<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/finally_joost_now_available_on.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2009:/1/tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7285-</id>
  <updated>2009-10-30T13:31:27Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Finally: Joost Now Available on the Web</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.23-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7285</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/finally_joost_now_available_on.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=7285" title="Finally: Joost Now Available on the Web" />
    <published>2008-09-18T15:55:14Z</published>
    <updated>2008-09-18T16:22:49Z</updated>
    <title>Finally: Joost Now Available on the Web</title>
    <summary>Today, Joost announced that all of its content is now available directly on its website and not just through its desktop client. Joost was one of the most hyped-up companies on the web when the peer-to-peer streaming video service was still in stealth mode in 2006 and beta invites were rare and coveted. However, once...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Frederic Lardinois</name>
      
    </author>
    
    <category term="News" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img alt="joost_logo_sep08.jpg" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/joost_logo_sep08.jpg" />Today, Joost <a href="http://blog.joost.com/2008/09/notice_anything_different.html">announced</a> that all of its content is now available directly on its website and not just through its desktop client. <a href="http://joost.com">Joost</a> was one of the most hyped-up companies on the web when the peer-to-peer streaming video service was still in stealth mode in 2006 and beta invites were rare and coveted. However, once users actually got a look at Joost, disillusion quickly set in. Joost's video quality was very high and it had signed up a wide range of content producers, but its downfall was its reliance on a desktop client. Users were already switching to viewing video on the web and having to start up a client just to watch video was simply too inconvenient.</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>Joost <a href="http://www.last100.com/2008/03/21/dont-turn-off-the-life-support-just-yet-joost-coming-to-the-browser/">announced</a> that it was working on a browser-based version in March. Currently, you will still need to install a plugin for your browser to view videos on Joost, but starting in October, Joost will also move towards a completely Flash-based system. The plugin will remain necessary for watching HD content and live video, however.</p> 

<p>Even though Joost does not rely on its P2P architecture anymore, the video quality is still high, especially in full-screen mode, but it does not rival that of the 'HD' offering of ABC or Vimeo. </p>

<p><img alt="joost_web_video.jpg" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/joost_web_video.jpg"  /></p>

<h2>More Social</h2>

<p>Joost has also added a wealth of social features to its site. You can now easily share videos with your friends on Joost and join one of the newly established <a href="http://www.joost.com/groups/I_Listen_to_Music_While_I_Work/">Joost groups</a>. Also, everything you watch is stored in your '<a href="http://www.joost.com/users/frederic/activities/ ">JoostFeed</a>,' which you can choose to make public. If you really do not want your friends to know that you have been watching <a href="http://www.joost.com/1359wbd/t/Britney-Spears-Baby-One-More-Time#id=1359wbd">Brittany Spears videos</a> all night again, you can also turn on a 'Stealth Mode.'</p>

<p>Because of its reliance on a plugin, however, Joost does not offer the ability to embed videos yet. We assume that this feature will be available once Joost has moved over to using Flash.</p>

<h2>Too Little, Too Late?</h2>

<p>Overall, we think it was about time for Joost to move to the browser. However, a lot of what Joost set out to do in 2006 has already been done on the web. Its biggest competitor is probably <a href="http://hulu.com">Hulu</a>, which has content deals with almost every large TV network and is slowly adding more HD content. Joost will have a hard time competing, unless it can sign up a similarly large number of quality content producers.</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7285-comment:67084</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7285" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/finally_joost_now_available_on.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/finally_joost_now_available_on.php#c67084" />
    <title>Comment from Tom Altman on 2008-09-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Tom Altman</name>
        <uri>http://tomaltman.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://tomaltman.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>All I'm getting is a "Page Load Error" - must be too much to handle today!  :)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-09-18T16:40:09Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7285-comment:67085</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7285" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/finally_joost_now_available_on.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/finally_joost_now_available_on.php#c67085" />
    <title>Comment from Tom Altman on 2008-09-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Tom Altman</name>
        <uri>http://tomaltman.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://tomaltman.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Fuuny, it is a DNS thing.  <a href="http://joost.com/" rel="nofollow">http://joost.com/</a> doesn't work but <a href="http://www.joost.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.joost.com/</a> does, for me anyway.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-09-18T16:41:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7285-comment:67092</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7285" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/finally_joost_now_available_on.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/finally_joost_now_available_on.php#c67092" />
    <title>Comment from Todd on 2008-09-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Todd</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>FYI - the "Joost plug in" is really 131 megabyte local install of Silverlight - which I do not consider "browser based".</p>

<p>Suggest everyone wait until pure Flash version gets released next month ( if ever ).</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-09-18T17:06:24Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7285-comment:67093</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7285" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/finally_joost_now_available_on.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/finally_joost_now_available_on.php#c67093" />
    <title>Comment from Frederic Lardinois on 2008-09-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Frederic Lardinois</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@todd - I installed the plugin and the download weighed in at about 7 megabytes. But you are right - I think the Flash version is what could save Joost.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-09-18T17:23:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7285-comment:67097</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7285" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/finally_joost_now_available_on.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/finally_joost_now_available_on.php#c67097" />
    <title>Comment from Todd on 2008-09-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Todd</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@Frederic Lardinois</p>

<p>What would save Joost is they need to deliver on their promise of "Annotated Television". I was one of the first Joost beta testers waaay back in 2006 when it was called "The Venetian Project".</p>

<p>Still waiting for the means to annotate what I am watching and have my friends see what I wrote when they watch the same show.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-09-18T18:11:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7285-comment:67098</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7285" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/finally_joost_now_available_on.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/finally_joost_now_available_on.php#c67098" />
    <title>Comment from Dan on 2008-09-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Dan</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>It is not silverlight you jackass.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-09-18T18:13:08Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7285-comment:67100</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7285" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/finally_joost_now_available_on.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/finally_joost_now_available_on.php#c67100" />
    <title>Comment from Anurag Bansal on 2008-09-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anurag Bansal</name>
        <uri>http://www.knowliz.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.knowliz.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I tried Joost last year and install the application on my Vista laptop.  But as soon as I understood, it can run without application, I didn't use it at all and uninstalled the second day.<br />
But now when Joost is available online, I will give it another try, but ya as you mentioned, Hulu really has the best quality online video and movies.  It doesn't even feel like I am watching it online.<br />
Joost will have a hard time competing with these services out there.<br />
Last month I wrote a blog post about the same, if you are interested to have a look:<br />
<a href="http://www.knowliz.com/2008/08/dont-miss-any-more-tv-shows-movies.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.knowliz.com/2008/08/dont-miss-any-more-tv-shows-movies.html</a></p>

<p>Thanks for the info.</p>

<p>Cheers<br />
Anurag Bansal</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-09-18T18:16:19Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7285-comment:67101</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7285" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/finally_joost_now_available_on.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/finally_joost_now_available_on.php#c67101" />
    <title>Comment from Sergio on 2008-09-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Sergio</name>
        <uri>http://www.montparnas.com/articles/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.montparnas.com/articles/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I've used Joost as a desktop app before, and it was a great experience. The main drawback was that it was--a desktop app, and I found it was a bigger pain in the butt to use than just, say, going to a website. I don't think they have really evolved very far beyond that. For one you have to download a plug-in. You also have to sign-up in order to view anything. That is two annoying steps removed from YouTube or Hulu! Get with the program Joost. Sheesh.</p>

<p>BTW. Am I the only one that loves Hulu? It got pretty trashed by many reviewers, but I like it. It's easy to use and has content that I'll actually watch, uncut and high-quality.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-09-18T18:56:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7285-comment:67103</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7285" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/finally_joost_now_available_on.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/finally_joost_now_available_on.php#c67103" />
    <title>Comment from Anurag Bansal on 2008-09-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Anurag Bansal</name>
        <uri>http://www.knowliz.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.knowliz.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I am a great fan of Hulu.<br />
And very well said Sergio..<br />
It is a pain to create an account and install a plug-in just to watch something on Joost whilst it is available free without any catch and PIB elsewhere pretty well.<br />
Still they are not getting what public demand is.</p>

<p>For me..<br />
LONG LIVE HULUUUUUUUUUU...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-09-18T19:09:17Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>