<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_next_android_smartphone.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2011:/1/tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13442-</id>
  <updated>2011-08-16T17:53:41Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for The Next Android Smartphone</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.35-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13442</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_next_android_smartphone.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=13442" title="The Next Android Smartphone" />
    <published>2009-01-20T14:04:08Z</published>
    <updated>2009-01-20T14:31:32Z</updated>
    <title>The Next Android Smartphone</title>
    <summary>Here in the U.S., your choices in phones running Google&apos;s new Android operating system have been limited. If you weren&apos;t a fan of the T-Mobile G1 form factor - a design best for heavy texters thanks to its slide-out keyboard - you were pretty much out of luck. No more. Word has it that Samsung...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Sarah Perez</name>
      
    </author>
    
    <category term="Google" />
    
    <category term="Mobile" />
    
    <category term="NYT" />
    
    <category term="Product Reviews" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/samsung-instinct-android_phone.gif">Here in the U.S., your choices in phones running Google's new Android operating system have been limited. If you weren't a fan of the T-Mobile G1 form factor - a design best for heavy texters thanks to its slide-out keyboard - you were pretty much out of luck. No more. Word has it that Samsung will soon be releasing their own Android smartphone for use on both the T-Mobile and Sprint carriers. </p>]]>
      <![CDATA[

<p>According to <a href="http://www.techradar.com/news/phone-and-communications/samsung-speeds-up-plans-for-android-phone-501860">TechRadar</a>, a company representative for Samsung confirmed that they will be speeding up the development of their own version of an Android-powered device in order to stay competitive in the mobile phone market. The phone will debut sometime in 2009 and will be available for T-Mobile and Sprint customers. </p>

<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/androidlogo2.jpg" align="right"> Beyond that, everything else about the news appears to be speculation, including the phone's supposed <a href="http://www.htlounge.net/article/7236/june-of-2009-brings-google-android-samsung-phone/">June 2009 launch date</a>. However, we're inclined to believe the rumor about the phone's form factor (or perhaps we just want to believe it). Some sources report that the new phone will resemble the <a href="http://samsungmobileusa.com/Instinct.aspx?cid=ppc_mac_goo_Past+Iconic_Instinct_samsung+instinct">Samsung Instinct</a>, a currently popular touchscreen phone that features Power Vision Services, Sprint's over-the-air TV offering. Other rumors point to the phone being a closer match to the <a href="http://samsungmobileusa.com/Omnia.aspx?cid=ppc_mac_goo_Omnia_General_omnia+phones">Omnia</a>, a phone initially made available in Asia and Europe, and is now with Verizon. Either way, the rumors point to the device being a touchscreen with no slide-out keyboard. </p>

<p>That seems plausible enough to us since the keyboard-equipped G1 is already already available on T-Mobile, one of the carriers which would sell the new Samsung device. The company probably wouldn't want to launch a phone that was too similar to the other Android phone. It's also likely that they would want to capitalize on the success of their previous models, too. </p>

<p>If any of the rumors are true, there's a good chance that the new phone will be introduced at next month's <a href="http://www.mobileworldcongress.com">Mobile World Congress</a>, the world's largest exhibition for the mobile industry, held in Barcelona. Until then, we'll just have to cross our fingers and wait. </p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13442-comment:123796</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13442" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_next_android_smartphone.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_next_android_smartphone.php#c123796" />
    <title>Comment from Corvida on 2009-01-20</title>
    <author>
        <name>Corvida</name>
        <uri>http://friendfeed.com/corvida</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://friendfeed.com/corvida">
        <![CDATA[<p>"Word has it that Samsung will soon be releasing their own Android smartphone for use on both the T-Mobile and Sprint carriers. "</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-20T21:51:44Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13442-comment:123784</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13442" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_next_android_smartphone.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_next_android_smartphone.php#c123784" />
    <title>Comment from Todd on 2009-01-20</title>
    <author>
        <name>Todd</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@Lance Sadly The Death Star...err, I mean At&T has already gone on record stating they will never, ever adopt Android as an OS because it makes it impossible for them to enforce their "business rules". Read what you may into that. We had a field day with this one over at Engadget, with the language in comments is probably "not safe for work" as they say:</p>

<p><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/06/not-so-fast-android-isnt-coming-to-atandt-just-yet/comments/15374386/" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/2008/11/06/not-so-fast-android-isnt-coming-to-atandt-just-yet/comments/15374386/</a></p>

<p>@Thomas Whitney</p>

<p>Android is a very secure OS since it doesn't have any legacy code, like zero, so exploits are limited. No OS is impervious to attack, but Android's browser, Chrome, does not provide externals sources with low level access to the core components ( Unlike IE/Windows! ).</p>

<p>I encourage you to participate in the security practices for Android. Express your concerns and contribute over at the message board:</p>

<p><a href="http://code.google.com/android/devel/security.html" rel="nofollow">http://code.google.com/android/devel/security.html</a></p>

<p><br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-20T21:40:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13442-comment:123749</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13442" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_next_android_smartphone.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_next_android_smartphone.php#c123749" />
    <title>Comment from Thomas Whitney on 2009-01-20</title>
    <author>
        <name>Thomas Whitney</name>
        <uri>http://pixelvoice@yahoo.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://pixelvoice@yahoo.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Android phones are the wave of the future certainly.  But the only thing I find myself interested in is digital security.  Can the bells and whistles protect my assets and my identity?  That's the question.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-20T19:31:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13442-comment:123709</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13442" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_next_android_smartphone.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_next_android_smartphone.php#c123709" />
    <title>Comment from Lance on 2009-01-20</title>
    <author>
        <name>Lance</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>From what I hear I'm the only person satisfied with AT&T - but I wish they had an Android model coming out soon.  It's time for me to upgrade (part of a family plan), and I'm not willing to shell out for an iPhone.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-20T16:01:27Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13442-comment:123703</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13442" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_next_android_smartphone.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_next_android_smartphone.php#c123703" />
    <title>Comment from Sarah Perez on 2009-01-20</title>
    <author>
        <name>Sarah Perez</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>@Todd: Excellent! Thanks for sharing. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-20T15:16:27Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13442-comment:123700</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13442" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_next_android_smartphone.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/the_next_android_smartphone.php#c123700" />
    <title>Comment from Todd on 2009-01-20</title>
    <author>
        <name>Todd</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I believe cupcake's supported camera resolution matches that Samsung's, the virtual keyboard too, so it's more than speculation.</p>

<p>Cupcake build is here, compare it against the specs for that Samsung phone:</p>

<p><a href="http://source.android.com/roadmap/cupcake" rel="nofollow">http://source.android.com/roadmap/cupcake</a></p>

<p>Source code for cupcake is missing the radio stack, but dig deep, you may find a reference to "Sprint" way down in there.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-20T15:09:38Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>
