<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_wrong_with_facebook_when_strategy_fails_to_meet_execution.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2011:/1/tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14432-</id>
  <updated>2011-08-16T17:31:42Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for What&apos;s Wrong with Facebook? When Strategy Fails to Meet Execution</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.35-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14432</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_wrong_with_facebook_when_strategy_fails_to_meet_execution.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=14432" title="What's Wrong with Facebook? When Strategy Fails to Meet Execution" />
    <published>2009-03-31T17:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2009-03-31T21:28:59Z</updated>
    <title>What&apos;s Wrong with Facebook? When Strategy Fails to Meet Execution</title>
    <summary>Facebook: When Strategy Fails to Meet Execution</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Ravit Lichtenberg from Ustrategy.com</name>
      
    </author>
    
    <category term="Features" />
    
    <category term="Social Networks" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/facebook_logo_mar09.png" width="150" height="41" />Over the last few weeks, Facebook has been rolling out its latest redesign. Within days of the first changes, a polling application on Facebook showed that 94% of the 634,484 users who took the poll <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebooks_users_dont_like_change.php">hate the redesign</a>, and some 1.7 million users signed a petition to bring back the old design.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/authors/ravit.jpg" align="right" width="75" height="113" /><em><strong>Author:</strong> Ravit Lichtenberg is the founder and chief strategist at <a href="http://ustrategy.com/">Ustrategy.com</a> -- a boutique consultancy focusing on helping companies succeed. Ravit works with CEOs, marketing groups, and Social Media managers to craft customer-centric engagement strategies that result in higher customer value, stronger customer community, improved monetization, and higher profitability. Ravit authors a blog at <a href="http://www.ravitlichtenberg.com/">www.ravitlichtenberg.com</a>.</em></p>]]>
      <![CDATA[<p>Facebook <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/159703/">made more news</a> in recent weeks <font style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><script type="text/javascript">digg_url = 'http://digg.com/tech_news/What_s_Wrong_with_Facebook_Strategy_Fails_to_Meet_Execution';digg_bgcolor = '#ffffff';digg_skin = 'normal';</script><script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript"></script></font>when the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) announced it would file a formal complaint with the Federal Trade Commission over Facebook's updated privacy terms, which essentially make user information the property of Facebook and give it free reign to use it as it may.</p>

<p>By now Facebook should be accustomed to criticism. Despite having had a tremendous growth spurt, it seems to be on a trial-and-error journey, guided by an ever-changing map and an elusive destination. In a way, it acts like a child in transition to puberty, slow to catch up on change, impressed by its new-found power, and definitely not bothered by such nuisances as "planning" for its future. But in the end, by will or by force, it too will have to grow up. What can Facebook do to make the transition less painful? What will it take for Facebook to start thinking like the grown-up company it is becoming?</p>

<h2>Better to Have B-Level Strategy but A-Level Execution</h2>

<p>That's what <a href="https://www.bschool.nus.edu.sg/Departments/BussPolicy/cv/kulwant%20singh%202008%2008%2015.pdf">Kulwant Singh</a>, Dean of the National University of Singapore's Business School, told us each day when we entered his classroom. It's a pretty basic principle, but one of the toughest for companies to uphold.</p>

<p>Facebook is still a pretty simple business: it is an online platform that facilitates community-building and provides multiple methods and points of interaction for users to express themselves and connect and share with each other. Its strategies, then, should also be pretty simple and its execution near flawless. That hasn't been the case, however. Facebook has failed to demonstrate that it is truly able to monetize its platform, and it continues to invest in meaningless endeavors, such as the recent redesign. This is due not to a lack of vision or talent but rather to the mile-long canyon between Facebook's strategy and its ability to execute.</p>

<h2>Facebook's Strategy Simplified</h2>

<p>In a recent <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-9996796-93.html">interview</a>, Sheryl Sandberg, Facebook COO, said the company will be focusing on growing its community and on monetization. To add some clarity to an otherwise generic statement, we can say that Facebook's strategy most likely includes these three key goals:</p>

<ol>
<li><strong>Increase user base.</strong> Grow network effect even beyond the current 175 million user base.</li>

<li><strong>Increase wallet share.</strong> Leverage existing platform and find new ways to make money (e.g. applications, advertising, revenue share on partnerships, paid services).</li>

<li><strong>Maintain and grow leadership in social media/networks.</strong> Effectively compete with and beat other online media platforms and
tools on which users spend time and money, or form a partnership (like with Twitter) for a piece of the action.</p>
</ol>

<p>As with all strategic plans, each of these goals can be further broken down into multiple objectives, each of which has its own specific requirements. All that's left to do is execute them. But in Facebook's case, the flow from strategy to execution is disjointed, resulting in a very bad case of broken telephone. What should have been a relatively easy and flawless execution has turned into a terrible blunder that continues to put Facebook in the hot seat for not realizing its potential.</p>

<h2>Facebook Vision Realized</h2>

<p>While it may have started out as a project by a couple of passionate students, Facebook today, like most successful startups, is in the business of making money. Advancing this vision does not mean spending what must have been countless hours of team meetings to discuss the corner radius on the new profile chicklets. Nor does it mean risking getting sued for quietly attempting to <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebook_launches_bill_rights_reverts_terms.php">take over user data</a>. It's time to lay down some fundamental principles to help Facebook bridge strategy and execution:</p>

<ol>
<li><strong>Start thinking like the large company you are becoming.</strong> Instead of kneejerk responses to competition and internal whim, Facebook needs to set a long-term vision and work backwards, taking into consideration priorities, technological capabilities, and company as well as (most importantly) user needs. When a company knows what targets to keep its eyes on, it can choose one of many roads depending on the circumstances at the time.</li>

<li><strong>Choose an identity and stick with it.</strong> Is Facebook a fun startup, or a large successful company? Engineers and geeks, or business people? Is it about connecting or sharing information? The next couple of years are going to shape Facebook's identity and redefine its culture, focus, and value proposition. Planning ahead by testing a few ideas can be of tremendous help to reducing noise and confusion.</li>

<li><strong>Listen to your users.</strong> It's not just about blogs, notes, and user comments. Facebook should proactively seek to understand its growing base of user segments, their needs and desires, and their relationship to upcoming technologies and Facebook's own strategic objectives. This will enable Facebook to design a complete experience (not thumbnails) that turns users into customers, while making it extremely difficult for competitors to match the experience.</li>

<li><strong>Grow with your market segments:</strong> While Facebook may have started with tech-savvy early adopters, it is now certainly crossing the chasm and attracting different user segments. Does Facebook understand the value proposition it offers to each of these segments? What about the growing base of 35- to 49-year-olds who are now <a href="http://columbus.bizjournals.com/columbus/stories/2009/03/09/daily16.html">flocking to social networks</a>? Does Facebook know how to keep its original evangelists active? Keeping a close eye on these evolving segments and making sure its services speak to their unique needs will be key to Facebook's success.</li>

<li><strong>Implement a co-creation architecture.</strong> Facebook could learn a great deal from the open-source environment by creating both feedback and contribution channels. The addition of OpenID and the increased flexibility for developers were significant steps forward, but they need to be integrated into a more holistic tool set and be linked to a strategy that answers more than, "How do we make money off our users?"</li>

<li><strong>Dare to change.</strong> Fear of change is one of the greatest pitfalls of established businesses and makes it easier for startups to take a significant share from them. Apple's <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/apples-iphone-may-closing-gap/story.aspx?guid=%7b52195AD8-E915-41BD-9696-B5AFCEAEF900%7d">iPhone</a>, <a href="http://www.seattlepi.com/venture/72692_vc31.shtml">BlueNile</a>, and <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/zappos_ceo_talks_culture_fit_a.php">Zappos</a> are but a few examples. Only by focusing on the whole experience and daring to break out of its own mold will Facebook maintain momentum and growth.</li>

<li><strong>Seal those gaps.</strong> This is a tough one for most <em>people</em>, more so for companies. It means pulling up the curtains, going from room to room, and figuring out what works and what doesn't. It also means sitting down and devising a strategy to address all those gaps in a way that enhances the business while not hindering its operation. Not an easy task, but crucial for growth.</li>

<li><strong>Stay honest.</strong> Stating that <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/facebooks_new_public_profiles_good_for_businesses_bad_for_people.php">public-figure pages</a> are good for users is borderline disingenuous, and placing friends' photos on ads is probably grounds for lawsuits. Take the example of Hulu CEO Jason Kilar, who says clearly that ads mid-program are Hulu's way of monetizing an otherwise free platform. Facebook should clearly distinguish between pursuing business objectives and meeting users' needs and should thus communicate the true intent of its actions.</li>
</ol>

<p>For a people-based business, it's shocking how little attention Facebook pays to understanding its own users. Less shocking is how poorly it has been executing its strategy, given the nature of this developmental stage it is going through. Parents often look for signs that those terrible teenage years are over and that their child is finally coming out of his or her self-involved state. For Facebook, this will happen when execution matches strategy, when the terms "user" and "customer" are integral to every single one of its strategic goals, when useless design tweaks finally meet their end, and when Facebook provides services and goods that users actually want. If nothing else, though, we can always take comfort in knowing that teenagers don't stay teenagers for long.</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14432-comment:188674</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14432" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_wrong_with_facebook_when_strategy_fails_to_meet_execution.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_wrong_with_facebook_when_strategy_fails_to_meet_execution.php#c188674" />
    <title>Comment from bariatric surgery on 2010-02-11</title>
    <author>
        <name>bariatric surgery</name>
        <uri>http://www.ebariatricsurgery.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.ebariatricsurgery.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I’d point out that DDO has minimal innovation in its gameplay mechanics (it’s D&D 3.5, with slight modifications) and it by all accounts doing quite well since it went F2P. And plenty of MMO’s with innovative mechanics have flopped.</p>

<p>I’d also refer you again to the Warhammer Fantasy RPG, which is a quite deep game with quite a few really interesting aspects. It’s also rather clunky to play PnP, but a few minor changes could really streamline it for computer gameplay.</p>

<p>It’s also not really the same setting, it’s far more interesting. Honestly, WAR screwed the heck up by not putting the Scaven in there.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2010-02-12T07:25:45Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14432-comment:136725</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14432" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_wrong_with_facebook_when_strategy_fails_to_meet_execution.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_wrong_with_facebook_when_strategy_fails_to_meet_execution.php#c136725" />
    <title>Comment from Lee on 2009-05-05</title>
    <author>
        <name>Lee</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Has anyone, anywhere, ever... considered that when people go to Facebook (or MySpace, or Friendster, or Twitter, etc...), they don't go there to end up spending money? And probably never will?<br />
They are often fun to visit for the user, but if you are a business person who really thinks any of them can be monetized in a "big way", you're not a very good business person.<br />
Some things people want to pay for, social networking isn't one of them.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-05-05T23:39:40Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14432-comment:133154</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14432" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_wrong_with_facebook_when_strategy_fails_to_meet_execution.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_wrong_with_facebook_when_strategy_fails_to_meet_execution.php#c133154" />
    <title>Comment from Varun Aggarwal on 2009-04-12</title>
    <author>
        <name>Varun Aggarwal</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>This has to be one of the less interesting article I have read at RWW.<br />
Ravit, you mentioned the recent redesign of the facebook web page as 'meaningless'. Do you have any idea on the increasing relevance and importance of feeds - especially when it comes to staying updated with your friends? And with the recent redesign facebook lets you categorize those news feeds based on friend-lists. You are making the critical mistake of discounting innovation - which tells me you are inexperienced at this. In the web industry, you always try and learn. No-one appreciated Twitter when it came out but see what it has transformed into.<br />
Lets give some credit to this 24 yr old guy who has made this giant empire solely based on innovative thinking and strategy - he gave us a platform to develop applications, he made us become more involved with our friends through news feeds and now he's given us Connect. I agree, he still doesn't have a monetization strategy - but I guess we both know one day facebook will crack it. They have the funds available with them. Social advertising is still in its infancy - who knows maybe one day facebook can become into this giant ad-platform which provides socially-relevant ads and contract them out to other websites. You never know - possibilities are endless. Of course, you are within your rights to analyze facebook, but your article has a very negative connotation to it and discounts all the good things facebook's done - which is unfortunate.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-13T05:07:00Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14432-comment:131999</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14432" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_wrong_with_facebook_when_strategy_fails_to_meet_execution.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_wrong_with_facebook_when_strategy_fails_to_meet_execution.php#c131999" />
    <title>Comment from Dave on 2009-04-03</title>
    <author>
        <name>Dave</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.newser.com/story/55124/facebook-should-unfriend-ceo.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.newser.com/story/55124/facebook-should-unfriend-ceo.html</a></p>

<p>“It is understandable for a 24-year-old to be fickle, easily swayed, and vengeful,” Thomas writes. “But that is the reason why we have very few 24-year-old CEOs.” Beyond the “public strikes” lies something worse: A failure to “build the company’s culture,” which he had claimed was his chief responsibility. “Here's the Harvard man in Zuckerberg revealed: He has assembled a coterie of servants instead of building a team.”</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-03T19:15:44Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14432-comment:131756</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14432" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_wrong_with_facebook_when_strategy_fails_to_meet_execution.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_wrong_with_facebook_when_strategy_fails_to_meet_execution.php#c131756" />
    <title>Comment from Dave on 2009-04-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>Dave</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Ravit,</p>

<p>That was one of the best summations of facebook's growing pains, but also a perfect example of what plagues the Social Networking movement. </p>

<p>The part that sticks out the most and seems to be the viral infection that gives rise to the rest of the problems is what you identified as:</p>

<p>2. Choose an identity and stick with it.</p>

<p>Most of these businesses are born out of a passion and drive that is a marker for not only the Millennials as a generation, but as a state of where they are in life's personal development. The game is far more fun, when it is not responsible or accountable to the business needs, but only to the whims of the creators and their loyal early adopters. They founders may desire the promise of gold and hip riches; and the belief that their idealistic ways will be rewarded on their merit and the details will work themselves out.</p>

<p>This of course if coming from a late Gen X'er, who also believes, in his heart those ideals and put them into action several times. Then of course, I felt the cold steel of reality from the businesses end of the sword. In some ways the recent financial crisis is also an example or analogy of the same kind of thinking--the ever expanding economy, leveraging ideas that are out of sync with economic forces and the "get mine now and who cares about the rest" mentality. Which is an interesting paradox from the noble thinking of creating free and open community and knowledge.</p>

<p>I believe that facebook's internal culture is one that screams, we know our generation and what they want, better than anyone else and that arrogance continues to haunt them through their transitions.</p>

<p>Thank you for putting together a great article!</p>

<p>Cheers,<br />
Dave</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-01T15:08:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14432-comment:131746</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14432" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_wrong_with_facebook_when_strategy_fails_to_meet_execution.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_wrong_with_facebook_when_strategy_fails_to_meet_execution.php#c131746" />
    <title>Comment from Jeremiah Owyang on 2009-04-01</title>
    <author>
        <name>Jeremiah Owyang</name>
        <uri>http://web-strategist.com.blog</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://web-strategist.com.blog">
        <![CDATA[<p>Ravit</p>

<p>This article was just fantastic, you've really demonstrated your strategy chops here.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-01T11:12:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14432-comment:131708</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14432" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_wrong_with_facebook_when_strategy_fails_to_meet_execution.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_wrong_with_facebook_when_strategy_fails_to_meet_execution.php#c131708" />
    <title>Comment from Boutique Accommodation on 2009-03-31</title>
    <author>
        <name>Boutique Accommodation</name>
        <uri>http://www.accommodate-me.co.nz</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.accommodate-me.co.nz">
        <![CDATA[<p>This is easy. Facebook has to be focused on profitability.</p>

<p>Unfortunately it has built its empire on being free to all users.</p>

<p>To be profitable you can't please everyone.</p>

<p>If you continue to bend over for everyones want of having all your services for free, you might as well start manufacturing cars and put your hand out to the US government.</p>

<p>Twitter will have the same problem, it only has explosive growth cos its free. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-01T02:03:45Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14432-comment:131698</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14432" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_wrong_with_facebook_when_strategy_fails_to_meet_execution.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_wrong_with_facebook_when_strategy_fails_to_meet_execution.php#c131698" />
    <title>Comment from Ravit Lichtenberg--Ustrategy on 2009-03-31</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ravit Lichtenberg--Ustrategy</name>
        <uri>http://ustrategy.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://ustrategy.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>@homepage- I really like the idea of options. It would cut cost on fixing the redesign (today facebook fixed the "get less/more from feed"--it's not an X anymore...instead it's a Hide function)and go "softer" on the user experience.  </p>

<p>Thanks!</p>

<p>Ravit</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-31T23:52:19Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14432-comment:131696</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14432" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_wrong_with_facebook_when_strategy_fails_to_meet_execution.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_wrong_with_facebook_when_strategy_fails_to_meet_execution.php#c131696" />
    <title>Comment from homepage on 2009-03-31</title>
    <author>
        <name>homepage</name>
        <uri>http://sthrt.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://sthrt.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>You know, Yahoo used to give people the option and maybe that is what Facebook should have done. Yahoo also said they went through 144 versions in alpha and beta testing before settling on a new design.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-31T23:47:52Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14432-comment:131684</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14432" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_wrong_with_facebook_when_strategy_fails_to_meet_execution.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_wrong_with_facebook_when_strategy_fails_to_meet_execution.php#c131684" />
    <title>Comment from watzabatza on 2009-03-31</title>
    <author>
        <name>watzabatza</name>
        <uri>http://kidonggamer.blogspot.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://kidonggamer.blogspot.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I don't know why...</p>

<p>But for me, I love facebook.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-31T21:48:46Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14432-comment:131683</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14432" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_wrong_with_facebook_when_strategy_fails_to_meet_execution.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_wrong_with_facebook_when_strategy_fails_to_meet_execution.php#c131683" />
    <title>Comment from Todd on 2009-03-31</title>
    <author>
        <name>Todd</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>Post seems to gloss over Facebook's $100,000,000.00 debt owed to Microsoft and all the implications therein.</p>

<p>Combine that with the completely closed walled garden that sucks in your data, personal photographs and mouse clicks, then monetizes them, giving you the user nothing in return, and what do you have?</p>

<p>“Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it” - George Santayana</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-31T21:36:49Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14432-comment:131677</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14432" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_wrong_with_facebook_when_strategy_fails_to_meet_execution.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_wrong_with_facebook_when_strategy_fails_to_meet_execution.php#c131677" />
    <title>Comment from Grzegorz on 2009-03-31</title>
    <author>
        <name>Grzegorz</name>
        <uri>http://gbalnis.wordpress.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://gbalnis.wordpress.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>1.7 million users is less than 1% of the total user population, is it not? I wouldn't call it a bad result.<br />
Personally, for now, I like Facebook evolution the way it is. They take good pages from the books of Twitter and FriendFeed and do it pretty quickly. Time will tell who's right, IMHO the jury will still be out for some time on that.<br />
I don't think it is time for Facebook to jump on Balanced Scorecards just yet :)</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-31T20:45:19Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14432-comment:131676</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14432" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_wrong_with_facebook_when_strategy_fails_to_meet_execution.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_wrong_with_facebook_when_strategy_fails_to_meet_execution.php#c131676" />
    <title>Comment from Daniel J. Pritchett on 2009-03-31</title>
    <author>
        <name>Daniel J. Pritchett</name>
        <uri>http://friendfeed.com/dpritchett</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://friendfeed.com/dpritchett">
        <![CDATA[<p>I like the change and I've ignored the few anti-new-FB invites I've seen thus far.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-31T20:35:43Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14432-comment:131675</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14432" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_wrong_with_facebook_when_strategy_fails_to_meet_execution.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_wrong_with_facebook_when_strategy_fails_to_meet_execution.php#c131675" />
    <title>Comment from Daniel J. Pritchett on 2009-03-31</title>
    <author>
        <name>Daniel J. Pritchett</name>
        <uri>http://friendfeed.com/dpritchett</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://friendfeed.com/dpritchett">
        <![CDATA[<p>Bah!  I still think people who are ok with the new design aren't likely to register for a new app just so they can vote their conscience.  The number of people who signed up for the app and voted no is less than 1% of the total user base.  That said, 94% is an astounding rate of negatives.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-31T20:35:25Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14432-comment:131673</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14432" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_wrong_with_facebook_when_strategy_fails_to_meet_execution.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_wrong_with_facebook_when_strategy_fails_to_meet_execution.php#c131673" />
    <title>Comment from Eric on 2009-03-31</title>
    <author>
        <name>Eric</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>What a pointless/vague post. </p>

<p>"Facebook needs to set a long-term vision and work backwards, taking into consideration priorities, technological capabilities, and company as well as (most importantly) user needs." --> OK. Thanks for the tip. </p>

<p>"What will it take for Facebook to start thinking like the grown-up company it is becoming?" --> come up with a viable business model and start making big money...simple as that. </p>

<p><br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-31T20:28:04Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14432-comment:131671</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14432" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_wrong_with_facebook_when_strategy_fails_to_meet_execution.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_wrong_with_facebook_when_strategy_fails_to_meet_execution.php#c131671" />
    <title>Comment from Nat on 2009-03-31</title>
    <author>
        <name>Nat</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>It look like FB will be the next Friendster.</p>

<p><br />
Nat<br />
www.loopcity.com</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-31T20:24:58Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14432-comment:131664</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14432" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_wrong_with_facebook_when_strategy_fails_to_meet_execution.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_wrong_with_facebook_when_strategy_fails_to_meet_execution.php#c131664" />
    <title>Comment from Chris on 2009-03-31</title>
    <author>
        <name>Chris</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>My problem with the new facebook design is that 90% of my facebook has been taken over by pointless quizzes,  name your 5 favorite ____ , and other useless crap.  At the very least, facebook has got to provide users a way to filter out this nonsense.  Plus the advertisers and advertising methods that go on there seem to be getting more intrusive, annoying and deceptive by the day.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-31T19:45:45Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14432-comment:131658</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14432" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_wrong_with_facebook_when_strategy_fails_to_meet_execution.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_wrong_with_facebook_when_strategy_fails_to_meet_execution.php#c131658" />
    <title>Comment from Stiflersmom on 2009-03-31</title>
    <author>
        <name>Stiflersmom</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>175 million "active" users<br />
$280 million revenue in 2008</p>

<p>That works out to $1.60 a user per year or $.13 per user per month or....less than half a penny a day of revenue per user.  For reals?</p>

<p>Sounds to me like Facebook has bigger problems to deal with than people whining about how they don't like the Twitter re-design.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-31T17:49:31Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14432-comment:131657</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14432" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_wrong_with_facebook_when_strategy_fails_to_meet_execution.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/whats_wrong_with_facebook_when_strategy_fails_to_meet_execution.php#c131657" />
    <title>Comment from Rutger Blom on 2009-03-31</title>
    <author>
        <name>Rutger Blom</name>
        <uri>http://www.rutgerblom.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.rutgerblom.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>I think Facebook implemented some interesting new features and an intelligent design. Unfortunately the Facebook users don't understand them. That's the disadvantage of being a very very mainstream social network I guess. It's the masses deciding now.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-03-31T17:44:51Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>
