<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/obamas_latest_pick_for_doj_is_riaa_lawyer.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:,2009:/1/tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13703-</id>
  <updated>2009-11-23T17:30:47Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Obama&apos;s Latest Pick for DOJ is RIAA Lawyer Who Killed Grokster and Sued Jammie Thomas</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.23-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13703</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/obamas_latest_pick_for_doj_is_riaa_lawyer.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=13703" title="Obama's Latest Pick for DOJ is RIAA Lawyer Who Killed Grokster and Sued Jammie Thomas" />
    <published>2009-02-05T20:27:31Z</published>
    <updated>2009-02-05T20:44:42Z</updated>
    <title>Obama&apos;s Latest Pick for DOJ is RIAA Lawyer Who Killed Grokster and Sued Jammie Thomas</title>
    <summary>Today, Donald B. Verrilli was appointed to the position of associate deputy attorney general by President Obama. While he is definitely not a household name, Verrilli was the lawyer who represented the music industry in the Grokster case in the U.S. Supreme Court. This appointment by itself wouldn&apos;t necessarily stand out, but the Obama administration...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Frederic Lardinois</name>
      
    </author>
    
    <category term="News" />
    
    <category term="Politics" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img alt="copyright_logo_jan09.png" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/copyright_logo_jan09.png"  />Today, Donald B. Verrilli was appointed to the position of  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Deputy_Attorney_General">associate deputy attorney general</a> by President Obama. While he is definitely not a household name, Verrilli was the lawyer who represented the music industry in the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grokster#The_history_of_the_case_in_the_U.S._courts">Grokster case</a> in the U.S. Supreme Court. This appointment by itself wouldn't necessarily stand out, but the Obama administration has now appointed a <a href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090105/1744183292.shtml">handful</a> of pro-copyright industry insiders to prominent positions in the Department of Justice, including <a href="http://change.gov/newsroom/entry/president-elect_obama_announces_key_department_of_justice_posts">Tom Perrelli</a>, who was one of the RIAA's top lawyers.</p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>As CNet <a href="http://tech.yahoo.com/news/cnet/20090205/tc_cnet/83011357831015738138">reports</a>, Verrilli, while working as a senior litigator for the Washington law firm <a href="http://www.jenner.com/people/bio.asp?id=180">Jenner &amp; Block</a>, also represented the entertainment industry in Viacom's <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/viacom_youtube_user_data.php">case</a> against Google's YouTube, and he represented the RIAA in its infamous <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/mistrial_in_thomas_riaa_case.php">case against Jammie Thomas</a>.</p>

<p><img alt="pirate_house.png" align="right" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/pirate_house.png" />This appointment of Verrilli rounds out a Department of Justice that is now stocked with pro-copyright, RIAA/MPAA lawyers. Neil MacBride, for example, another new associate deputy attorney general, once <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/technology/2009/01/software-piracy.html">led</a> the BSA's nopiracy.com <a href="http://www.bsa.org/country/News%20and%20Events/News%20Archives/en/2009/en-01152009-rewards.aspx">efforts</a>, a program that tried to get employees to blow the whistle about the use of illegal software in their businesses.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Obama-Stocking-DOJ-With-RIAA-Lawyers-100708">DSLReports</a> notes that Obama's own ethics rules would prohibit these appointees from directly working on copyright issues, as they previously represented the entertainment industry in these cases, but it is somewhat disconcerting that the Obama administration would pick so many industry insiders for these positions. We would have hoped that the administration had chosen a set of appointees with a more <a href="http://www.lessig.org/blog/">progressive </a>attitude towards copyright.</p>

<p><em>CC-licensed images courtesy of flickr users </em><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mikeblogs/3020966582/"><em>MikeBlogs</em></a> and <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jemsweb/38800916/">jemsweb</a><em>.</em></p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13703-comment:125599</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13703" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/obamas_latest_pick_for_doj_is_riaa_lawyer.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/obamas_latest_pick_for_doj_is_riaa_lawyer.php#c125599" />
    <title>Comment from Daniel J. Pritchett on 2009-02-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Daniel J. Pritchett</name>
        <uri>http://friendfeed.com/dpritchett</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://friendfeed.com/dpritchett">
        <![CDATA[<p>I see the phrase "pro-copyright" sprinkled throughout the article.  Is RWW against all copyrights?</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-02-05T21:00:16Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13703-comment:125600</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13703" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/obamas_latest_pick_for_doj_is_riaa_lawyer.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/obamas_latest_pick_for_doj_is_riaa_lawyer.php#c125600" />
    <title>Comment from Marshall Kirkpatrick on 2009-02-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Marshall Kirkpatrick</name>
        <uri>http://friendfeed.com/marshallk</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://friendfeed.com/marshallk">
        <![CDATA[<p>heh, not the ones at the bottom of our pages :)  fair question.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-02-05T21:00:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13703-comment:125601</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13703" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/obamas_latest_pick_for_doj_is_riaa_lawyer.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/obamas_latest_pick_for_doj_is_riaa_lawyer.php#c125601" />
    <title>Comment from Daniel J. Pritchett on 2009-02-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Daniel J. Pritchett</name>
        <uri>http://friendfeed.com/dpritchett</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://friendfeed.com/dpritchett">
        <![CDATA[<p>No big deal, Marshall.  The end of the article mentions a preference for people with progressive views on copyrights, so I think it sorts itself out in the end.  I have to admit I was confused at first though.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-02-05T21:06:28Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13703-comment:125604</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13703" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/obamas_latest_pick_for_doj_is_riaa_lawyer.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/obamas_latest_pick_for_doj_is_riaa_lawyer.php#c125604" />
    <title>Comment from stev on 2009-02-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>stev</name>
        <uri>http://www.csscody.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.csscody.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>DSLReports notes that Obama's own ethics rules would prohibit these appointees from directly working on copyright issues, as they previously represented the entertainment industry in these cases, but it is somewhat disconcerting that the Obama administration would pick so many industry insiders for these positions.</p>

<p>Thanks<br />
csscody.com</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-02-05T21:30:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13703-comment:125609</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13703" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/obamas_latest_pick_for_doj_is_riaa_lawyer.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/obamas_latest_pick_for_doj_is_riaa_lawyer.php#c125609" />
    <title>Comment from Tony on 2009-02-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Tony</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Lawyers have an obligation defend their clients based on the country's existing laws.  This is true even if these laws are poorly written.  Just because this lawyer participated in a case doesn't mean that he's against copyright reform.  As with most people in the tech industry, I think copyright laws need a major overhaul. But I don't know if it's right to blame a lawyer for trying to uphold laws that the legislative branch wrote, but I hear what you're saying in that he might be a bit too close to the industry.  </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-02-05T22:06:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13703-comment:125683</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13703" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/obamas_latest_pick_for_doj_is_riaa_lawyer.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/obamas_latest_pick_for_doj_is_riaa_lawyer.php#c125683" />
    <title>Comment from Jason on 2009-02-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jason</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Could this be a step forward in Copyright and Patent laws being reestablished? I can we can only wish.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-02-06T14:46:19Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13703-comment:125688</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13703" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/obamas_latest_pick_for_doj_is_riaa_lawyer.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/obamas_latest_pick_for_doj_is_riaa_lawyer.php#c125688" />
    <title>Comment from Jason Miller on 2009-02-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jason Miller</name>
        <uri>http://shutterb.org/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://shutterb.org/">
        <![CDATA[<p>It's easy to knock "pro-copyright" individuals, but your stance on the issue changes depending on which side of the copyright you are on. Personally, I think the last sentence is the most appropriate.<br />
- Jason</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-02-06T15:38:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13703-comment:125752</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13703" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/obamas_latest_pick_for_doj_is_riaa_lawyer.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/obamas_latest_pick_for_doj_is_riaa_lawyer.php#c125752" />
    <title>Comment from Mike King on 2009-02-06</title>
    <author>
        <name>Mike King</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Yet another appointee with a bias.  I thought he was going to pick qualified, fair people to these posts.  I wonder if this guy paid his taxes-;)  How many pirated movies & tunes does this guy have on his home PC?  I guess we should look the other way yet again since this is a magic lawyer that will help the MPAA & RIAA sue unemployed single parents for what their kids download.  Take three steps backward.  Maybe we should offer TARP money to hollywood.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-02-06T23:06:46Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13703-comment:126117</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.13703" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/obamas_latest_pick_for_doj_is_riaa_lawyer.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/obamas_latest_pick_for_doj_is_riaa_lawyer.php#c126117" />
    <title>Comment from Uddruthi on 2009-02-10</title>
    <author>
        <name>Uddruthi</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Michelle Obama's area of legal practice at Sidwell was...copyright law. Family legal connections, anyone? </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-02-10T23:28:14Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>