>Comment from Jack Thorogood on 2008-07-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jack Thorogood</name>
        <uri>http://friendfeed.com/trickmcsneak</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://friendfeed.com/trickmcsneak">
        <![CDATA[<p>Zenbe's a useful email tool.  The ability to automatically integrate incoming email with a file repository (for attachements) and an online calendar is a good first step to easing use of email.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-02T11:38:59Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688-comment:59267</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php#c59267" />
    <title>Comment from james on 2008-07-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>james</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I don't quite buy it.  E-mail might get used less for somethings, but overall most *normal* people don't want to use 10 different services for various things.  E-mail has a level of versatility that is relatively unrivaled.  Why would I want to go to 10 different things for work to get different types of updates and communications when I can just have all of it PUSHED to me without my active involvement in one location?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-02T12:06:45Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688-comment:59268</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php#c59268" />
    <title>Comment from Dan Goodman on 2008-07-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>Dan Goodman</name>
        <uri>http://blog.loladex.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.loladex.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I love the characterization of e-mail along dimensions of communications.  But there's more to e-mail than just substantial person-to-person communication.  Permanence and storage are also important.  Twitter just can't deliver that (now), although David's comment about his team's use of IM chat is revealing.</p>

<p>IM, now Twitter, and presumably emerging tools are providing modes of communication that improve upon e-mail for certain uses, especially those that require some dimension of urgency.  But there will remain lots of circumstances for which e-mail is the best choice.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-02T12:07:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688-comment:59278</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php#c59278" />
    <title>Comment from Dan on 2008-07-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>Dan</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Email is ubiquitous and functional - more so than any other solution.</p>

<p>As others have stated, its still the first choice for sending files electronically, and it also helps document critical conversations and processes in a corporate environment.</p>

<p>It may not be the best choice - but considering the adoption rate for email, it will be the first choice for a verrrry long time to come.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-02T12:23:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688-comment:59279</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php#c59279" />
    <title>Comment from gregory on 2008-07-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>gregory</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>look, it is all going to end up at pure clairvoyance, it doesn't matter that the forms are changing, in fact it is necessary</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-02T12:38:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688-comment:59280</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php#c59280" />
    <title>Comment from BenN on 2008-07-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>BenN</name>
        <uri>http://www.benshouse.net</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.benshouse.net">
        <![CDATA[<p>The way we work here is...<br />
- If it's something you need an immediate response to, or possibly a long discussion about, then face-to-face is probably the best way to go.<br />
- If it's not so important and the person is further away than the other side of the room, IM (through either Windows Live Messenger or Skype).<br />
- If it's more formal, or you want the conversation on record, or it's just an information thing then an Email.</p>

<p>There's no real place in this for Twitter to fit in, since all three of these support discussions between groups and there's no need for yet another level of granularity. </p>

<p>BenN</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-02T12:44:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688-comment:59281</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php#c59281" />
    <title>Comment from Karlyn on 2008-07-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>Karlyn</name>
        <uri>http://www.karlynmorissette.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.karlynmorissette.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Email is not in danger.  Need proof?  What do you need to sign up for any of the services you mentioned?  An email address.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-02T12:51:06Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688-comment:59282</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php#c59282" />
    <title>Comment from Bryan on 2008-07-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>Bryan</name>
        <uri>http://quux.tumblr.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://quux.tumblr.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Email won't die - it's quite functional. Especially when integrated with notes/tasks/appointments/calendar (can you tell I like Outlook?). </p>

<p>But we do need to evolve new habits. I think inside corporations, the attachment should mostly die, and wikis and shared project management tools should be used instead.</p>

<p>And we need to solve the spam problem. Ohmigod, we need to solve the damn spam problem!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-02T12:51:50Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688-comment:59283</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php#c59283" />
    <title>Comment from Bret on 2008-07-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>Bret</name>
        <uri>http://www.techtraction.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.techtraction.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Email isn't going anyway, but it's frequency and role in day to day personal communications will change. A valid email address is as much as a requirement for many things as a first and last name. Email is the digital equivalent of a home address. Newer faster forms of communication are on the raise, but I don't see them completely replacing email.  Also, in the corporate environment change happens at a snail's pace. Took the corporation years to wake up to email -- they're not ditching it any time soon.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-02T13:10:11Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688-comment:59284</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php#c59284" />
    <title>Comment from redusmartin on 2008-07-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>redusmartin</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Email won't be able to be killed to corporations can effectively big brother twittter. I should stop....I feel big brother</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-02T13:20:48Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688-comment:59286</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php#c59286" />
    <title>Comment from Sam on 2008-07-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>Sam</name>
        <uri>http://www.leveragingideas.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.leveragingideas.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@Bret "Email is the digital equivalent of a home address" </p>

<p>The primary issue with email is that it requires interpretation by the receiver. Even the simplest task request can thus become convoluted and lost amidst differences in language, tone and intention.</p>

<p>Workstreamer.com is working to address many of these very issues</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-02T13:40:14Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688-comment:59287</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php#c59287" />
    <title>Comment from Julie Riley on 2008-07-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>Julie Riley</name>
        <uri>http://www.openedit.org</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.openedit.org">
        <![CDATA[<p>Email will eventually become obsolete, look at the next generation of those under twenty - they text, they don't have time for email. How will they communicate when they enter the workplace? It's the multi-billion dollar question! But I bet it won't be email.</p>

<p>As my teenage niece says: Y? Emsg wen u cn jst txt?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-02T13:49:54Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688-comment:59291</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php#c59291" />
    <title>Comment from Todd on 2008-07-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>Todd</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>An XMPP aware wiki would easily kill off Exchange overnight if it weren't for the FUD masters in Redmond.</p>

<p>Email, or as I like to call it "E-Fail" ( Thanks Tantek! ) has been "dead" for awhile, its the people that get paid to manage Microsoft Exchange, which is a full time job frequently requiring an entire staff of people, that are keeping it alive. How many more Melissa virus type events will corporate  America tolerate before they just abandon email?</p>

<p>Over and over, reputable research shows 90% of all email traffic is spam, paying for that bandwidth is not sustainable and is going to start rising to the top of everyone's to-do list. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-02T14:41:40Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688-comment:59292</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php#c59292" />
    <title>Comment from DominusOminous on 2008-07-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>DominusOminous</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with #8, Joe Clark. IMHO, the death of Email began when it went from plain-text to HTML formatting. A pox on Microsoft for doing that. I yearn for the day when the best mail program would read it all. I sorely miss Eudora. That was a real mail program, not a hodge-podge of functionality forced upon us by "improvements" like... background textures! "Yippee!!" Blech.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-02T14:42:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688-comment:59294</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php#c59294" />
    <title>Comment from graham mudd on 2008-07-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>graham mudd</name>
        <uri>http://friendfeed.com/grahammudd</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://friendfeed.com/grahammudd">
        <![CDATA[<p>great write-up.  while i don't think email is going anywhere, it's really interesting to look at the fragmentation that's occurred in online communication.  while it was once the case that email served almost all use cases, now there is a technology for every possible type of communication.  to me, this only solidifies the argument that aggregator services like friendfeed will be increasingly necessary and helpful.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-02T14:48:11Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688-comment:59295</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php#c59295" />
    <title>Comment from Luis Suarez on 2008-07-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>Luis Suarez</name>
        <uri>http://www.elsua.net</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.elsua.net">
        <![CDATA[<p>For the last five months, and counting, I have been able to reduce my corporate e-mail numbers down by 80%, by simply moving ALL conversations that come through it to much more open, public, transparent, collaborative environments, i.e. mainly social computing tools. There is only one exception for which I still process e-mails through e-mail and that is for the one-on-one conversations of a private or sensitive nature discussing confidential information. For the rest everything is Out of the Inbox!</p>

<p>The experiences so far? Quite amazing, to say the least, feel much more productive, much more collaborative and keen on sharing my knowledge with others while I learn from them at the same time, finally being able to say that I am no longer addicted to e-mail and therefore I can now fully enjoy my time away of the office without having to check my e-mail constantly, while I am enjoying some quality time in my personal life. </p>

<p>A couple of days back I published an article in the NYTimes along these lines and explaining more in detail how I have actually been able to manage it all thus far and those folks interested can read it over here: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/29/jobs/29pre.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/29/jobs/29pre.html</a></p>

<p>Alternatively, you can also check my blog where I will be reflecting, much more in detail than just this comment, about the different reactions generated on this blog post put together by Alex, as well as other links I have been bumping into as a result of the NYTimes piece.</p>

<p>In short, e-mail may not be in danger, but, certainly, if it doesn't pick things up and starts innovating quite a bit, my suspicion is that it is going to have its days numbered, both in the consumer market and in the enterprise. And if not, just observe how the younger generations are working their way through e-mail vs. other online collaboration, knowledge sharing and social networking tools ... e-mail is, in most cases, one of those tools they just don't count on very much as far as I can tell.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-02T14:49:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688-comment:59314</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php#c59314" />
    <title>Comment from vacations on 2008-07-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>vacations</name>
        <uri>http://www.leisurehawaiivacations</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.leisurehawaiivacations">
        <![CDATA[<p>I myself have been using email a lot less. When people need to contact me they just send me a message with one of the social networks.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-02T17:32:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688-comment:59317</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php#c59317" />
    <title>Comment from Sean Mulholland on 2008-07-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>Sean Mulholland</name>
        <uri>http://www.seanmulholland.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.seanmulholland.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>These type of articles always leave out the other option...they will all live happily together.</p>

<p>Postal mail isn't dead, it's just dead for personal communication outside of birthday cards.</p>

<p>Email won't die either.  It is truly useful, and with a Blackberry, it is used almost exactly like a text message or Twitter...short little bursts, sent back and forth among users.</p>

<p>--BUT--</p>

<p>When you need to, it can do much more than a short little burst.  Twitter...not quite :-)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-02T18:05:22Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688-comment:59325</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php#c59325" />
    <title>Comment from Ben Chestnut on 2008-07-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ben Chestnut</name>
        <uri>http://www.mailchimp.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.mailchimp.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>How would all this make email dead? Twitters and blogs and backpacks and basecamps all take crap out of my inbox (that shouldn't have been there in the first place) and make email even better-er. </p>

<p>However, I must say that whenever my favorite blogs get updated, or whenever a project in basecamp gets updated, I do receive an email. Round and round we go. </p>

<p></p>

<p><br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-02T18:46:55Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688-comment:59343</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php#c59343" />
    <title>Comment from Q dub on 2008-07-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>Q dub</name>
        <uri>http://qwang.net</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://qwang.net">
        <![CDATA[<p>I would try to dimensionalize your 4-squares as:</p>

<p>Fast vs slow (synchronous vs asynchronous)<br />
   - & - <br />
Interpersonal vs broadcast</p>

<p>- Email falls in the asynchronous interpersonal square, but is trying to do 3 of the 4<br />
- Twitter belongs in asynchronous broadcast<br />
- IM is synchronous interpersonal<br />
- Live activity streams (lifestreaming, qik) would be synchronous broadcast.</p>

<p>Problem with email is that it's the fall-back destination for all sorts of notifications - each type with drastically different level of priority, but they all appear undifferentiated in a list.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-02T20:44:30Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688-comment:59351</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php#c59351" />
    <title>Comment from Lauren on 2008-07-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>Lauren</name>
        <uri>http://www.dtelepathy.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.dtelepathy.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I love email. I feel like it is safe -- for a while.</p>

<p>I use email all the time, but most noticeably when that time of year comes around again: the Job Hunt. I have fired off at least 85 emails (see: resume attachment) over my past three years of college. </p>

<p>I feel that, if email is phased out, it will be like cursive writing. When attempts to end cursive occur, they are met with strict resistance. Email is the same way -- it's a hallmark, people love it, but it will eventually devolve into an increasingly archaic bastion of the past. Eventually, it probably will go -- but, even as script writing is preserved in cursive font types, reminders of email will live on in all future online communication.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-02T22:56:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688-comment:59353</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php#c59353" />
    <title>Comment from KerryJ on 2008-07-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>KerryJ</name>
        <uri>http://kerryj.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://kerryj.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I've got a background in broadcast journalism, so the short, snappy communications available via Twitter really suit me. And yes, Twitter is a playspace and informal learning environment for me.  I don't widely broadcast my Twitter account, am picky about whom I follow and who follows me and don't like co-workers to follow me.</p>

<p>I love Skype and prefer it to the phone for meetings/teleconferences because you can share documents and links.</p>

<p>Email is a chore, an invasion and a monumental waste of time.  As I sometimes have to fill in for web desk support, I check it periodically but have the attitude that if people are in dire need -- they can pick up the phone. Emergency email message? To me, it's a contradiction in terms. Need me NOW? Phone me. Have something detailed that can wait? Fine, send me an email. </p>

<p>Got a groovy link to share? Use del.icio.us! Don't make me open a bloody email, click on the link, then tag it and save it to del.icio.us myself.</p>

<p>Need a quick question answered? IM me via our internal messenger or send me a skype.</p>

<p>I don't like asynchronous communications because I think that message boards lead to waffling and soap-boxing.</p>

<p>In Second Life, I rent space on an island of communicators, educators and geeks called jokaydia and we get together to chat, learn together, collaborate on projects or just enjoy each other's company.  Sometimes planned, sometimes not. I like it because it is immediate and any misunderstandings that might arise can be dealt with, sans dramas and power plays.</p>

<p>Yup, splintering is happening. Is it making us more efficient communicators or is it straining our already limited attention spans?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-02T23:56:09Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688-comment:59361</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php#c59361" />
    <title>Comment from freerangemom on 2008-07-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>freerangemom</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Twitter will not be the end of e-mail.  Twitter is a public form of cocktail party chatter. It is not a way to get business done.  Email allows you to keep copies to refer to, digest and respond to later.  Texting and twitter is too immediate. </p>

<p>As much as people love playing with twitter and text, it will never replace a memo -- and that's what email really is, a quick memo conversation.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-03T03:14:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688-comment:59362</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php#c59362" />
    <title>Comment from Dan Randow on 2008-07-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>Dan Randow</name>
        <uri>http://onlinegroups.net</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://onlinegroups.net">
        <![CDATA[<p></p>

<p>Email is going to be hard to shake as it's so encumbent. It's so encumbent because it's so versatile. Almost every user of a connected computer has a unique address, knows how to use email, has a client already running on their machine, and checks it regularly. And the client has searchable archives, supports offline use, and can talk to all other clients of its type. What other class of application meets these criteria?</p>

<p>Any alternative faces the challenge that if one team member refuses to use the alternative, the whole team has to revert to using email.</p>

<p>My approach is to embrace email but improve how we use it. This requires tools and new practices, but both are simple. The main problem with email as a discussion tool, is that its primary entity is an individual. A group has no persistent identity in email, no address and and no repository. Every participant must maintain their own list of group participants and message archive. Furthermore, group discussion via email quickly gets messy, and there are no conventions for keeping it organised.</p>

<p>Email list servers with web archives (like <a href="http://groups.yahoo.com" rel="nofollow">Yahoo! Groups</a>, <a href="http://groups.google.com" rel="nofollow">Google Groups</a> and our own <a href="http://onlinegroups.net" rel="nofollow">OnlineGroups.Net</a>) solve this problem, by providing an email address, a url, and a shared archive for the group, and by enabling participation via both the web and email. The online archives are sorted into to topics (or threads) which encourages <a href="http://onlinegroups.net/help/participation/contribute/#contribute-write-good-subject-lines" rel="nofollow">thoughtful use of subject lines</a>. The email messages have a subject line prefix, which adds further metadata. This means that, with minimal change in practices, emails can be triaged quickly, and even deleted, without being read, and viewed later if necessary in the shared archive.</p>

<p>Systems that naturally attract use away from email do, of course erode its monopoly. There is a definite lower limit to the age-group in email's grip. Twitter, and even Facebook et al, however are still used by a relative minority (early adopters - not to mention that many organisations block access to them). Attempts to drag the rest of us away from email are, I believe, futile. I <a href="http://blog.onlinegroups.net/2008/05/19/why-fight-email/" rel="nofollow">blogged about all this recently</a>.</p>

<p>Even now I am getting email notifications that someone has posted to a forum on the web. To that notification: "If you're going to tell me it's happened, why not tell me the actual message? And if you did, would it be asking too much to be able to actually reply by email?"</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-03T03:39:09Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688-comment:59363</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php#c59363" />
    <title>Comment from sull on 2008-07-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>sull</name>
        <uri>http://sull.outputs.it</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://sull.outputs.it">
        <![CDATA[<p>you cannot compare "email" but you can compare "email workflow".  for years now, gmail has been my info hub.  i was an early adopter of RSS sent to my EMAIL... typically using rssfwd.com.  In this case, email allowed me to merge RSS feeds into my inbox where i manage/filter/organize the content.  admittedly, i am starting to use google reader more now but i still have many feeds coming in through email.  </p>

<p>another reason why email is still relevant is how you can use it to post content to web services or your own database etc. <br />
my first exposure to this approach was when i setup CRM applications and had email piping to mysql database. <br />
several services let you post/blog by emailing a special address.  a recent example of simple blogging is posterous.com, which is making its way around the blogosphere, including here.  it's tumblrish but centered around email as the content delivery mechanism.  couldn't be simpler and non-geeks can totally grok it (the millions of people who live in email and dont know a thing about social networking related shit).  </p>

<p>so, it's not email that you can compare and contrast and predict the possible demise of.... it's only how people use email... the common workflows.  business and casual usage of email.  but email itself is great and meshes with today's social publishing trends.<br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-03T03:41:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688-comment:59368</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php#c59368" />
    <title>Comment from Pip on 2008-07-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>Pip</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>The Future of email? Are we not wasting time debating where email might be heading, time we could of spent being more productive?</p>

<p>As humans the general opinion of what will happen in the future rarely turns out to be true or what events occur over time...</p>

<p>Bill Gates: I have to say</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-03T04:55:49Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688-comment:59377</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php#c59377" />
    <title>Comment from Harald on 2008-07-03</title>
    <author>
        <name>Harald</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>That sounds like that piece that explained why the telephone service will die soon ... Astonishingly, people DO still talk over phones - even mobile ones.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-03T07:04:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688-comment:59393</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php#c59393" />
    <title>Comment from Joker on 2008-07-03</title>
    <author>
        <name>Joker</name>
        <uri>http://jokerred.wordpress.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://jokerred.wordpress.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I sent a trackback to this post but it doesn't seem to work.<br />
In my opinion, e-mail and all other things you mentioned belong to different dimension. <a href="http://jokerred.wordpress.com/2008/07/02/e-mail-cannot-be-replace-twitter-or-blog/" rel="nofollow">http://jokerred.wordpress.com/2008/07/02/e-mail-cannot-be-replace-twitter-or-blog/</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-03T10:31:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688-comment:59406</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php#c59406" />
    <title>Comment from John Wilbur on 2008-07-03</title>
    <author>
        <name>John Wilbur</name>
        <uri>http://www.kraft.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.kraft.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>From the perspective of a large business user, I have not seen a proliferation within the company of instant messaging nor blogging, even though it is offered. I suspect it is for 1 main reason, work(over)load. Most people use the queue up and respond later attribute of email to balance their daily workload. If a needed contact is able to respond immediately to email, a phone call usually works better. It's faster and can impart more nuances of information easier, and misunderstandings and language issues are more quickly overcome.</p>

<p>Blogs are distributed to too many people, requiring too much care in their input. It would be BAD to say something that coulde be mistinterpreted.</p>

<p>Instant messaging is OK, I use it at home extensively, but there's no time for idle chatter at work, it tends to be distracting because of the immediacy of it's nature.</p>

<p><br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-03T13:29:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688-comment:59410</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php#c59410" />
    <title>Comment from Edible Public on 2008-07-03</title>
    <author>
        <name>Edible Public</name>
        <uri>http://ediblepublic.typepad.com/edible_public/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://ediblepublic.typepad.com/edible_public/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Although it's uses may evolve, email, generally speaking, isn't going anyplace anytime soon.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-03T14:03:46Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688-comment:59411</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php#c59411" />
    <title>Comment from bolinchan on 2008-07-03</title>
    <author>
        <name>bolinchan</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>"Microsoft realised that business people want one tool to do it all, so email was enhanced with calendar, to do lists and other features."</p>

<p>This statment makes it sound as though you are saying Microsoft invented this concept.  Email/calendar intergration has been around since the 1980s (maybe earlier) for the corporate world, long before anyone ever heard of Microsoft Outlook, Exchange or IE. I used products from IBM and WordPerfect with those features back then and I'm sure there were other products available as well.  E-mail has evolved and it will continue to but I don't think it will last.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-03T14:08:26Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688-comment:59415</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php#c59415" />
    <title>Comment from Nicolas on 2008-07-03</title>
    <author>
        <name>Nicolas</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>GMail conversation grouping isn't innovative. Desktop clients have done it forever. It's webmail that has always been behind. So yeah, GMail is the first webmail that had conversation grouping, but you can't call them innovative for that.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-03T14:29:12Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688-comment:59418</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php#c59418" />
    <title>Comment from Document Management Also a Threat? on 2008-07-03</title>
    <author>
        <name>Document Management Also a Threat?</name>
        <uri>http://www.hyperoffice.com/hypermain/Online_Document_Management.cfm?menuset=product</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.hyperoffice.com/hypermain/Online_Document_Management.cfm?menuset=product">
        <![CDATA[<p>for me another major threat to emails in a professional context are document management systems. a lot of emails are sent out to distribute documents and collaborate on them. document managers offer an easier way where everyone can access and collaborate on documents at a central location saving on a lot of back and forth emails. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-03T14:51:36Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688-comment:59425</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php#c59425" />
    <title>Comment from Bob Kelly on 2008-07-03</title>
    <author>
        <name>Bob Kelly</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I agree that e-mail, especially in the enterprise, isn't going away anytime soon.  Remember that fax is still alive, but much less used than 20 years ago.  What will likely happen though, and the signs and start-ups are already here, is that e-mail will become integrated into a broader technology trend called unified communications.  This will extend the useful life of e-mail by making it one of several communications solutions - IM/Presence, Web/Audio collaboration, Wikis, and yes, the Phone, both fixed and mobile - that are tied together in interesting and compelling ways.  This isn't a product plug, but check out Zimbra (a recent Yahoo acquisition) for a glimpse at what the future holds.  Microsoft and IBM are also working on such "value adds" for their e-mail solutions.  Because of all this innovation and investment, the future for enterprise communications looks very bright.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-03T17:36:56Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688-comment:59428</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php#c59428" />
    <title>Comment from Ben on 2008-07-03</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ben</name>
        <uri>http://www.benpowell.co.uk</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.benpowell.co.uk">
        <![CDATA[<p>Twitter will never replace email, because it is not decentralised. One company running a single communications netwrok and protocol, is simply not going to work for the entire world. </p>

<p>Now if you standardised a short message protocol and got some big players behind it, made it mobile and then got everyone to use it, you'd be onto a winner. Oh yeah, isn't that SMS, part of the GSM standard?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-03T17:50:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688-comment:59441</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php#c59441" />
    <title>Comment from Debbie on 2008-07-03</title>
    <author>
        <name>Debbie</name>
        <uri>http://www.sesatlanta.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.sesatlanta.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Email has become cumbersome for many for many of the reasons you state.  Everything has been rolled into Outlook and the simplicity is lacking.  I don't think corporate America is ready to oust their Exchange server and for good reason.  Email is a great tool when used correctly.  I think as other collaboration tools are implemented for document sharing, meeting planning, documentation, collaboration and things like Twitter, etc are used for "quickies" email will clean up.  BUT it has become a catch all for everything.  We all need to begin to welcome other tools to help us clean up our inboxes.  I think in our personal lives we do this, now it is time for this to carry over into our business life.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-03T20:31:53Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688-comment:59571</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php#c59571" />
    <title>Comment from Arthur on 2008-07-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Arthur</name>
        <uri>http://www.byteburn.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.byteburn.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I am trying to picture myself inside the office, in front of the computer, with my boss walking past beside me, and instead of him seeing me attending to my email alerts, he sees my computer screen stuffed with all sorts of social networking sites.</p>

<p>With that, I'm sure I've got a lot of explaining to do.</p>

<p><br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-04T21:39:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688-comment:59600</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php#c59600" />
    <title>Comment from Tmaslecoo on 2008-07-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Tmaslecoo</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>NO Danger, really! </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-05T07:03:53Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688-comment:59609</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php#c59609" />
    <title>Comment from Gary Barber on 2008-07-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Gary Barber</name>
        <uri>http://manwithnoblog.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://manwithnoblog.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I wouldn't worry about email, its the online forums and smaller communities that are suffering as the community fragments into these other immediate deliver social tools.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-05T12:28:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688-comment:59611</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php#c59611" />
    <title>Comment from Ruben Zevallos Jr. on 2008-07-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ruben Zevallos Jr.</name>
        <uri>http://www.direito2.com.br</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.direito2.com.br">
        <![CDATA[<p>I think the e-mail'll continue to work for a good time... just because it can be used just for off-line communication... and other are normally used for online chat.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-05T13:01:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688-comment:59708</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6688" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/is_email_in_danger.php#c59708" />
    <title>Comment from Nury Barros on 2008-07-07</title>
    <author>
        <name>Nury Barros</name>
        <uri>http://www.helloaustralia.tv</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.helloaustralia.tv">
        <![CDATA[<p>Email is here to stay, albeit in a different style, since switching my habits to an email client that provides video email I have not looked back. Sending video email not only saves time (lots of it)but the message is clear and precise - no more misinterpreting or trying to decipher typed messages.  The conversation thread feature is simple, with a click on the clients name I can enter a private video chat or talk to them on an integrated voip system. I am not rushing back to :)'s or ALLCAPS for self expression!!! VIDEO says it better!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-07T08:26:19Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>