<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_31_addon_developers.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2009:/1/tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.12536-</id>
  <updated>2009-10-30T13:11:29Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Mozilla Asks Add-On Developers to Prepare For Firefox 3.1</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.23-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.12536</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_31_addon_developers.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=12536" title="Mozilla Asks Add-On Developers to Prepare For Firefox 3.1" />
    <published>2008-11-13T22:53:28Z</published>
    <updated>2008-11-13T23:28:14Z</updated>
    <title>Mozilla Asks Add-On Developers to Prepare For Firefox 3.1</title>
    <summary>Mozilla has cultivated one of the most interesting and healthiest ecosystems for extension developers around its popular Firefox browser. The problems with this, of course, is that whenever Mozilla releases a new version of Firefox, developers have to make sure that their software is compatible. For the next release of its browser, Mozilla aims to...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Frederic Lardinois</name>
      
    </author>
    
    <category term="Browsers" />
    
    <category term="News" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img alt="firefox_logo_nov08.jpg" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/firefox_logo_nov08.jpg" /><a href="http://www.mozilla.org/">Mozilla</a> has cultivated one of the most interesting and healthiest <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/">ecosystems</a> for extension developers around its popular Firefox browser. The problems with this, of course, is that whenever Mozilla releases a new version of Firefox, developers have to make sure that their software is compatible. For the next release of its browser, Mozilla aims to make sure that 90% of those add-ons that make up the top 95% of add-on usage will be compatible with the latest version of Firefox. The release of Firefox 3.1 is still a while off, but currently only 28% of the top extensions are ready for the transition.</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<h2>Long Tail</h2>

<p>According to <a href="http://blog.mozilla.com/addons/2008/10/29/firefox-31-add-on-compatibility-tracking/">Mozilla's Justin Scott</a>, 861 add-ons make up 95% of the total usage, while the other 5% are distributed among close to 5000 add-ons. 94% of the top add-ons are currently compatible with Firefox 3.0. </p>

<p>According to Mozilla's <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/compatibility/report">compatibility dashboard</a>, as of today, only about <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/compatibility">28%</a> of the top 861 extensions are compatible with the latest builds of Firefox 3.1.</p>

<h2>Getting to 95%</h2>

<p><img alt="mozilla_addon_usage.png" align="right" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/mozilla_addon_usage.png"  />Currently, Mozilla's evangelism team is trying to <a href="http://blog.mozilla.com/addons/2008/11/10/identifying-migration-issues-between-firefox-30-and-31/">reach out</a> to all Firefox developers to make sure that everybody is ready by the time Firefox 3.1 is released. The release date for Firefox 3.1 is currently a moving target, but the second beta version should be available to the public by the <a href="http://news.softpedia.com/news/Firefox-3-1-Beta-2-Release-Blocked-by-17-Bugs-97664.shtml">end of this month</a>, which might be followed by a third beta before the final version is released. </p>

<p>Some extensions, of course, are abandoned by their developers over time, so it might not be possible for Mozilla to get to the 95% mark for Firefox 3.1, but given the importance of Firefox and the <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_add-ons_recommended.php">extension ecosystem</a> around it, it is good to see them reach out to developers proactively. For developers, getting ready for 3.1 should also be a priority, as Firefox users tend to <a href="http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2008/06/27/firefox-3-already-rules-the-roost/">update their browser very quickly</a> after a new version is released.</p>

<p>For more information about the transition to Firefox 3.1 for extension developers, have a look at Mozilla's '<a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/compatibility">Add-on Compatability Center</a>,' which will soon also feature additional tools for developers.</p>

<p><img alt="firefox_addon_compatibility.png" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/firefox_addon_compatibility.png"  /></p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.12536-comment:116813</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.12536" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_31_addon_developers.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_31_addon_developers.php#c116813" />
    <title>Comment from venkat on 2008-11-13</title>
    <author>
        <name>venkat</name>
        <uri>http://computersservicing.blogspot.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://computersservicing.blogspot.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>yes this is irritating even Firefox says even beta versions also can't support installed add-ons with Firefox3.Developers make sure that all add-ons are compatible with Firefox3.1 and start working for users when Firefox3.1 installed without any problems.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-11-14T06:17:51Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.12536-comment:116853</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.12536" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_31_addon_developers.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_31_addon_developers.php#c116853" />
    <title>Comment from Diamonds on 2008-11-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>Diamonds</name>
        <uri>http://www.diamondonnet.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.diamondonnet.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Last update broke Ubiquity, some sort of memory leak that made the browser so slow.  I had to uninstall the plug-in,  these updates surely discourages a lot of plug-in installation.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-11-14T17:38:12Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.12536-comment:116891</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.12536" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_31_addon_developers.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_31_addon_developers.php#c116891" />
    <title>Comment from srw on 2008-11-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>srw</name>
        <uri>http://www.nektra.com/oss/firefox/extensions/cookiepie/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.nektra.com/oss/firefox/extensions/cookiepie/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I would rather say: Please... Mozilla build developer tools to build extension (you know eclipse plugin system?), building extensions requires a lot of personal energy because the platform is a bulk of xml,xul,rdf and in the 21st century we need tools.</p>

<p>Look at the source of tab mix plus, and see how the developer needs to spend a lot of time to make his extension compatible to everything!</p>

<p>I think the Mozilla guys are the lazy here.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-11-15T01:18:56Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.12536-comment:116988</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.12536" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_31_addon_developers.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_31_addon_developers.php#c116988" />
    <title>Comment from brutuscat on 2008-11-17</title>
    <author>
        <name>brutuscat</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Yes! Build tools please!!!! </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-11-17T14:39:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.12536-comment:117244</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.12536" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_31_addon_developers.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_31_addon_developers.php#c117244" />
    <title>Comment from Priyanka Shitole on 2008-11-19</title>
    <author>
        <name>Priyanka Shitole</name>
        <uri>http://www.shelko.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.shelko.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Well, I would also like to add on specific that, Firefox 3 and newer versions need to get compatible with the Password Bank and Vista. There are cases where Firefox 3 and updates, crash on vista. And the new updates do not take the information from the Password Bank. Firefox needs to take note of this. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-11-19T16:26:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.12536-comment:117282</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2008://1.12536" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_31_addon_developers.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/firefox_31_addon_developers.php#c117282" />
    <title>Comment from Mac @ Motorcycle Fairings on 2008-11-19</title>
    <author>
        <name>Mac @ Motorcycle Fairings</name>
        <uri>http://www.motorcycle-fairing.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.motorcycle-fairing.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I cannot wait to see the new update of FireFox. Currently using the 3.0.4 is a great experience so 3.1 hope would be greater!</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2008-11-19T22:04:52Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>