<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/tvcom_vs_hulu_round_one.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2009:/1/tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13325-</id>
  <updated>2009-10-30T13:01:03Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Can the New TV.com Challenge Hulu?</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.23-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13325</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/tvcom_vs_hulu_round_one.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=13325" title="Can the New TV.com Challenge Hulu?" />
    <published>2009-01-12T19:34:09Z</published>
    <updated>2009-01-12T20:35:51Z</updated>
    <title>Can the New TV.com Challenge Hulu?</title>
    <summary>CNet&apos;s TV.com used to be a relatively bland TV listings site with some additional content. Since CBS bought CNet last year, however, TV.com is slowly turning into a full-blown online video destination site that is starting to resemble Hulu. Today, CBS announced distribution deals with PBS, Sony, Showtime, MGM, and Endemol that will greatly expand...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Frederic Lardinois</name>
      
    </author>
    
    <category term="NYT" />
    
    <category term="News" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img alt="tvcom_logo_jan09.png" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/tvcom_logo_jan09.png"  />CNet's <a href="http://tv.com">TV.com</a> <a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20071013003015/http://www.tv.com/">used to be</a> a relatively bland TV listings site with some additional content. Since <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/cbs_buys_cnet.php">CBS bought CNet</a> last year, however, TV.com is slowly turning into a full-blown online video destination site that is starting to resemble <a href="http://hulu.com">Hulu</a>. Today, CBS announced <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/12/business/media/12cbs.html">distribution deals</a> with PBS, Sony, Showtime, MGM, and Endemol that will greatly expand TV.com's line-up of shows on the site. Thanks to this, it looks like TV.com might be able to challenge Hulu, though CBS is also clearly emphasizing a different set of features on its service.</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<h2>TV.com Emphasizes Social Experience</h2>

<p>In contrast to Hulu, TV.com is putting a lot of emphasis on the social networking features on its site, starting with a chat widget right on the homepage. CBS also puts more emphasis on letting viewers rate shows and makes these ratings a focus of its service.</p>

<p>At the same time, TV.com makes good use of the rich amount of data it has collected over the years. Every show comes with short <a href="http://www.tv.com/csi-miami/show/8460/cast.html">descriptions</a> of the show, <a href="http://www.tv.com/csi-miami/show/8460/reviews.html">reviews</a> from viewers, and a list of all the <a href="http://www.tv.com/csi-miami/show/8460/cast.html">cast members</a>, as well as blogs and forums for some shows. </p>

<p><img alt="tv_hulu_jan09.jpg" align="right" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/tv_hulu_jan09.jpg"  />Hulu, on the other hand, puts the shows front and center on its service and offers very little additional information. Also, while Hulu barely mentions broadcast TV on its site, TV.com put the prime-time schedule for the big networks on almost every page.</p>

<h2>TV.com Needs More Content</h2>

<p>If CBS manages to get more content on its service, then it could indeed challenge Hulu, which saw its <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/youtube_grows_but_loses_market_share.php">market share grow</a> rapidly last year. For now, however, the 'Watch Now' buttons on TV.com often only lead to short teasers for the shows and the links to 'Full Episode Videos' <a href="http://www.tv.com/greys-anatomy/show/24440/videos.html?category=full_episode">often</a> leads to pages fully devoid of full episodes.</p>

<p>For now, Hulu is clearly the better destination if you simply want to watch TV shows online. Hulu has fewer features than TV.com, but it also features more shows and makes getting to these shows easier than TV.com.</p>

<h2>Do TV Viewers Want to be Social?</h2>

<p>Another question, of course, is if most viewers are actually interested in all these social features. Watching TV, after all, is not exactly a social activity, though sites like <a href="http://www.televisionwithoutpity.com/index.php">Television Without Pity</a> have shown that there is a market for sites that cater to hardcore fans.</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13325-comment:122604</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13325" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/tvcom_vs_hulu_round_one.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/tvcom_vs_hulu_round_one.php#c122604" />
    <title>Comment from Bryan Bennett on 2009-01-12</title>
    <author>
        <name>Bryan Bennett</name>
        <uri>http://blog.tvloop.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.tvloop.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Nice post Frederic. I think TV.com is going the right route by taking a more social approach to video and TV content. While watching TV may not be the most social activity, discussing and interacting around TV content certainly is. Consumers are generally more than happy to discuss episodes, plot-lines, and characters of their favorite TV shows after the most recent episode airs. And we've found that shows no longer on the air like Friends and Seinfeld continue to have passionate fans that can't get enough show-related quizzes and trivia. The key is integrating the appropriate social features in the the right places across the product so that content can be shared with friends as part of the natural user experience. That's a big part of our product strategy with TVLoop.com and our Facebook apps.</p>

<p>Bryan Bennett<br />
Sr. Director of Marketing<br />
Watercooler</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-12T21:22:28Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13325-comment:122959</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13325" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/tvcom_vs_hulu_round_one.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/tvcom_vs_hulu_round_one.php#c122959" />
    <title>Comment from Bill on 2009-01-14</title>
    <author>
        <name>Bill</name>
        <uri>http://cinema.lycos.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://cinema.lycos.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Lycos Cinema has also taken a social approach to TV and movie watching - in fact you've been able to watch and chat simultaneously with fellow viewers there for a few years now.  Content runs more toward indie films and classic TV, e.g. newly added titles include Bonanza, Ozzie and Harriet, Dragnet. If you're looking for some edgy films or nostagic TV, it's a great option: <a href="http://cinema.lycos.com" rel="nofollow">http://cinema.lycos.com</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-01-14T18:28:14Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>