<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_and_how_embargoes_work_in.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2009:/1/tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7127-</id>
  <updated>2009-10-30T13:40:57Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Why and How Embargoes Work in Tech Blogging</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.23-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7127</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_and_how_embargoes_work_in.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=7127" title="Why and How Embargoes Work in Tech Blogging" />
    <published>2008-08-30T01:00:08Z</published>
    <updated>2008-08-30T01:35:19Z</updated>
    <title>Why and How Embargoes Work in Tech Blogging</title>
    <summary>An embargo is something that tech companies use to set a time when their product will launch and the press can publish their reviews of it. Embargoes aren&apos;t as simple as they sound and they aren&apos;t uncontroversial, either. We believe they can be a good idea, though. Below we discuss why and share thoughts about...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Marshall Kirkpatrick</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Blogging" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img alt="stringfinger.jpg" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/stringfinger.jpg" width="150" height="100" >An embargo is something that tech companies use to set a time when their product will launch and the press can publish their reviews of it.  Embargoes aren't as simple as they sound and they aren't uncontroversial, either.</p>

<p>We believe they can be a good idea, though.  Below we discuss why and share thoughts about how we think an embargo can be run well.  If you've got comments to share, don't be shy, that's what the comments section of a blog is for.</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<h2>Why Embargoes?</h2>

<p>Not every announcement needs to be embargoed, but complicated ones involving new technology can benefit from such an exercise.  Tech blogging is really competitive, some blogs won't write later about something discovered by one of their competitors.  None of us like to, we don't want to give our readers the impression that we're slow on the news or have people skip our posts because they already read about something elsewhere.</p>

<p>Here's why embargoes can be good.<br />
<ul><li>They give multiple blogs a chance to review a technology in depth, instead of making it a race.</li><br />
<li>This means readers get to read multiple perspectives on an interesting topic.  Different bloggers have different strengths and ways of looking at things.</li><br />
<li>Embargoes lead to more total coverage than exclusives.  If you're someone for whom the only thing that mattered in high school was to win the approval of the most popular kid in school and you want to extend that philosophy into your work life as an adult - then the richness and breadth of your work and life experience will suffer accordingly.  Exclusives are the tactic of people with weak products and of reporters who compete better in bullying than in writing.</li></ul></p>

<h2>How to Run an Embargo</h2>

<p>This is one way to do it, but we think it's a good way.</p>

<p><strong>Ask Writers if They Want Pre-release Info Under Embargo.</strong></p>

<p><img alt="lolbear.jpg" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/lolbear.jpg" width="310" height="211" align="right">Sending an email briefly describing what's being launched and asking if a writer wants more pre-release info under embargo is a good way to entice people into engaging in conversation and to receive an explicit reply accepting the embargo.  </p>

<p>A lot of people have been sending emails lately with all the information in them and asserting that it's embargoed until a particular time.  Apparently accepting the embargo is assumed, but it seems a stretch to hold someone responsible for something they haven't agreed to.  </p>

<p>Additionally, having a conversation is much more effective than shooting out one complete email and crossing your fingers.</p>

<p><em>Right: From <a href="http://icanhascheezburger.com/2007/12/06/i-tells-you-sekrit-k/">ICanHazCheeseBurger</a>, a blog you can always trust with an embargo.</em></p>

<p><strong>Make Sure The Subject of the Embargo is...Embargoed</strong></p>

<p>There is no sense in telling writers they can't write about something that's publicly available on the front of your website until a later date.  An embargo involves an agreement hold off writing until a given time - in exchange for a chance to take a look at something before it's publicly available.  If it's live and easily found - then anyone could find it.  Thus anyone could write about it and it's fair game at any time.</p>

<p><strong>Reach Out to Bloggers Large and Not so Large</strong></p>

<p>A handful of top blogs in any niche are used to recieving press inquiries.  Medium sized, up and coming blogs, usually only get spam or press releases for unexciting things.  Offering to include an up and coming blog in an embargoed release is a sign of respect that will be appreciated.  It will lead to more coverage, more links, and more perspectives.  Readers don't read every post on the big blogs, many people will discover you through a post on a smaller blog or they will take the time to read about you after noticing that a number of people have written about your launch.</p>

<p>There's a sprawling network of tech blogs online and ideally your release would hit big and medium ones with such compelling news that an even larger number of smaller blogs would follow up with posts of their own.   Blogging is a long tail world - chosing instead to put all your eggs in one basket (with an "exclusive," for example) isn't necesary or necesarily in your best interest.  </p>

<p>That said, the only incentive bloggers have to respect embargoes is that they want to recieve more embargoed information again in the future.  It's serious or aspiring news-type blogs that have that incentive.</p>

<p><strong>Send the Info and Offer to Talk</strong></p>

<p>Some companies refuse to send launch info unless a blogger agrees to talk to their CEO on the phone.  Co-incidentally, those CEOs are often particularly obnoxious.  The best PR agents will accept a request to just send out a release and other pertinent info - along with an offer to talk.  Many times it won't be necesary.</p>

<p>What is much more helpful is to make yourself available in the days and hours leading up to the embargo to answer any questions that come up.  Providing a phone number, email and IM contact info for someone who can answer questions promptly is a big help.  </p>

<p><strong>Then, Lift the Embargo!</strong></p>

<p>At the agreed upon time, push whatever you're lauching live and go check out your blog coverage.  Best practices for engaging with that coverage are subject enough for several other blog posts.</p>

<h2>Questions</h2>

<p><strong>Will Bloggers Respect My Embargo?</strong></p>

<p>If you do it right, they most likely will.  At least 95% of the embargoes we see get respected by all the blogs that were included.  Some are better than others, a few are downright awful.  You can figure it out.  Most are great, at least in our field.</p>

<p><strong>What Do I do If A Blogger Breaks My Embargo?</strong></p>

<p>There's a number of ways you can handle it but here's one option.  Leave a matter of fact comment on the post ("This was embargoed until 4 hours from now and I would have appreciated it if you could have respected that.") and then let the other blogs you'd reached out to know that the embargo has been broken.  You probably don't need to tell them by who, they'll check and find out on their own.  Then they'll either run their story about you, or if they hadn't written it yet then they may not cover you at all.</p>

<p>Then ask yourself honestly if this was actually your own fault due to unclear or inconsistent communication.  All serious news bloggers try to respect embargoes because that's part of the business.  Sometimes they are thick headed, though, and that's how it goes.</p>

<p><strong>How Much Lead Time Should I Give an Embargo and What Day of the Week Should It Lift?</strong></p>

<p>It's up to you but we'd recommend three days lead time, lifting Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday or Friday - depending on an honest assesment of how exciting your product is.  It's a crapshoot.</p>

<h2>That's How We See it, How About You?</h2>

<p>The above is just one take on embargoes in tech blogging.  We know there are lots of other ways to look at it.  See, for example, <a href="http://www.louisgray.com/live/2008/08/why-embargo-process-is-broken-and-why.html">Louis Gray's excellent post this month</a> where he makes similar arguments in more detail or pro-journalist Mathew Ingram's contrary post <a href="http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/08/21/embargoes-thanks-but-no-thanks/">Embargoes: Thanks but No Thanks</a>.</p>

<p>Thoughts? Feelings? Suggestions?  Leave them in comments, because that's one of the things that makes blogging such a great form of media.</p>

<p><em>Title image: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/8135706@N06/2368879704/">Untitled</a>, CC from Flickr user Lauren.</em></p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7127-comment:65176</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7127" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_and_how_embargoes_work_in.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_and_how_embargoes_work_in.php#c65176" />
    <title>Comment from Allen Stern on 2008-08-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Allen Stern</name>
        <uri>http://friendfeed.com/allenstern</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://friendfeed.com/allenstern">
        <![CDATA[<p>hmm</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-08-30T01:25:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7127-comment:65179</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7127" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_and_how_embargoes_work_in.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_and_how_embargoes_work_in.php#c65179" />
    <title>Comment from Dion Almaer on 2008-08-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Dion Almaer</name>
        <uri>http://almaer.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://almaer.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I never understand it when I get an email "Here is some secret news that is under embargo...." expecting you not to leak it, rather than FIRST asking you.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-08-30T01:58:27Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7127-comment:65180</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7127" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_and_how_embargoes_work_in.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_and_how_embargoes_work_in.php#c65180" />
    <title>Comment from bdthomas on 2008-08-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>bdthomas</name>
        <uri>http://www.leadvine.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.leadvine.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Marshall, nice post.  I could have used this post about a month ago.  :)  </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-08-30T02:11:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7127-comment:65181</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7127" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_and_how_embargoes_work_in.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_and_how_embargoes_work_in.php#c65181" />
    <title>Comment from Louis Gray on 2008-08-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Louis Gray</name>
        <uri>http://friendfeed.com/louisgray</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://friendfeed.com/louisgray">
        <![CDATA[<p>Nice job, Marshall.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-08-30T02:14:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7127-comment:65182</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7127" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_and_how_embargoes_work_in.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_and_how_embargoes_work_in.php#c65182" />
    <title>Comment from Dave Donohue on 2008-08-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Dave Donohue</name>
        <uri>http://www.davedonohue.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.davedonohue.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Marshall,</p>

<p>Personally - and definitely not objectively since I'm coming at this from the PR side - IMO embargoes generally cause more trouble than they're worth, for a variety of reasons.</p>

<p>Among them are that too many vendors look at all of their  announcements as (to use your words) "complicated ones involving new technology", and too many of their PR support staff are stuck in a black and white world where all news has to be an exclusive or it has to be everywhere all at once via embargo.  The gray area in between is where we can and should drive conversations around a trend, but it requires a change in thinking on everyone's part.</p>

<p>Thanks for sharing continued insight from the editorial side. It's interesting for everyone in tech to watch the segmentation of the leading outlets as some focus on analysis vs. the race to Techmeme - one that we're all still involved with one way or another.</p>

<p><br />
  </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-08-30T02:20:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7127-comment:65183</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7127" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_and_how_embargoes_work_in.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_and_how_embargoes_work_in.php#c65183" />
    <title>Comment from Miiko Mentz on 2008-08-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Miiko Mentz</name>
        <uri>http://www.pinkmoxie.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.pinkmoxie.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Marshall, I see the PR storm of TC50 and DEMO embargoes have hit your inbox. And next week the PR storm will reach category 5 (sigh).</p>

<p>Embargoes are a PR tactic that do serve a purpose, but sadly they are over used and abused. Both you and Louis did a good job at spelling out why they are good, as well as pointing out some of the negatives around embargoes. And yes, we all hate it when they are broken and that's always a risk when you take the embargoed route. But really, at the end of the day, is a broken embargo that serious. Not really, nobody dies when an embargo is broken. We all just get ticked off and PR people have to scramble to let everyone else know that it was broken.</p>

<p>I think the only time it can be somewhat serious is when it's a public company and its material news, but for private tech startups, it's certainly not that serious. But it does tick everyone else off so it's not good practice to break embargoes, because when you do break them, next time you probably won't get the news. And you never know who is going to have the next big thing and don't you think you might want it. So my advice is, don't break embargoes if you agree to them and honor them like everyone else.<br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-08-30T03:00:51Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7127-comment:65184</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7127" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_and_how_embargoes_work_in.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_and_how_embargoes_work_in.php#c65184" />
    <title>Comment from Denis on 2008-08-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Denis</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>As a reader I would prefer if you were less worried about "looking slow on the news" and more worried about me getting the information I need.</p>

<p>If I could rely on you covering everything interesting (even if someone else breaks it) then I could unsubscribe from techcrunch and minimize the amount of reading matireal. However due to your childish posturing I have to follow a lot of blogs.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-08-30T03:04:46Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7127-comment:65185</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7127" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_and_how_embargoes_work_in.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_and_how_embargoes_work_in.php#c65185" />
    <title>Comment from Elliott Ng on 2008-08-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Elliott Ng</name>
        <uri>http://friendfeed.com/elliottng</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://friendfeed.com/elliottng">
        <![CDATA[<p>Tell it to them brother.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-08-30T03:18:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7127-comment:65186</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7127" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_and_how_embargoes_work_in.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_and_how_embargoes_work_in.php#c65186" />
    <title>Comment from Elliott Ng on 2008-08-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Elliott Ng</name>
        <uri>http://friendfeed.com/elliottng</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://friendfeed.com/elliottng">
        <![CDATA[<p>Exceptional post because it provides rationale for embargoes and when you would use them, and some situational if-then advice that helps one figure out what to do if things don't go exactly as planned.</p>

<p>Twitter: @elliottng</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-08-30T03:23:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7127-comment:65188</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7127" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_and_how_embargoes_work_in.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_and_how_embargoes_work_in.php#c65188" />
    <title>Comment from Julio on 2008-08-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Julio</name>
        <uri>http://friendfeed.com/julio</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://friendfeed.com/julio">
        <![CDATA[<p>Good article</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-08-30T03:26:28Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7127-comment:65189</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7127" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_and_how_embargoes_work_in.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_and_how_embargoes_work_in.php#c65189" />
    <title>Comment from Troy Peterson on 2008-08-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Troy Peterson</name>
        <uri>http://www.addoursearch.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.addoursearch.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Marshall,<br />
So, I have a question...</p>

<p>Is an embargo required in order for a blog to take a new launch seriously?</p>

<p>Case in point, when I launched Addoursearch.com about 3 months ago.  </p>

<p>This was the first site I had launched on my own, and reached out to several top tier bloggers, but approached them after I had actually launched the site. So, no embargo was added.</p>

<p>The response I recieved was actually VERY disappointing.  As a matter of fact, I recieved no writeups from blogs I contacted directly.<br />
I did recieve some blog publicity, but they were all sourced from places like SimpleSpark and KillerStartups (and oddly enough mostly overseas in Europe and Japan)</p>

<p>Granted, it could be that the concept and the site was just not up to snuff, but I have to wonder if there more I could have done to help it along. Could an embargo have helped it get more serious consideration?</p>

<p>Thanks!<br />
Troy<br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-08-30T04:18:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7127-comment:65191</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7127" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_and_how_embargoes_work_in.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_and_how_embargoes_work_in.php#c65191" />
    <title>Comment from Troy Malone on 2008-08-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Troy Malone</name>
        <uri>http://www.pelotonics.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.pelotonics.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this post Marshall. It is good to get a glimpse into the world of top tier bloggers. I guess that we can complain about the process all day long, but that does not change that there are certain ways to approach bloggers that will either get you coverage or get you buried. </p>

<p>I agree with the prior commenter that I don't necessarily care if it was RWW or the other guy that "broke" the story, I just care that I read about it in my preferred blog. Most of the world is willing to wait a few hours for the information and will not have any negative consequences by finding out about something a bit later than otherwise. </p>

<p>That having been said, that's just not the way that it works! It is fun playing the game regardless. Whether it is traditional PR or bloggers, there is gamesmanship involved at some point in the process. </p>

<p>Now excuse me, I have to plan for my embargo :) </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-08-30T04:59:44Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7127-comment:65193</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7127" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_and_how_embargoes_work_in.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_and_how_embargoes_work_in.php#c65193" />
    <title>Comment from Danielle Morrill on 2008-08-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Danielle Morrill</name>
        <uri>http://www.daniellemorrill.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.daniellemorrill.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I recently used an embargo for the first time, and found it simple to execute (we're a smallish private tech company).  The greatest benefit I found was simply the level of comfort it gave me giving bloggers, who I had only spoken to once over the phone, screenshots and details that the people building the product considered sacred.  It also gave us a week in advance to review the videos and posts, instead of scrambling at the last minute with an exclusive.</p>

<p>I thought about what it would mean for us if the story was leaked, but decided the benefit to the folks carrying the story was minimal (if at all).  The story was not leaked, however, and now those guys will be the first I email.</p>

<p><br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-08-30T05:08:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7127-comment:65198</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7127" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_and_how_embargoes_work_in.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_and_how_embargoes_work_in.php#c65198" />
    <title>Comment from human e4 on 2008-08-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>human e4</name>
        <uri>http://www.e4x4.net</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.e4x4.net">
        <![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing such wonderful info. Have a good one man.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-08-30T05:51:44Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7127-comment:65199</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7127" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_and_how_embargoes_work_in.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_and_how_embargoes_work_in.php#c65199" />
    <title>Comment from Curt on 2008-08-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Curt</name>
        <uri>http://morphemetales.wordpress.com/2008/01/07/no-embargoes/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://morphemetales.wordpress.com/2008/01/07/no-embargoes/">
        <![CDATA[<p>As I wrote back in January, I dislike embargoes for a couple of reasons(my POV is non-tech journalist, tech marketing guy and, most importantly, reader): it encourages the sort of cooperation between journalist and those they cover that is of no benefit to the reader. Journalism should be an "impolite" vocation and, although no journalist should be in bed with those they cover, many are. It discourages the cultivation of sources and competition. It dulls the critical faculties of journalists. And it allows businesses to dictate the terms of coverage. No one wins. Correction, the reading public doesn't win. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-08-30T06:18:18Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7127-comment:65206</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7127" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_and_how_embargoes_work_in.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_and_how_embargoes_work_in.php#c65206" />
    <title>Comment from Robin Good on 2008-08-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Robin Good</name>
        <uri>http://www.masternewmedia.org</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.masternewmedia.org">
        <![CDATA[<p>I think that Denis really hit the nail on the head. Readers really do not care very much about a blog relationship with companies and embargoes, and, key point, they are caring less and less about your blog being the first out with a specific news story. It is the insight and usefulness / applicability of your info that they care more to find.</p>

<p>On the other hand, I as a web publisher really hate embargoes and do my best NOT to cover stories that come to me with such a restriction. </p>

<p>Why?</p>

<p>a) I hate to be running a story another 10 or 50 blogs will cover as well on the same day. I don't care about being on Techmeme, so let them have it.</p>

<p>b) I hate to be treated like a marketing agent for a new company or product when they are dictating the rules of how can best do that.</p>

<p>c) The benefit for the reader is diminished as one would need to scan and check all posts made on that story to get a complete and comprehensive story. </p>

<p>I also acknowledge that for a company there can be many advantages to using this approach and that their marketing and visibility results could be enhanced by it. This can work best with smaller blogs and with top tech news sites like yours who are willing to play this game to stay head to head with your competitors. </p>

<p>Wouldn'it be better instead for one of you top tech news sites to send to hell the need to be first with a story and to instead have it an editorial policy to come out after all the others with the specific goal of making full sense of the story. With all that much insight scattered on tens of blogs, isn't there a huge editorial and market opportunity in being late, but as comprehensive as none of those others can have been?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-08-30T10:44:21Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7127-comment:65211</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7127" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_and_how_embargoes_work_in.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_and_how_embargoes_work_in.php#c65211" />
    <title>Comment from Fletch on 2008-08-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Fletch</name>
        <uri>http://fletchnz.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://fletchnz.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>This is an insightful discussion from an entrepreneur's perspective.</p>

<p>One thing I'm wondering - does anyone know of a comprehensive listing that might also include some mid-sized tech blogs referred to above?</p>

<p>I'm sure we all know and read our favourite's but these are probably larger blogs, and for startups to be able to provide news to mid-sized blogs as well makes a lot of sense.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-08-30T12:15:41Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7127-comment:65212</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7127" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_and_how_embargoes_work_in.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_and_how_embargoes_work_in.php#c65212" />
    <title>Comment from JamesBruni on 2008-08-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>JamesBruni</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>As a PR consultant with over two decades of experience, I'd have to say this is the best explanation of an "embargo" I've ever read.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-08-30T12:55:20Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7127-comment:65213</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7127" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_and_how_embargoes_work_in.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_and_how_embargoes_work_in.php#c65213" />
    <title>Comment from Ricky on 2008-08-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ricky</name>
        <uri>http://www.symbian-guru.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.symbian-guru.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>As a techblogger for both a mid-to-large sized site, as well as my own niche site, I personally think embargoes are great. They give me the opportunity to craft a well thought out post, rather than scrambling to get the basics up and then come back to fill in the details. </p>

<p>Specifically when it comes to conference/show season, when you have 4 manufacturers each announcing 4 phones, that's 16 stories. If I can get any of them a few days ahead, and have those done early, that's a tremendous boon for me. It also gives me an opportunity to really study the news, and find things that others will miss, rather than simply listing out specs. It allows me time to differentiate my offering, which is great. </p>

<p>I do agree, however, that embargoes should not be overused, nor should they be offered lightly. This was a recent discussion around part of the blogosphere - the idea of sending embargoed information prior to receiving an agreement to honor that embargo. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-08-30T14:22:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7127-comment:65227</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7127" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_and_how_embargoes_work_in.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_and_how_embargoes_work_in.php#c65227" />
    <title>Comment from ethnicomm on 2008-08-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>ethnicomm</name>
        <uri>http://ethnicomm.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://ethnicomm.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>An embargo may be considered effective from a vendor's point of view but it really does not encourage writers to be on their game nor does it help differentiate good writers from those that take the canned PR statements and regurgitate them. </p>

<p>I also think that the consumer (reader) suffers because there ends up being an oligopoly in terms of information purveyors.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-08-31T02:21:46Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7127-comment:65282</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7127" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_and_how_embargoes_work_in.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_and_how_embargoes_work_in.php#c65282" />
    <title>Comment from Richard Cunningham on 2008-09-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>Richard Cunningham</name>
        <uri>http://friendbinder.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://friendbinder.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Though you can do all that and not get covered anyway.</p>

<p>The number of different startups covered by RWW, Mashable and TechCrunch is quite low, so unless you have some ex-Google people, Millions in funding, a truly ground-breaking idea or you actually are Google, Yahoo or MS this won't work on it's own.</p>

<p>Further more, if you try to pitch to big sites and individual bloggers at the same time, then it's likely that the individual bloggers won't want to cover a site, that will be all over the big tech blogs anyway.this won't work on it's own </p>

<p>Or at least that was my experience doing all that with <b>friendbinder</b> (friendbinder.com). </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-09-01T10:44:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7127-comment:65586</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7127" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_and_how_embargoes_work_in.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_and_how_embargoes_work_in.php#c65586" />
    <title>Comment from http://joeanderson.co.uk/blog/ on 2008-09-03</title>
    <author>
        <name>http://joeanderson.co.uk/blog/</name>
        <uri>http://friendfeed.com/computerjoe</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://friendfeed.com/computerjoe">
        <![CDATA[<p>I couldn't agree more with reaching out to small blogs.</p>

<p>I generally only receive PRs from very minor US elections (BILL BLOGGS FOR STATE SENATE, etc) for some reason. The most exciting PR I have had politically was from Mike Gravel's thinktank, which the BBC later covered. Sadly, I'm not a political blogger!</p>

<p>I love it when biggish companies reach out to me. Clipmarks did early on in their existance, and I'd like to think I actually made a difference (I later guestblogged about them on a very large Gawker Media blog). A small act of friendship to a small blog might always result in a bigger story. Sarah started small, I remember!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-09-03T20:58:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7127-comment:120182</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7127" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_and_how_embargoes_work_in.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/why_and_how_embargoes_work_in.php#c120182" />
    <title>Comment from Dawn Douglass on 2008-12-17</title>
    <author>
        <name>Dawn Douglass</name>
        <uri>http://friendfeed.com/dawnkey</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://friendfeed.com/dawnkey">
        <![CDATA[<p>Arrington's article claims TechCrunch has never broken an embargo, but seems to me he's claimed before that they have when he wants to make sure he's first with big news.  Maybe I'm wrong, but I really thought he's said that before.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-12-17T22:21:03Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>