<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/miro_20_review.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2011:/1/tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13763-</id>
  <updated>2011-08-16T17:46:47Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Miro 2.0: What if Boxee and iTunes Had a Love Child?</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.35-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13763</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/miro_20_review.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=13763" title="Miro 2.0: What if Boxee and iTunes Had a Love Child?" />
    <published>2009-02-10T18:00:32Z</published>
    <updated>2009-02-10T18:13:20Z</updated>
    <title>Miro 2.0: What if Boxee and iTunes Had a Love Child?</title>
    <summary>The Participatory Culture Foundation just released version 2.0 of Miro, the open source online TV application formerly known as Democracy Player. Miro is a combination of a video and audio podcast player with a built-in bittorrent client. In this new version, Miro also adds rudimentary support for streaming video, though in that respect, it is...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Frederic Lardinois</name>
      
    </author>
    
    <category term="Product Reviews" />
    
    <category term="Video Services" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img alt="miro_logo_feb09.png" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/miro_logo_feb09.png"  />The <a href="http://participatoryculture.org/">Participatory Culture Foundation</a> just <a href="http://www.getmiro.com/blog/2009/02/miro-20-is-here/">released</a> <a href="http://www.getmiro.com/">version 2.0 of Miro</a>, the open source online TV application <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/democracy_player_reborn_as_miro.php">formerly</a> known as Democracy Player. Miro is a combination of a video and audio podcast player with a built-in bittorrent client. In this new version, Miro also adds rudimentary support for streaming video, though in that respect, it is clearly outclassed by Boxee. Besides the support for streaming video, the new version of Miro also features a more streamlined user interface, a better <a href="http://www.getmiro.com/blog/2009/02/just-launched-miro-guide-30/">programming guide</a>, and, maybe most importantly, significant performance upgrades.</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>The support for streaming video, however, feels half-baked. Unlike Boxee, Miro does not take the videos and displays them within its own interface - instead, it just loads up websites like Hulu.com in a browser inside the application. </p>

<p><img alt="miro_interface_big.jpg" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/miro_interface_big.jpg"  /></p>

<h2>Great Video Podcast Player</h2>

<p>The area where Miro excels is as a video podcast client. Thanks to the Miro Guide, adding video podcasts like Democracy Now or the Onion News Network is just a two click process. The Miro Guide, which is very well designed, now features over 6000 video podcasts. It is important to remember, though, that this content is bound to your desktop, as Miro doesn't feature any support for portable players.</p>

<h2>Too Much Competition</h2>

<p>We really like the idea and people behind Miro, but while the promotional video calls it the "best internet video application available," others like Vuze or Boxee are currently offering a wider range of features. Maybe the comparison with Boxee is not necessarily a fair one, though, but the current trend is also clearly towards a convergence between TV and the Internet, and Miro doesn't offer a Boxee-like solution for bringing this content to your living room. </p>

<p></p>
<center><embed src="http://blip.tv/play/t2Hr0lQA" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="550" height="397" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></center>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13763-comment:277235</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13763" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/miro_20_review.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/miro_20_review.php#c277235" />
    <title>Comment from Cris on 2010-11-27</title>
    <author>
        <name>Cris</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Miro Box: Internet video for the test of us.</p>

<p>There, I've given the product name and tag line.  Now maybe someone go make the Miro Box.  </p>

<p>Streaming video is not an option for marginal DSL connections.  Boxee Box does not even support progressive download.  If you go back, it starts to rebuffer again, i.e. there is no buffer to speak of. Absolutely worthless if you have a marginal broadband connection. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2010-11-27T17:23:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13763-comment:161713</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13763" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/miro_20_review.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/miro_20_review.php#c161713" />
    <title>Comment from d on 2009-10-08</title>
    <author>
        <name>d</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Miro is not Boxee and it shouldn't be thought of as such. Boxee is too clunky for what I want. I want a computer not just an embedded TV app. Miro achieves this to a far greater extent than boxee. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-10-08T14:14:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13763-comment:128698</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13763" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/miro_20_review.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/miro_20_review.php#c128698" />
    <title>Comment from söve on 2009-03-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>söve</name>
        <uri>http://www.sove.name</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.sove.name">
        <![CDATA[<p>It's a superior player. We love it and really support an alternative so well made.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-04T09:49:41Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13763-comment:126124</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13763" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/miro_20_review.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/miro_20_review.php#c126124" />
    <title>Comment from pwb on 2009-02-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>pwb</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Boxee would win if it pared down the interface and concentrated on internet video.</p>

<p>For the entrepreneurs: give away a Roku and stuff it with ad-supported TV like Hulu.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-02-11T00:46:53Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13763-comment:126104</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13763" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/miro_20_review.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/miro_20_review.php#c126104" />
    <title>Comment from Daniel Aharonoff on 2009-02-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>Daniel Aharonoff</name>
        <uri>http://broadscaler.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://broadscaler.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Looks like <a href="http://www.skejcast.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.skejcast.com</a> does all this already and then some. It can schedule playback of radio and video streams and supports about 10x more content then Miro.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-02-10T21:15:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13763-comment:126102</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13763" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/miro_20_review.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/miro_20_review.php#c126102" />
    <title>Comment from Nicholas Quixote on 2009-02-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>Nicholas Quixote</name>
        <uri>http://www.rabbitbites.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.rabbitbites.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>It's a superior player. We love it and really support an alternative so well made.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-02-10T20:38:02Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13763-comment:126096</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13763" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/miro_20_review.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/miro_20_review.php#c126096" />
    <title>Comment from Mark Schoneveld on 2009-02-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>Mark Schoneveld</name>
        <uri>http://poptent.net</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://poptent.net">
        <![CDATA[<p>I'm really surprised that Miro hasn't tried to take farther steps in bringing Internet content to TVs the way Boxee has.  I simply haven't used Miro because there are so many other options out there that fit my needs better.  The biggest step up they could make is, say, integrate with the Roku box or something.  My two cents...</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-02-10T19:09:25Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>
