<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flock_to_developers_were_using_firefox_addons_now.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2009:/1/tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.12185-</id>
  <updated>2009-10-30T13:20:53Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Flock To Developers: We&apos;re Using Firefox Add-Ons Now</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.23-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.12185</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flock_to_developers_were_using_firefox_addons_now.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=12185" title="Flock To Developers: We're Using Firefox Add-Ons Now" />
    <published>2008-10-16T14:24:20Z</published>
    <updated>2008-10-16T14:36:17Z</updated>
    <title>Flock To Developers: We&apos;re Using Firefox Add-Ons Now</title>
    <summary>On Tuesday, Flock revealed the new version of their social browser, Flock 2.0. At the time, the company made a point to mention that most Firefox extensions would work in their browser, too, including one of our favorites, Greasemonkey. However, yesterday, Flock Community Ambassador Evan Hamilton sent out an email to all Flock developers about...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Sarah Perez</name>
      <uri>http://www.sarahintampa.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Products" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/flock_logo_2008.png">On Tuesday, <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flock_20_launches_adds_myspace.php">Flock revealed the new version of their social browser</a>, <a href="http://www.flock.com">Flock 2.0</a>. At the time, the company made a point to mention that most Firefox extensions would work in their browser, too, including one of our favorites, Greasemonkey. However, yesterday, Flock Community Ambassador Evan Hamilton sent out an email to all Flock developers about some changes the company had decided to make. The email made it clear that Flock had not just decided to support Firefox add-ons, they were killing all the Flock-specific add-ons, too.</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[

<u><p>According to Evan's email:</p></u>

<blockquote>
  <p><a href="http://Extensions.flock.com">Extensions.flock.com</a> has had a bumpy history. There's a fundamental issue here: there are very few Flock-specific extensions, and a great many Firefox extensions that are already hosted on <a href="http://addons.mozilla.org">addons.mozilla.org</a>. The architecture behind <a href="http://extensions.flock.com">extensions.flock.com</a> is not mature, and we have historically been unable to devote valuable developer resources to this.&#160; It's unrealistic (and doesn't make a lot of sense) to try to create our own system on the level of <a href="http://addons.mozilla.org">addons.mozilla.org</a> until we have more Flock-specific extensions. Our admiration for the work Mozilla has done extends to addons.mozilla.org...AMO really is the best experience for getting extensions. <strong>With that in mind, we have cut the fat that is our unwieldy extensions system.</strong></p>
</blockquote>

<h2>Sorry Developers, We Took Down Your Flock Extensions </h2>

<p>The email goes on to inform the developers that the company had removed all the extensions from the site that are not Flock-specific - that is, any extensions that take advantage of some unique feature within the Flock browser itself. In addition, the Drupal back-end from <a href="http://extensions.flock.com">extensions.flock.com</a> has been removed which means no more comments or ratings on posts and no more automatic submission system. Any developer wanting to submit an extension going forward will need to email <strong>extension-submission@flock.com</strong> instead.</p>

<p>For visitors to the Flock web site, the new extensions page will point them directly to <a href="http://addons.mozilla.org">addons.mozilla.org</a>. </p>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/flock_extensions.png">

<p>According to Flock, the changes will allow the company to move forward focusing only on Flock-specific extensions, and finally, themes. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flock_20_launches_adds_myspace.php">As we noted earlier</a>, customization is an important aspect to the browser experience. Something as simple as being able to skin Flock could make the transition easier for those making the switch. </p>

<h2>Flock's Real Message: We're Just A Version Of Firefox</h2>

<p>We think Flock's decision to separate their extensions from Firefox's extensions is a good one. Although their email promoted the idea that this just freed up time for Flock to focus on other aspects of their project, that's probably not the whole story here. </p>

<p>Flock wants to appeal to the social media crowd, a group that typically includes a large number of Firefox users. But in the past, Flock had set themselves too far apart from the Firefox community and gave off the impression they were really an <em>alternative</em> browser. Now that Flock has upgraded to the Firefox 3 codebase and lets you use nearly all the Firefox extensions, the message they're sending is that they aren't that different after all, they're just a version of Firefox 3 with nifty social features. In other words, you get the best of both worlds: Firefox 3 and social media integration.</p>

<p>Will this change in direction work and help Flock pick up some steam? It's possible. If you can move to a new browser which works like your old one and take all your extensions with you, the experience is much less painful. Now all they need is some sort of extension import wizard and we'll be all set. </p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.12185-comment:114138</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.12185" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flock_to_developers_were_using_firefox_addons_now.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flock_to_developers_were_using_firefox_addons_now.php#c114138" />
    <title>Comment from diatribe on 2008-10-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>diatribe</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>wow...flock is still around, did not know that.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-10-16T17:39:02Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.12185-comment:114199</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.12185" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flock_to_developers_were_using_firefox_addons_now.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flock_to_developers_were_using_firefox_addons_now.php#c114199" />
    <title>Comment from Josh on 2008-10-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>Josh</name>
        <uri>http://extendably.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://extendably.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Good point...</p>

<p>It was a mistake from the start to promote Flock as 'the browser for social media junkies' etc because really, who wants to identify themselves like that?</p>

<p>It's better to think of Flock as an innovative browser which provides a whole lot of great features built right in. It's much more stable than if you did this yourself just with extensions for FF...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-10-17T04:51:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.12185-comment:114209</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.12185" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flock_to_developers_were_using_firefox_addons_now.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flock_to_developers_were_using_firefox_addons_now.php#c114209" />
    <title>Comment from Avatar on 2008-10-16</title>
    <author>
        <name>Avatar</name>
        <uri>http://Widgetslab.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://Widgetslab.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>ugh... i have said it before and will say it again. i like flock 2.0. i loved version 1.0 but they really don`t have a clue on how to run things. really sad.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-10-17T06:49:15Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.12185-comment:114211</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.12185" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flock_to_developers_were_using_firefox_addons_now.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flock_to_developers_were_using_firefox_addons_now.php#c114211" />
    <title>Comment from D on 2008-10-17</title>
    <author>
        <name>D</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Umm....Could this possibly just be Flock downsizing in the face of a worsening Credit and economic market?  Only makes sense.  It will definitely lower there costs, and just like every Venture capatilist and firm has said, downsize and batten the hatches; this one's going to be a rough size.  They said it themsevles:</p>

<p>With that in mind, we have cut the fat that is our unwieldy extensions system.</p>

<p>I wonder how RWW didn't pick up on that.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-10-17T07:06:02Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.12185-comment:114212</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.12185" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flock_to_developers_were_using_firefox_addons_now.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flock_to_developers_were_using_firefox_addons_now.php#c114212" />
    <title>Comment from D on 2008-10-17</title>
    <author>
        <name>D</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Ugh...sorry on the innumerable spelling and grammar mistakes in that last post.  It's just a bit late here.  </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-10-17T07:08:58Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.12185-comment:114226</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.12185" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flock_to_developers_were_using_firefox_addons_now.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flock_to_developers_were_using_firefox_addons_now.php#c114226" />
    <title>Comment from Luca on 2008-10-17</title>
    <author>
        <name>Luca</name>
        <uri>http://www.lucafiligheddu.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.lucafiligheddu.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Firefox3, with heavy usage, hits 700MB on my Macbook. Flock was almost unusable last time I tried it. I don't want to change my computer just to use a browser, sorry. I currently use WebKit or Opera, another experience and performances.<br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-10-17T09:08:21Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>