<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_tests_preferred_sites.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2011:/1/tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13435-</id>
  <updated>2011-08-16T17:53:42Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Roll Your Own Google: Customize Your Search Results With &apos;Preferred Sites&apos;</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.35-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13435</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_tests_preferred_sites.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=13435" title="Roll Your Own Google: Customize Your Search Results With 'Preferred Sites'" />
    <published>2009-01-19T18:57:00Z</published>
    <updated>2009-01-19T20:49:54Z</updated>
    <title>Roll Your Own Google: Customize Your Search Results With &apos;Preferred Sites&apos;</title>
    <summary>Alex Chitu from the Google Operating System has found a new experimental feature for Google Search: preferred sites. Thanks to this, you may soon be able to tell Google about your favorite sites and have them appear more often in your search results. If you like to get your movie data from the IMDB, for...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Frederic Lardinois</name>
      
    </author>
    
    <category term="Google" />
    
    <category term="NYT" />
    
    <category term="News" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img alt="google_dec_08.jpg" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/google_dec_08.jpg"  />Alex Chitu from the <a href="http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2009/01/google-preferred-sites.html">Google Operating System</a> has found a new experimental feature for Google Search: <a href="http://www.google.com/support/websearch/bin/answer.py?answer=118281">preferred sites</a>. Thanks to this, you may soon be able to tell Google about your favorite sites and have them appear more often in your search results. If you like to get your movie data from the <a href="http://imdb.com">IMDB</a>, for example, you can tell Google to prefer this site over other movie review services. This feature would also be very useful if you want Google to prefer results from your local newspaper over stories from national papers, or if you want to see product reviews from specific sites.</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>As it is typical for these experiments from Google, this new feature is only slowly being rolled out and it is not clear if this will become part of Google's standard feature set for Google Search yet. If you want to see if it is available for your account, click on the 'Preferences' link next to the search box on Google Search. </p>

<p><img alt="google_preferred_sites.png" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/google_preferred_sites.png" /></p>

<h2>Custom Search Engines for the Masses</h2>

<p>It is worth noting, too, that Google has started to make more changes to its core search product lately, with a clear focus on customization. <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/searchwiki_google_experiments.php">SearchWiki</a>, which lets users re-organize search results, already represented a major change to Google's approach to search. The 'preferred sites' feature, when and if it is rolled out to all users, will give users another option to customize their search results. In some ways, this new feature will bring Google's relatively unknown <a href="http://www.google.com/coop/cse/">Custom Search Engines</a> to the majority of Google's users.</p>

<p>As Ed Oswald <a href="http://technologizer.com/2009/01/19/google-to-give-preferred-sites-prominence-in-results/">notes</a>, it will be interesting to see if Google will use this data in some form or another to tweak its regular search results. However, given that Google isn't typically very open about sharing this information, we don't expect to hear from them anytime soon.</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13435-comment:123634</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13435" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_tests_preferred_sites.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_tests_preferred_sites.php#c123634" />
    <title>Comment from Bill on 2009-01-19</title>
    <author>
        <name>Bill</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>You're kidding yourself if you think Google is not going to use their SearchWiki data to refine results. It's in their best interest and ours to do so. Human powered search is the future.</p>

<p>I'm willing to bet they already have an alpha platform inside the company that feeds off the SearchWiki data. Once it's refined enough, I can see them releasing it to the masses.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-19T22:10:49Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13435-comment:123633</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13435" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_tests_preferred_sites.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_tests_preferred_sites.php#c123633" />
    <title>Comment from Michael on 2009-01-19</title>
    <author>
        <name>Michael</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I like it and undoubtedly will use it, but I also find it a bit pathetic at the same time. They could easily implement this feature in an automatic fashion for users with enough search history, yet they understand that users would prefer to pretend that Google doesn't really know them so well. How sad that we choose to indulge in such charades.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-19T21:43:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13435-comment:123629</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13435" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_tests_preferred_sites.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_tests_preferred_sites.php#c123629" />
    <title>Comment from Ray Scott on 2009-01-19</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ray Scott</name>
        <uri>http://www.alienspaces.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.alienspaces.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Google's Custom Search Engines totally rock. I use the one's I've build constantly. It's a great way to isolate an area of the web.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-19T20:11:40Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>
