<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_next_for_google.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2008:/1/tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6749-</id>
  <updated>2008-12-03T21:30:52Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for After Lively, What&apos;s Next for Google?</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.23-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6749</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_next_for_google.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=6749" title="After Lively, What's Next for Google?" />
    <published>2008-07-09T17:32:45Z</published>
    <updated>2008-07-09T18:11:43Z</updated>
    <title>After Lively, What&apos;s Next for Google?</title>
    <summary>Yesterday, Google released Lively, a browser based virtual world somewhat reminiscent of The Palace from the mid-90s. A lot of people have been wondering why Google would be interested in entering this market, but according to Hitwise, it seems Google is looking at all the major categories its search engine is sending traffic to and...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Frederic Lardinois</name>
      
    </author>
    
    <category term="Google" />
    
    <category term="Predictions" />
    
    <category term="Products" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img alt="google150.jpg" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/google150.jpg" />Yesterday, <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/lively_google_launches_virtual.php">Google released Lively</a>, a browser based virtual world somewhat reminiscent of <a href="http://thepalace.com/">The Palace</a> from the mid-90s. A lot of people have been wondering why <a href="http://www.google.com">Google</a> would be interested in entering this market, but <a href="http://weblogs.hitwise.com/us-heather-hopkins/2008/07/google_lively_predictions_goog.html">according to Hitwise</a>, it seems Google is looking at all the major categories its search engine is sending traffic to and then tries to develop a product for that category.</p>
]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>Hitwise has a very good track record in using its Clickstream data for predicting Google's next moves. In January, they <a href="http://weblogs.hitwise.com/us-heather-hopkins/2008/01/google_health_predicting_googl_1.html">predicted</a> Google would enter the health, travel, or virtual world market. Since then, Google <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_health_pilot_program.php">launched Google Health</a> and <a href="http://lively.com">Lively</a>, though it doesn't have a major travel product besides <a href="http://maps.google.com">Google Maps</a> in its portfolio just yet.</p>

<p>Looking at the latest data, Hitwise predicts that Google would either enter the automotive or music market next. Both of these are very broad categories with a large range of competitors already operating in them, but then, that has never stopped Google from entering a new market.</p>

<p><img alt="Google Lively.png" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/Google%20Lively.png" /></p>

<h2>Google Autos</h2>

<p>Google could easily build a competitor to <a href="http://cars.com">cars.com</a>, <a href="http://vehix.com">Vehix</a>, or <a href="http://www.autotrader.com/">Autotrader</a> by tying together data from its Google Base product (which already has a '<a href="http://www.google.com/base/s2?a_n0=vehicles&amp;a_y0=9&amp;hl=en&amp;gl=us">Vehicles</a>' category) and mashing it up into a more comprehensive used car market by also allowing users (or dealers) to easily put up their own cars for sale. As of now, Google is only aggregating data from all the major online car buying sites. </p>

<h2>Google Music</h2>

<p> <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/Google/?p=189">Rumors</a> about Google Music have flared up regularly over the last few years, but so far, no actual product has materialized. Entering the music business is obviously fraught with problems for any new player. Given the issues around licensing music, as well as its failure in selling videos on Google Videos, Google might not want to develop a mainstream music platform.</p>

<p>What Google could do, though, would be to offer a platform for independent musicians, somewhat akin to what MySpace was in its early days or what <a href="http://amiestreet.com/">AmieStreet</a> does today.</p>

<h2>Google Travel</h2>

<p>Given Google's background in search, we think Google might also be likely to develop a competitor to the large travel aggregator sites like <a href="http://kayak.com">Kayak</a> or <a href="http://farecompare.com">FareCompare</a>. Not only is this a market where Google could develop a decent revenue stream outside of its core advertising market, but it would fit in right with Google's core expertise. As of now, Google only links to Kayak, Expedia, Hotwire and others when you enter <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=pdx+to+sfo+7%2F15">the right query</a> into its search engine, but it doesn't display any actual results itself yet.</p>

<h2>Our Prediction: Travel is Next</h2>

<p>If Google is indeed trying to fill out all of these major niches with a product of its own, we think a travel product is still Google's most likely next move. It is not only the closest to Google's core competency of search, but Google could also easily put ads on there as well.</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6749-comment:60075</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6749" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_next_for_google.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_next_for_google.php#c60075" />
    <title>Comment from GundyGroup on 2008-07-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>GundyGroup</name>
        <uri>http://www.gundygroup.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.gundygroup.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Real Estate would be my guess!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-09T18:19:56Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6749-comment:60077</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6749" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_next_for_google.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_next_for_google.php#c60077" />
    <title>Comment from Kevin on 2008-07-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Kevin</name>
        <uri>http://i-stuff.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://i-stuff.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>You missed AdWord, Adsense and patent search. Well, i guess next would be some kind of microblogging service (like twitter) or something like Digg or Yahoo! Buzz ?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-09T18:54:09Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6749-comment:60078</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6749" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_next_for_google.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_next_for_google.php#c60078" />
    <title>Comment from Michael on 2008-07-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Michael</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I think the problem they are facing is not which market to enter - but which market to enter *profitably*. Right now google only makes money off searches on its network and not other property that it owns (apart from youtube and gmail - but less so) competes well in the markets that it participates. In fact, its competitors, (Yahoo, Facebook etc...) are mostly kicking its ass in everything BUT search and video. </p>

<p>So they have to:</p>

<p>1. figure out how to get mainstream audiences to use their other products<br />
2. figure out how to make money out of them (and cpm graphical advertising doesn't seem to be the way - see Yahoo or Facebook). <br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-09T19:01:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6749-comment:60079</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6749" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_next_for_google.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_next_for_google.php#c60079" />
    <title>Comment from Godon Taylor on 2008-07-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Godon Taylor</name>
        <uri>http://www.infovark.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.infovark.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Well, after that, based on hitwise's stats, looks like it will be Google Government. </p>

<p>I guess there might be some country somewhere that would be willing to "crowdsource" their government. Maybe with some kind of legislation wikipedia thing...</p>

<p>We're feeling lucky!  </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-09T19:03:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6749-comment:60080</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6749" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_next_for_google.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_next_for_google.php#c60080" />
    <title>Comment from Dmitry Paranyushkin on 2008-07-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Dmitry Paranyushkin</name>
        <uri>http://friendfeed.com/deemeetree</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://friendfeed.com/deemeetree">
        <![CDATA[<p>I have something travel-related for Google, now pleaseÂ give me your money or I'm going to sell it to Nokia instead.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-09T19:04:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6749-comment:60089</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6749" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_next_for_google.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_next_for_google.php#c60089" />
    <title>Comment from Mapper99 on 2008-07-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Mapper99</name>
        <uri>http://www.livelyworlds.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.livelyworlds.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>You can already view Google Lively worlds right in Google Maps:</p>

<p><a href="http://www.livelyworlds.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.livelyworlds.com</a></p>

<p>Pretty cool stuff!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-09T20:41:16Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6749-comment:60095</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6749" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_next_for_google.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_next_for_google.php#c60095" />
    <title>Comment from Adam Wexler on 2008-07-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Adam Wexler</name>
        <uri>http://adamwexler.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://adamwexler.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Google has THE pulse on the universe. Why not tap into their enormous database and monetize the most popular searches?</p>

<p>Michael Robertson did the same thing when he was running his own search engine back in  1994. He noticed a search term that seemed to be gaining traction called a "mp3". Somebody already possessed the domain, but he bought him out (for pretty darn cheap...$1000). Fast forward to 2005 when mp3.com was sold: Robertson pocketed a cool $385 million. What's the return on that one?!?</p>

<p>As for Google, if you're listening, give me 6 months and you just might like the music resource we are creating...</p>

<p>-Adam Wexler</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-09T21:45:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6749-comment:60356</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6749" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_next_for_google.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_next_for_google.php#c60356" />
    <title>Comment from L7 World on 2008-07-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>L7 World</name>
        <uri>http://L7world.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://L7world.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>What's next for Google?</p>

<p>Google Matchmaker of course,<br />
they match you up based to a "Googol dimensions of compatibility"</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-14T07:00:50Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6749-comment:61598</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6749" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_next_for_google.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_next_for_google.php#c61598" />
    <title>Comment from monza on 2008-07-25</title>
    <author>
        <name>monza</name>
        <uri>http://www.casemonzabrianza.it</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.casemonzabrianza.it">
        <![CDATA[<p>Real Estate would be my guess!</p>

<p>Posted by: GundyGroup | July 9, 2008 11:19 AM</p>

<p><br />
me too!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-07-25T08:51:09Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>