<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_eye-tracking.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2009:/1/tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13721-</id>
  <updated>2009-11-23T17:30:50Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for What Are You Looking At? Google Details Results of Eye Tracking Study</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.23-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13721</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_eye-tracking.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=13721" title="What Are You Looking At? Google Details Results of Eye Tracking Study" />
    <published>2009-02-06T20:51:01Z</published>
    <updated>2009-02-06T21:20:20Z</updated>
    <title>What Are You Looking At? Google Details Results of Eye Tracking Study</title>
    <summary>Google posted an update about its eye tracking usability studies today. Most of the results are not exactly groundbreaking. It is, for example, no surprise that most users only scan the first couple of search results. Indeed, most Google users don&apos;t seem to scan much further than the second result. There are, however, some interesting...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Frederic Lardinois</name>
      
    </author>
    
    <category term="Google" />
    
    <category term="News" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img alt="google_doodle_logo_feb09.png" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/google_doodle_logo_feb09.png"  />Google posted <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/02/eye-tracking-studies-more-than-meets.html">an update</a> about its <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eye_tracking">eye tracking </a>usability studies today. Most of the results are not exactly groundbreaking. It is, for example, no surprise that most users only scan the first couple of search results. Indeed, most Google users don't seem to scan much further than the second result. There are, however, some interesting nuggets of information in this post about how Google uses this data to study every aspect of its search results page.</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>More interestingly, though, is that Google was apparently concerned that adding thumbnails into the '<a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2007/05/universal-search-best-answer-is-still.html">universal search</a>' interface would distract users. According to Anne Aula and Kerry Rodden, the two user experience researchers at Google who wrote the post, thumbnails did not make a big difference for how users scanned their search results. Instead, it apparently made it easer for users to skip over results with thumbnails when these weren't relevant to their searches.</p>

<p><img alt="google_eye_tracking.png" align="right" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/google_eye_tracking.png"  />As Google also points out, scanning the search results page and deciding where to look at and what to click on seems to be an almost completely subconscious process.</p>

<p>Overall, users on Google's search page follow the familar F-shaped pattern that was also apparent in <a href="http://www.useit.com/alertbox/reading_pattern.html">earlier eye-tracking studies </a>.</p>

<h2>What About Google's Ads?</h2>

<p>Google's researchers don't mention advertising in this post at all. Neither the video, nor most of the images in the post include any advertising. Given how important these ads are for Google, we can only asume that Google regularly uses these studies to test how its users perceive the advertising on the search results pages.</p>

<p>Judging from the only <a href="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_7ZYqYi4xigk/SYx4IIZR5UI/AAAAAAAACUw/r4DXjZA8ZYo/s1600-h/4-bees.jpg">images</a> that show ads, most users only look at them after they have scanned through at least the first three or four search results. </p>

<p>Chances are that Google didn't want to give away too much of its secret sauce, though it would have been nice to see a bit more information about how users perceive and react to these ads.</p>

<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/w29DrEEsqT4&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/w29DrEEsqT4&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13721-comment:125741</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13721" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_eye-tracking.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_eye-tracking.php#c125741" />
    <title>Comment from Ian Camarillo on 2009-02-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ian Camarillo</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>my colleague and i were talking about this today at lunch. i didnt get to read everything but this would seem like a huge national defense tool, if it could be implemented secretly.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-02-06T21:48:58Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13721-comment:125744</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13721" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_eye-tracking.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_eye-tracking.php#c125744" />
    <title>Comment from Apres Ski on 2009-02-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Apres Ski</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Google never left the back pocket of the government. It was always there and is <em>still</em> there. We must be careful how we surf and that so called, <em>"private"</em> surfing isn't really showing them how we actually surf or collecting our data. Of course, they probably have been since Google started!</p>

<p>Let's be careful out there . . .</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-02-06T22:06:47Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13721-comment:125865</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13721" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_eye-tracking.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/google_eye-tracking.php#c125865" />
    <title>Comment from muhabbet on 2009-02-08</title>
    <author>
        <name>muhabbet</name>
        <uri>http://www.Muhabbetim.in</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.Muhabbetim.in">
        <![CDATA[<p>We must be careful how we surf and that so called, "private" surfing isn't really showing them how we actually surf or collecting our data <a href="http://www.mIRC18.Net" rel="nofollow">mIRC</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-02-08T15:25:30Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>