<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ben_goodger_on_google_chrome.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2011:/1/tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13934-</id>
  <updated>2011-08-16T17:42:55Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Ben Goodger on Google Chrome</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.35-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13934</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ben_goodger_on_google_chrome.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=13934" title="Ben Goodger on Google Chrome" />
    <published>2009-02-20T01:07:30Z</published>
    <updated>2009-02-20T01:12:27Z</updated>
    <title>Ben Goodger on Google Chrome</title>
    <summary><![CDATA[Ben Goodger, who leads the UI team of Google Chrome, presented today at the Webstock conference about browsers. He said that Google decided to build Chrome simply because &quot;browsers suck&quot;. Existing browsers were too slow (especially with javascript heavy apps), there are too many crashes, too easy to get pwned (security issues), and UIs were...]]></summary>
    <author>
      <name>Richard MacManus</name>
      <uri>http://www.readwriteweb.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    <category term="Browsers" />
    
    <category term="Webstock 2009" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/chromologo2.jpg" /><a href="http://www.bengoodger.com/">Ben Goodger</a>, who leads the UI team of <a href="http://www.google.com/chrome">Google Chrome</a>, presented today at the <a href="http://www.webstock.org.nz/">Webstock</a> conference about browsers. He said that Google decided to build Chrome simply because &quot;browsers suck&quot;. Existing browsers were too slow (especially with javascript heavy apps), there are too many crashes, too easy to get pwned (security issues), and UIs were becoming more and more bloated. He said that Google has a history of improving on browsers and creating add-ons - including contributing to Mozilla's Firefox, where Goodger used to work before Google. But Google wanted to re-architect the browser and do something more ambitious than current browsers, including Firefox. </p>
]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>One of Chrome's innovations is to isolate and &quot;pre-emptively multi-task&quot; applications, just like operating systems do. This provides high performance, stability and security. So Google created the feature which has perhaps been Chrome's distinguishing one so far - enabling tab processes to function independently, so if one tab crashes the rest stay operational. Plugins also have their own processes, so that too provides more stability. Goodger referred to this as a &quot;jail cell for web content&quot;, preventing people from exploiting security issues in the browser.</p>
<p>Google also found that this independence of processes resulted in less &quot;jank&quot;, which is Google's term for unresponsiveness in the browser. Google wanted Chrome to be the &quot;fastest and least janky browser around." 200 miliseconds is their baseline for performance in startup speed, page load time, javascript execution. Responsiveness matters, said Goodger. He said that the user must always be in control of their browsing experience. As a sidenote, Goodger mentioned that the latest version of Internet Explorer 8 also now has the separate processing for different tabs feature.</p>
<p>Goodger talked about the user interface that Chrome has, which he said is a bit different from other browsers. He said they &quot;stripped down the UI&quot; and focused on the mantra &quot;content not chrome&quot;, which he acknowledged was ironic given the browser's name. He showed the following video, from Japan, to illustrate this approach:</p>
<p><object width="480" height="295"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/SHZFsJKlsuA&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/SHZFsJKlsuA&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="295"></embed></object></p>
<p>There are obvious differences in the UI in Chrome, for example the lack of menu buttons. There are also other subtle differences, such as fewer &quot;attention-grabbing&quot; popups. Goodger also noted that Chrome has &quot;fewer options, better defaults&quot;. His rule is that &quot;options are never an excuse for bad design&quot;.</p>
<p>Goodger talked a little about Chrome's release cycle. Google uses channels to release versions of Chrome: stable, beta and dev (bleeding edge). Google aims to treat Chrome just like any web app, that releases early and often and in an automated method. So users get automated updates to the latest stable version, without having to manually update anything.</p>
<p>Finally Goodger reiterated that Google Chrome is open source, with community discussions happening at <a href="http://dev.chromium.org/">dev.chromium.org</a>.</p>
]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13934-comment:198995</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13934" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ben_goodger_on_google_chrome.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ben_goodger_on_google_chrome.php#c198995" />
    <title>Comment from diş beyazlatma on 2010-03-24</title>
    <author>
        <name>diş beyazlatma</name>
        <uri>http://www.disbeyazlatma.net</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.disbeyazlatma.net">
        <![CDATA[<p>I do see differences in performance on ajax sites like Yahoo mail, versus Gmail. And I'm missing functionality of RSS integration but looking forward to new integrated methods for that. ? whois you</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2010-03-24T13:42:05Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13934-comment:192093</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13934" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ben_goodger_on_google_chrome.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ben_goodger_on_google_chrome.php#c192093" />
    <title>Comment from köpek on 2010-02-22</title>
    <author>
        <name>köpek</name>
        <uri>http://www.kulube.net</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.kulube.net">
        <![CDATA[<p> deployed platform doesn't suck? thank you for posted</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2010-02-22T21:07:23Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13934-comment:129968</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13934" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ben_goodger_on_google_chrome.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ben_goodger_on_google_chrome.php#c129968" />
    <title>Comment from söve on 2009-03-15</title>
    <author>
        <name>söve</name>
        <uri>http://www.sove.name</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.sove.name">
        <![CDATA[<p>It is also true that many enterprise solutions are programmed using </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-15T15:01:11Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13934-comment:127616</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13934" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ben_goodger_on_google_chrome.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ben_goodger_on_google_chrome.php#c127616" />
    <title>Comment from Lee Drake on 2009-02-23</title>
    <author>
        <name>Lee Drake</name>
        <uri>http://entrepreneur-blog.os-cubed.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://entrepreneur-blog.os-cubed.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Until Chrome can be corporately managed, and "incognito mode" can be turned off by policy you will not see heavy adoption into corporately managed webs.  On the contrary you may see it placed on IT hit lists because it enables users to get around logging and tracking capabilities.  Since it can all be run from a flash drive, with no installation required - it is even more dangerous.</p>

<p>It's a fine personal browser.  I use it myself sometimes.  But it fails in the corporate world.  IE, despite it's flaws, is very well integrated into the corporate security infrastructure, so necessary to properly managing today's browsers.</p>

<p>And from a security point of view it's really no more secure than firefox, or any of the other browsers out there.  There have been just as many security releases for chrome, they're just "distributed silently" via an update process that is not controllable (another corporate no-no) so they're not as visible.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-02-23T19:15:07Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13934-comment:127539</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13934" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ben_goodger_on_google_chrome.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ben_goodger_on_google_chrome.php#c127539" />
    <title>Comment from Eric Portelance on 2009-02-22</title>
    <author>
        <name>Eric Portelance</name>
        <uri>http://www.ericportelance.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.ericportelance.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Does anyone else find some of these comments Goodger made on "other browsers" ironic, given that he used to be the Lead Developer on Firefox?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-02-22T22:53:32Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13934-comment:127446</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13934" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ben_goodger_on_google_chrome.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ben_goodger_on_google_chrome.php#c127446" />
    <title>Comment from Cole Jolley on 2009-02-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>Cole Jolley</name>
        <uri>http://colemanjolley.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://colemanjolley.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>To date, I'm very impressed with the speed and the stability. So much so that I have switched it to become my default browser and, much to my surprise, I rarely find compatibility issues on sites anymore. </p>

<p>I do see differences in performance on ajax sites like Yahoo mail, versus Gmail. And I'm missing functionality of RSS integration but looking forward to new integrated methods for that. </p>

<p>Sadly, the majority of consumer level experience comes from IE 7 or earlier and it isn't a pleasant task to have to go through testing phases with that technology. It is also true that many enterprise solutions are programmed using .NET code due to the developer base and require IE to even work. For those environments, Chrome should build out emulation otherwise it will always be relegated to peripheral browsing.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-02-21T12:33:14Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13934-comment:127445</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13934" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ben_goodger_on_google_chrome.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ben_goodger_on_google_chrome.php#c127445" />
    <title>Comment from Mike Krus on 2009-02-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>Mike Krus</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>I particularly appreciate the care that was put into the behavior of the tab bar (in particular the order of the tabs, the way they resize when closed, etc)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-02-21T11:57:27Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13934-comment:127418</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13934" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ben_goodger_on_google_chrome.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ben_goodger_on_google_chrome.php#c127418" />
    <title>Comment from Arekibo LTD on 2009-02-20</title>
    <author>
        <name>Arekibo LTD</name>
        <uri>http://www.arekibo.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.arekibo.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>With several browsers to support when developing websites, at what percentage of the market should or do the web design/development community have to support chrome (currently just under 4%).</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-02-20T22:59:49Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13934-comment:127346</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13934" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ben_goodger_on_google_chrome.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ben_goodger_on_google_chrome.php#c127346" />
    <title>Comment from Engago Team on 2009-02-20</title>
    <author>
        <name>Engago Team</name>
        <uri>http://www.LEADSExplorer.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.LEADSExplorer.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Thus the most deployed and used platforms ever (Browser) suck.<br />
Normally a widely used and deployed platform doesn't suck, else people wouldn't be using it.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-02-20T13:41:42Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>
