<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/government_20.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2009:/1/tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7222-</id>
  <updated>2009-10-30T13:31:29Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for To 2.0 or Not 2.0? That is The Government&apos;s Question</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.23-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7222</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/government_20.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=7222" title="To 2.0 or Not 2.0? That is The Government's Question" />
    <published>2008-09-11T02:45:00Z</published>
    <updated>2008-09-12T05:17:12Z</updated>
    <title>To 2.0 or Not 2.0? That is The Government&apos;s Question</title>
    <summary>To 2.0 or Not 2.0? That is The Government&apos;s Question</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Alexandra Rampy</name>
      
    </author>
    
    <category term="Analysis" />
    
    <category term="Features" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/web20_save_us.jpg" />And we've got the answer. Three of them actually: Listen, learn, and let go. Let's face it, Web 2.0 is a buzzword. And when it comes to government, change, and innovation, we have to reach beyond buzzwords. Surprising to some, the government isn't too far beyond.</p>

<p>Government is doing some amazing social media initiatives to better serve their constituents, and why not - social media is all about increasing the democratization of communications. The government serves its people, and thus, it's a perfect match.</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>We government-familiar types know of the greatness that is CDC - from their virtual world explorations in Whyville and SecondLife, to their numerous <a href="http://www2a.cdc.gov/podcasts/">podcasts</a>, <a href="http://www2a.cdc.gov/ecards/">e-cards</a>, MySpace <a href="http://www.myspace.com/cdc_ehealth">page</a> and <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/healthmarketing/blog/">blog</a>, and their <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/cdctv/">CDC-TV channel</a>, they are leading the way. But there's more.</p>

<p>The EPA has its own <a href="http://apps.facebook.com/causes/92351">cause</a> on Facebook for its EnergySTAR program to stop global warming. The U.S. Intelligence Agency has it's own data-sharing and social network-esque called <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intellipedia">Intellipedia</a>. TSA uses its blog <a href="http://www.tsa.gov/blog/">Evolution of Security</a> as instrumental to its customer service abilities. Not to mention, there are currently 7 head directors and decision makers with their own blog.  But, I will admit that some areas in government just need some more coaching.</p>

<p>If you are within government or outside of government, here are three helpful strategies to be the social media maven for your agency: <strong>Listen. Learn. And Let go.</strong></p>

<p>These three strategies are listed in no particular order as they all circle one another. Think back when you learned how to ride a bike. You did not let go of the training wheels, until you have learned how to ride the bike. But, you couldn't learn how to ride the bike, until you listened to the instructions. Same deal.</p>

<h2>Listening</h2>

<p>The more you learn about the space, the more comfortable you will become. This will involving listening to webinars and speakers on the topic. For starters, the CDC is having a live <a href="http://www.webdialogues.net/cs/cdc-new_media/view/di/158?x-t=home.view">web dialogue</a> on September 18th with an expert panel to talk about how government health agencies can integrate social media practices into their initiatives. There are currently 217 people signed up!</p>

<p>Listening also involves learning how to search, and how to search effectively. Largely, learning how to navigate the RSS feeder. I know it looks intimidating. I was at first too. But, it's called <em>Real Simple Syndication</em> for a reason, because it really can be simple. Check out <a href="http://www.google.com/reader/view/">Google Reader</a> or <a href="http://www.bloglines.com/">Bloglines</a> or email me, and we can work together.</p>

<!--nextpage-->

<h2>Learning</h2>

<p>While listening, you will learn. It's inevitable. I have best found that learning is maximized when you live with what Geoff Livingston said best in one of Buzz Bin blog <a href="http://www.livingstonbuzz.com/2008/09/05/the-value-of-events/">posts</a>, "You cannot underestimate the value of remaining teachable." Attending speakers, applying your knowledge and participating in the space as an individual all help facilitate learning.</p>

<p>For example, Sec. Mike Leavitt and a group of world leaders came together in 2007 to create the <a href="http://blog.pandemicflu.gov/">Pandemic Flu Leadership Blog</a>. Through this short-term blog, conversations and discussions were shared leading up to an offline Leadership Forum. Taking the lessons learned from this experience, Sec. Leavitt launched his own <a href="http://secretarysblog.hhs.gov/">blog</a> on behalf of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services in August 2007.</p>

<h2>Letting Go</h2>

<p>As your listening and learning combines, eventually, you will feel more comfortable in letting go. And letting go can include baby steps. Like, the case of Sec. Leavitt, you can build upon past activities. Do gather the statistics. Do highlight other case studies.</p>

<ul>
	<li>Perhaps, instead of creating your own social network, it begins with placing a web badge or banner about your initiative on a social network.</li>
	<li>Perhaps, instead of creating a Twitter account feed, you conduct Twitter searches for your government agency's name and important keywords.</li>
	<li>Perhaps, instead of creating your own blog, first do a guest entry on an already established blog.</li>
	<li>Perhaps, when pitching new information or publications to traditional news outlets, see if that media organization has a relevant blog column or social media reporter and share your information with him or her.</li>
</ul>
<p>The ideas are endless, which is why <em>being relevant is core</em>. Let's not be doing things for the sake of doing them. Let's connect in meaningful ways. The tools may be new, but the importance of relationship-building and support remain constant. I'm excited to have the opportunity to highlight in this Government 2.0 column ways our government is being innovative as we all listen, learn and let go together.</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7222-comment:66438</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7222" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/government_20.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/government_20.php#c66438" />
    <title>Comment from Dating on 2008-09-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>Dating</name>
        <uri>http://www.cupidincorporated.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.cupidincorporated.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Very nice write-up on Web 2.0 It's really hard to get those old beaurocrats to listen learn and let go. That's why private industry trives in the USA.<br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-09-11T05:35:30Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7222-comment:66456</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7222" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/government_20.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/government_20.php#c66456" />
    <title>Comment from Geoff Livingston on 2008-09-11</title>
    <author>
        <name>Geoff Livingston</name>
        <uri>http://www.livingstonbuzz.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.livingstonbuzz.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>You are so on with this.  Government will likely have a hard time, but there are people and like you @immunity are doing great things and educating our public servants. Society has much to gain from a socially engaged public sector.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-09-11T12:52:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7222-comment:66458</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7222" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/government_20.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/government_20.php#c66458" />
    <title>Comment from Joe Flood on 2008-09-11</title>
    <author>
        <name>Joe Flood</name>
        <uri>http://www.joeflood.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.joeflood.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Bear in mind that many well-meaning government employees are burdened with outdated rules and regulations that limit their ability to get involved in Web 2.0.  These include rules on accessibility, IT security, "information quality" and a host of other potential roadblocks.  The Internet has evolved faster than the rules have so there's a lot of confusion within government on what's allowed.  That's why you see certain agencies, like the CDC, well ahead of the rest of government when it comes to Web 2.0.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-09-11T13:37:51Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7222-comment:66460</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7222" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/government_20.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/government_20.php#c66460" />
    <title>Comment from Alex, aka SocialButterfly on 2008-09-11</title>
    <author>
        <name>Alex, aka SocialButterfly</name>
        <uri>http://www.fly4change.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.fly4change.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@Geoff and @Dating thank you 4 the kudos, and it will be a tougher road to travel, but the more we as individuals become comfortable and knowledge about the 2.0 space, the more we can transfer and aplpy that knowledge into our organizations. </p>

<p>@Joe I totally feel you and understand what you are saying. With web 2.0, in the private sector, at times, it's easier to adopt a learn-as-you-go attitude, and within government that can be tricky. However, AIDS.gov and EPA's blog Greenversations both launched their blogs with full transparency about learning as they go, and so far, I see them as successes. But, yes, you are correct in that there are more policies, regulations and concerns to take into consideration...which makes it especially harder for the smaller government agencies too.</p>

<p>What I think is important, as kudos to Geoff for the phrase, but that we remain teachable. Learning about the space can only lead to further understanding, application and growth. It's at least a starting ground. =)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-09-11T14:08:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7222-comment:66462</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7222" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/government_20.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/government_20.php#c66462" />
    <title>Comment from Lee on 2008-09-11</title>
    <author>
        <name>Lee</name>
        <uri>http://www.uk.music-jobs.com/blog</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.uk.music-jobs.com/blog">
        <![CDATA[<p>Yes, a great read there, and here's to hoping that people take note (and the red tape allows them to evolve) :)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-09-11T14:57:17Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7222-comment:66471</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7222" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/government_20.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/government_20.php#c66471" />
    <title>Comment from DaveMurr on 2008-09-11</title>
    <author>
        <name>DaveMurr</name>
        <uri>http://www.themurr.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.themurr.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>One thing to remember is that social media is not for EVERY organization.  Having worked in Higher Education - which has an umbilical chord attached to government - I can tell you that there is a lot of red tape and a lot of tradition that would need to be either 1) eliminated or 2) restructured in or for any social media outreach to be truly successful.</p>

<p>I don't see the Gov outright taking off w/ social media for the exact same reasons.  Though it would be interesting to see the Secretary of Defense Twitter something like: "Off to another meeting about military defense - then back to the white house for some Wii Sports Woot!!"</p>

<p>If we are talking new marketing and niche markets - then the small pockets within government that are utilizing social media are paving the way of change.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-09-11T17:41:49Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7222-comment:66472</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7222" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/government_20.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/government_20.php#c66472" />
    <title>Comment from Charlie on 2008-09-11</title>
    <author>
        <name>Charlie</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@DaveMurr</p>

<p>If the Secretary of Defense ever utters or writes the word "Woot", we are in big trouble. Not even "web 2.0" (ugh, when will that term cease?) will be able to help.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-09-11T18:46:53Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7222-comment:66473</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7222" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/government_20.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/government_20.php#c66473" />
    <title>Comment from Alex, aka SocialButterfly on 2008-09-11</title>
    <author>
        <name>Alex, aka SocialButterfly</name>
        <uri>http://www.fly4change.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.fly4change.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@Charlie I feel you on the overuse of Web 2.0, and prefer more specific identifiers like social media. I've found that web 2.0 is often used to gain attention (as I shamelessly used in my title) and buzz. However, as I also stated --> We have to get beyond the buzz.</p>

<p>@DaveMurr You bring up an interesting topic around the growing formation of niche communities. For example, NING is very innovative, but I've found it most successful for very niche groups. Like those who all attended a conference together, or those driven there by their local non-profit. If you think in TV terms, the MySpaces and Facebooks are broadcast, and the niche social communities and applications forming are the cable.  </p>

<p>Also, I agree that social media is not the panacea. And, I want to be careful to box all of government into a yay or nay on the social media topic as the breadth of social media is a never-ending tunnel that's growing every day. So, the more we learn about the space, the more we may find a variety of applications. But, yes, every situation is different and should be analyzed as such. </p>

<p>However, simple applications, like Awaymail for example, may make a director or manager's daily job much more breatheable and efficient whether its government or not. We just have to simply learn about these new tools, before we cast the mallet. Thus, this series. =)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-09-11T19:05:35Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7222-comment:66475</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7222" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/government_20.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/government_20.php#c66475" />
    <title>Comment from Andre Blackman on 2008-09-11</title>
    <author>
        <name>Andre Blackman</name>
        <uri>http://www.pulseandsignal.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.pulseandsignal.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Great work here Alex! I would especially like to agree with Joe in regards to well meaning people in the gov't having to go through alot of red tape in order to move things along. It is indeed alot easier for individuals and non govt entities to integrate social media practices into their work because of agility to change.</p>

<p>I'm glad to see the CDC taking the reins and producing these materials. The second point about Learning is important in that regard because many govt institutes have been seen as the authority on issues (and in many instances they are) - so the willingness to learn about new ideas and features that are helpful is very important.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-09-11T19:41:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7222-comment:66479</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7222" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/government_20.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/government_20.php#c66479" />
    <title>Comment from Robert on 2008-09-11</title>
    <author>
        <name>Robert</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I agree with everyone here, eventually the government will get into the web 2.0, just might take a while. Great article Alex.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-09-11T21:34:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7222-comment:66571</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7222" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/government_20.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/government_20.php#c66571" />
    <title>Comment from Jeffrey Levy on 2008-09-12</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jeffrey Levy</name>
        <uri>http://blog.epa.gov</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.epa.gov">
        <![CDATA[<p>Darn tootin'!  Nice article, Alex. :)</p>

<p>Gov't will get there despite Joe's very accurate points about obstacles.  It's just taking time.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-09-13T04:05:34Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7222-comment:66573</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7222" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/government_20.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/government_20.php#c66573" />
    <title>Comment from Jeffrey Levy on 2008-09-12</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jeffrey Levy</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Hey, another thought, in line with "Let Go."  Can you suggest some places we forward-thinking gov't-types could contact to ask about guest blogging?  Like, say, RWW? :)  Please send me a note!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-09-13T04:07:39Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7222-comment:67112</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.7222" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/government_20.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/government_20.php#c67112" />
    <title>Comment from Alex, aka SocialButterfly on 2008-09-18</title>
    <author>
        <name>Alex, aka SocialButterfly</name>
        <uri>http://www.fly4change.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.fly4change.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the great question Jeffrey, and I'm glad that my email helped. As I told Jeffrey, with guest blogging, it completely depends on yuor agency's niche area of content and focus. Alltop.com is a great resource to quickly find blogs in your content area, however. If you'd like to discuss further, I am reachable at arampy@gmail.com.</p>

<p>Thank you!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-09-18T21:10:51Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>