<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
      xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flash_comes_to_the_living_room.php" />
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/atom.xml" />
  <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2011:/1/tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14714-</id>
  <updated>2011-08-16T17:25:21Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Flash Comes to the Living Room</title>
  
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.35-en</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14714</id>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flash_comes_to_the_living_room.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=1/entry_id=14714" title="Flash Comes to the Living Room" />
    <published>2009-04-20T16:45:13Z</published>
    <updated>2009-04-20T21:45:04Z</updated>
    <title>Flash Comes to the Living Room</title>
    <summary>Adobe today announced that it has partnered with a number of prominent content creators and hardware manufacturers to bring its Flash platform to the living room. As a part of this initiative, Adobe will release a new version of Flash that will be optimized to run on set-top boxes, Internet-enabled TVs, and Blu-ray players. Among...</summary>
    <author>
      <name>Frederic Lardinois</name>
      
    </author>
    
    <category term="Adobe" />
    
    <category term="News" />
    
    <category term="Real World" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.readwriteweb.com/">
      <![CDATA[<p><img alt="adobe_logo_apr09.png" src="http://www.readwriteweb.com/images/adobe_logo_apr09.png"  /><a href="http://adobe.com">Adobe</a> today <a href="http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;newsId=20090419005024&amp;newsLang=en">announced</a> that it has partnered with a number of prominent content creators and hardware manufacturers to bring its <a href="http://www.adobe.com/flashplatform/">Flash platform </a>to the living room. As a part of this initiative, Adobe will release a new version of Flash that will be optimized to run on set-top boxes, Internet-enabled TVs, and Blu-ray players. Among Adobe's partners are Broadcom, Comcast, Intel, Netflix, The New York Times Company, and Disney. The company expects that these companies will release the first Flash-enabled devices in the second half of 2009.</p>
]]>
      <![CDATA[<h2>Competition from Yahoo and Microsoft</h2>

<p>Adobe, of course, isn't alone in trying to make a push for the living room. Microsoft is also trying to aim for the same market with its <a href="http://silverlight.net/themes/silverlight/common/home.aspx?AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1">Silverlight </a>platform. Although Silverlight has been used to power some high-profile events lately, including NBC's Olympics site, it is still only a minor player in the overall market. </p>

<p>Last August, Intel and Yahoo also <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/yahoo_wants_to_bring_the_inter.php">announced an initiative</a> to bring Yahoo widgets to TVs. Even though other vendors like Verizon already <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/verizon_unveils_their_vision_for_the_web-connected.php">offer some widgets</a> on their set-top boxes, these solutions are often too clunky to be really useful.</p>

<p>Similar to Silverlight, the new Adobe platform will not just focus on widgets, however. Adobe also plans to give content creators the ability to stream HD video directly to these devices. </p>

<p>Interestingly, Netflix, which currently uses Silverlight to power its browser-based players, is also among Adobe's launch partners.</p>

<h2>Can Flash Succeed Where Others Have Failed?</h2>

<p>Interactive TV has long held a lot of promise, but the idea never really caught on with consumers. Flash, however, may be able to change this. Adobe can rely on a dedicated group of third-party developers who will only have to make minor changes to their programs to make them run on these Flash-enabled devices. </p>

<p>Hopefully, Adobe will create an App Store-like experience that will allow developers to promote their apps and allow consumers the ability to pick and choose widgets for their TVs.</p>]]>
    </content>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14714-comment:304847</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14714" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flash_comes_to_the_living_room.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flash_comes_to_the_living_room.php#c304847" />
    <title>Comment from altın çilek on 2011-02-22</title>
    <author>
        <name>altın çilek</name>
        <uri>http://www.altincilek.tk</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.altincilek.tk">
        <![CDATA[<p>Adobe is doing the right thing commercially, but at the end of the day i hope that for developers and consumers only one technology will be implemented across all applications, as it starts to be looking messy, too many standards is simply a bad thing<br /><br /></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2011-02-22T14:02:42Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14714-comment:147777</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14714" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flash_comes_to_the_living_room.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flash_comes_to_the_living_room.php#c147777" />
    <title>Comment from GekkoG on 2009-07-17</title>
    <author>
        <name>GekkoG</name>
        <uri>http://www.gekkog.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.gekkog.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Adobe is doing the right thing commercially, but at the end of the day i hope that for developers and consumers only one technology will be implemented across all applications, as it starts to be looking messy, too many standards is simply a bad thing</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-17T20:54:33Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14714-comment:147764</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14714" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flash_comes_to_the_living_room.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flash_comes_to_the_living_room.php#c147764" />
    <title>Comment from Aziz on 2009-07-17</title>
    <author>
        <name>Aziz</name>
        <uri>http://www.kodes.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.kodes.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>you are avoiding to mention the biggest two players in this using their own solutions: Samsung, Sony and LG.</p>

<p>Then as other mentioned you have chumby. </p>

<p>Microsoft got many ways to integrate silverlight and widgets into the TV. they got Media Center, they got the Xbox, IP-TV, Microsoft TV (top box firmaware in many cable top boxes around the world) and Mediaroom (the integration of Media Center, IP-TV and Microsoft TV into one). that also don't counts that they could also go the route of making partnerships with Samsung and LG for the North American market as they will not let go of the Asian market and probably will use their own solutions over there.<br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-17T19:13:39Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14714-comment:147763</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14714" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flash_comes_to_the_living_room.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flash_comes_to_the_living_room.php#c147763" />
    <title>Comment from alidesidero on 2009-07-17</title>
    <author>
        <name>alidesidero</name>
        <uri>http://www.gekkog.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.gekkog.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Adobe is doing the right thing commercially, but at the end of the day i hope that for developers and consumers only one technology will be implemented across all applications, as it starts to be looking messy, too many standards is simply a bad thing</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-17T19:12:29Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14714-comment:145180</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14714" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flash_comes_to_the_living_room.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flash_comes_to_the_living_room.php#c145180" />
    <title>Comment from chat on 2009-07-03</title>
    <author>
        <name>chat</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p><b><a href="http://geneltarihimiz.googlepages.com/tarih.htm" rel="nofollow">TARIH</a></b></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-07-03T10:11:11Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14714-comment:134536</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14714" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flash_comes_to_the_living_room.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flash_comes_to_the_living_room.php#c134536" />
    <title>Comment from The Flash Designer on 2009-04-20</title>
    <author>
        <name>The Flash Designer</name>
        <uri>http://www.flashdesigner.com.au</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.flashdesigner.com.au">
        <![CDATA[<p>Adobe is doing the right thing commercially, but at the end of the day i hope that for developers and consumers only one technology will be implemented across all applications, as it starts to be looking messy, too many standards is simply a bad thing. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-21T01:10:14Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14714-comment:134535</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14714" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flash_comes_to_the_living_room.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flash_comes_to_the_living_room.php#c134535" />
    <title>Comment from nick b. on 2009-04-20</title>
    <author>
        <name>nick b.</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>This just makes it more likely for what I've outlined in my blog, <a href="http://digg.com/u11R1U." rel="nofollow">http://digg.com/u11R1U.</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-21T00:51:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14714-comment:134530</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14714" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flash_comes_to_the_living_room.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flash_comes_to_the_living_room.php#c134530" />
    <title>Comment from Avatar X on 2009-04-20</title>
    <author>
        <name>Avatar X</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>you are avoiding to mention the biggest two players in this using their own solutions: Samsung, Sony  and LG.</p>

<p>Then as other mentioned you have chumby. </p>

<p>Microsoft got many ways to integrate silverlight and widgets into the TV. they got Media Center, they got the Xbox, IP-TV, Microsoft TV (top box firmaware in many cable top boxes around the world) and Mediaroom (the integration of Media Center, IP-TV and Microsoft TV into one). that also don't counts that they could also go the route of making partnerships with Samsung and LG for the North American market as they will not let go of the Asian market and probably will use their own solutions over there.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-20T23:45:12Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14714-comment:134489</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14714" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flash_comes_to_the_living_room.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flash_comes_to_the_living_room.php#c134489" />
    <title>Comment from Ryan on 2009-04-20</title>
    <author>
        <name>Ryan</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>This will be really good for set-top boxes like VUDU which already have web functionality. VUDU already touts the highest quality YouTube videos, but with this actual flash development everything should be high quality which will be really nice. </p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-20T18:34:14Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14714-comment:134488</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14714" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flash_comes_to_the_living_room.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flash_comes_to_the_living_room.php#c134488" />
    <title>Comment from jon on 2009-04-20</title>
    <author>
        <name>jon</name>
        <uri>http://www.topwebpost.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.topwebpost.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>very nice articles.</p>

<p>digg like site design for designing only. digg your design post and get traffic</p>

<p><a href="http://www.topwebpost.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.topwebpost.com</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-20T18:21:38Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14714-comment:134487</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14714" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flash_comes_to_the_living_room.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flash_comes_to_the_living_room.php#c134487" />
    <title>Comment from anrkist713 on 2009-04-20</title>
    <author>
        <name>anrkist713</name>
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
        <![CDATA[<p>ATT Uverse has some of this functionality. I can connect to Flickr, Yellow Pages, Local Weather... though I find it all rather useless and exceedingly slow.</p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-20T17:40:37Z</published>
  </entry>

  <entry>
    <id>tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14714-comment:134482</id>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:www.readwriteweb.com,2009://1.14714" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flash_comes_to_the_living_room.php"/>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/flash_comes_to_the_living_room.php#c134482" />
    <title>Comment from Steve on 2009-04-20</title>
    <author>
        <name>Steve</name>
        <uri>http://www.last100.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.last100.com">
        <![CDATA[<p>Don't forget Chumby and more importantly Google. This space is hotting up... <a href="http://www.last100.com/2009/04/20/adobe-wants-flash-o-the-telly/" rel="nofollow">http://www.last100.com/2009/04/20/adobe-wants-flash-o-the-telly/</a></p>]]>
    </content>
    <published>2009-04-20T17:11:29Z</published>
  </entry>

</feed>
