<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/results_rww_predictions_friendfeed_bigcos_googledocs.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2009:/1/tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6771-</id>
  <updated></updated>
  <title>Comments for <![CDATA[Results: RWW Predictions &amp; Polls (FriendFeed, Bigcos, Google Docs)]]></title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.23-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6771</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/results_rww_predictions_friendfeed_bigcos_googledocs.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=6771" title="Results: RWW Predictions &amp; Polls (FriendFeed, Bigcos, Google Docs)" />
    <published>2008-07-11T23:43:04Z</published>
    <updated>2008-07-12T00:04:28Z</updated>
    <title>Results: RWW Predictions &amp; Polls (FriendFeed, Bigcos, Google Docs)</title>
    <summary>This week we announced a new feature for our community: ReadWriteWeb Predictions, a Predictions Center that we hope will enable you to tap into the collective intelligence of RWW readers. The first prediction is about the battle for users and mind-share that has emerged this year between Twitter and FriendFeed. Here are the results, along...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Richard MacManus</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Polls" />
    
    <category term="Predictions" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/34/109266586_65745333d2_m.jpg" width="150" />This week we <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/readwriteweb_predictions_friendfeed_twitter.php">announced</a> a new feature for our community: <strong><a href="http://readwriteweb.predictify.com">ReadWriteWeb Predictions</a></strong>, a Predictions Center that we hope will enable you to tap into the collective intelligence of RWW readers. The <a href="http://readwriteweb.predictify.com/auctionview.aspx?ID=5002">first prediction</a> is about the battle for users and mind-share that has emerged this year between <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/tag/twitter">Twitter</a> and <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/tag/friendfeed">FriendFeed</a>. Here are the results, along with results for our two polls this week...</p>
]]>
      <![CDATA[
<p>In RWW Predictions, we asked: How many monthly U.S. visitors will FriendFeed have for July 2008 according to Compete? As of writing, 400-599k is the most popular prediction. Here are the results so far:</p>
<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/friendfeed_prediction_july08.jpg" /></p>

<p>You can <a href="http://readwriteweb.predictify.com/auctionview.aspx?ID=5002">make your own prediction here</a>.</p>

<h2><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/poll_best_internet_bigco_2008.php">Poll: Best Internet Bigcos of 2008</a></h2>

<p>We've reached the halfway point of 2008, so time for a half-year assessment of the Internet bigcos. This week we ran a poll asking for your picks for best bigcos so far in '08. We did <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/best_web_company_in_2007.php">a similar poll last July</a> - and Facebook just edged out Google for the RWW popular vote. At the end of '07 we named Facebook our <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/best_web_bigco_of_2007.php">Bigco of the year</a>. We also <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/poll_best_internet_bigco_2006.php">ran the poll in 2006</a>. Here are the results this time round:</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" language="javascript" src="http://s3.polldaddy.com/p/761328.js"></script><noscript> <a href ="http://answers.polldaddy.com/poll/761328/" >Which Internet bigco has impressed you the most over the first half of 2008?</a>  <br/> <span style="font-size:9px;"> (<a href ="http://www.polldaddy.com">  polls</a>)</span></noscript></p>

<p>At time of publishing, <strong>Google had 19%</strong>, followed by <strong>Apple on 18%</strong> and <strong>Mozilla 17%</strong>. Also in double figures were Amazon and Adobe, both of which got 12%. Interestingly, Facebook fell to 8% and the other two parts of GYM, Microsoft and Yahoo, didn't fare so well either. Microsoft scored 6% and Yahoo 5%.</p>
<p><em>See also: <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/public_internet_bigcos_market.php">Internet Bigcos - How The Market Sees Them</a>  and <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/there_is_no_bubble_public_stocks.php">It's Official: There Is No Bubble</a> </em></p>
<h2><a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_docs_is_down.php">Google Docs Goes Down - How Long is Too Long for You? (POLL)</a></h2>
<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/googledocs-logo.jpg" align="left" />Earlier this week, Google's hosted office suite <a href="http://docs.google.com">Google Docs</a> was down for more than 30 minutes, rendering documents inaccessible and users frustrated.  Short outages are not uncommon, but it was a good time to ask - how long is too long for you?  At what point would you personally deem a web service too unstable to use, and presuming that varies from service to service, what's your requirement for Google Docs?</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" language="javascript" src="http://s3.polldaddy.com/p/765676.js"></script><noscript> <a href ="http://answers.polldaddy.com/poll/765676/" >How much down time would it take for you to quit using Google Docs?</a>  <br/> <span style="font-size:9px;"> (<a href ="http://www.polldaddy.com">  polls</a>)</span></noscript></p>
<p><em>Image credit: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/archeon/109266586/">hans s</a></em></p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

</feed>