<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/aol_split_in_two.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2011:/1/tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6960-</id>
  <updated>2011-04-29T11:12:02Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Slow March to AOL&apos;s Funeral Continues: Split in Two</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.35-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6960</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/aol_split_in_two.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=6960" title="Slow March to AOL's Funeral Continues: Split in Two" />
    <published>2008-08-06T16:03:58Z</published>
    <updated>2008-08-06T16:25:12Z</updated>
    <title>Slow March to AOL&apos;s Funeral Continues: Split in Two</title>
    <summary>According to a statement by Time Warner, AOL will be split into two separate businesses: advertising and access. Overall, revenues from its AOL division declined 16% to $1.1 billion last year. Most importantly, subscription revenue from its dial-up services dropped by 29%, especially after AOL started to offer more of its products for free. The...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Frederic Lardinois</name>
      
    </author>
    
    <category term="News" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img alt="aol-logo.png" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/aol-logo.png" />According to a <a href="http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/080806/20080806005529.html">statement</a> by Time Warner, AOL will be split into two separate businesses: advertising and access. Overall, revenues from its AOL division declined 16% to $1.1 billion last year. Most importantly, subscription revenue from its dial-up services dropped by 29%, especially after AOL started to offer more of its products for free. The only bright spot for AOL was that its advertising sales grew by 2%. Even there, though, the decline in users on sites in the AOL network put a dent into the otherwise relatively positive results.</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>There had already been some <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=9437">speculation</a> about a potential sale of AOL by Time Warner before this. Given the current state of AOL's Internet access business, the question has to be if anybody would even be interested in this. </p>

<h2>Earthlink to the Rescue?</h2>

<p><img alt="aol-dial-up.jpg" align="right" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/aol-dial-up.jpg" />Chances for a revival of AOL's dial-up business, which was once almost synonymous with 'the Internet,' are probably pretty low and the same goes for its subscription services. If anything, as <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-10002969-93.html">Marguerite Eardon</a> speculates, EarthLink might be interested in picking up what is left of AOL's dial-up services. On the other hand, Time Warner has already been <a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080206-time-warner-to-ditch-aol-dial-up-biz-good-luck-with-that.html">shopping AOL around</a> since at least February and apparently has not found any buyers yet. While there is still a sizable number of people who do not have access to broadband services, dial-up service is simply a dying business.</p>

<p>Time Warner will probably hold on to the advertising side of AOL, though. After all, it is still a growing business. AOL also still has a number of other profitable content and service properties like its AOL Mail and Messenger, though Time Warner also apparently <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/idg/IDG_852573C4006938800025749100505BC4.html">decided</a> to shutter some of AOL's less successful business like XDrive and&#160; AOL Pictures.</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6960-comment:63010</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.6960" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/aol_split_in_two.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/aol_split_in_two.php#c63010" />
    <title>Comment from Jeff Bernheisel on 2008-08-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jeff Bernheisel</name>
        <uri>http://mortgageandrealtymarketing.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://mortgageandrealtymarketing.blogspot.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Must be rough to take a decline and STILL have 1.1 BILLION in revenue.  Poor guys...  I can't really wrap my mind around how that can be considered a "problem" just yet.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-08-06T22:42:59Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>
